Has someone a valid explanation for this?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Wrong.
Sorry man, but you are out of your depth on this...inertial thrust doesn’t need an atmosphere.
Newton’s law applies in space as well.
Inertial thrust is science fiction / prototype science- certainly not around in the 1960s. Are you sure I'm the one out of my depth?
And you're begging the question by saying Newton's lawS apply in space.
Newton’s third law does.
And you are an utter moron...I think that’s pretty clear.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GxBRQXxBRic&feature=youtu.be
You're a fucking moron if you think we've ever been to space. What a stooge.
I don't want to deport you but that way of speaking is now allowed here.
Go ahead. You aren’t here to learn, nor consider you might not understand what you think you do..you’re here to argue. And the hilarious part is that you’re arguing against at least one scientist...it’s mind boggling. There’s been several people tell you what you’ve got wrong, but you’re absolutely certain you’re right.
I’m not part of some conspiracy designed to cover up space being fake...I’m sharing the benefit of my 12 years of university and 29 years of work in the field. What do you do? You know..,since you’re obviously smarter than anyone here ?
Are you serious with this argument? Holy shit. This is not even remotely comparable.
Pumping air out is not the same as an ATOM-LESS INFINITE VACUUM. There are still particles inside that tube.
A tiny cylinder completely encapsulating the object is different from, again an INFINITE VACUUM
There’s no such thing as an “atomless infinite vacuum”...lol, where did you get that nonsense from??
And yes, pumping the air out of a chamber is, indeed, a vacuum...exactly the same as space. A vacuum is a vacuum....negative pressure means zero atmosphere ??♂️
Skip ahead to 12:08 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-BsrzO7aXNs