▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I very much appreciate your well thought out response and I also want to make it clear that I appreciate your research and contributions. The only thing I am asking everyone in this forum is to treat eachother better, rule 1 is simple tho not easy. We should be able to find some kind of common ground and agree to disagree at an impasse, there is no need to resort to our baser instincts of attacking people instead of arguments. Do you agree?

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your contributions as a whole are well appreciated, the infighting being done between any one here is unnecessary, wouldn't you agree that it divides and keeps up distractions from greater issues at play?

Let me know if I'm being unreasonable.

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

That quote has been asked to be edited, or it'll be removed shortly, as will your meta, call out comments, we're not doing that here anymore. There are 3 simple rules here to prevent community break down and it's not too much to ask everyone.

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was already handling the meta call-outedness of this comment. You breaking rule 1 is not helpful, will you edit?

I'm talking to turtlebam to not be infighting too. (The 3 simple rules are here to prevent the breaking of community)

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree, his posts are not trivialities. Jews don't have a monopoly on corruption and evil, though there are some Jews and 'Jews' that are also involved.

I think infighting/meta stuff is counterproductive. Let's find where we have common ground and agree to disagree if need be.

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're right, I should have pruned better, fixed now, on both ends. Your infant remark was what I first removed and commented on. I appreciate both of yours help going forward. Edit: my apologies for my poor time management issues this last little while.

▲ 3 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was being silly with you, I'll delete

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't mind what was between me and him. Your comment was removed for attacking the user not the argument, maybe reread what I removed?

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was replying to me and I deleted my comment after he read it. The mod won't delete if you don't break the rules, so keep that in mind.

▲ 3 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Comment removed by user for being silly 🤪

▲ 3 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Removed for another rule 1 violation. Knock it off dude.

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

removed for rule 1. I know you know better

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hilarious!
We attack arguments here, not people.(rule 1)
If you have nothing to add as a refute, it is better to bow out and keep your integrity. I hope you'll do better going forward.

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Removed for rule 1: attack the argument, not the person
Can be approved upon edit

▲ 4 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good luck getting targeted by seething psychos and glowie feds who can't handle the Truth!

The rabbit hole goes deeper than that, fren 🕳️🐇

▲ 3 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'll second that I don't think Dr. Andreas Noack is controlled op but it is good to question things and people, praying to the Most High God who knows everything can also be very helpful :o)

▲ 2 ▼
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'll take your word for it, would probably push me over the edge of insanity and I'm standing too close as it is..

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›