As my readers know, for the past year I’ve been demonstrating—with much evidence and proof—that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.
Some people reply: “So why are all these people dying?” “What is the cause?”
I’ve answered those questions at length. I’m going to answer them again.
First of all, if someone says, “I know a family where three people died, so what else could it be, besides the virus,” the answer is:
I have no idea why these three people died. I’m not doing remote viewing. The person who asked the question has no idea, either.
But because we have no idea, that doesn’t mean it must be the virus. Think it through. It could be exposure to an environmental toxin. It could be the effects of a vaccine. It could be several different reasons acting in concert.
But that person says, “It wasn’t a toxin or a vaccine. They were all healthy until last month.” How does he know it wasn’t a toxin? And again, just because we don’t know, there is no reason to skip from there to: “It must have been the virus.”
Does “we don’t know” equal “the virus”? No.
Does “we don’t know” equal “let’s accept the official propaganda about the virus”? No.
Does “we don’t know” equal “let’s accept the preponderance of opinion”? No.
All right. Moving on—the most important thing to know about so-called COVID is: THERE IS NO SINGLE CAUSE OF ALL THESE PEOPLE DYING.
It isn’t one cause.
I’ve been explaining this basic principle to people since 1988 (the example then was AIDS), and it’s the hardest piece of truth to deliver with success, because…
People are always looking for THE ONE.
They want THE ONE THING.
They’re predisposed (hypnotized, conditioned) to demand THE ONE CAUSE.
“If it isn’t the virus, what is it?”
There is no “it.”
The basic con involves stitching together a quilt of people dying for different reasons, and inventing a story that makes it seem they are all dying for one reason. That’s the game. That’s the trick. That’s the sleight-of-hand.
Now I’m going to list the main reasons “all these people are dying.” I’ve covered each reason, in detail, in previous articles. Here I’m just giving the summary version.
ONE: The relabeling of flu-like illness as COVID. (Estimate—there are 1 billion flu cases a year, 300,000-500,000 flu deaths per year, worldwide)
TWO: The relabeling of pneumonia as COVID. (Estimate—there are 1.7 million adult pneumonia deaths per year, worldwide)
THREE: Relabeling lung infections. (Estimate—there are 3 million chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) deaths per year, worldwide)
Note: Air pollution is a significant cause of death in the above three categories.
FOUR: Writing “COVID” as the cause of death on patient files, when it’s clear the patient died for some other reason.
FIVE: Terrifying (with a COVID diagnosis) and isolating old people who are already ill and frail with a variety of long-term conditions. These people then fold up and die. This is murder.
SIX: Killing old people with devastating and toxic treatments—ventilators plus sedation, and remdesivir.
SEVEN: Prior toxic vaccine campaigns.
EIGHT: The COVID vaccines.
NINE: Note—wherever a person has symptoms that resemble the list of so-called COVID symptoms (cough, chills, fever, lung congestion, pneumonia), a positive PCR test seals the deal for a diagnosis of COVID-19. The PCR test is meaningless, for many reasons, and therefore spits out false-positives like water from a fire house. Since the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist, the test has zero validity from the get-go.
In different areas, in different pockets and clusters of people, there may be other reasons why people labeled “COVID” are getting sick and dying. None of these deaths has anything to with a fake virus called SARS-Cov-2.
COVID is a complete fraud. It was a fraud from the beginning.
Codemonkeyz has a message for everyone:
In just a few hours, I will be releasing a short video that every citizen of our beautiful country should watch.
As soon as the video drops, take a minute to watch it, then turn around and spread it across every platform and every crevice of the internet.
Big tech and the lying press will be working overtime to censor this video.
It will be censored. It must be seen!!
We will be utilizing overwhelming numbers to spread the video far and wide so every citizen has a chance to see it.
Before spreading the video, consider adding a watermark of your own, flipping the video, mirroring it, adding to it, removing from it... anything to make each copy of the video slightly unique so the censors have a harder time censorsing the video.
Help each other spread the video to the far reaching corners of the Earth.
Spread the video - your life depends on it. Spread the video - our country depends on it. Spread the video - the world depends on it.
Yeah I won't hold my breath, but this guy just permanently discredited himself if this doesn't materialize.
Looks like Offspring is a band of faggots.
Murray was extremely dedicated to exposing the Syrian gas false fag, so I would imagine he's being punished for that and his many other "transgressions."
You might remember the flurry of gold repatriation stories that emerged a few years ago. It began when Germany wanted to repatriate some of its gold from the New York Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the Bank of France. Germany has, according to some estimates, the second largest holdings of gold reserves after the U.S.A. The story then became...well, peculiar, when we learned that there would be some "delay".
For my part, I speculated that perhaps, once again, the NY Fed has somehow "misplaced" Germany's gold, the first time being during 1928 during a visit of Reichsbank president Hjalmar Schacht. Even after Germany supposedly had the gold returned, there were stories about the purity of that gold, and lack of transparent assay and audit.
During this period, other countries suddenly jumped on the gold repatriation bandwagon, including Austria, the Netherlands, and... Venezuela.
Well, Venezuela's efforts are again in the news, according to this article shared by V.T., and it's a story that might contain some clues:
The Saga Continues: Venezuela’s 31 tonnes of seized gold at the Bank of England
Note that Venezuela's request for its gold has yet to be honoured, but for a very intriguing reason:
In what’s becoming one of the longest running legal dramas in the global gold market, the saga of Venezuela’s ‘frozen’ gold in London continues to roll on, most recently reaching the UK Supreme Court in a 4 day court hearing between 19 – 22 July.
At the core of the legal drama is the question of who has the authority to withdraw Venezuela’s gold reserves which are stored in custody at the Bank of England. Is it the Banco Central de Venezuela (BCV) under the direction of de facto president of Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, or is it a team directed by self-styled interim president of Venezuela Juan Guaidó, who is backed by the US and UK governments. Given the multiple developments in this saga over the last few years and the complexity of the matter, a recap is in order.
To understand the significance of this development, imagine, for a moment, that all of the USA's gold, or significant amounts of it, were held by the Bank of France, and then imagine if the Bai Den regime demanded that x amount be repatriated, and the Bank of France refusing on the basis of concerns about voting fraud and election legitimacy. In effect, that's what is going on here.
But this is where it gets interesting, because in the absence of a clear legal claim, that gold enters a kind of bullion limbo, where notwithstanding the legal issues, its claimants can still use it in transactions, in this case, as collateral:
From 1980 until 2011, the BCV had 99.2 tonnes of gold stored at the Bank of England. For details, see the BullionStar article from May 2015 titled “Venezuela’s Gold Reserves – Part 1: El Oro, El BCV, y Los Bancos de Lingotes”.
Between late 2011 and early 2012, the BCV conducted a famous gold repatriation operation, flying 160 tonnes of gold bars that were held abroad, back to Caracas in Venezuela to be stored in the vaults of Venezuela’s central bank. Following the completion of that gold repatriation in January 2012, this still left 4,089 of BCV’s Good Delivery gold bars stored in the Bank of England’s vaults (about 50.8 tonnes).
Sometime after 2012 and until 2018, the BCV then began entering various gold swap transactions, including those with Deutsche Bank and Citibank as counterparts, and also with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) as a counterpart. To do this, the BCV used most of the gold that it held in the Bank of England vaults in London as collateral for the gold swaps.
One such transaction was a $1.7 billion gold swap with Deutsche Bank, which the BCV let lapse in 2017, thus allowing Deutsche Bank to keep the gold that had been put up as collateral. This was somewhere between 30-40 tonnes of gold.
Another was a gold swap transaction with Citibank, again with the BCV putting up gold as collateral. In April 2018, the BCV paid Citibank $172 million to recover some of that gold from Citi which had been put up as collateral. That then left the BCV, as of April 2018, with a net total of 14 tonnes of gold held at the Bank of England (about 1125 Good Delivery gold bars).
Note that physical delivery gold is being used as collateral in swaps with other banks, long before the legal issues currently before British courts are resolved, and recall that the Bank of England almost immediately began stalling on the repatriation of Venezuela's gold when that government first demanded it, even under then-president Hugo Chavez.
The question is, did real physical gold leave the Bank of England's vaults, and if so, why, and where is it now? Or were these paper transactions only, leaving the physical gold still at the Bank of England, with the books reflecting that Venezuela only has fourteen tons of gold currently on its account.
Or to put my speculation country simple: it appears that "someone" is seizing the opportunity to use Venezuela's gold over and over (rehypothecation) under cover of the question of its legal owner to build more liquidity into the system, and notably, squatting in the middle of it, are the Bank of International Settlements, and our old (and dubious) friend Deutsche Bank.
And this, as the article says, is where it gets interesting:
In November 2018, it became public knowledge that the Bank of England was stalling on the BCV’s request to withdraw 14 tonnes of Venezuela’s gold from London, with the Bank of England using bogus excuses such as transportation insurance costs and anti-money laundering concerns to not fulfill its withdrawal obligation on BCV’s gold custody contract.
However, the real reason for stalling the BCV’s gold withdrawal request was political – in the form of US State Department and US Treasury pressure that was put on the British Foreign office and HM Treasury to block Venezeula’s gold withdrawal and repatriation plan. This stalling was designed to allow time to roll out US sanctions against Venezuela in November 2018 and critically, to move the goalposts and change the rules of the game by allowing time for the Guaidó team (backed by the US and UK) to enter the arena so as to try to win control of the remaining 14 tonnes of BCV gold at the Bank of England.
All of this raises a rather nasty question: was the US-UK decision to back the claims of Juan Guaido to be the legitimate government of Venezuela really not about the alleged "socialism" of Maduro's government, but rather really about the control of the gold? And if so, why bother with such a comparatively small amount? One possibility might be that Venezuela's handling of its bullion, suggestive as it is of massive rehypothecation, might expose the widespread use of that tactic. In effect: want to rehypothecate a lot of gold? Then obfuscate the issue of its ownership.
The article concludes with some stern warnings and implications:
While the Supreme Court judgment will determine who has the authority to withdraw and use 31 tonnes of BCV gold stored under custody at the Bank of England, this case will also have far reaching international implications for all sovereign assets held in the United Kingdom, and particularly monetary gold.
A ruling in favour of Guaidó will mean that the UK Government can at will seize control over state assets of foreign governments held at the Bank of England and elsewhere, and such a ruling would send shockwaves internationally about the notion of sovereign property rights, and how they are treated in the City of London, and wider England and the UK.
A ruling in favour of Guaidó also creates a worrying situation where a government executive (HM Government) can intervene and interfere into the judiciary using claims which have no basis in reality – i.e. Guaidó has no control over the Venezuelan central bank, nor it’s employees, nor is he even recognised by the EU as president of Venezuela, nor is he recognised as president by a vast list of countries including China and Russia, nor is he even leader of the Venezuelan national assembly anymore.
Over 70 sovereign nations hold gold in storage at the Bank of England including many nations in South and Central America and across the Middle East and Asia. If the Supreme Court rules against the BCV and in favour of Guaidó, and creates this precedent that sovereign gold reserves are not safe in London, expect the sound of many phones ringing at the Bank of England from central banks around the world trying to line up their gold withdrawal and repatriation requests. That in itself would be a sight to behold.
While you might think that the five lords a-leaping in the Supreme Court in their judgement will take these critical sovereign property right concerns into account, don’t underestimate the connections between the various strands of the British Establishment across politics, judiciary and the City of London, where the ‘fraternities’ and undisclosed connections between the ‘brothers’ will nearly always be more important than what how an outsider would view the situation.
It would therefore not be surprising if the law lords of the Supreme Court side with the Foreign Office, the Bank of England, and the US State Department, who are all working on the same side to prevent the BCV getting its hands on 31 tonnes of the BCV’s gold bars (worth approximately US $ 1.8 billion at current spot price).
Moral of the story for central banks – Don’t hold gold at the Bank of England if you actually ever want to withdraw it.
But if my own speculative analysis is correct, this story is about much more than a squabble between two central banks. It's really about the practices of an entire financial system, a system that's in huge trouble, and which - to my eyes - appears to be scrambling to maintain its physical control of as much actual physical bullion as possible. Maybe that's why the whole gold repatriation fad got started with Germany... maybe they suspected "something going on."
Let’s start here:
The SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.
The supposed diagnostic tests are meaningless.
The case numbers are meaningless.
The people who have died have died for multiple reasons, none of which has anything to do with SARS-CoV-2.
I have spent the past year writing over 300 articles, providing compelling evidence for the above assertions.
There are “people who have died who are LABELED COVID deaths.” AKA “official reality.” AKA “official lies.”
Who are these people? By and large, who are they?
Here are two statements. The people DID die, but not because of SARS-CoV-2:
The Kaiser Family Foundation, July 24, 2020: “Adults 65 and older account for 16% of the US population but 80% of COVID-19 deaths in the US…”
AARP, April 1, 2021: “95 percent of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. have occurred among people who were 50 or older.”
A member of Biden’s coronavirus task force, Dr. Zeke Emanuel, once stated there is no reason people should want to live beyond the age of 75. Just go gently into that good night.
Well, what is called COVID is old people.
My first clue about the elderly came from a report published by Italy’s National Institute of Health during the early days of the “pandemic.” It stated that the average age of people dying from COVID in the country was 79.5. That clue was the size of an aircraft carrier parked outside your house.
Soon after the Italian report, the Institute of Health went dark. No more research was released. No updates. They’d spoken out of school, and someone slapped them in the head.
Open-source press reports revealed the “excess mortality” of 2020 was largely the result of elderly people dying in nursing homes.
This has nothing to do with a virus.
It has to do with patients who are ALREADY on a long downward health slide. They ALREADY have multiple health conditions. For years, even decades, they’ve been pounded with toxic medical drugs, weakening their bodies and shredding their immune systems—
And THEN they’re hit with the TERROR of an arbitrary and fake COVID-19 diagnosis—
And THEN they’re isolated and shut off from family and friends—in facilities where gross neglect and indifference are all too often the “standard of care.”
Death is the direct result.
Forced premature death.
These patients just fold up and die.
The managers of pandemic information tell the big lie. They spin tales about “the virus” having a greater impact on the elderly.
No, the STORY about a virus has the impact. The terror has the deadly impact. The isolation has the deadly impact. The terror and the isolation deliver the final blow.
To an astounding extent, COVID-19 is a NURSING HOME DISASTER.
Mass murder by cruelty.
Memo to financial investigators: Calculate how much money government and private insurers are saving, because they don’t have to keep paying for the long-term care of all the old people who are dying premature deaths in nursing homes. The money number will be staggering.
Tony Fauci knows the con. He knows COVID-19 is old people. People are dying from the fear he promotes. Fauci has no shred of shame. He’s a mouthpiece turned out by Bill Gates and David Rockefeller.
Evil permeates the COVID operation. The elderly in nursing homes are the primary target. Getting them to die earlier is the tactic, in order to pump up the fake COVID mortality numbers.
Without those phony numbers, the whole “pandemic” would be exposed in an hour.
I’ve said there were two key events in the foisting of the whole vicious COVID fiction—the Chinese regime locking down 50 million citizens overnight for no good medical reason, giving the green light to the World Health Organization and the CDC to “follow the new model”; and the Bill Gates-financed computer projection of deaths, put together by Neil Ferguson, who lied through his teeth when he claimed half a million people could die in the UK and two million in the US by the summer of 2020—thus supplying the final “rationale” for the lockdowns.
The third key event was and is the sustained attack on the elderly.
Kill these people with terror and isolation, and make the death numbers escalate.
As of May 22, 2020, Forbes reported that, “…in the 43 states that currently report such figures, an astounding 42% of all COVID-19 deaths have taken place in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.”
Washington Post, May 18, 2020: “The World Health Organization said half of Europe’s covid-19 deaths occurred in such facilities.”
Headline of same Post article: “Canada’s nursing home crisis: 81 percent of coronavirus deaths [in the country] are in long-term care facilities.”
The Guardian, May 16, 2020: “About 90% of the 3,700 people who have died from coronavirus in Sweden were over 70, and half were living in care homes, according to a study from Sweden’s National Board of Health and Welfare at the end of April.”
“The country [Spain] was shocked at the end of March when the defence minister revealed that soldiers drafted in to disinfect residential homes had found some elderly people abandoned and dead in their beds.”
“…the regional governments of Madrid and Catalonia have been publishing their own figures on people who have died in care homes…”
“In Madrid, the total for Covid, or suspected Covid, deaths since 8 March stood at 5,886 on Thursday. In Catalonia, it was 3,375. Between them, care home deaths in the two regions account for more than a third of all the coronavirus deaths in the country.”
And there was a great deal of early warning on the subject, if anyone from public health agencies wanted to pay attention—The Guardian, 13 April, 2020: “About half of all Covid-19 deaths appear to be happening in care homes in some European countries…Snapshot data from varying official sources shows that in Italy, Spain, France, Ireland and Belgium between 42% and 57% of deaths from the virus have been happening in homes, according to the report by academics based at the London School of Economics (LSE).”
These nursing home figures only give a partial picture. Consider the HUGE NUMBER of elderly, already-ill people who are basically in the same situation AT HOME—terrified by COVID propaganda, locked down, isolated; and then die—and also those who manage to make it to a hospital, where they are put on breathing ventilators, heavily sedated, and killed.
The Hill, undated (late April 2020), reported on “data…gathered at Northwell Health, New York state’s largest hospital system. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examines 5,700 patients hospitalized with coronavirus infections in the New York City region, with final outcomes recorded for 2,634 patients. The average patient age was 63 years old… For the next oldest age group, ages 66 years and older, patients receiving mechanical ventilation recorded a 97.2 percent mortality rate.”
And yet the ventilator death-treatment continues. As does treatment with remdesivir, a highly toxic drug.
The New York Times (June 27, 2020) reported that 43 percent of all US COVID deaths were occurring in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly. In at least 24 states, more than 50 percent of all COVID deaths were occurring in these facilities. The Times failed to mention deaths of the elderly at hospitals or, at home, cut off from family and friends. The situation is far worse than the Times made it out to be.
COVID is old people. Pushed into death.
It’s mass murder.
Behind politicians’ and public health officials’ oh so caring directives and demands and declarations and pronouncements, it’s mass murder.
Imagine YOU were 80 years old. For years you’ve been suffering from multiple serious health conditions. For years, doctors have been giving you many toxic drugs, carving up your immune system, weakening your body, affecting your judgement. Along comes a false story about a deadly virus. Every time you turn on the television set, there it is, that fearful story. You’re terrified. Maybe the virus will visit you. And then one day, your doctor gives you a test, or simply eyeballs your clinical symptoms, and says yes, you have it. The virus. You’re infected. Your terror escalates. Your worst nightmare has come true. And suddenly, you’re isolated in your home, alone, or you’re locked up in your room in a nursing home, cut off from family and friends. Day after day, week after week. What would you do?
Chances are, you would see no point in living. You would give up and die.
The operation called COVID is old people. Killing old people.
oops thanks!
show me on the doll where trump touched you
I'm still catching up on the details of this case, but Murray is a legend and this reeks of corruption at the highest level.
Scotland is totally cucked.
We don't take kindly to faggots like you.
In the past few days alone, we have learned that the October 2020 Michigan governor kidnap plot was largely a creation of the FBI; a "senior FBI official" was on the take from media organizations; and another assistant director was in a "romantic relationship with a subordinate" and involved in "other misconduct." The leadership failures documented by the Office of the Inspector General are now almost standard and part of a tiresome media drip-torture for the public to endure.
The FBI ran a coup against President Trump. It failed. The following got away: Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Clinesmith, Pientka, Brower, Baker, et al. Any real consequences for attempting to overthrow the government of the United States? No.
Questions are now being raised as to whether the FBI had a role in the Capitol Hill protests of January 6, 2021. When one examines the FBI's involvement in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax; Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses; standing by idly while in possession of Hunter Biden's Ukraine and Burisma-laden laptops, while President Trump endured a second phony impeachment; and the frame-up of Trump's National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – it is not too difficult to imagine.
The FBI needs to go away. It should happen in an orderly and thoughtful process, over a period of months. Congress should authorize and create an investigative division in the U.S. Marshals Service and open applications for law enforcement officer seeking to be rigorously screened, vetted and then accessed into the new organization. Similar action was taken before in the very creation of the FBI. It is now time to clean house and restore the public's trust in the "premier investigative agency" of federal law enforcement.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) continues its downward spiral into terminal corruption. Sadly, the scandals, criminality and ethical abuses of the organization are largely ignored by the American public and by the institutions of government charged with oversight and correction. Outrage after outrage is reported, hearings are held, Inspector General reports are issued -- but the systemic corruption is never really tackled and dirty cops skate away virtually unscathed.
This situation is constitutionally unacceptable, corrosive to public trust in law enforcement, and a threat to the survival of the republic.
In the past few days alone, we have learned that the October 2020 Michigan governor kidnap plot was largely a creation of the FBI; a "senior FBI official" was on the take from media organizations; and another assistant director was in a "romantic relationship with a subordinate" and involved in "other misconduct." The leadership failures documented by the Office of the Inspector General are now almost standard and part of a tiresome media drip-torture for the public to endure.
Meanwhile, the FBI had the audacity to issue a Stasi-like tweet urging "monitoring of 'family members and peers' for extremism."
Remember: what we learn about the FBI in the press are only the stories that are SO outrageous that the FBI cannot keep a lid on them and is forced to make disclosures via a toothless Inspector General report -- but never anything that results in a criminal indictment. Imagine what the ordinary day-to-day misconduct in FBI offices across the country could be. And these scandals don't just amount to "bad press" – in several of these, federal courts scourge the FBI for lawbreaking. Additionally, Inspector General report after report details FBI abuses such as whistleblowers being retaliated against and ignoring "high-risk" employees who fail polygraph tests.
There are still apologists for the FBI. Some seek to defend the organization with the rationalization that "it's always been that way." That sort of thinking is a cynical effort to inoculate and immunize real criminality as something normal and regular. "Get used to it kid, that's the way of the world," they offer with a shrug and a grin. Others, like Sean Hannity, cling to the "just a few bad apples" excuse. That sort of FBI cheerleading flies in the face of a litany of systemic abuses and pervasive abusers. The FBI ran a coup against President Trump. It failed. The following got away: Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Clinesmith, Pientka, Brower, Baker, et al. Any real consequences for attempting to overthrow the government of the United States? No.
In May 2018, veteran reporter Eric Lichtblau of Time magazine wrote an article titled, "The FBI Is in Crisis. It's Worse Than You Think," wherein he detailed:
The bureau, which is used to making headlines for nabbing crooks, has been grabbing the spotlight for unwanted reasons: fired leaders, texts between lovers and, most of all, attacks by President Trump ... internal and external reports have found lapses throughout the agency, and longtime observers, looking past the partisan haze, see a troubling picture: something really is wrong at the FBI... other painful, more public failures as well: missed opportunities to prevent mass shootings that go beyond the much-publicized overlooked warnings in the Parkland, Fla., school killings; an anguishing delay in the sexual-molestation probe into Olympic gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar; and evidence of misconduct by agents in the aftermath of standoffs with armed militias in Nevada and Oregon. FBI agents are facing criminal charges ranging from obstruction to leaking classified material.
Four years later and the situation has not improved.
Let us go back to the Michigan governor "kidnap plot" for a moment. The entire operation was an anti-Trump political smear job -- and was called into question for being exactly that back when the story broke in October 2020. Now we find out that the FBI was running at least a dozen paid "confidential informants" in the plot. It was a plot they dreamed up. It was actually a rehash of an Obama-era 2010 FBI plot by the so-called "Hutarees" that fell apart in court.
The FBI worries about "entrapment" in these cases because the FBI must demonstrate that there is reasonable suspicion that the subject in a case is about to be or is engaging in criminal activity. The government then allows the criminal/terrorist the opportunity to commit the act. In these cases, the FBI has good reason to worry.
More disturbingly, this is nothing new. Look at the "Herald Square Bomber" case as another instance in which the FBI identifies, recruits, trains, dispatches and then arrests the very informant they recruited in the first place. The FBI appears to have fabricated plots and terrorists to advance their own agenda and statistics. It looks, walks, and talks like "entrapment." Are there really no other bad guys out there for the FBI to go after? They need to focus on this modus operandi?
Questions are now being raised as to whether the FBI had a role in the Capitol Hill protests of January 6, 2021. When one examines the FBI's involvement in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax; Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses; standing by idly while in possession of Hunter Biden's Ukraine and Burisma-laden laptops, while President Trump endured a second phony impeachment; and the frame-up of Trump's National Security Advisor, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – it is not too difficult to imagine. And that is just the problem: It is not difficult to imagine. It should be an "impossibility."
The FBI needs to go away. It should happen in an orderly and thoughtful process, over a period of months. Congress should authorize and create an investigative division in the U.S. Marshals Service and open applications for law enforcement officer seeking to be rigorously screened, vetted and then accessed into the new organization. Similar action was taken before in the very creation of the FBI. It is now time to clean house and restore the public's trust in the "premier investigative agency" of federal law enforcement.
world domination. We're watching different globalist factions fighting it out, probably the same conflict that's been going on for thousands of years.
They are using weather modification warfare against each other, and using the cover of "mother nature" for plausible deniability so the population is left in the dark.
-
"Some 99.995% of the 469,982 children in England who were infected during the year examined by researchers survived... In fact, there were fewer deaths among children due to the virus than initially suspected." WSJ
-
CDC reports 337 childhood fatalities from COVID. There are 100,000,000 children in U.S. This is a 99.9997% survival rate. Fatalities attributed to COVID in this age group is 0.67% of all deaths. CDC reports 94% of COVID deaths have serious comorbidities
-
"A flood of new data — on the national, state and district levels — finds students began this academic year behind." The Washington Post reports on "lost generation" of students falling behind during COVID pandemic.
-
"Young children especially rely on facial expressions to understand situations. With face coverings, this may become increasingly difficult... making them more vulnerable to feelings of mistrust and concerns for their safety." Mask mandates may affect a child’s emotional, intellectual development
-
"Youth mental health is worsening... throughout the COVID-19 pandemic youth ages 11-17 have been more likely than any other age group to score for moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and depression." source
-
"The wearing of nose and mouth coverings by children leads to an increase in carbon dioxide levels... The results found an average of 13,120 and 13,910 parts per million of carbon dioxide in the air inhaled by children while wearing masks." source
-
“Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria." 11 pathogens were found on childhood masks in a U. of Florida analysis.
-
Masks will almost certainly cause more harm than good to children's physical & emotional health. The only real question is how much damage the increased depression, anxiety, neurosis, as well as diminished psychosocial & academic development will cause to generations to come.
What a bunch of faggots.
The Port Arthur Massacre in the 90's was an EXTREMELY AND BLATANTLY obvious false flag meant to confiscate the guns of Australians.
I've studied countless false flags and staged events, and the Port Arthur incident is probably THE MOST OBVIOUSLY STAGED of them all (sandy hook is close).
Aussies let themselves be cucked over a SINGLE hoax.
They brought this on themselves.
Never give up your guns. EVER.
We are dealing with psychopaths who ARE NOT human.
Fair enough, it took the COVID hoax to finally do it for me, but I was getting there for many years.
Terrain theory.
Bacteria DO cause ailments and disease, as well as their lab-created pathogens.
But "viruses" appear to me a massive scam and hoax and actually the product of our own cells.
yeah you're right, gonna delete
The COVID scam is playing out differently depending on region. In the US it was used to steal the 2020 election, and mail-in ballots were one aspect of that theft.
btw your blistering pessimism is EXTREMELY tiresome at this point and plays DIRECTLY into the hands of the psychotic "elite" that wants us to just give up.
Fuck you.
This triggers the shills and NPCs.