The truth is being introduced in a way people can start to digest. Matthew's video on ZOG is the kind of video mainstream would never touch 10 years ago.
It's alright to appreciate a victory once in a while. I see God moving here to reveal truth in a big way.
The psyop continues.
Tonight we have a conversation with documentary filmmaker Matthew Tower, the creator of Israel’s Second 9/11: How Zionism Conquered JFK, America & Palestine. Watch the documentary here: https://truthtower.com/ Follow Matthew on X here: https://x.com/TruthTowerPod
That documentary has some pretty good info. https://rumble.com/v4n9nmk-israels-second-911-how-zionism-conquered-jfk-america-and-palestine.html
So I'm very surprised a "centrist" publication is covering it. Bravo though.
No shit.
So you agree with my stance and have nothing to argue about.
Most people delivering this line equate remaining neutral with "worshipping Putin". You're no different.
I made it clear in my satirical post what I equate it too. Go froth and spittle elsewhere.
That's a false dichotomy you proposed, not me.
You can think Zelensky is a loser puppet and realize that Putin isn't fighting the Rothschilds/WEF/etc.
Precisely. I'm glad to see someone else who sees this for what it is. Seeing the truth is the first step to any meaningful progress in science.
I wonder what would happen if more believers came together to advance physics in the absence of arrogant atheists and the Synagogue of Satan. Perhaps not sharing anything with those types at all.
So
-
He defines curved space (potentially) by acceleration of objects in that space. But that still brings us back to what is space and what is curving? What is acting on what and how?
-
His other (potential) definition for curved space is pure mathematics, treating everything as a vector in a coordinate system. Well that is just math and not a physical model. In a proper physical model an object needs to be acted upon by something in some way.
His definition of space are just some general characteristics of a mathematical coordinate system. So just more math and nothing physical.
I decided to ask physicists on reddit again and here is the best they've come up with so far. It still defines spacetime as a mathematical fantasy land and not a physical model.
[QUOTE] "What then does that space curvature physically mean for space in that box?"
There are two main interpretations of curvature:
1- Geodesic deviation: usually, we expect that objects with zero acceleration are in uniform, rectilinear motion with respect to one another. This is not the case in curved spacetimes. Curvature tells us precisely how they are accelerating with respect to one another.
(We have to be careful with the meaning of "acceleration", but this is the gist of the idea).
One of the key insights during the development of General Relativity was that free falling objects can accelerate with respect to one another when the gravitational field is non-uniform. We call this effect tidal acceleration. So, if we wish to interpret free fall as inertial motion, we better have a way to make inertial objects "accelerate" with respect to one another.
Anyways, this leads to a beautiful correspondence between curvature and tidal effects.
2- Parallel transport around a closed loop (have a look at the geometric meaning section): suppose we pick an arrow and start moving around with it, doing our best not to deform nor to change its direction. Eventually, we go back to our starting point. By how much would our vector have changed?
We expect that it wouldn't have changed at all. And we would be right if spacetime were flat. In curved spacetimes, though, our arrow might change. Once again, curvature tells us precisely how it changes.
what do we mean by "space" anyway?
In the context of General Relativity, spacetime is a structure with three main aspects:
1- A manifold structure: we are able to map events via coordinate charts, just like a cartographer maps places on the surface of our planet.
2- It has a metric structure: we are able to measure lengths and time intervals.
3- It has an affine structure: we can tell by how much vectors change from one point to another.
If we are able to slice spacetime in a very specific way, we can call these slices "space".
And since this is relativity, I'd also ask the question "what is it straight or curved relative to exactly?"
Not everything in Relativity is frame dependent. An essential part of the theory is to explain which things are not coordinate dependent. Besides, something may be "relative" in a trivial sense: it is defined in a coordinate dependent manner, but it has the same values in arbitrary coordinate systems.
[END QUOTE]
Or the wignats on this sub are also feds supporting their fellow agents.
No quantum effects isnt the same as "space" travel, but they all kinda work the same.
Using quantum mechanics to defend relativity seems like a non-sequitur. Relativity has never been unified with quantum theory.
Math can even describe...Why would it be fake for the observable universe
There is more to physics than just math. Physics has physical concepts and models which can either be logically consistent or inconsistent. However even looking at pure mathematics, mathematician Stephan Crothers rips General Relativity to pieces from that perspective.
If you try to pin them down on that, eventually they will say "well the math works so the theory is true".
those who look at scientism ("Trust the Science, chud") for all the answers could believe this idiocy.
That is almost every modern physicist today. It's like covid and climate change. Question relativity and the NPC lynch mob forms pretty quickly.
Perhaps all part of the strong delusion.
The last 6 minutes talk about a fictional "black hole".
Space and time are supposedly so "curved" within it, that nothing escapes. That's undefined nonsense because these are terms with no physical understandings attached to them.
Someone first needs to define what a "non-curved" space physically is and what a "curved" space is. What are their properties? What are the forces it exerts on an object and why? Why does a non-curved space seem to exert no forced on anything, but a "curved" space does? How does it exert a force on both light and matter? If a weight is put on a spring, how does "curved" space make the apple push down the spring?
And once again, time can't "point" to the center of a blackhole because in GR the "time" axis is orthogonal to space. It doesn't point AT individual objects within space.
Just watch the first 6 minutes of the video.
This is one of many attempted explanations for near Earth gravity using General Relativity. Relativists can't agree on this because none of their explanations make any sense.
"The apple falls because it's future points downwards"
Not even remotely possible, since even in relativity time is not a spacial dimension so it cannot point something "downwards" or at an object in space. That's beyond stupid stacked on top of an already stupid model of reality.
Ok, well to start in the first minute, a plan to reintegrate 3.3 million Jews to Poland sounds absurd and not real.
People are giggling from the start making me think this is some mock meeting. No name of the meeting, or the group are given.
There is clearly more going on and someone is trying to spin this.
Can I get a shred of evidence TikTok spied on anyone, outside of RINO talking points?
Sounds like you're just supporting ZOG censorship of TikTok.
The original Protocols reads like satire created by a critic of Jews. It may be accurate as to their plans but it doesn't read like actual notes of a meeting.
Anyway I don't want to install telegram to view this info, I'm lazy and I know Jews are bad (in general).
Here's how I never fell into that cult. I looked into Trump and saw he was in bed with the Synagogue of Satan. End of story.
So from one form of idolatry to another. How unfortunate.
I don't idolize man my confused hypocrite friend. I recognize that what God has given us is far better than being a base low IQ animal. It's called gratitude.
What you support is degeneration (at least in theory, because in practice you keep enjoying the fruits of being human).
You say, as you still type away on that keyboard :)
But no, even for the "king of the jungle" it's quite a rough merciless life when you get old and the pack discards you and shows it never loved you. And, no, you aren't even close to choosing a truly wild animal life and you never will. You simply idolize nature.
Enjoy a short brutish life where it is kill or be killed all the time then.
Oh wait you won't do that because you're enjoying the comforts that not being a base animal gives you. Actions speak louder than words.
Vulgar, perverse, childish, but hey he must be "based" since he's being cartoonishly racist right? -- Average wignat.
IMHO