2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

I recognize you are 99% likely trolling, but JUST IN CASE, here's the proof:

I was BANNED from reddit for stickying an ITALYGATE thread at the top of /r/conspiracy for days...only 12 hours after a Senator complained about "reddit conspiracies" in Congress!

If my removal wasn't significant, why did it generate multiple MSM hit pieces against me that specifically reference the US Senator calling me out?

My response to The Daily Dot article (and others) about me

This is the thread that got me nuked

Why me?

Because I actually think for myself. They can't have that.

They've been coming for me for a decade

7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

you missed the point completely if you're comparing bacteria and viruses. One exists and one doesn't.

COVID doesn't exist. Good luck as you plunge further down the rabbit hole!

9
axolotl_peyotl 9 points ago +9 / -0

video clip

They did the same thing with the Simpsons Movie subplot (the pig and quarantine) and the subsequent swine flu hoax, which was a complete fabrication by the CDC, WHO and other world health authorities.

It's obvious now that the swine flu scam was yet another step leading to the implementation of the New World Order via the COVID-19 fairytale.

There seems to be minimal information about this film.

The director and writer are Chinese, and this is their first and only released film (a second appears to be in the works).

Why hedgehogs?

Hedgehog coronavirus 1

"Surely that's a coincidence?", you might ask (and don't call me Shirley).

Let's check the list of specific animal coronaviruses...In addition to hedgehog coronavirus, I'm seeing bovine, human, bat and mouse coronaviruses. That's it.

Now, naming a movie "Hedgehogs" is one thing, but a film released in 2016 (when all of this was allegedly being planned out), centering around a virus, a masked population, a savior vaccine, and directed/written by unknown Chinese dudes, and named after one of the 5 animals with common coronavirus types, well that's sure one hell of a coincidence.

Gee, it must be nice being a coincidence theorist.

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

you have pretty much abdoned this place

I haven't, though.

I haven't been as active as in my /r/conspiracy heyday, but can you fault me for stepping back from the internet for a few months?

I literally had a US Senator call me out personally in Congress hours before I was memoryholed from the internet.

That was a bit much, and I took the opportunity to step back a bit.

I will always maintain this place as long as I have the opportunity.

This space is more important than you and even I might think.

your shitty atempt at creating a new forum failed utterly

It's doing OK. We haven't failed.

and all you have left is whining about reddit.

You can skip these threads. I posted about how NASA is admitted searching for ancient high tech in our solar system yesterday. Check out that thread. You're outrage peddling is showing.

4
axolotl_peyotl 4 points ago +4 / -0

Amos is probably the only true "individual" left on the team. That being said, I think years modding has embittered him, but he still maintains his fierce independence, which I respect. But he's not a leader like I tried to be.

I take partial credit for Amos joining the mod team...I nominated him and heavily pushed for him.

Amos also believes .win is a honeypot, and was open about his concerns with me when I still was on the /r/conspiracy mod team.

I also respect his concerns about this place and don't fault him for not coming over.

Balthanos showed up here briefly but hasn't come back. I liked him too but honestly the lack of support from the /r/conspiracy mod team after my obviously staged ban was really disappointing.

I obv don't know the mods, but I spent 10 years with many of them through countless ups and downs. We've seen each other at our best and worst.

None of them have even reached out to me since January. Feels kinda bad, but I suppose it's part of moving on. They were good friends.

F

3
axolotl_peyotl 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't "put myself" there, they did. A US Senator literally conspired with the reddit admins to have me removed and banned. I was right about the COVID hoax, but more importantly I was exposed the 2020 election fraud, and they simply couldn't have that, so I had to go:

https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRZla9tC/was-sen-duckworths-complaint-abo/c/

This will all eventually be revealed. I look forward to the apologies from my obsessive harassers, lol oh wait that will never happen.

7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

My personal theory

  1. The remains of high tech is riddled throughout the solar system. Many moons are completely or partially artificial.

  2. The origin of this tech is HUMAN, not "alien", showing our TRUE history is THOUSANDS TO MILLIONS of years older than what we're being told.

  3. They are planning an alien "disclosure" that will essentially be a false flag to perpetuate their continued attempted subjugation o the planet and human species.

IOW, there may be aliens, but the TRUE history of humanity is the key to unlocking countless mysteries, and they are going to distract from this AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE with the alien meme.

This will be the next battle for the conspiracy theorists to fight after COVID.

The alien hoax.

4
axolotl_peyotl 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's a curious article at Forbes magazine that was shared by V.T., in which it is reported that a recent NASA paper advocates looking for technology from other civilizations in space:

Revealed: Why We Should Look For Ancient Alien Spacecraft On The Moon, Mars And Mercury According To NASA Scientists

There's an interesting interpretation to give to this story by way of a bit of high octane speculation, but we'll get to that. First, however, in order to highlight that speculation, let's look at the article and how it summarizes the NASA paper. From the beginning of the article we read the following paragraphs:

From UFO crash sites on other planets and aliens “lurking” on asteroids to a permanent radio telescope on the far side of the Moon, a new NASA-funded study into the search for intelligent extraterrestrial life (SETI) details how future NASA missions could purposefully look for the “technosignatures” of advanced alien civilizations.

Described as evidence for the use of technology or industrial activity in other parts of the Universe, the search for technosignatures has barely begun, but could unearth something surprising without much additional spend, says the study.

Published in the specialized journal Acta Astronautica, the study includes a list of what’s NASA missions could detect as observational “proof of extraterrestrial life” beyond Earth.

Perhaps most intriguingly, the paper suggests that interstellar probes might have been sent into the Solar System a long time ago, perhaps during the last close encounter of our Sun with other stars.

This in itself is interesting, for the implication of the last paragraph is a tacit admission that "someone" from outside this solar system might have "been here" long ago. With this, there is a further implication, namely, that part of NASA's mission should include - for want of a better expression - extraterrestrial archaeology.

The article then summarizes NASA's list of "things to look for," which, we note, includes (1) a search for "crash sites on the Moon, Mars, Mercury, or Ceres." What's interesting again are the implications, for crash sites would imply "debris fields," and anyone who looked through the snapshots accompanying the link of last Friday's blog will readily appreciate the significance of this point.

Even more peculiar are points (5) and (6). Point (5) notes that NASA should look for "lurkers on asteroids." Regular readers of my books and blogs will know that I entertained the exploded planet hypothesis for the creation of the asteroid belt, a hypothesis advanced by astronomers in the 19th century who posited a now-missing planet in the solar system that exploded and created not only many of the comets in orbit around the sun, but our solar system's asteroid belt, a hypothesis revived in the 20th century by Dr. Tom van Flandern of the US Naval Observatory.

Notably, the 19th century astronomers named that missing planet "Krypton." Even more interesting is the fact that NASA is now entertaining an idea I advanced at the 2015 Secret Space Program in Bastrop, Texas, where I coupled the idea of "the Watchers" found in ancient texts such as the Slavonic text of the book of Enoch, to the exploded planet hypothesis and the hypothesis of an ancient cosmic war.

Then comes point number (6), namely, that NASA should conduct "intercept missions" on "interstellar interlopers," such as the "comet" Oumuamua that came streaking into our Solar System a few years ago, and then left. Some serious scientists entertained the notion that the "comet" wasn't a comet at all, but a spaceship or space probe of some sort.

In this respect, the idea of "intercept missions" takes on a more forbidding implication: what should we do if we do intercept something like that? And then finally, another stunner, number (10): look for "small asteroids" that might in fact be "artificial."

Now, all of this might seem "new" and exciting, except it isn't new at all. In the late 1950s NASA commissioned the Brookings Institute to do a study on what one might expect to find as humanity ventured forth in space. That study concluded that one might find all sorts of "remains" and "artifacts", including high technology, left over from some ancient space-faring civilization out there.

The study concluded that if that was the case, such discoveries should be handled very carefully if not kept secret altogether, for fear that its disclosure would upset religious fundamentalists. Reading between the lines of the report, it really is implying that one of the purposes of venturing into space was to retrieve and recover (and presumably, reverse engineer) such technology, and any old excuse for keeping it secret would do.

So why am I rehearsing that history? Because of today's high octane speculation. NASA's recent paper about looking for such technology and conducting "intercept" missions is not all that new. In fact, the possibility was known, and talked about, from the very beginning. And if NASA thought of it, one can be assured the Soviets - the only other players in the space race at the time - did too.

But most people have never heard of the Brookings Report, and even fewer have sat down to actually read it. (When one does, one is in for some shockers, as I detail in my book Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations). In any case, what's new here isn't the content so much as where these ideas are now being talked about, not in a specialized think tank study, but in a major print media outlet.

That, I think is the real story here. And while I'm at it, I'll walk right off the end of the speculation twig once again:

I think a new narrative is being prepared. After all, we've seen a definitive "uptick" in major lamestream media coverage of the whole UFO issue in the past three to four years.

12
axolotl_peyotl 12 points ago +12 / -0

haha legend here :D

5
axolotl_peyotl 5 points ago +5 / -0

“We’re hearing they’ve all quit!” one parent said before the group held their own impromptu election and struck down the mask mandate

Based parents :D

I know you're a bit doom and gloom (hard not to be these days) but folks like this give me hope for humanity.

11
axolotl_peyotl 11 points ago +11 / -0

Last week, I published Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s devastating critique of the claim that SARS-CoV-2 has been discovered.

Dr. Kaufman offered a blow-by-blow analysis of a typical description of “virus-isolation.” He showed that no such isolation has occurred.

In other words, “here it is,” “we found a new virus”—false. Unsupportable. Fraudulent.

Equally fraudulent, the claim that the “genetic structure of the virus” has been sequenced—-because, if you don’t have a purified isolated specimen of the virus, you have no way (other than fabrication) to claim you understand its structure.

What are the implications?

The COVID PCR and antibody tests are designed to detect a virus that isn’t there.

The COVID case and death numbers—stemming from the virus—are meaningless.

The lockdowns, masks, distancing, the closure of businesses, the economic destruction—all based on stopping the virus—are unnecessary, meaningless, vastly criminal.

People who have been dying have been dying for various other reasons—but their deaths have been relabeled and repackaged as “caused by the virus.”

The vaccine is supposed to protect against…what? The virus that isn’t there.

People who say this monstrous mountain of fraud is too large to be a fraud—well, that’s not an authentic argument. It’s just an expression of preference for established authority; and a preference for a sense of stability created by a lie.

For the past year, I’ve been making the case that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists. Mainstream researchers, in their published studies, have been SAYING they are proving it, but SAYING and PROVING are two very different approaches.

What makes Dr. Kaufman’s analysis so disruptive and accurate is: he took a detailed and typical passage from one of these studies, and he presented a step-by-step refutation of every significant laboratory procedure. He showed that every move the researchers made did NOT lead toward a legitimate conclusion that SARS-CoV-2 exists.

Indeed, Dr. Kaufman’s approach exposes the entire industry of virology. It torpedoes this pseudoscience.

The time-honored process for isolating (discovering) other viruses (e.g., HIV) comes under the same harsh spotlight: researchers say they’ve discovered a virus, but they haven’t come within miles of proving it.

Instead, all they have is the assertion that they are the authorities.

This is the same bald assertion the social-media industry uses to censor information that reveals SARS-CoV-2 has never been discovered.

I would summarize Dr. Kaufman’s analysis with this analogy: You have a large swamp next to a landfill on the edge of a city. The swamp contains a host of toxic chemicals, waste, and genetic material from a number of unknown sources. You observe small fish and insects in the swamp are dying. You decide, based on no evidence, that a virus must be in the swamp, and IT is killing the fish and insects. And THEN you claim that, THEREFORE, you have ISOLATED the virus and demonstrated that it is deadly. AND it is a new virus that no one has ever found before. AND you know the precise genetic structure of this virus.

In other words, you’ve shown the OPPOSITE of isolation. The soup in the swamp never delivers up any evidence of a virus. But you SAY it does.

And this is the basis for declaring a worldwide pandemic.

And no one is supposed to disagree.

And this is science.

And because you’re connected to every government in the world, and every major news source, and to the CDC and the WHO, and to untold numbers of law-enforcement entities, you try to shove this “science” down the throats of 7.8 billion people.

THIS is the gateway to the New Normal and the Great Reset. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that the Brave New World will also shove its precepts and structure down the same throats.

And therefore, resistance on many levels—including opening up the economy every-which-way-possible—is necessary. And falls to us to make it happen.

7
axolotl_peyotl 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thanks friend. Great to have you here. This entire episode has been rather bittersweet. I gave 10 years of my life to that forum, and I feel like I was "sacrificed" in some weird ritual or something. At least my online persona. It's hard to describe.

There's a reason why I made a hard pivot to vaccine research around 2013/14...I saw ALL of this unfolding today.

Now that it's here and I've lost friends and family to psychotic fear, despite my explicit warnings, I'm sort of at a loss of what to do.

Think about this: January 6 was clearly a false flag meant to usher in the censorship of half the internet.

I was banned in the early morning of January 7. I was the FIRST...before Trump, before anyone else on social media was banned, they hit ME.

Now, I don't think it was about ME personally, as much as they needed control of all corners of the web, and I wasn't part of that plan to be in charge of a controversial forum like /r/conspiracy.

I was dead right about COVID and the election fraud, and they can NEVER give me the satisfaction when we're eventually vindicated, so they've opted to memoryhole me and my research instead. The /r/conspiracy mods even removed my flair, lol the cowards.

The reddit admins ultimately did me a favor. The karma weight of subjecting myself to years of constant abuse and death threats was not a sustainable way to live. It was beyond thankless, so ironically a big thank you to the admins for removing the obligation of my self-imposed burden.

At least now I can say "I tried" and move on with my life. I just wish it wasn't at the cost of allowing the world to consume itself in hysteria.

Thank YOU friend for being the light in the darkness for all those years. You've inspired me constantly for a decade, and the fact that you're still here with me now means so much.

Take care :)

2
axolotl_peyotl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bro you banned a dude for saying his dad died of COVID.

lol you actually believe that? Citation plz. Jesus christ these people.

9
axolotl_peyotl 9 points ago +9 / -0

The conspiracy mods showed their true colors when none of them stood up for me after my ban.

That was the moment the sub should've rallied in support, but they were all cowards.

I literally was the first person/social media personality to be banned after the January 6th false flag. That should speak volumes.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›