like an "official" conspiracies.win twitter?
Is Texas being preemptively punished for secession talk?
Anyone else want to test with their email provider?
Meanwhile @Biden: TRUTHINESS CZAR MEOW
Crocodile tears from Chucky Schumer LOL.
Good catch. Numerology is a game to them.
More examples: 1988 Armenian earthquake 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake 1994 Los Angeles earthquake 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan 2010 Haiti earthquake
The 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami: Collection of articles that point to a man-made event and potentially an act of warfare.
REMINDER...LARGE EARTHQUAKE EVENTS ARE OFTEN MANMADE: Very powerful M 7.9 earthquake strikes southeast of the Loyalty Island. The event is being reviewed to determine if there is a threat to the US west coast.
Hey faggot, that's not a reason for be removed and banned from reddit.
It's because of the suspicious timing.
You got it! When "reddit conspiracies" was mentioned in Congress, it forced the admins to act. They were waiting for the opportunity to ban me...I think it was coordinated.
Also, they needed to generate headlines that they acted...either remove the sub completely or just the "controversial" head mod...they opted for the latter. /r/conspiracy is honeypot 100% now.
If you have been following the career and website of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., son of the late U.S. Senator, you will be aware that he's not exactly persona grata in the corridors of big pharma power. But V.T. caught and shared this latest article from Mr. Kennedy's website, The Children's Health Defense, and it has one paragraph in particular that caught my eye:
Immunologist: Pfizer, Moderna Vaccines Could Cause Long-Term Chronic Illness
What caught my eye was this:
Back in 1999, leading U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official Dr. Peter Patriarca contended that modern advances in vaccine technology were rapidly “outpacing researchers’ ability to predict potential vaccine-related adverse events.” Patriarca mused that this could lead to “a situation of unforeseen and unpredictable vaccine outcomes.”
In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”
For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road.
In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.
Classen’s study establishes the potential for the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna to activate human proteins to take on “pathologic configurations” — configurations associated with chronic degenerative neurological diseases. Although his specific interest is in prion diseases (conditions associated with misfolded versions of normal proteins), Classen also outlines a handful of other mechanisms whereby RNA-based vaccines could give rise to “multiple other potential fatal adverse events.” (Boldface emphasis added)
The article concludes with this:
It would be interesting to know what those researchers would say about Classen’s blunt conclusion that “Approving a vaccine, utilizing novel RNA technology without extensive testing is extremely dangerous.”
What caught my eye here not only was the possibility that mRNA "vaccines" might be associated "with chronic degenerative neurological diseases" but that the study was done by Bart Classen, who, as the article notes, specializes in "prion diseases" which are neurological conditions "associated with misfolded versions of normal proteins." Then there is the mention that some effects of vaccines do not manifest immediately, and that Classen has previously written papers "exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes - not right away, but three or four years down the road."
In other words, we may not even encounter adverse reactions from the covid mRNA "vaccines" until a few years from now. But what sorts of reactions? As outlined above, those may come in the form of chronic neurological disorders. And what might those in turn be? Here I'm reading between the lines, and speculating. Given Classen's expertise in prions - "misfolded proteins" - what seems to be suggested is the possibility that one might expect to encounter - years from now - the emergence of diseases like bovine spongioform encephalopathy, or to give it its more popular name, Mad Cow Disease, or diseases like kuru, known to produce similar effects in populations known to practice cannibalism (see, for example, https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2016/09/06/482952588/when-people-ate-people-a-strange-disease-emerged). I've mentioned this possibility in previous blogs about the potential hazards of mRNA "vaccines," because in a certain way, they could be viewed as a form of cannibalism. Granted, the article does explicitly say this, but it does seem to emerge as an implied possibility.
Hopefully, I'm wrong. But the problem is, we may not know until years from now. If there is a sudden explosion of prion-related chronic neurological disorders, we'll know where to look...
... and whom to blame, and Operation Warp Speed will have to be right at the top of that list.
See you on the flip side...
The admins are shitty, but so is the general public for believing the censors again and again.
After all you've done for reddit this is how they treat you.
Pretty wild, hard to ignore the irony of spending a decade removing TOS violations only to be removed for purported TOS violations =/
One question, why didn't you consider using a proxy mod account?
Meh I didn't think it was necessary...there are a couple members on the team I still trust, and I figured if my axo account was even nuked, it would only happen in a reddit environment that had become so toxic and evil that there would be no point in continuing to feed the beast.
That's how I feel now...I feel psychologically liberated in many ways without the burden of that gig. Signing in to reddit itself was becoming a chore...dozens of angry and threatening PMs frequently waited for me.
They were trying to take me down emotionally/mentally...it didn't work (admins had to do it), but fighting back against that took a lot of my creative energy which now can be focused elsewhere.
Also, as much as I have respect for several members of the /r/conspiracy mod team, they are pretty much subservient to the admins who forbade them to add me back under an alt. Not that I would want that, but it's pretty telling the admins felt it necessary to say that lol.
Hey!!
Just an immediate temp-silence.
That's how I felt after my election suspension...no explanation, no response, and no ability for me to contact the mod team for a week.
I was also preemptively silenced across social media as well with almost matching timelines.
This was the biggest tech purge in history, and it's mindnumbingly obvious it was planned in advance.
I can't wait until it's all exposed!! It's inevitable...
just a matter of time until he got banned.
You don't remove and ban a head mod of a community because you don't like them.
Nice I will contact him. I already reached out to PV when this all went down and they replied that they were interested. I have yet to fully follow up but I will.
It happened practically overnight...all of the sudden the entire conspiracy research community was branded as "Russian".
They went in too hard...it caused us all to be immediately skeptical of the muh Russia narrative, and they never forgave those of us who refused to join the propaganda.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on the third day of the impeachment trial criticized House managers for failing to show how former President Donald Trump “incited” the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol.
Cruz said that while the House managers’ presentation was “designed to be emotional and powerful,” it only makes the case that a “terrorist attack” occurred at the Capitol on Jan. 6. He said that the prosecution team presented “virtually no argument” on how Trump’s conduct meets the legal standard of incitement.
“The House managers focused a great deal on the president, using words like ‘fight or fight like hell.’ Well if that constitutes incitement, then every single political candidate in America is guilty of incitement,” Cruz told reporters, according to the Capitol pool. “Because I guarantee you all 100 senators in that chamber have stood on the stump and said we need to ‘fight or fight like hell.'”
House Democrats have spent two days during the trial laying out evidence in an attempt to support their claim that Trump incited an insurrection on Jan. 6. Impeachment managers attempted to rely on multiple sliced up clips and audio of Jan. 6 as well as parts of Trump’s Jan. 6 speech and other remarks to make their case. However, their presentations failed to include new revelations or conclusive evidence to substantiate the allegations.
The House managers’ presentations have been praised for making powerful statements but also drew criticism from Democratic commentators who pointed out that their arguments were “getting too repetitive” and should have been shortened.
On Thursday, the House managers wrapped up their arguments and urged senators to convict the former president.
“We humbly, humbly, ask you to convict President Trump for the crime for which he is overwhelmingly guilty of. Because if you don’t, if we pretend this didn’t happen, or worse, if we let it go unanswered, who’s to say it won’t happen again?” House impeachment manager Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) said in his closing remarks.
“When President Trump stood up to that podium on January 6, he knew that many in that crowd were inflamed, were armed, were ready for violence. It was an explosive situation. And he knew it,” he added, without providing concrete evidence to demonstrate how Trump would have known.
David Schoen, Trump’s impeachment defense attorney, told reporters on Thursday that he did not think the Democrats were able to link Trump to the Jan. 6 incident and added that it was “offensive” to open up old wounds.
“I think they’re making a movie. You know, they haven’t in any way tied it to Donald Trump,” Schoen said. “And I think it’s offensive. Quite frankly, it’s antithetical [to] the healing process to continue to show the tragedy that happened here that Donald Trump has condemned, and I think it tears at the American people, quite frankly.”
“They’re showing the same repetitive videos. [Making] points that don’t exist,” he added.
Schoen and Trump’s other attorney, Bruce Castor, on Friday are expected to present their concluding arguments to the Senate, who will then have to vote whether to convict the former president. To convict, two-thirds of the Senate or 67 votes are needed. Democrats are unlikely to obtain the requisite number of votes as 44 Republicans on Tuesday have indicated that they believe the trial is unconstitutional.
Speaking about strategies the lawyers could take, Cruz said that their job now is to make clear how the impeachment managers have not carried out their burden of proof, and have not demonstrated that Trump’s conduct satisfied the legal standard of “high crimes and misdemeanors” required for conviction under the U.S. Constitution.
“And any standard that is put forth and certainly any standard that House managers have tried to put forward on its face would equally condemn multiple comments from multiple Democrats, whether it is [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi calling police officers storm troopers and Nazis, whether it is [Senate Majority Leader] Chuck Schumer threatening to ‘unleash the whirlwind’ on Supreme Court justices,” he said.
The Texas senators said he believes the trial could wrap up on Friday or Saturday.
Love all those comments saying crazy Qanon stuff without elaborating at all.
The weird thing is that I never pushed the Q stuff too. I didn't disavow it or anything and admit I was sympathetic to the movement (exposes child trafficking etc), but literally no one thought I was heavy on Q.
It's the new "Conspiracy Theorist" but for people who are into conspiracy theories.
Yeah I thought it was really strange when pizzagate turned into "Q"...I knew something was up when I saw lots of folks saying the guy who "shot up" Comet Ping Pong was a "Q" supporter (Q hadn't even posted yet)...shows how they try to fuck with the timeline and why it's really important the conspiracy theorists rehash this shit ad nauseum so it's not memoryholed.
Hm, I wonder if a certain similar sub over at reddit has fixed their mod logs yet...