1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need to provide pics that can only be taken from space, Google maps can (and is) created with spy planes. This disqualifies google maps. But if you were to provide a real picture of the entire earth floating in space, you would prove we really do have satellites with cameras in space.

PS, notice when you zoom far enough away on Google Earth, it shows you a computer generated earth. No images of globe Earth from space are real

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

The earth is a sphere 24,901 miles at the equator according to Nasa. There are earth curve calculators online, and equations you can look up to calculate earth curve over a given distance.

But the earth isn't a sphere or oblate spheriod or any of that bs. It's flat and stationary with a firmament enclosed over us. And the north pole is the center and Antarctica is an encircling land mass. The sun and moon and stars are small and local and rotate at different speeds like the hands of a clock.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough, however if we do live in some flat biodome as the Bible says, with a creator watching over us, it may feel like a computer simulation to someone who is unaware of the creator.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those can be taken from a high altitude spy plane retard, you don't have to leave the atmosphere to create Google maps. Again, real photos taken in space or on another planet. Why is this so difficult. Show me the ball earth from space, mars, Jupiter, saturn, a satellite in space, a tesla in space. I think you will find every image you pull up is computer generated, or faked in a Hollywood studio.

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

5th person to respond, still can't provide one real photo taken from space. It's a very simple challenge if we indeed have thousands of satellites in orbit.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of those are a live image of earth, they are computer generated composites from sensors all over earth. If any of them were real images you would be able to look at high definition clear images of a ball earth, which u cant.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, for all I know matter might all be energy, or this is all a digital simulation. All these theories are more plausible to me than heliocentric model/relativity/big bang.

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I'm full of shit, it's an extremely simple challenge I posed and you should be able to prove me wrong by simply using a search engine. Yet everyone who has replied so far won't partake in the challenge. And if you can't figure out why they would lie about something as fundamental as our cosmology, you deserve to be a NWO slave. If we live on a flat domed earth as the Bible and dozens of pre-modern cosmologies suggest, then everyone will have to acknowledge our creator, and that we are not some accident resulting from the big bang. The big bang theory and evolution are designed to make us nihilistic, atheists, with no understanding of our souls or divinity. This is why everyone is falling for NWO control of their lives, and satanic immorality like pedophilia and altering the sex of children. All the problems we have right now would be solved overnight if people knew our satanic world leaders were trying to hide God from us.

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have no doubt there are luminaries I can observe, I've even viewed them through the telescope of a private observatory. I simply have never seen a real photo taken by a satellite or probe in space. Considering we have satellites that Google mapped all of earth (actually done by high altitude planes), it should not be hard to view images that are not computer generated. We even sent probes to every planet in the solar system (except maybe mercury?) So we should have real pictures of these. So if you find any real images taken by satellite/probe, let me know.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +2 / -1

I will if you provide a photo as requested in this post.

5
YuuugeAsshoe 5 points ago +5 / -0

The point I'm trying to make is that any picture of venus, Jupiter, earth, satellites in space etc... is computer generated and not a genuine photo.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ya, I'm a Mariner, seeing objects beyond what the earth curve should have blocked kept happening to me continually. That combined with figuring out Nasa's lies turned me to the Flat Earth path. I want one of those p1000 cameras cause I can take some really good proof shots at work.

-1
YuuugeAsshoe -1 points ago +3 / -4

Globies: I can see the curve in an airplane at 35k feet.

Black Science Man Neil degrasse tyson: You can't see curve at 120k feet, that shit is flat!.

by pkvi
1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure it did in the hysterical people, but I didn't buy into the pandemic or vaccines from the start. When I got sick I was just stoked for 10 days off work. I'm just thinking there was some way they were making people sick even if a virus is not the explanation. It took me 2 months to recover my sense of tastes which never happened to me before.

by pkvi
1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've always kept an open mind to this possibility. I suppose the main holdup I have is when I got sick with covid as confirmed by testing (allegedly), the illness felt unlike any illness I had experienced before. The symptoms I experienced felt different than previous illnesses. Do you have any theories as to how people like me experienced this unique illness?

I realize many people had a cold or flu and assumed it was covid, but whatever I went through felt different. And my roomie got sick at the same time so I assumed it was a virus. I thought 5g targeting could be another explanation.

by xihg
1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good question, I'm glad you asked. Below i linked you a Playlist of videos that address that exact topic. Please check it out as the visual aid makes it far more comprehensible. But to state it in my own words, if I were to watch a vessel sail off into the horizon until it vanishes, due to the limits of our vision it will vanish as if it's melting into the horizon. However with the semi recent invention of cameras with high zoom capability while recording, these objects can be brought back into full view after apparently vanishing over the horizon. Earth curve playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IrRn4efSuyOl4AkEmcvrCMo

Here is a good example the media tried to explain away with an atmospheric phenomina known as refraction. Temperature differences over land or water can actually bend light allowing you to see things you shouldn't. However the image it produces should be scattered, warped, and disproportionate; maybe even inverted like some mirages. And refraction had a very limited effect. This is a case of downtown Chicago being viewed from 60 miles away across lake Michigan. The tallest building in Chicago is 1451 ft plus a little more over the lake. The observer, depending on their height of eye which is obviously close to the lake, should have had Chicago obscured by hundreds of feet of earth curve, even the tallest building. https://youtu.be/SADAiC6DNFg

Verify my claims by simply googling an earth curve calculator online, though I can do these calculations on my own.

Please let me know if you want me to go into more detail for the math behind any of my claims, and appreciate your inquisitiveness.

by xihg
2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I actually grew up a believing in God, so you are right many people do have faith while also believing those 3 things. However I came to realize the earth was flat a few years ago, after scoffing at the idea any time I heard it. I was eventually convinced of flat earth for scientific reasons, not biblical reasons. I actually grew up never realizing the Bible describes a flat domed earth. I finally gave flat earth a chance when various Flat earthers made videos that convinced me the moon landing and International space station is fake. I was impressed with their reasoning and proof, so I got curious how they can believe the earth is flat. There are hundreds of reasons why I think the earth is flat but to keep it simple I will give you my top 3:

First I am a Mariner and have often observed objects or landmarks far further than I should with earth curve geometry. There are atmospheric affects that can bend light or create mirage, but the sightings I am referring to are far below the curve of the earth and appear as though you are seeing it on a flat plane. These sightings are best done over water so terrain heights can't interfere. All you need to know is your height of eye, the objects height, and the distance and you can calculate how much curve should block your sight.

2nd, Airplanes set their gyroscopes before they take off so the pilot knows exactly which way down is no matter what maneuvers take place. Gyroscopes are unaffected by gravity, acceleration, deceleration, inertia or any other motion, they maintain their orientation. If you flew from USA to Australia your Gyroscope would tell you the plane is upside down by the time you got around a spherical earth. In addition earth is spinning over 1000 mph at the equator, so that motion would throw the gyro off too. Let's not forget we are orbiting the sun, and the sun is orbiting the milky way (allegedly). Gyroscopes can only work on a flat stationary plane that doesn't move. Also a plane flying 600mph would have to dive 2400 feet every 6 min in order to not fly off into space, according to earth curve geometry. That doesn't make any sense.

Finally Antarctica. If I were able to fly from Buenos Aires Argentina to Perth Australia, the shortest route would be straight over the middle of Antarctica. I picked those cities cause the are prominent and line up well. They are 7840 miles apart, totally doable flight. No one has ever flown across or used Antarctica to circumnavigate because it's impossible. Look up flights in the southern hemisphere, they make zero sense on a sphere, but perfect sense on flat earth. People circumnavigate east to west all the time (they are really doing a circle around the north pole), but no one can do a north south circumnavigation. The Buenos Aires to Perth flight would convince me I'm wrong if we can do it in one flight over Antarctica. I'm not picky though any city from south America to Australia that takes us over Antarctica would do. But it's impossible cause Antarctica is not a pole.

by xihg
2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dont see that community, have a link?

by xihg
4
YuuugeAsshoe 4 points ago +4 / -0

The earth is flat (with terrain obviously). But it is not a floating disk in space. Space as we are told, does not exist. The north pole is the center of our earth, and Antarctica is the encircling land mass, some use the term ice wall. What is beyond Antarctica is speculation because it is impossible to explore there independently due to the Antarctic treaty, and logistic impossibilities. Personally I've seen evidence that indicates Biblical cosmology is correct (along with many other ancient cosmologies that are similar). Go deep enough into Antarctica and you will hit the "Firmament" or whatever structure is at its base. The Firmament is a solid dome over our earth of unknown thickness or material. There seems to be a layer of some sort of liquid before you hit the solid firmament. You can see rockets that hit the firmament go through a liquid layer, and skip off the solid part.

What is under the earth? No one can say because the deepest hole ever dug is less than 8 miles. But biblical cosmology suggests that Sheol is inside earth, and bellow that is more water, pillars and foundation of the earth. When God created the earth he separated the waters above, from the waters below with the firmament, so we are surrounded by water.

There are no satellites in space, no living human has ever escaped our dome earth, except Jesus when he left. The closest thing to satellites are high altitude balloons with solar powered tech hanging from them, these are easy to research.

3 biggest lies that are meant to hide the existence of our creator and turn people atheist: -Gravity and theory of relativety -Big bang theory -Evolutionary theory Flat earth causes these three theories to collapse which is why they are trying to hide it and brainwash everyone from birth.

7
YuuugeAsshoe 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think the population has simply become more polarized on this matter. The sheep are more hypnotized than ever, so you are correct. But there are simultaneously more people awake than ever. 10-20 years ago you could hardly find anyone that 9/11 was an inside job, or that the moon landing was fake, or our government is full of satanic pedophiles. Now I can find a lot of people that will talk about those things.

3
YuuugeAsshoe 3 points ago +3 / -0

How did you see through that much atmosphere at sea level? The air is not totally translucent. Anyone who will not consider flat earth simply has not taken the time to find out the moon landing was fake, the ISS is fake, all footage of astronauts in space is fake, all images of ball earth and planets and nebula etc... are fake. Flat earth is too much of a jump till you figure that out. But the alleged earth curve is far more dramatic than most people realize. Two men 6' tall should no longer be able to see eachother behind earth curve at 6 miles apart for example. These tests are easy to conduct over ocean with a high zoom camera or telescope. Also there are fake flat earthers out there to throw people off with ridiculous explanations. Flat earth makes God our creator undeniable, and destroys lies like evolution that make people atheist

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol I linked the earthcurve online calculator I used, there are several of them out there. But if you don't trust them, the get a book called American Practical Navigator by Nathaniel Bowditch, it's basically the Bible of navigation. It has a whole section on how to calculate earth curve and the variables involved. It will lead you to the same numbers I produced, as mariners do this math all the time. I think by now everyone sees you are an aggro retard, good luck!

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the calculation is so easy a monkey do it, then please answer my previous question in feet. How much of the sears tower will be blocked by earth curve from an observer 60 miles away and 10 ft high? Answer or admit you are full of shit, because I gave you specific answers for 3 different observer heights.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›