Look up Peter Doshi. The "flu" is a 100-year-old scam. The "Spanish flu" was a hoax and caused by experimental vaccines and over-prescription of aspirin.
You got sick because you were unhealthy + exposure to actual toxins (not phantom flu "viruses").
It was the top story on zerohedge and alternative media all day yesterday.
I believe USA Today also reported on the claim from NBC, but they are already scrubbing the original article.
They slipped up and let out too much info.
I saw that. The "33" numerology is about as blatant as it gets.
Sandy Hook was a massive hoax and another occult mega-ritual.
Governments around the world are being bribed/coerced/threatened into lockdowns and the ushering in of the Great Reset.
Govs that DON'T do it fast or complete enough are being deposed or assassinated.
They are panicking because the US is behind schedule, and the current "leaders" will be the first to go if they continue to fail spectacularly.
The US is the prize pony for the psychos attempting to subjugate the planet.
The US will be their undoing.
The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.
The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.
Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.
They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.
In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:
During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation.
While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.
Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”
Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.
BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.
In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.
If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”:
They have a soup they make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.
Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”
To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”
Virology equals “how to spread bullshit for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.
The flu exists. It is real.
If you still believe this you're in trouble.
Swine flu was a hoax. You got food poisoning or something else.
You are literally parroting the talking points of shills with this btw, whether knowingly or not.
This isn't just a ritualistic event, it's the event.
I said that over a year ago, folks.
we didn't have the actual document before.
Coronavirus Hype As Economic Warfare & Occult Ritual: We are experiencing one of the most significant propaganda efforts of the modern era. (removed by reddit inc)
Updated list of Coronavirus articles referencing the number "33"
Esoteric Astrology, Numerology and the Coronavirus: Pandemics as Staged Occult Rituals
BTW these threads are from January-March 2020.
I warned you all.
Interesting that the head mod of the largest conspiracy forum on the web gave MASSIVE and REPEATED warnings about the greatest conspiracy of our time.
And then that mod was purged and memory-holed and you will be attacked for even mentioning his name.
Interesting...
Question: How dangerous is the Delta Variant?
Answer: There is no Delta Variant. Because there is no original SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Question: Why are we hearing that the majority of new cases of COVID-19 are occurring in the unvaccinated?
Answer: “A case” means a positive PCR test. The test doesn’t detect a virus. There is no virus. But since people who test positive are called cases…think it through. People who have been vaccinated are far less likely to get tested than people who haven’t been vaccinated. Therefore, it’s going to look like “most new cases” are occurring in the unvaccinated.
Furthermore, the CDC instituted a change in the way vaccinated people are then tested. The sensitivity of the test has been reduced for them—which means fewer results indicating “infection with the virus.” This is outright manipulation. Unvaccinated people are still tested at higher sensitivity, meaning more of them will seem to be “infected.”
Question: Experts say the vaccine may not prevent infection with the virus, but it will greatly reduce the chance of serious illness or hospitalization. True?
Answer: False. First of all, this is a vaccine to protect against a virus that doesn’t exist. Second, the 3 major clinical trials of the vaccine were only designed to show the vaccine could protect against mild disease, such as a cough, or chills and fever.
Question: Across the world, political leaders are threatening or ordering new lockdowns, saying too many people are refusing the vaccine. Is this anything other than a pressure tactic to force people to take the shot?
Answer: It’s exactly a pressure tactic to justify mandating, forcing, shaming, quarantining.
Question: Regardless of whether the vaccine is necessary or effective, is it safe?
Answer: Here are the latest CDC figures I have, as compiled by Children’s Health Defense. The statistics are taken from VAERS, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. “VAERS data released today by the CDC showed a total of 463,457 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 10,991 deaths and 48,385 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 9, 2021.”
There are two chronic problems with VAERS. The reports of injuries have not been studied to determine which injuries stemmed from a vaccine and which didn’t. And there is vast underreporting of injuries, because most Americans don’t know what VAERS is or are hesitant to make a report. By far, the second problem is the larger one—underreporting.
Some analysts have suggested that, to get a reasonably accurate count, you should multiply reported numbers by 10.
The well-known 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study of VAERS bluntly stated: “Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of ‘problem’ vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public.”
Following the finding of that study, you could multiply the number of reported vaccine injuries by 100 to arrive at a proper figure.
The numbers of vaccine injuries and deaths are huge. In any situation other than the current fake pandemic, the vaccination program would have been stopped. Cancelled.
Question: There are reports of many new COVID cases in areas or states which didn’t apply strict COVID measures early on in 2020. Are these reports legitimate?
Answer: First of all, there are no COVID cases, because there is no virus. Second, the “number of cases” can be manipulated by changing the sensitivity of the PCR test, which in turn changes the test result. The relatively few honest politicians in the world should carefully investigate this possibility, if “case numbers” in their area suddenly rise.
COVID is fake and gay.
"Swine Flu" was a massive hoax and was meant to condition the public for COVID and future pandemic hoaxes.
The shills always come out of the woodwork when you mention the Swine Flu scam (esp on reddit).
It's EXTREMELY important that people still believe Swine Flu actually existed.
I think bots are programmed to respond to comments that mention "Swine flu" on reddit. They then appear and say some variation of "I had swine flu. It was the worst 2 weeks of my life."
These are fake, phony and gay.
If you're a real person who believed you had "swine flu", please do about 10 seconds of research. Look up Sharyl Attkisson. Look up Peter Doshi. Look up Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.
It was a massive hoax, just like COVID.
Nice. We should compile a list of "unproven" snopes claims.
I see people who have never questioned authority ACTUALLY questioning this one.
Some folks who I thought would NEVER wake up ARE waking up. The only thing that could've roused them from their slumber is an insane worldwide conspiracy like the COVID hoax.
Yes, some people are further into their slumber than ever, but they risked EVERYTHING by going all in on this hoax, and they will LOSE everything as a result.
This "plan" wasn't ready yet. They rushed it.
We are now observing the fallout of a failed coup attempt of the planet.
Because they went in hard, it's going to get even messier, but they've already lost and they KNOW it.
I've never been so sure about anything.
This is a fascinating article that was found by V.T. and passed along, and I have to blog about it, for three reasons: (1) the pyramids, (2) the giant and the elefants, and (3) the giant finger. Here our method is as it always is: we assume the photos are genuine and not doctored in any way in order to indulge in our a bit of fun high octane speculation. Here's the article:
Regarding the pyramids, what is intriguing to me is their shape. In one of my very earliest books in this alternative research output I've been doing, The Giza Death Star Deployed, I noted that in the classified Soviet-era research into pyramids, they made the discovery that these narrow, tall, and sharp pyramids seemed to function rather like antennae, broadcasting whatever mysterious power pyramids manipulate.
Wider, shallower pyramids with angled faces below 51 degrees inclination from the plane seemed to have an opposite function, gathering and collecting such energy, rather than projecting it. Oddly, the Great Pyramid, with faces inclined to a few minutes and seconds above 51 degrees, was at exactly the precise angle to do both.
So let's indulge in a little high octane speculation. Assuming these Nubian pyramids had another, perhaps hidden, function other than just the funerary, what might it be? One thing that struck me looking at the picture of these pyramids was that they appear to be arranged along a curve. Perhaps we are looking at some sort of phased antenna array.
One of the things that argues that that's not the case is the fact that the inside of these structures are painted with murals, one of which, as the article points out, depicts a giant carrying two elephants as if they were small dogs.
Elephants when born weigh about 200 lbs, and stand approximately 3 feet tall, so the picture - if depicting something real - is highly suggestive. I am one of those who takes stories and reports of giants rather more seriously than standard quackademia, even Christopher Columbus reported encountering them among the native populations of the New World.
And of course, they play a role in the myths and legends of the world, including the Old Testament of the Bible. What's intriguing to note in this regard is that this ancient site is that given the conquest of the area by Egypt ca. 1500 BC, this would place the depiction in the same time frame as the Old Testament books of Moses (if one accepts more conservative dating of those books), the books that mention giants.
Then... there's the finger...
The article ends by showing a picture of what purports to be a giant mummified humanoid finger, emphasizing its size by playing a currency note next to it. Of course, archaeological frauds occur all the time and this could be a case in point...
... but I suspect not. I'm reminded of those Mesopotamian cylinder seals depicting very large kings seated on very large thrones, being served by very small men...
I'll pray for her. Thank you for trying.
This story barely made the news, and of course, if you're afflicted with the American lamestream corporate propatainment version of media - a media only slightly less valuable than 1930s Pravda for a valuable source of news and information - you may not have heard about this story at all.
And speaking of the American propatainment media, Pravda, and so on, the Chinese media (of the same stock as the American propatainment media and Pravda) didn't hear about this story until after it was over, and of course, the reasons given for the visit were all standard boilerplate about "unity" and "the wonderful diversity of diversity" and "follow the Party/science/politburo/Fauci" and "trust the (latest five year) plan". (Funny that, how much the Q anon stuff sounds like the Chinese Communist Party, but I digress...)
Oh, and did I mention that all of this fuss was over Chairman Xi Jinping's recent visit to Tibet, the first major Chinese leader to visit that country in decades? And did I mention that the visit was only announced after it was already over? (Story shared by D.P.):
Xi ‘secretly’ visits Tibet, first trip by a China president ..
The reasons for the visit were ostensibly the 70th anniversary of the Anschluss of Tibet by Communist China, an opportunity to issue more boilerplate, which according to the article Mr. Xi did:
According to Xinhua news agency, the president visited the president visited the Tibet Autonomous Region in connection with the 70th anniversary of Tibet’s “peaceful liberation the first time in the history of the party and the country”.
...&c &c blah blah blah.
Now I have to wonder, was Mr. Xi's visit simply about commemorating the Tibetan Anschluss, or was it possibly about something else? After all, the visit took place during a period of another record rainfall and flooding in his country, and thus far, Mr. Xi has at least "shown the flag" during such disasters, showing up personally in critical areas. One would have thought therefore that another high-ranking envoy could have been sent to Tibet, while Mr. Xi remains to be seen managing the latest crises.
Perhaps that is the point: perhaps he needed to be seen at the center of a "happy" event (at least from the Communist perspective) like the annexation of Tibet, and not constantly associated with floods and Covid.
As usual, however, I have another high octane speculation to advance. Consider Al Jazeera's version of the story of the visit:
China’s Xi urges people in Tibet to ‘follow party’ in rare visit
Al Jazeera is at least seeking deeper motivations for the visit than simply a celebration of the Anschluss, for it's sub-headline mentions the growing tensions with India in addition to the other boilerplate about party unity and trusting the Fauci... er... The Science... uhm, I mean, The (Latest Five Year) Plan:
In Lhasa, Xi watched a cultural performance that showcased Tibetan culture and loyalty to the party through song and dance, including a famous song with the lyric “sing a folk song for the party, the party is like my mother”.
But what if, after all, the visit really is about the Flooding/the Plan, at least in part? There is an odd mention in the Al Jazeera version of the story that hints at this:
After a “warm welcome by cadres and masses of all ethnic groups”, Xi went to the Nyang River Bridge to learn about ecological and environmental protection of the Yarlung Tsangpo River and the Nyang River, CCTV said.
And that brings me to this story I blogged about a couple of years ago and which I have mentioned in various interviews: China plans rapid expansion of 'weather modification' efforts Note what this story actually says: China basically plans to turn all of Tibet into a "weather modification zone", with specific emphasis on domestic weather control:
For six decades, the communist nation has deployed military aircraft and anti-aircraft guns to lace clouds with silver iodide or liquid nitrogen to thicken water droplets to the point where they fall as snow or rain. The technology has mostly been used at a local level to alleviate droughts or clear skies ahead of major events, such as the 2008 Olympics or last October’s 70th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China.
Part of that is a new weather modification system in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, Asia’s biggest freshwater reserve. Chinese scientists are working on the ambitious Tianhe (“sky river”) plan to divert water vapour northwards from the Yangtze River basin to the Yellow River basin, where it would become rainfall.
They say they have found potential channels near the boundary of the troposphere that could carry 5bn cubic metres of water annually. The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation has reportedly constructed hundreds of chambers in the mountain region – known as Asia’s water tower – to feed silver iodide into the atmosphere in large volumes. (Boldface emphasis added)
Notably, the flooding in China this year is not restricted to the Wuhan basin below the Three Gorges Dam, but has ventured - exactly according to "the Plan" - further north, where there have already been three dam failures, while heavy rains and floods continue in the south as well. So could Xi's visit also be about inspecting those weather modification facilities?
Is this why a top Chinese general accompanied him? And, more importantly, is this visit because that plan is going well, or horribly wrong? One may even go so far as to ask, was this visit about reasserting control of those facilities and reining them in (not to coin a pun)? Or was it about using those facilities to counter-act someone else's weather warfare?
Obviously, I do not know. But I am convinced that there is weather manipulation going on in China; they have admitted it. And that manipulation is causing a great deal of suffering in China, on Mr. Xi's watch...
you've got it backwards.
The "elite" have lost touch with their humanity and are regressing into a primal state. They're trying to take as many of us with them.
But the real humans are currently ascending. I feel it. I'm smarter and more lucid than I've ever been.
I have unfettered optimism for the future. If you only could see what I see...
This makes me smile.
There is NO WAY this dude would say this if we weren't WINNING.
Haha what a faggot.
That's because they are panicking and scrubbing it from the web.