The number of times you've heard an argument is IRRELEVANT to its truth value. You've done nothing but regurgitate layman-tier armchair atheist rhetoric. The idea that you can derive logic and reasoning from chaos and the fact that you moderated an atheist vs religion group but don't understand that science is based on philosophical axioms that cannot be proven by evidence based means doesn't make any sense. You're making self refuting arguments and it doesn't bother you. That means you've got faith in the scientific method. Moreover, you should know that an appeal to absurdity is logically fallacious and shouldn't be the basis of your belief system. I hope you open your eyes while you still can, fren.
The number of times you've heard an argument is IRRELEVANT to its truth value. You've done nothing but regurgitate layman-tier armchair atheist rhetoric. The idea that you can derive logic and reasoning from chaos and the fact that you moderated an atheist vs religion group but don't understand that science is based on philosophical axioms that cannot be proven by evidence based means doesn't make any sense. You're making self refuting arguments and it doesn't bother you. That means you've got faith in the scientific method. Moreover, you should know that an appeal to absurdity is logically fallacious and shouldn't be the basis of your belief system. I hope you open your eyes while you still can, fren.