That's a much better find, straight from the horses mouth. And yet take a look at these MSM gas lighting articles that normie sent me. How do they think they can get away with this.
https://www.goodrx.com/health-topic/vaccines/are-mrna-vaccines-gene-therapy
https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk/blog/why-mrna-vaccines-arent-gene-therapies/
For the record here are all the shit tier normie articles denying reality. I marvel at the gas lighting.
https://www.goodrx.com/health-topic/vaccines/are-mrna-vaccines-gene-therapy
https://www.genomicseducation.hee.nhs.uk/blog/why-mrna-vaccines-arent-gene-therapies/
you could take a wild live virus and purposefully refine it and then infect someone with it and this would be gene therapy, depending on the type of virus
In that case you're just giving someone immunity to the virus they were infected with. So that is natural immunity, not gene therapy. What you are proposing is a perversion of language, because a "therapy" can't be the disease causing agent itself.
It sounds like you are trying to minimize the seriousness of man-made DNA manipulation.
Man made injections of modified viral vectors and mRNA pose very unique risks. Normally adenovirus vectors enter through the respiratory tract, injection bypasses all that. These therapies are also specially designed to bypass cell defenses once inside the body. So this isn't the same as normal exposure to virus particles.
And that is not even mentioning the toxicity of the genetic payload the virus was artificially engineered to have.
Only if they are* genetically engineered by man.
Thanks, it is good to get positive feedback on this website once in a while.
I studied biochemistry once upon a time so I'm able to get a little more in depth on this stuff (though I don't claim to be "an expert" in it).
He is checking all the shill boxes
There was a Swedish paper showing mRNA was incorporated into the genome of liver cells last (or maybe this) year. But the papers I cited are before most were aware of that possibility.
The point I was making originally to this vaxtard is that they called this gene therapy whether it edited genes or not.
Not a smart move by Kanye, assuming this is the real deal.
Keep muddying the waters. I hope they double jabbed you before this assignment so you won't bother us for long. Get right with God before the VAIDS sets in.
So why were the OG expansionists complaining about a 15% increase in the German empire.
Who said GB being wrong makes Germany right?
At the end of the war, Russia controlled Poland. Patton pointed out that they could drive the Communists out of Poland.
Hitler gave USSR half of Poland in his invasion. But you forgive him for that an not the allies? They are both wrong to have done that. So your argument is simultaneously "fuck Poland" and "US didn't treat Poland well enough".
Hitler wanted Poland. Russia ended up with Poland
Hitler gave half of Poland to USSR. You keep ignoring that.
Also worth noting, those papers all mention the terrible safety record with adenovirus vector gene therapy.
I'm Christian and therefore not racist you dumb fed.
politically incorrect.
You're making the NSA about race when the tyranny from the federal government has little to do with race. Your fellow whites are selling you down the river in the NSA and FBI.
Introducing racism into it is fed like behavior.
So anytime you get challenged on your bullshit you run away (or tell me to, same thing)?
Everything I said was factual and it sounds like you can't challenge it.
I think a lot of the racist posts are feds trying to discredit this website.
Why do you post from a known disinfo rag? You only give newspunch more credibility by using them.
Did any of that show up at (((Nuremberg)))?
It shouldn't matter to Nazis though. Hitler thought that might makes right, and was into Darwinian survival of the fittest. Therefore according to him it is right that Germany got pwned by another stronger group.
This was a tragic tale of what idolatry and trusting in man's wisdom over God can do. Germany was judged for it. USSR was judged for it. Now we are seeing USA under judgement. Everyone gets their turn.
What a load of horseshit. For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). You have to be ignorant of history to think only Jewish governments are mass murderers.
As for Hitler what I said is correct. Even without the story of gas chambers, Hitler killed many people by putting them into forced labor camps against their wills in order to feed his war machine. That decision put them into peril where many died.
Moreover Hitler decided to invade Poland. Germany being "provoked" does not remove German agency. You cannot force Germany to make a pact with the Soviets to crack Poland in half, they did so because Hitler thought they could get away with it and he was impatient to solve this territorial dispute.
That gamble that Hitler took not only directly murdered Poles, it led to the deaths of millions of his own people when they lost the war that he foolishly dragged them into.
I would never trust a Hollywood dramatization of such an important event. It is like people getting your War On Terror history from Zero Dark Thirty.
I don't trust any of these mfers. They are all playing us.
Lady Gaga deliberately covered her eye when someone said "oh my God". When you know you know.
"The forced labor camps were fantastic. Best slavery I ever experienced" --prisoner of war
"The Blitzkrieg was great, 10/10. Soviets put us under an iron curtain but would do again" -- Polish resident.
"Our country was completed decimated after the war. Would have been nice if Hitler just let Danzig be instead of risk World War II" -- German resident
It's really going to blow your mind when you find out both funny mustached men killed a lot of people. It is turns out mass murder is characteristic of totalitarian governments.
Thanks, yes I am in good faith and sharing my honest thoughts from a Christian perspective. I know lies were told about Germany, and we weren't told the whole truth. But at the end of the day, I see the dark side of what Germany became and I see the parallels to other modern totalitarian regimes. I'm trying to bring a balanced perspective.
I find it interesting to see the evil of the allied side we were never told, but I've come back from taking the perspective of "well that must mean the other side was the good guys". There isn't always a good guy, especially not by my particular standards (someone who supports limited government and freedom).