"What Is Actually Going on in North Carolina? (Part 1)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XlLjFMXTKY
It's a simple formula.
Step 1) Steer and intensify a storm over an area not ready for it.
Step 2) Delay response and ensure max casualties
Step 3) Claim funds are running low for FEMA because hurricane frequency keeps increasing.
Step 4) Blame Climate Change (the magic CO2 molecule).
Step 5) More "Green" bullshit.
edit: Another video where local says they ran out of body bags in his area. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOJvrghIfZk
It turns out not only was it a badly written paper but they failed to provide controls for the most important portion of the study.
I didn't pick up on this at first since the first two sections mentioned controls which made me think everything was on the up and up. This is wrong.
To not have controls for the incubation period where they found the majority of their findings is beyond negligence. So something is up with these guys.
Still it doesn't mean that there isn't nanotech either. Just that these researchers seem to have made their study intentionally bad. Perhaps in order to be ridiculed later and debunked (psyop)? Now the shills are out there "debunking" it, I think all as planned.
That's what they tell us. Light can travel through a vacuum with nothing in it. And maybe so but what is the evidence?
So I looked up the best vacuum on planet Earth. It contains 2.5 million molecules of air per cubic cm. This is said to replicate conditions between stars. So how then can we say we've ever tested light waves going through "nothing". We haven't.
To test the validity of my suspicions I've asked the science guys on reddit if they have an answer for this. The first few responses have already been hostile and that usually indicates this is one of those issues they simply don't have a good answer for. I was very polite in my question btw, so no I didn't provoke anybody, this is all on them.
We'll see how it goes. I'm open to a good explanation of why this is a valid test, but this light has 2 million molecules to interact with ever cubic cm it propagates, so you didn't rule out matter.
Einstein told us that the speed of light must always, not only appear, but BE the same in every frame of reference no matter how fast we are moving towards or away from it. So even if you are moving at half the speed of light towards a light beam, the entire universe must conspire to either "speed up" or slow down your "time" to account for this difference.
If that makes sense to you, you are no longer sane. You cannot create scenarios of two mutually exclusive events at the same time and call that reality. This is fundamental to reason.
To show this contradiction, consider you are running away from a light beam and towards another at the same time. You move at half the speed of light. Of course in real life you will encounter the light you are moving towards first, but in Einstein's universe both beams MUST (in your world) hit you at the same time. However, in Einstein's universe, someone else will see them hit you at different times because they also MUST see light travel at a certain speed. This is just plain fucking stupid.
At best you can have an illusory effect, but to confuse that with a real difference in simultaneity is to truly give up on reason itself.
