1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you expect elon to be honest? He's one of the richest men in the world (publicly). Most of his net worth was built through government funding. His quote about the orbiting tesla video, "You can tell its real cause it looks so fake." Was simply a response to all the autists online pointing out it is CGI. Why do you trust him?

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

The encircling icy landmass is a pretty easy one to prove. Millions of people have circumnavigated the earth east to west. Obviously I think they are making a circle around the north pole on our plane. No one has ever circumnavigated across the south pole and come out the other side of earth. A flight from Perth AU to Buenos Aires would have the shortest path across the middle of Antarctica. But try it yourself and watch what flight routes come up when you book it; it makes perfect sense on a FE map. https://youtu.be/WOl3uf2SeNU

Have you seen any of the vids of ships disappearing over the horizon from the bottom up, then they use a nikon p1000 to zoom in and bring it back into full view? It's just an optical effect. Besides ships over the horizon is kind of irrelevant when people view objects all the time that should be hidden behind the earth curve such as lighthouses, islands, mountains, skyscrapers. And the military has targeting systems (lasers) that target objects a couple hundred miles beyond what should be possible geometrically. Here is an observation I made myself that should be impossible, message me privately if you want more specifics on the sighting. https://communities.win/c/flatearthresearch/p/16ZXQp6ItT/flat-earth-observation-san-cleme/c

The sun is the most difficult one because there is so much unproven about it. How big is it? how high? does the firmament effect its light distribution? Does it have a physical location, or is it some sort of projection that depends upon the observer? I don't know for sure and it was the hardest thing to explain about FE. How can you possibly experience night if the sun is moving over a plane? I was convinced by watching many videos that offered demonstrations and simulations. Here is a playlist, that's the best I can do. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IqA_ZqjXvtHsjLlksN_CS8u

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +11 / -9

There is no such thing as Orbiting Satellites. They only float around on helium balloons. They don't want the public to figure out the earth is flat and domed, and the infinite void of space is fake. The Chinese cover story is just to hide the fact the only thing close to a 'Satellite', floats around on balloons.

https://youtu.be/ZgcT_aSXFXM

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

-Evolution, relativity, big bang would all be disproven. -Atheism would be impossible and all moral implications that go with thinking you are a cosmic insignificant accident. -People would have to know God is real. -People would quit putting faith is scientism priests and politicians. In fact they would be proven liars and psychopaths. -People would question War, media narrative, academia, financial system, Hollywood propaganda, history etc... -Law would greatly be effected because people would hold God's law higher than the evil legal systems we accept now. -I think an enormous revival in Christian faith would break out, although not all flat earthers follow Christ. -Knowledge, wisdom, truth, morality would all increase. -Also it would be much harder to scam populations on taxes and fund psyops like NASA.

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh good, at least those don't sound dangerous. Thats really interesting, What is your average body temp on a normal healthy day you think?

And if you don't mind sharing, what is your ancestry? I'm familiar with various heritages that are known for high rate of rh- blood.

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm a millennial but true lol

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Which did you find the least convincing?

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I assume they were using infrared thermometer guns? If you read the warning label on those it says to never point it at human flesh and specifically not eyes. I had to explain this to so many assholes during the pandemic, as they are trying to point it at the brain of every person they try to temperature check.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, it's speculation. I already know ISS isn't in space for other reasons primarily their cgi, greenscreen, and harness mistakes while pretending to be up there.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Wikipedia puts the ISS altitude at around 400 km. Using this for the distance, I get an orbital velocity of 6,576 meters per second (14,710 mph). That's not bad! Checking my result online, I see that the listed orbital speed is 7,600 meters per second, so I'm off by about 15 percent."

Hes looking at the angular size of the object. This means the object can be any size that fits within that angle. It could be extremely huge and 100k miles away, or it could be a tiny drone 50k feet high. This does nothing to prove the distance or size of the object. It's still assumed that nasa isn't lying about those things.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kaaarrll, how do you know the size, speed, and altitude of the object you are looking at in the night sky? Did you go up to the ISS in a shuttle and clock it's speed?

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think fiber optic cable will have a bit more bandwidth and reliability lmao, great point retard.

Ohhh wooow, radio signals from a distant galaxy! How the fuck would you know!? I bet you love all neil defgrassi Tysons BS.

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

I dont know where they keep the projectors, could be anywhere, there are military bases all over the world. I saw 'starlink satellites' at night one time flying all in a row and I was convinced they were real because the news told me what those dots are. Never once saw them again. But Elons fake tesla in space was one of the things that got me thinking it's all bullshit. Let me guess, you think the tesla is really in orbit too?

Ok so if I were to send radio wave to the opposite site of earth, how many times would it have to bounce between the ionosphere and the surface of the earth to make it? Draw yourself a diagram if you have to. How does it bounce off various terrain and ocean?

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's amazing, you can look in the night sky and tell the size, speed, trajectory, and features of any object up there. Wow it's like your brain and eyes are a military targeting system. Incredible

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

First let me say that looking through your post history you seem to only comment the way a fed shill would, so I hope you are getting paid.

2nd, I've had a projector before, you can shine it on all sorts of surfaces and produce an image. So your characterization of the firmament is retarded.

3rd, answer the question I posed to you.

4th, I hope you are staying on top of your booster shots.

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

One thing the video mentions that coincides with flat earth but is not overtly stated; the sea cables are layed out in a way that makes more sense on a flat earth map than on a globe. Notice the FE sea cable map in the video. For instance, there are no cables that run from Australia to South America because they are on opposite ends of the plane. Instead they are routed from Australia to West coast USA to South America. Also this video states that 99% of intercontinental communication takes place through these cables, and I've heard similar figures from other sources. Orbiting Satellites are completely unnecessary for our world wide network. Also a flat earth with a dome explains how radio frequencies can be transmitted from USA to AU, which should be inconceivable on a globe as the radio waves would have to bouce between the surface and the ionosphere many times to make it around the sphere.

Ya as a flat earther it's impossible to say what the sun and moon exactly are. I find it much easier to point out what they aren't. Perhaps if we had Nasa's budget we could get more difinitive answers lmao.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again, every picture I've seen (of the ISS from earth) looks like a projection to me. I think its the result of 'project bluebeam'. And if we indeed have a firmament, this would mean we have a solid surface in the sky that could be projected on to. However, I dont believe the ISS is orbiting in space because of the sheer number of green screen, cgi, and harness fails they have had filming inside or on 'spacewalks'. Also I can barely see a jumbo jet 7 miles high with the naked eye, the ISS is about the same size, how would I see it 250 miles high?

Why do you believe the ISS is real, and orbiting the earth 250 miles high every 90 minutes?

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Watch the video. As far as you can tell, all you see is a light in the sky and you don't know it's speed, altitude, size or shape. The video shows helium balloon satellites, and solar powered drones, and high altitude planes. In addition living on a flat earth with a solid firmament, would explain why you can bounce radio waves from USA to Australia (impossible on a sphere). Also a firmament would explain technology like project bluebeam where you can project images in the sky. Sightings of the ISS from amateur telescopes look oddly holographic. The line of satellites everyone thinks is starlink could be any of these options.

2
YuuugeAsshoe 2 points ago +3 / -1

Eh I got a rich grandma who wants to donate and I realized I didn't know any charities I was confident in. Just curious what people would suggest.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well there are no flat earth atheists from what I've seen, you have to throw out big bang and evolution. You no longer have to live as some insignificant cosmic accident that evolved from bacteria.

Also zero flat earthers got the fauci ouchy, so there is that. The cabal would have zero control over the world population if enough people realized they lied to us about everything and we are actually the center of God's creation.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›