Atheists just hate God because of how they look, their lot in life, their desire to live a perverted life, or because their family sucks. They have no objective basis for human rights or morality. An atheist is literally saying his life has no objective, intrinsic meaning, therefore the atheist is declaring that he is objectively worthless and that his life is insignificant.
There is no truth without God. Everything you just said is based on faith. You don't have a deep philosophical understanding of the words you're using.
How do know that evidence is how you determine truth? How do you know that science can determine truth? You have FAITH it does. The scientific method CANNOT be proven VIA the scientific method. You have to BELIEVE/HAVE FAITH that it does, because there's no way to verify it.
Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. This is a common philosophical problem that arises when discussing positivism and empiricism.
Science deals with very few apoditic statements. It is all TENTATIVE based on newer information, thus all current science is JUST the most commonly agreed upon beliefs. 200 years from now, all modern science could be obsolete (false).
If there is no Sentient Creator who designed and structured the universe, then it follows that "truth"
as you perceive it is just your brain's random chemical reactions pretending to know what is real and what isn't. You can't even give me evidence that YOU EXIST and that I'm not talking to a bot or to a figment of your imagination without God. Without Intelligent Design (God), nothing is knowable.
Atheists just hate God because of how they look, their lot in life, their desire to live a perverted life, or because their family sucks. They have no objective basis for human rights or morality. An atheist is literally saying his life has no objective, intrinsic meaning, therefore the atheist is declaring that he is objectively worthless and that his life is insignificant.
There seems to be some logical error there. Par for the course though.
Yes, atheism is illogical.
Not believing in something until there's evidence it's real is absolutely logical. Remember, the truth gives no shits about your feelings.
There is no truth without God. Everything you just said is based on faith. You don't have a deep philosophical understanding of the words you're using.
How do know that evidence is how you determine truth? How do you know that science can determine truth? You have FAITH it does. The scientific method CANNOT be proven VIA the scientific method. You have to BELIEVE/HAVE FAITH that it does, because there's no way to verify it.
Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. This is a common philosophical problem that arises when discussing positivism and empiricism.
Science deals with very few apoditic statements. It is all TENTATIVE based on newer information, thus all current science is JUST the most commonly agreed upon beliefs. 200 years from now, all modern science could be obsolete (false).
If there is no Sentient Creator who designed and structured the universe, then it follows that "truth" as you perceive it is just your brain's random chemical reactions pretending to know what is real and what isn't. You can't even give me evidence that YOU EXIST and that I'm not talking to a bot or to a figment of your imagination without God. Without Intelligent Design (God), nothing is knowable.