1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +2 / -1

You are a liar. You know that you are. No point pretending to be all upset about it.

0
Xaviermgk 0 points ago +2 / -2

Saying "I dare you" to me is malicious.

You crimped my "free speech" with a threat.

Some "free speech ethos".

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +2 / -1

You are even LYING about calling me a liar.

WOW

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is nice rhetoric and all, so that's why I was banned for over a month by Axo and threatened with banning by you, along with you calling me a liar, multiple times.

Ah yes, that free speech ethos.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +2 / -1

Here's what Clem said to me before:

Me: it's Clem banning people that talk about specific shills, especially if they make a post about it.

clemaneuverers: Explain this vague quote in more detail, I dare you.

Why is a mod threatening me?

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL, you get downvoted for saying fuck the rules.

Hilarious.

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +3 / -1

Clem said someone "vouched" for Tallestskil, and he's bulletproof since.

Amazing.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +2 / -1

Go ahead, talk to the mods like you love to do to others.

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

So, when you called me a liar multiple times, I won.

Cool.

Thanks for your input.

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps I should all find a better place than this then.

Shit, PMs aren't even private, and they make no illusion about it.

Mods don't care to know or divulge who actually owns it. Mod has called me a LIAR multiple times (for telling the truth), and PutinLovesCats even disappeared just after he talked to the current mod about my "lying". It's all in their comment histories. Mods threatened me with banning for talking about shills.

Should I go on?

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt anyone was 'silenced' for disagreement.

I gave an example in the thread. Guy made a second account and then really got canned quick (mocking the mods is a no-no but the plebs can be mocked relentlessly). Questionable followed me from thread to thread mocking me, for days. I don't care. But if he did that to a mod...gone in a second.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

ka-ching

kachinka

From one doll to the next. I guess the other is a toy more than a doll.

Ever see the old Mark Twain claymation film? They had a part with kachinkas that was pretty cool.

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

They sure seem to babysit certain things though. That's the point. It's not about me, ya know?

3
Xaviermgk 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think chess is overblown I bit.

Also, it seems like it was actually India...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturanga

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Manly was 33 degree freemasons. he did a great job,

Ok, sure. But you don't know what he did in secret. And therein lies the inherent issue. And Hall wasn't avoiding torture from the Catholic Church. Neither was Washington.

yet freemasons have been always evil?

Pretty much, yeah.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

glorian.org

Yeah, not my cup of tea. I tend to avoid websites based on one dude. I've literally talked to Lilith. I could probably teach them some things.

I've also been around a long time, so I've seen a majority of that stuff in other contexts as well.

Yeah, like in one passage on ETs on the site, they talk about how fearless Columbus was, but people had traveled to America well before him. Like many thousand years before him.

I also like to research things more spontaneously. Like I don't deny that there is validity to astrology, tarot, even "sex magic" which isn't really magic. Most of that stuff is actually just dogma.

3
Xaviermgk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Man, no joke, one of my coworkers made a calligraphic wall hanging of Jung's name.

I'm like...I don't think you know the full story of that dude.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also they were celibates, this is what the apron originally represented to begin with.

I don't think that is the case at all. I mean them being celibates.

And just because Manly P Hall wrote stuff, that doesn't absolve Washington or clear his name. They keep secrets for a reason. It's not rocket science.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

why did they give to americans guns then? slaves can't own guns, free man can.

Because they know that even with a public that has guns, they have superior organization.

It's quite an illusory "freedom". Meanwhile, their "freedom" is complete lawlessness. Hunter Biden et al.

4
Xaviermgk 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, those 55,000 are probably airport terminals, train stations, and people in comas at hospitals.

That'd be my guess.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, but did Jesus himself carry a sword? No, he had a "sword of iron" that came out of his mouth. Not everyone is fit to fight, Jesus included.

But I do NOT agree that there were dark forces in Jesus' time, dark forces now, but Washington and other MASONS kept the darkness at bay.

Don't believe that for a second, and there is plenty of evidence to the contrary.

That's why there was an Anti-Masonic Party in the U.S. Actually the first "third party" in American politics.

2
Xaviermgk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like a Weeble Wobble.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Washington believed that you should avoid dogma, but he was a Mason?

Those two completely clash.

He's a liar and a fake.

1
Xaviermgk 1 point ago +1 / -0

USE THE FUCKING SWORD TO DECAPITATE THE SATANISTS WHO RAPE KIDS THAT TOOK OVER THE WESTERN GOVERNMENTS

So Washington decapitated Satanists back in the day?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›