Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
Satellites orbiting in a vacuum don't exist. This is how communication actually occurs across our flat domed earth. (www.bitchute.com)
posted 2 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe 2 years ago by YuuugeAsshoe +9 / -4
36 comments share
36 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Do you draw any conclusions or speculation from this?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

I have long wondered how they managed to stretch communications cables across the entire Atlantic or Pacific ocean.

I cannot say I know much about it. Just shared some of what I researched.

It would be interesting to find what percentage of internet traffic and communications occurs via these oceanic cables versus satellites.

I'm not convinced of flat earth theory or the dome, but I find these theories interesting at least. One thing that boggles my mind is that the earth and moon are supposedly both spinning, and the moon spinning around the earth, but we are to believe that they spin at some kind of absolutely perfect rate to guarantee we only ever see one side of the moon? That right there seems bogus to me.

I wonder if we could zoom in on sun and see if we are only seeing one side of the sun. perhaps by analyzing these "sunspots" and trying to identify patterns.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– savman 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

oceanic cables versus satellites.

Jesus christ, you guys are fucking dumb. Have you no comprehension of how slow satellite internet is? Have you not researched the COST and the SPEED????

99.999% of all communications are using undersea cables because it's a fraction of the cost of launching and maintaining a satalight.

Fuck, you guys are beyond pathetic. Just lazy dolts who don't know shit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Ya so why do you think satellites exist?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– savman -1 points 2 years ago +2 / -3

They don't. Everything is just a simulation and fake, just like your gay brain.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Lasereyes -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

to fool normie tards

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– YuuugeAsshoe [S] 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

One thing the video mentions that coincides with flat earth but is not overtly stated; the sea cables are layed out in a way that makes more sense on a flat earth map than on a globe. Notice the FE sea cable map in the video. For instance, there are no cables that run from Australia to South America because they are on opposite ends of the plane. Instead they are routed from Australia to West coast USA to South America. Also this video states that 99% of intercontinental communication takes place through these cables, and I've heard similar figures from other sources. Orbiting Satellites are completely unnecessary for our world wide network. Also a flat earth with a dome explains how radio frequencies can be transmitted from USA to AU, which should be inconceivable on a globe as the radio waves would have to bouce between the surface and the ionosphere many times to make it around the sphere.

Ya as a flat earther it's impossible to say what the sun and moon exactly are. I find it much easier to point out what they aren't. Perhaps if we had Nasa's budget we could get more difinitive answers lmao.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy