0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +6 / -6

Ironic you say flat earthers speak like leftists when many in this community want them censored and banned, which is a unanimous quality of the left.

3
YuuugeAsshoe 3 points ago +5 / -2

Treating content differently in any way is censorship, there are degrees. If you search fe on youtube all the top results are debunkers and fags like professor Dave.

With the 2nd video I've been following that guy Terry for years. He's on his 3rd channel as far as I know. Why the heck did he get banned if it's just a silly theory. He doesn't cuss or have any sexual content, it's super PG

-1
YuuugeAsshoe -1 points ago +4 / -5

Straight out of the horse's mouth, proof FE is algorithmicly censored: https://youtu.be/9uJX6Gv8XrM

Also, this is constantly happening to pro FE content creators (account bans, or loss of access). https://youtu.be/BCZUNNC_LzQ

13
YuuugeAsshoe 13 points ago +23 / -10

That absolutely fits the definition of censorship. Content of any other topic would be governed by upvotes/downvotes/comments, not so with FE.

7
YuuugeAsshoe 7 points ago +8 / -1

Ya lets say the FE crowed got it all wrong and the earth is what NASA says it is... imagine trying to keep a nation of obedient sheep with a growing number who won't even trust the government on the shape of the earth. Even if you think FE is retarded, people should at least appreciate that FE's are impossible for the NWO to govern. I have never heard of a single FE who took the covid shot for example, and they all understand what the federal reserves actual purpose is. Once you begin censoring it never stops. Sounds like I'm preaching to the choir though.

12
YuuugeAsshoe 12 points ago +20 / -8

Nay

Can't say I wasn't expecting FE to get censored, as it does all over the net. Although I am surprised you are taking it to a vote (hopefully with no bot accounts.) Thanks to all the feds or their associates who provided a relatively uncensored forum (honeypot) up to this point. Anyone who votes yay is no better than the NPC authoritarian left. The conciquence of free speech is sometimes you have to hear a lot of shit you dont like, but its better than being told what is OK. Have fun living in your sci-fi universe.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who knows for sure if it was shot with a missle or self detonated. The only thing I am sure of is whatever story we get will be a lie, and orbiting Satellites in a vacuum don't exist. It seems like the story isn't staying consistent.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of the public won't investigate any conspiracy theories. However, there are millions who will. Satellites on balloons are one of the many things that got me to investigate the moonlandings, ISS, and NASA. These balloons are spotted constantly, they malfunction and decend in areas they will be noticed by the public. And they are also spotted at night when passing in front of the moon (from the observers perspective).

Yea the media will often ignore stories they don't want talked about, and let them die within 1 news cycle. But they constantly offer establishment explanations on just about any slightly conspiratorial subject we can talk about.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

The public was spotting and recording the balloon anyway, they had to act and form our perception. We all have an idea of what satellites supposedly look like from cgi images and movies. So when people saw what looks like s satellite hanging from a balloon they had to come up with a stupid Chinese cover story. In addition people are more likely to trust their government if they see external threats like China or Russia.

0
YuuugeAsshoe 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why would China be interested in any sort of old school warfare when their 5th gen warfare had been far more effective? The 20 million it took to build that satellite balloon could have been spent on paying off our politicians or military contractors for far more gain than a stupid balloon can get. This is clearly a cover story, but for what is the question? Personally I think they are trying to hide the fact orbiting Satellites don't exist.

Also why did they just change the wiki of the F22 from a ceiling height of 65000ft to 50000ft? The video gives a pretty good reason.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol OK, the media is totally right, it's a Chinese spy balloon. And we had to blow it up rather than study it's components and capability.

-2
YuuugeAsshoe -2 points ago +1 / -3

For sure. Hope he's getting paid to be such an establishment cuck

-2
YuuugeAsshoe -2 points ago +1 / -3

That guy takes positions the establishment would want you to parrot, 100% of the time.

4
YuuugeAsshoe 4 points ago +4 / -0

I bet you thought the video of that tesla in orbit was real.

4
YuuugeAsshoe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Satellites that orbit in a void don't exist. The only thing similar to that are helium balloon satellites. They don't want the public to figure out our concept of space, and space travel is fake. When these balloon satellites get spotted because they decend in the wrong area they have to come up with a BS cover story. "It's a Chinese spy balloon!" I ask you why would China need a balloon to spy if they have satellites in orbit?

https://youtu.be/ZgcT_aSXFXM

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a flat, domed earth was created by aliens, or its actually a digital simulation, then who created those creators? All you are doing is trying to make creation more remote, just like the big bang theory.

You are right, it wouldn't prove the specific God I believe in. But it would make atheism ridiculous. And if you can't see how a flat, domed earth would eliminate big bang, relativity, and evolution then I think you are one of the few people in the world who would see it that way.

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, they get spotted when they cross in front of the moon or when they malfunction and decend in the wrong area. You know, I've never seen you take a stance that doesn't align with the establishment which is odd for a conspiracy forum.

https://youtu.be/ZgcT_aSXFXM

1
YuuugeAsshoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Elon has expressed his interests in using Twitter to form a system like the Chinese app Huawei. Which is basically a do everything in one app for payments, social media, news, ID etc... I don't know if elon drinks adrenochrome like many elites but his mother was an overt luciferian. Twitter has barely rolled back on its censorship and I think that is only temporary.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›