Certainly they should. However if you read the thread and not just the link there is a rationale as to why BTC will be Epsteined.
They do not want to have alternatives. I mean why should they give you alternative to the CBDC?
Just answer me this please...
The crash came early in 1637, when doubts arose as to whether prices would continue to increase. Almost overnight the price structure for tulips collapsed
So, we must keep the BTC frenzy going until we get out safe!
Two more weeks please
DISCLAIMER: I hold 25% of my entire funds in digital assets such as BTC, ETH and other shit coins !
So, I am not against them. I just realise that I've been played. Again!
Please give me some hopium with a solid argument and I can send you some LUNC
Thank you. You can see the conundrums.
So let us examine what you said and try predicting what is likely to happen.
official exchanges aren't that important as long as cash is still being used
if people are willing to barter for bitcoin>
Bitcoin (or gold) and cash/fiat/ government issued currency are intimately connected.
Even though I appreciate BTC's lofty intentions (if we assume it was not a CIA psyop to lure the plebs into digital currencies) the fact of the matter is that unless you have a community that will be able to provide all essential to survival services (rent, buying land and therefore shelter, electricty, water, food etc basically mazlov's pyramid) by exchanging BTC then all TPTB need to do is ban the conversion to CBDC or fiat (electronic money as it is now called in regulatory terms).
bartering may only happen to a self sufficiient autonomous community or zone.
But if someone reaches that sort of sufficiency development why even use bitcoin? Why not use orange peeps? is it because there are unlimited orange peeps? well orange peeps can only be produced with proof of work and there are limited orange trees within your limited autonomous zone. So...
It is rather simple.
I feel people are hypnotised by cryptochADS.
I never said the Internet will go down or the networks will be banned, shut down or destroyed.
I never said that the exchanges be centralised or decentralised will cease to exist.
I never said that peer to peer swap of these digital assets will be banned.
I never said that fiat or CBDC is good and prefereable.
All I said is that there will be NOWHERE where the swap of these digital assets to fiat or CBDB will be permitted.
NOWHERE!
Your arguments please.
NO.
You are all missing the point.
I am not saying that the network will go down.
The network can continue ad infinitum.
Peer to peer exchange of BTC can continue ad infinitum.
So what, if you cannot convert it to fiat or CBDC?
Example...you have 100 beans. I and 29 friends keep exchanging the beans. They are good and great beans. No one else knows that we are doing this.
We value one bean $16,000.
However, noone else in this planet (except the 30 of us) likes to do anything with these beans.
Noone is stopping us for swapping our beans, lending it to each other or do whatever with it. However, we have to pay the bills, buy food, pay gas, and the Internet bill and none of these idiots want to accept our beans. All these idiots (except us 30) like to play with some idiotic form of currency called CBDC.
Your arguments please...
"believe"
"think"