1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said sauce, not “source”. Please tell me you know the difference.

PS, I (a random internet person) saw on CNN that we’re all getting 50K in stimulus and that they love Trump now.

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol...the entire ducking post is about Federal debt.

You look like an idiot already...but hey, keep spouting ??‍♂️

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ummm....what???

350 million people in the US

350 million x 3,000 = 1.05 Trillion.

35 Trillion divided by 350 million people is $100,000.00 each.

Keep in mind that’s ALL people in the US...not taxpayers.

Total taxpayers are 125,000,000, so that 35 Trillion means $280,000.00 per taxpayer.

You might want to reconsider your lack of concern....and I would be careful throwing around stuff like “Walmart economics degree” and “idiot”....just sayin’

3
TenDaysDark 3 points ago +3 / -0

He says with a comment devoid of punctuation ??‍♂️

I had typed those on separate lines. It’s not my fault the auto format here is fucking ghey

11
TenDaysDark 11 points ago +11 / -0

A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.

-Robert A. Heinlein

10
TenDaysDark 10 points ago +11 / -1

Weak men make for hard times

Hard times make for strong men

Strong men make for easy times

Easy times make for weak men (we’re here)

Weak men make for hard times (almost here)

Repeat.

4
TenDaysDark 4 points ago +4 / -0

That guy is a brilliant satirist, and is as based as they come. He’s a valuable asset

3
TenDaysDark 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ummmmm.....you know that they used Dominion, right? You know that the election was rigged, right? You know that the Military stepped in to remove an illegitimate government, right? You know that the military action is very widely supported by the citizens, right?

Just out of curiosity...are you a Biden supporter/think he should be in power?

2
TenDaysDark 2 points ago +2 / -0

‘Omega: The Unknown’ by Jonathan Lethem?

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your words:

“It's that in a vacuum, devoid of any matter or molecules, that roman candle has nothing to push against. It's like falling out of an airplane and trying to swim through the air to get to a lake (sort of a bad example because here we do have air resistance and it would work, but just to illustrate the idea.)”

Now go away.

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is. There are literally hundreds of examples of other people don’t no the same experiments. Their problem in that video was the type of ignition they were using...NASA doesn’t use hobby rocket hotwires run with a 9v battery.

And I didn’t “concede” anything..,I ignored it because it’s both a straw man and to one stupid to address.

You know what? Believe what you want.,,I sincerely don’t give a fuck. We’ll just laugh and shake our heads I guess. 4% are unsaveable after all.

Physics don’t care about your feelings son. ??‍♂️

Cya

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

It did sustain. There’s 2400 FPS video there...with the scale and everything....and “little bit of thrust”? That scale was in pounds genius...that’s a substantial amount of thrust ??‍♂️

And yeah, I directed you to something that suits your level of intellect. I mean come on, you’re actually arguing against not only me, but the most basic of the laws of physics.

You asked for an example, I gave you two that even the slowest kid in class cold understand...yet here we are.

You think you’re right? Take it up with Newton.

I’m out ??

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Last time: Rickets don’t need to “push” against anything. You’ve had multiple people tell you this, but you can’t/won’t wrap your head around it.

Rockets are a controlled explosion. Explosions release energy. All a rocket does is direct that energy in one direction. So yes, if such thing as an “atomless infinite vacuum” actually existed (it doesn’t), a rocket would still produce thrust.

In all sincerity, you need to crack a book...you are actually arguing that physics itself is incorrect.

Just. Stop.

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go ahead. You aren’t here to learn, nor consider you might not understand what you think you do..you’re here to argue. And the hilarious part is that you’re arguing against at least one scientist...it’s mind boggling. There’s been several people tell you what you’ve got wrong, but you’re absolutely certain you’re right.

I’m not part of some conspiracy designed to cover up space being fake...I’m sharing the benefit of my 12 years of university and 29 years of work in the field. What do you do? You know..,since you’re obviously smarter than anyone here ?

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +1 / -0

There’s no such thing as an “atomless infinite vacuum”...lol, where did you get that nonsense from??

And yes, pumping the air out of a chamber is, indeed, a vacuum...exactly the same as space. A vacuum is a vacuum....negative pressure means zero atmosphere ??‍♂️

Skip ahead to 12:08 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-BsrzO7aXNs

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +2 / -1

Newton’s third law does.

And you are an utter moron...I think that’s pretty clear.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GxBRQXxBRic&feature=youtu.be

1
TenDaysDark 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ummm....”anywhere else in nature”?

Where else, pray tell, do you propose a vacuum exists “in nature”?

Just because this is getting stupid, and people think rockets work like jet turbines/propellers...and have apparently skipped basic physics (It’s Newton’s law FFS):

Find a vacuum chamber, stick a bottle rocket inside with an electric igniter, and fire it. It’ll bounce around inside.

2
TenDaysDark 2 points ago +3 / -1

Wrong.

Sorry man, but you are out of your depth on this...inertial thrust doesn’t need an atmosphere.

Newton’s law applies in space as well.

view more: Next ›