The number of times you've heard an argument is IRRELEVANT to its truth value. You've done nothing but regurgitate layman-tier armchair atheist rhetoric. The idea that you can derive logic and reasoning from chaos and the fact that you moderated an atheist vs religion group but don't understand that science is based on philosophical axioms that cannot be proven by evidence based means doesn't make any sense. You're making self refuting arguments and it doesn't bother you. That means you've got faith in the scientific method. Moreover, you should know that an appeal to absurdity is logically fallacious and shouldn't be the basis of your belief system. I hope you open your eyes while you still can, fren.
You're a butthurt fagtard, aren't you?
Ok Glowfaggot.
You glow brighter, shitbag. 😆
Says the dickless fedfag.
Cry more, piss drinking pedilophile scum ...
Goofy ass low iq pedo scum, facts change all the time. Especially scientific fact. Science does contain much apodotic truth.
Your opinion that someone alerted human chromosomes is useless in the discussion of if there's an uncaused creator.
Science is a cult.
None of the sciencetards get this.
Who created aliens?
Wow. You didn't even TRY to answer any of my questions. It's like you tried to memory hole them like the media does with inconvenient stories because they were too much to handle. Are you acknowledging that your beliefs require some faith, just like religion does? 🤔 Also, you use the term faith as if it's a pejorative, but you have FAITH in the scientific method (scientism), and you have FAITH in your senses being able up perceive reality. The difference is that people who acknowledge God don't deny that faith is one of the components of their belief.
There is no truth without God. Everything you just said is based on faith. You don't have a deep philosophical understanding of the words you're using.
How do know that evidence is how you determine truth? How do you know that science can determine truth? You have FAITH it does. The scientific method CANNOT be proven VIA the scientific method. You have to BELIEVE/HAVE FAITH that it does, because there's no way to verify it.
Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. This is a common philosophical problem that arises when discussing positivism and empiricism.
Science deals with very few apoditic statements. It is all TENTATIVE based on newer information, thus all current science is JUST the most commonly agreed upon beliefs. 200 years from now, all modern science could be obsolete (false).
If there is no Sentient Creator who designed and structured the universe, then it follows that "truth" as you perceive it is just your brain's random chemical reactions pretending to know what is real and what isn't. You can't even give me evidence that YOU EXIST and that I'm not talking to a bot or to a figment of your imagination without God. Without Intelligent Design (God), nothing is knowable.
And that's why they're miserable and feel empty inside. They cut themselves off from God. The fruits of atheism are rotten.
You love playing pretend. You're pretending that humans have no intrinsic value or purpose. You're pretending that God doesn't exist. You're pretending that the faith known as science has done away with God.
Yes, atheism is illogical.
Both of you believe in some batshit crazy pseudoscience. Reminds me of the tinfoil on the above abovetopsecret forum years ago.
Strawman fallacy. Your "muh joos" khazarian bullshit got called out. Deal with it.
Micro evolution is real. Macro evolution is a lie.
Sci-fi meets tinfoil antisemitism.
No. Secularism destroyed America.
That's not what God means. God = uncreated Creator.
Atheists just hate God because of how they look, their lot in life, their desire to live a perverted life, or because their family sucks. They have no objective basis for human rights or morality. An atheist is literally saying his life has no objective, intrinsic meaning, therefore the atheist is declaring that he is objectively worthless and that his life is insignificant.
It should have been more specific about gun rights.
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theepochtimes.com%2F94-percent-of-medication-not-supported-by-high-quality-evidence-harms-underreported-study_4541149.html