TL;DR: We’ll compare someone everyone is talking about, Peter Thiel, with someone no one is talking about, Sean Parker. This is basically a counter-intelligence analysis, featuring he of whom you’re not really supposed to be aware.

Advisory: If you are already satisfied that you know what the dealio is with all things Thiel, you will find nothing of value here. Reading further will only make you upset so, you know, that’ll be on you if it happens.

Peter Thiel and Palantir are the talk of the conspiracy town, fear-mongered and condemned in all corners of the conspir-o-sphere. Frankly, that alone should be enough to tell you that there’s no there there.

What do I have to say about Thiel and Palantir? Pretty much nothing. That’s exactly what I would have said before the Mighty Wurlitzer cranked up a few months ago to play us a tune, first about Thiel and now about Palantir. I had barely heard of Thiel before then, and I have almost no idea what Palantir does. Now they’re mentioned everywhere and I find it dismaying that no one finds this suspicious. But let me amplify on all this.

As to Thiel, in a minute I’ll link to a podcast that includes some alarming(!) remarks by him about the End Times. Or something like that, because I wasn’t listening closely. You see, if you want to hear some half-formed claptrap comments about the End Times or anything else, you can find about 200/day on r/conspiracy. The only reason you’re hearing Thiel’s comments is that they’re being pushed in your face while you’re being instructed on how alarming(!) they are.

Palantir is some kind of tech company, something to do with surveillance I think. You know who else had tech? The KGB, and the Cheka before them. Think of all the damage they did with their tech: filing cabinets, typewriters and bakelite phones. If only someone had sounded that alarm(!), huh?

The tech, in and of itself, is never the problem. I would guess that the most awake tovarishchi of the USSR would tell you that it was lack of awareness of the threat that was the problem. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said as much in one of his most famous quotes.

So “They” will push any manner of alarming(!) narrative at you, hoping you’ll buy into at least one or maybe just waste all your time carefully deciding which to pick. It’s as pointless as discussing the KGB’s typewriters. An important observation is that “Corona” (one of the most prominent brands of typewriter, children) means “crown”. Obviously referring to the British Royal family, which takes us to Vlad the Impaler, and…. Okay, see what I mean?

The object, plainly (to me, anyway), is to blackwash all things Trump. There are “nefarious doings” afoot. They don’t care what you think those doings are. You’re free to make them up and that’s exactly what people do. But okay, I get it, up to this point has been a lot of hand-waving, so let’s get some sauces and hot-links going because that seems more persuasive.

Do you remember when we first started hearing the music out of the Wurlitzer about Thiel? It was after Trump named JD Vance as his running mate. The basic tune targeted conspiracy bros and went something like, “Know how all these Silicon Valley tech gurus are sus and evil, bro? Well, did you know that JD Vance used to work for Peter Thiel? That’s the blood boy guy from ‘Silicon Valley’, bro!”

That’s about all they could say. Weird, yes, but mostly because it’s unfamiliar. A lot of people who have received blood transfusions admit they understand what Thiel is talking about. Blood doping has been around a long, long time. If you want to get freaked out, read up on the Lance Armstrong doping case, where you’ll be upset to find out:

More upsetting to many were reports that he forced others to dope, even to be on the team.

There’s nothing to be gained—from an agitprop perspective—by promoting any of that, so why would either the mainstream or online shills tell us about it? That’s not what they’re paid for. The blood stuff was all an aside anyway because the point is JD Vance’s guilt-by-association with Peter Thiel. On that wiki page, you’ll find that Vance is mentioned in the text a total of… one time:

Two of said senatorial candidates (Blake Masters (who lost his race) and later U.S. Vice President JD Vance) were also tech investors who had previously worked for Thiel.

That single mention is, as you can see, quite literally parenthetical. But let’s take a look at someone mentioned (non-parenthetically) five times in the text, whose name just never seems to come up in any of this Thiel talk: Sean Parker. We discussed him before in this post:

How generational Satanists took control of what goes in your ears (bonuses: a demonically-possessed novelty podcasting light and a connection to Sandy Hoax) (conspiracies.win 10/16/2024)

The focus there was his impact on society through Napster and Spotify. The focus here is on his other big project, Facebook, and that’s exactly where he intersects with Thiel. Facebook is another source of enormous societal impact, isn’t it? We could go on and on about how socially corrosive it has been, all the data collection and psychological distortion, the experimentation and outright manipulation, the banging of high school gfs/bfs behind the back of wifey/hubby, etc, could we not? But they say nothing about any of that in relation to Thiel. FB is still an important weapon in their arsenal and They won’t badmouth it.

We need to begin with something boring: money. Namely, how much money did Parker walk away with from Napster? Well, Napster was always privately-held so there was no disclosure, and no one has ever casually mentioned a figure. From 2001 and into 2002, the company was in the endgame. Just two weeks before the curtain came down, Bertelsmann offered $85M but a judge forced them to liquidate instead. Did Parker and Shawn Fanning split something like that amount? Whatever it was, it must have been some goodly ducats, right?

The reason I bring this up is to argue that the involvement of Peter Thiel was never for anything more than to occult (haha) Parker’s central role. You see, all Thiel did was give them half a million bucks way back in 2004. Technically, his investment was only a convertible note—bridge financing, a sort of short-term loan—and he had no part in running the company. He got a board seat a few months later but you’ll see that was probably for his “Rolodex”, as Silicon Valley types say.

The thing is, Parker was president of the company. Do you really think he could not float it $500k? Seriously? He’d prefer to sell off 10% of the company? None of us are SV tycoons (I don’t think) but that sounds like a load of bullshit to me. Aren’t we supposed to think billionaires—which Parker would soon become—are all greedy a-holes? Maybe not Parker, huh, just giving away the store?

Now let me juxtapose some things for you to judge. We are being told to think Thiel is central to the “Dark Enlightenment” project, which now includes Vance and Bannon and Trump himself, but is said to stretch back to Fascist Italy. Know when that wiki page stretches back to? A month ago. Isaac Weishaupt has swallowed all this hook, line, sinker, fishing pole, and boat. He congratulates himself for raising the alarm(!), and dismisses all the h8rs for questioning whether he’s really quite got it right on this one.

Alternatively, we can believe that Thiel is the Antichrist, or maybe his forerunner, or perhaps just thinks the AC is a cool dude, and also that Thiel is trying to bring on Armageddon or something. As I mentioned, I was not listening closely but this line is being flogged by James Corbett:

Episode 481 – Antichrist or Armageddon? (Corbett Report 7/4/2025)

I don’t want to plant any ideas, but James becomes, with each passing episode, audibly more frantic for anyone to buy into his “research”. For some time now, I’ve recognized the trend where “They” are becoming more willing to burn their assets because there’s no tomorrow if They don’t come out on top. That podcast has become my new hate-listen, but I do it for COINTEL.

Let’s look again at how evil genius Thiel figures into Facebook, that most diabolical of Big Tech projects. Surely it is part of the Dark Enlightenment/Armageddon/Choose Your Own Adventure (although no one mentions it). We get something of a unique highlight from an article written by the man himself, Sean Parker:

The 100 Most Influential People: Reid Hoffman (Time 4/16/2015)

Back in 2004, when Mark Zuckerberg and I were starting Facebook, Reid Hoffman was the first person we called to fund the company…. He set us up with Peter Thiel and suggested that Peter join the Facebook board; Reid was too busy launching LinkedIn, but he agreed to give us our first funding anyway.

That’s right, Thiel was involved essentially tangentially. In fact, the wording makes it seem that Reid and not Thiel gave FB the money. Maybe there’s been some smearing of history.

Okay, so Facebook was Zuck and Parker, but Zuck is The Man, isn’t he? Everybody knows Facebook = Zuckerberg. Normies know that, FFS! Well, on Sean’s page we find this comment from a guy who would know something about it:

According to Peter Thiel, Parker was the first to see potential in the company to be "really big", and that "if Mark ever had any second thoughts, Sean was the one who cut that off".

Do we see now who was behind the wheel of this social and psychological rape van?

Let me wind up by giving you a list of things we’ve talked about: Peter Thiel, Palantir, KGB, Dark Enlightenment, Antichrist, Armageddon, Napster, Trump, Vance, Bannon, Facebook, blood boys. You can hate and fear any of them, or all of them together in combination. Make up whatever you like about them. Write a social media post, record a podcast, put a video up on YouTube. Many others have and no one will stop you.

Think about that for a minute, or maybe two. See what I did there? Is the Mighty Wurlitzer playing loud enough to drown out everything you should be aware of?

Thanks as always for reading these long posts!

This mainstream article exposes the schism. First note: the mainstream is not clever enough to paper over it.

CIA says Iran’s nuclear program ‘severely damaged’ by U.S. strikes President Donald Trump dismissed an earlier Defense Intelligence Agency assessment as inconclusive and premature. (NBC News 6/25/2025)

CIA Director John Ratcliffe said Wednesday credible intelligence indicated that Iran’s nuclear program was “severely damaged” in recent U.S. airstrikes and that several key sites were “destroyed.”

A Defense Intelligence Agency initial assessment leaked Tuesday found that the U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites may have set back the country's nuclear program by only several months, a more limited impact than President Donald Trump stated after the strikes.

To properly analyze this, we have to put a black box around it and look at the effect it's having outside of that box.

DIA wants to maintain Israel's pretext for striking Iran in the first place, which ignited a war that was, in fact, ended by the US bombing itself.

As a separate issue, do I think that bombing actually took place? No, I do not, not at all. A complete fiction. Nor is it hard to figure out, and I conclude all these military/intelligence types know it well. I stipulate that people who should know better yet announce otherwise are lying.

This is, of course, something to be aware of as to a general understanding of the world and how it works, but the black box goes around that too. What actually took place is unimportant for the vast majority of the population, but only what they believe took place.

Back outside the box, Trump, Gabbard, Hegseth, and the CIA are saying Iran's nuclear program is done into the foreseeable future and the whole thing is over. No more military action by anyone is warranted. This brings a crisis: anyone who maintains otherwise must declare or imply that these others are incompetent or lying.

The DIA has already broken cover to do so. I concluded long ago that General Michael Flynn, late of the DIA, was a Deep State plant. A few others have finally started to get that. I thought he was an anomaly that just happened to be at the DIA, but now I conclude it is just another nest.

The next significant move is for Bibi to make. Maybe he'll say something like, "Hey you lying American dumdums, back my play as I continue this war." Sounds ridiculous, but (((they))) are usually willing to say anything as long as they can say more later.

I hate to point out information at odds with a Trump "truth" and every jackhole with a keyboard at r/conspiracy, but several hours after the purported attack, we should take a look at what the Iranians themselves are saying about this outrageous act of war that will surely lead to a regional conflagration.

The state-owned propaganda outlet aimed at the West, PressTV has exactly one article:

Iran's atomic body condemns American assault on nuclear sites, vows legal action (PressTV 6/22/2025)

In a strongly worded statement early Saturday morning, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) condemned the aggression on the country’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, which have been claimed by the United States.

Slow down, Iran! What's next, a strongly-worded Letter to the Editor of the New York Times? They also apparently had to learn about it from Trump's tweet rather than things blowing up in Iran. They also failed to mention one of the obliterated sites.

Okay, what about the fiery Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, responsible for a big part of the problem with Iran to begin with? Two of their most important officers were killed (or were they?) in the first Israeli strike.

The IRGC is in charge of all the missiles currently raining down on Israel, and they're surely going to let us know about the Islamic fire and Jihadi fury that is soon to be raining down upon the Great Satan. Death to America! Here's comes the voice of vengeance in their semi-official press outlet, Tasnim News Agency.

As of this writing, there is not a single story on the "US attack". For the record, the top story is:

Iran Won’t Forgo Nuclear Rights: President (Tasnim News 6/21/2025)

I guess we'll just have to stay tuned for how they're going to smoke all the Amreekan infidels. They could not be bothered to comment on it yet.

TL;DR: In the same vein as Dave’s classic expose on Laurel Canyon, Devo does not seem to be just a bunch of musically talented weirdoes whose funky songs and robotic style earned them fame and fortune. Connections we find along their way help shine a light on the Spooky Underworld and bring the subliminal up over the threshold.

To begin, I’m a fan of Devo. I’ve actually had my suspicions about them for some years now, but resisted looking into the issue for fear of what I would find. After this research I found nothing you could really call nefarious.

That made me realize that an “evil new wave band” was as silly an idea as an “evil zookeeper” from Austin Powers. Not that Devo isn’t tied up in the Big Spiderweb--as we are soon to see-- but that not everything in the giant evil plan is itself evil. For all of us critical thinkers, that would be the “fallacy of division”, so I should have known that anyway. Then again, there is this:

The name Devo comes from the concept of "de-evolution" and the band's related idea that instead of continuing to evolve, mankind had begun to regress, as evidenced by the dysfunction and herd mentality of American society. In the late 1960s, this idea was developed as a joke by Kent State University art students Gerald Casale and Bob Lewis….

I always assumed that, yes, it was a joke that was then spun up as a marketing gimmick. But when you’re looking at their early years they sure seem to spend more time and attention on it than they would have if it was just some goof. I tend to now view that “They” introduced it to say, “We’re telling you to your faces that we’re reducing you to animals, and look how novel and edgy and entertaining you find it all. A herd you are indeed.” Am I taking that thought too far?

To begin with the “not just a new wave band” material, somewhere along the line I learned that Gerald Casale had been a student at the university during the Kent State Massacre on May 4, 1970.

I always assumed he just happened to be enrolled there at the time it took place. One time, I had been on campus at a university during a huge demonstration, but I had no idea it even took place until I read about it in the school paper the next day. I was in the library the whole time because I had shit to do. But here, Gerald was far closer to the situation:

Being involved with Freshman orientation at the KSU Honors College, he personally knew two of the victims, Jeffrey Miller and Allison Krause, and was near Krause when she was shot. Casale described that day in multiple interviews as being "the day I stopped being a hippie". Together with Bob Lewis, Casale used the shooting as a catalyst to develop the concept of De-evolution, forming the band Devo in 1973.

Welp, there it is: the whole deal came out of the Kent State event. And that brings up the big conundrum and puts it right in our faces:

The Kent State Massacre Never Happened (Miles Mathis 8/2/2017 (23-page PDF)

We have to square that circle, don’t we? The fake-itude of the massacre is not going to go. When you really look at all the famous pics, you can’t avoid seeing how phony they are. I’ve made this point before: no one notices because they are not really looking. So Gerald Casale is not just some rando college student, and now we have to take a closer look.

Well, TBH, what actually made me take a closer look was something I heard offhand in a podcast about Monsanto. I looked it up to confirm that I had heard correctly:

Monsanto Paying $80 Million Penalty for Accounting Violations (SEC 9/19/2023)

The SEC’s investigation found no personal misconduct by Monsanto CEO Hugh Grant and former CFO Carl Casale….

Okay, I looked and there’s almost no genealogical information available on either of these Casales, so we can’t prove or disprove they’re related. That’s par for the course, and I’m still surprised when I can actually make the hard genealogical connections. But really, that shared, nearly unique name makes you suspicious, doesn’t it? Let’s move on and see if there’s more. (There is.)

Devo gained some fame in 1976 when their short film The Truth About De-Evolution… won a prize at the Ann Arbor Film Festival. This attracted the attention of David Bowie, who began work to get the band a recording contract with Warner Music Group. In 1977, Devo were asked by Neil Young to participate in the making of his film Human Highway.

I trust that in these circles, we really don’t have to do more than mention the name David Bowie to associate him with the occult and his fake death. The guy is sus and we find him right here. Neil Young is not widely considered to be sus, but guess where he’s quoted praising Charles Manson? Dave McGowan’s Weird Scenes: Inside the Canyon:

“He had this kind of music that nobody else was doing. I thought he really had something crazy, something great. He was like a living poet.”

The Manson murders were another landmark hoax. As I’ve remarked before, sometimes this stuff seems to write itself. In any case, you can believe that Devo got their “big break” by attracting the attention of these two “music industry icons”, or that “this is what they were handed” using the influence of two “guys that were in on it”. You decide.

And you’ll need to do a lot more deciding because this is where we venture into the tall weeds. To be specific, these Salem Witches always manipulate events from just outside the spotlight. They stand there plain as day yet no one ever notices them. So what happens when we start looking around Devo? We saw his name earlier but I bet it got by you, so here’s a quote from Devo’s wiki:

The name Devo comes from the concept of "de-evolution" and the band's related idea that instead of continuing to evolve, mankind had begun to regress, as evidenced by the dysfunction and herd mentality of American society. In the late 1960s, this idea was developed as a joke by Kent State University art students Gerald Casale and Bob Lewis, who created a number of satirical art pieces in a devolution vein.

The joke is on us, I believe. So both the concept and later the band come from Robert Curtis Lewis. He just so happens to share a last name with Mercy Lewis, who “played a crucial role during the Salem witch trials in 1692, when 20 people were executed for witchcraft, including her former master, George Burroughs.” Imagine the coincidence. But maybe it is, though, huh? Is there anything unusual about ordinary composer and musician Bob?

In the 1980s, while working as a consultant in Damascus, Syria, he was Middle East Correspondent for Rolling Stock magazine….

Oh, uh, whaddaya know. Nothing spooky about that, just covering music for Rolling Stone in the Middle East, right? Wait, no, that was Rolling Stock:

Rolling Stock was a newspaper of ideas and a chronicler of the 1980s published in Boulder, Colorado…. The paper had a regional motif, but featured correspondents covering the world, including Woody Haut on Labor….

Listen, if that doesn’t scream “Intelligence front” to you, then I don’t even know how you came to be reading this. Boulder is a suburb of Denver and that place is super spooky, a main hub for Them. If you’re unfamiliar, a fun writeup is Exposing the Dark World: There’s something very strange about “Evergreen” (conspiracies.win 2/20/2024). But did you catch the rather uncommon name of the first listed writer, Woody Haut? Ring a bell?

He shares the surname of 1st Lt. Walter G. Haut, public information officer at the 509th Bomb Group and close personal friend of base commander Col. William H. Blanchard at the time of the Roswell Incident. That was one of “Their” capstone false flags, paying massive dividends up to this very day. Haut was absolutely crucial as the man who wrote the fateful press release on the orders of Col. Blanchard. Lots more about the whole hoax in this key post:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

There’s no genealogy, but I wouldn’t expect any since “Woody Haut” is more or less a fake person. If I had to guess at his existence as an actual person, then based on ages he’s Walter’s nephew. The rest is just Intelligence legend.

Take a look at this page: Woody Haut's Blog: About me. Do you think that’s the actual photo of an actual writer looking to promote their work? We’re also never told about the odd transition from international/regional labor commentator to noir fiction author. I’d complain that it’s all insulting but no one is paying close enough attention to be insulted, which is how they get away with it.

Now for this last part, if you want to try to sort out what names are real and who got what fake name from where, go ahead but I don’t think that’s important. I just want to bring the pieces into close juxtaposition. It centers around the fairly uncommon name “Woody”.

To begin, back in about 1992 or 1993, the fiction writers of the Roswell event realized that they had left a plot hole in the narrative. It’s a bit complex to understand the problem, but they sought to patch it over with more “newly discovered” narrative. That came in the 1994 book by disinfo peddlers Kevin Randle and Donald Schmitt, The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell (includes downloadable versions). The pertinent invention is on page 3:

South of Roswell, William Woody was watching the night sky with his father when he spotted a white light with red streaks in it. It glowed brilliantly and, unlike (he many meteors he had seen in the past, took a long time to fall. It was brighter than any of those other meteors, and according to Woody, the wrong color.’

The father is never given a name and William Woody has no existence outside the pages of the book, because narratives don’t need infinite detail. So let’s get this straight: On July 4th, William Woody happens to see a UFO. Four days later, Walter Haut writes a false/true press release about the crash of presumably that very same UFO. Decades later, we come across Woody Haut who turns out to be a spooky, ephemeral character. Coincidence?

My final offering on this is to address the question of the original source of the name “Woody”. It’s a rare surname, but is found slightly less rarely as the short form of “Woodrow” (Harrelson) or sometimes “Heywood” (Allen). I can only attest that I have not come across any Woodys or Woodrows or Heywoods in my extensive research on these people.

All that I can offer is that in the list of people of the Salem witch trials, we find “Elizabeth Woodwell, age 33 and living in Salem” and Anne Wood Price Bradstreet. FWIW.

Final final note: If you think it’s possible all this was stitched together out of whole cloth, just googling up combinations of names and making something out of nothing, I would contend that’s extremely difficult. You just get stuff like the obituary of Roswell Woodrow "Woody" Hamlett. Try to find something beyond that he was born on Halloween. Rest in peace, Woody.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: It was a hoax, yes, but there are a lot of hoaxes. What will be illuminating is our examination of the context surrounding it, which is never discussed in DB Cooper research circles. Of course you know that’s the hallmark of how these “enduring mysteries” endure.

Fair warning: This is super long but I’m trying to take a 50-year-old baffling cold case and stomp it into a mudhole in the ground so it never gets back up. I’ll try to be brief but it will still take a bit.

To begin, let me say that I was never interested in D. B. Cooper or anything else in the “true crime” genre. If you choose to punch out now for that reason, go ahead, but I think even Cooper-ologists will miss out on aspects not discussed elsewhere.

Coming into contact with the case is unavoidable, as I’m sure you will agree, and now every conspiracy/true crime podcast out there has to do an episode on it as if it’s required by state law. I think the reason They ran the hoax in the first place had something to do with tightening the police state’s noose on peasants flying through the air. However, I think history has proven it to be more impactful due to the time wasted by people doing research on DB Cooper that has not and will not ever get them anywhere. Really, the mind boggles at the sheer number of conspiracist-hours down the toilet.

So somewhere along the line I heard about the recovered ransom money, and we’ll pause here to discuss the crucial role of “anomalous” evidence. Scientists know that not only must they account for all evidence, they should pay special attention to evidence that doesn’t fit in with accepted theory. When properly investigated, it can truly point the way towards new science. But since scientists don’t get funding for, “This thing didn’t work out like I thought,” pretty much zero of them do it nowadays.

Well, that money was anomalous. You see, there was just no plausible explanation I could come up with—no matter how I stretched my imagination—as to precisely how the money could have come to be where it was. I’m not talking about proof for any particular thesis, I’m talking about dreaming up a thesis at all. Turns out it’s hard to get the hard details (surprise) but what I was trying to make sense of was this situation:

$5,800 of airplane hijacker D. B. Cooper’s ransom money is found near the Columbia River on February 10, 1980. (History Link 8/6/2024)

So I let it go, which brings up an even more important point than anomalous evidence. At the time, my “Overton Window” (so to speak) for how the world could possibly work did not include as an available thesis, “Ohhhhhh, this whole fucking thing was fake, wasn’t it?” It’s a limitation of consciousness, really, and you should always strive to be aware of what you’re subconsciously ruling out as impossible.

In any case, I lived and learned about the shenanigans of the Spook Elites. As I was researching fake UFO incidents, I happened to encounter one of those innumerable Norjak podcast episodes. That’s when I came to realize that the DB Cooper incident had taken place in the same area I have come to think of as the Puget Sound Stronghold. There is a lot more material on it, but what I wrote up so far is here:

The Puget Sound Flap: Or, How the boring Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting blows up in your face in terms of Salem Witches (conspiracies.win 5/1/2025)

BTW, who downvotes such content? Could there be enemy infowarriors among us? Perhaps. Anyway, this DB Cooper materials adds to the pile we’re building on Puget Sound.

Since I mentioned the infowar, I might mention that I have never once heard it suggested from any researcher, given all the work they have done collectively on the case, that it has occurred to any of them it might have been faked. So, witting shills or the promotion of dimwit “experts”, you can see how the information war is really waged.

I will credit one of those podcasts for casually mentioning that at one point, there were only six other people on the plane besides DB. You see, they’re all too busy talking about cigarette butts and clip-on ties and parachutes and so forth, all the shit that I’m now telling you will get you nowhere. It took dozens of documentaries and podcasts before the fact that only a very tiny group was involved stuck in my consciousness.

At last, with the idea in mind that it may all have been phony, I tried to think up various scenarios as to how it took place. Another piece of anomalous evidence—never discussed, surprise—was DB’s very strange choice of outfit. A plain dark suit and tie for jumping out of an airplane into the forest at night?

It was late November in the Pacific northwest coming into night, and gear pretty much as rugged as you like would not have seemed out of place. In fact, while others were worried about getting drenched while walking to the plane, it was noted by a witness that DB appeared to have no such worries. Anomalous, right?

My explanation is that DB was not worried about walking to the plane because DB was not going to walk to the plane. At least, not the DB making a show of himself in the departure lounge. Plot twist! It turns out that a fringe theory on the case is that DB Cooper was the co-pilot, First Officer Robert “Bob” Rataczak:

Could The DB Cooper highjacking have been an elaborate simulation for an old fashion Ransom? Could he have just been the co-Pilot in sunglasses? Shouldn’t we consider this? (r/dbcooper 5/23/2017)

The idea is not fleshed out there, but what’s important to note is the comments: the OP gets absolutely hammered for even bringing it up. Remember we were talking about the infowar? I think the whole subreddit exists just to “keep the mystery alive”. For comparison, the thesis came up again on our old familiar stomping grounds—as heavily controlled and infiltrated as they are--and got a very warm reception:

No one ever jumped out of the plane! Meet Dan Cooper! It was an inside job! (r/conspiracy 6/2/2025)

You may even see my tiny contribution there, that it was a form of a stage magic trick. Let me here expand on my suggestion: DB did not disappear from the plane, he was never on it. Everyone incorrectly believes he was where he never actually was. This short video demonstrates the principle:

Vanishing a Quarter Into Thin Air (Scam Nation 10/22/2018 YouTube 5:40)

That video was originally from the “Scam School” podcast, which proposed to teach you fairly simple tricks you could use at the bar or at parties. I watched the entire run, hundreds of episodes I think, and never learned one single trick. You see, I ended up studying the principles those tricks were based on, and how our perceptions are manipulated, and how easily our “knowledge” comes to be incorrect. Highly recommended on that basis.

The “vanishing DB into thin air” effect goes basically like this: DB Cooper walks into the airport, buys a ticket, and makes sure he is seen at the departure lounge. As everyone is getting their shit together and boarding, DB just dips out. Who would notice such a thing? No one. There’s the trick: you know “for a fact” that everyone who buys a ticket gets aboard the plane (barring some mundane problem). But can we find any record of anyone testifying they saw him climb into the plane? Nope. No one even asks the question, you see.

Back to DB’s anomalous choice of outfit. As necessary, the co-pilot takes the flair off his uniform and suddenly he’s DB. Would people recognize him? Of course not. Could you describe the pilot and co-pilot of any jet you’ve been on? Also, you’ll find in the original witness statements that the “DB on the ground” was about 5’9” and the “DB in the air” was about 6’1”. Another anomaly never discussed.

At the end of the big caper, the flight crew walks off the plane with the money in their carry-ons. Who would check? The cash dropped away into the night, didn’t it? Years later, the money on the riverbank was planted to—again—“keep the mystery alive”. Dumb, but it has worked perfectly.

Perhaps that’s already enough to convince you of the fakery, but if you need that extra push over the cliff, then once again we find the Salem Witches at work. You’ll need your list of people of the Salem witch trials.

First things first: is a relative of Dan/DB Cooper on there? Well, we have every reason to believe he would and could and did give a fake name. He even said it was “Dan” but it got munged to “DB”. So what a coinkydink it is to find Elizabeth Cooper, born November 12, 1676 in Salem, Massachusetts. Yes, it seems there were Coopers in the tiny town of Salem at the time of the fake trials.

Were any Coopers—or anyone whose name doesn’t appear in the list—directly involved? It becomes hard to say because we know people (eg Robert Moulton III) have been left off the wiki list. Also, women’s maiden names are not frequently noted. I could do all the very tedious research, but I’m going more with, “Try to make yourself believe this is all mere happenstance.”

Moving on, the flight's pilot was Captain William Scott. You may be interested to know that one of the last group of witches of Salem to be fake hanged by the neck until not dead was Margaret Scott.

As far as my description of the magic trick, one person that would have definitely noted that DB Cooper did not board the plane would have been the gate agent, making little pen marks on his manifest or whatever they did in 1971. His name is rarely mentioned and hard to find (surprise) but it was Hal Williams. Perhaps we should hold a seance and ask Abigail Williams, “among the first of the children to falsely accuse their neighbors of witchcraft in 1692”, what she knows about all this. But whoa, I guess that would be witchcraft.

BTW, as far as the members of the crew who identified as female, good luck finding out if their last names were their maiden names or if they were married or what their mother’s maiden names were or anything else about them. So who knows. Tina Mucklow, the one that sat next to DB, apparently joined a nunnery later in life. Guilt? Again, who knows.

You’d think the FBI would have to be in on it. They seem to be in on a lot, and I think they were in on this too. Take a look at this Big List of FBI agents Associated with Norjak (Martin Andrade 9/22/2016). The second to last was Larry Carr, and I refer you to the supposedly witchery-afflicted “Ann Carr-Putnam Sr., age 31 and living in Salem Village/Danvers”.

As for the agents who handled the case for the first two decades, Charlie Farrell and Ron Nichols, there is a deeper connection and I’ll have to refer you to a longer writeup to find out what that’s all about. If you concur, though, that gives us three hits out of six FBI agents:

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell: a disinformation agent with unlikely connections to the Montauk Project, DB Cooper, and the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 5/29/2025)

Maybe we’ll call this the bonus: The final connection I located is the most unexpected and most mysterious, and therefore the most interesting. There was an enormous manhunt for DB, of course, taking tremendous resources and led by the Clark County Sheriff. Do you know what his name was? Try finding it, because it has very nearly been stricken from the record. It was tangentially mentioned in this old article about the retirement of his undersheriff:

Career of doing what ‘needed to be done’ comes to a close: After 47 years of EMS, fire district service, Tom McDowell's retirement well earned (The Columbian 7/27/2018)

Why the hell is Eugene Cotton so low-profile? Disturbing, isn’t it? Sort of indicates he was in on it too, right? Anyway, remember that cash that was found on the riverbank in Washington? Just some local yokel wandering the woods, right? Nope:

Mena man to sell D.B. Cooper cash (Arkansas Times 1/26/2006)

Mena? Hmm, where have I heard that tiny ville (pop ~5k) half a continent away mentioned before? Anyway, did you read the article about that lucky hick? You should have. The very last paragraph says:

Interestingly, there is another Arkansas connection to the D.B. Cooper episode. The county sheriff who led the manhunt in Washington state retired to Montgomery County years ago and his widow still lives in Norman.

Where is the absolutely miniscule (pop ~500) Norman? About 37 miles along Highway 8, leaving east out of Mena. It’s the next stop so you can’t miss it. Small world.

Final note: His surname is Cotton, which is not common at all, but my guess about the Shadowy Sheriff is that he somehow bears a relation to the guy I take as the Special-Agent-in-Charge of the whole Salem Witch Psyop, Cotton Mather. Hey, even if that was just a weird coincidence it would still be worth knowing.

Thanks for reading this very long one!

TL;DR: We expose another of the numerous disinfo agents running around these days. The first part is a dry examination we can do concerning any suspected agent. The second part is the moist, juicy center containing his strange connections to other famous (fake) events, which you are free to convince yourself are mere coincidence.

Where to begin with Dr. Farrell? We’ll begin at the end with what he does now. Even if you’re somewhat familiar with him, I wish to bring everything into sharp focus (which you will note is the opposite of what disinfo agents do). At his site Giza Death Star, we are told:

Giza Community is a community of speculation, commentary, and opinion centered around current events, history, humanities, and the sciences, and the written works and commentary of Dr. Joseph P. Farrell.

Now, that alone is very interesting not for what’s there, but for what’s not there but should be. I get it—that’s a hard thing to notice but I’ll get back to it. In the meantime, Take a look at his bibliography in Giza Death Star: About Joseph P. Farrell. His leadoff book was The Giza Death Star, published 1/1/2002. Amazon tells us:

This is physicist Joseph Farrellis' amazing book on the secrets of the Great Pyramid of Giza. Among the topics discussed in detail….

“Detail”? They spelled his name wrong and Farrell has evidently never caught that in 23 years. Also, Is Farrell a physicist? Not according to anything else you’ll see, but further down the page under “About the author” they confirm it with:

Joseph P. Farrell is a physicist and researcher who lives in Oklahoma.

Again, he has apparently never corrected or clarified any of this in 23 years. They also left out the first half of his career but, again, we’ll get to that.

Farrell has this drawn out, authoritative, professorial style. However, unlike almost every other teacher you had growing up, he’s not an asshole. He’s a smart, cool dude you could smoke a bowl with. That’s the impression you’re supposed to get. But he’s not here to smoke, nor am I. Let’s go back to his bibliography and I’ll tell you what’s going on.

Farrell is here to sit next to you in the slot-car Jeep and point out the sights as he takes you on a ride through “Occult Paranormal Nazi Secret Breakaway UFO Breakthrough Physics Tech Bankers Park”. It’s an amusement park, and if you look up the etymology of “amuse” you will not be amused. At the end of the day, he’ll send you home with a belly full of ice cream and a head full of air, and somehow with the smug sense that you know more than the normies.

To pause for a moment and compare my work to his, I can’t see that he’s driving towards any sort of synthesis or conclusion. That’s because rides at the amusement park just go in a big circle. For myself, as diverse as the topics I write about may seem, I am definitely driving towards a conclusion. But it’s like building a pyramid, one that includes the capstone this time. You have to start at the bottom and go brick by brick. It’s laborious, but we’ll only get there by trying.

Note that I’m not the only one saying he’s a disinfo agent, although there appears to be literally only one other. Some website called “All Religions Are One” has this to say about him:

Joseph Patrick Farrell is a disinfo agent of the Coast to Coast scene, used to spread disinfo about UFO's (expanding on the Die Glocke mythology like Nick Cook), pyramids, NASA, the JFK ritual, Operation Paperclip, Atlantis, Nikola Tesla, extraterrestrials,...

That’s not quite the summary I would give but I wanted to show you how far anyone else has gotten. I’m not vouching for the site, either. See that ellipsis? That’s not mine, it’s theirs, although there’s no reference to where they copied the text from. Maybe they just don’t know what ellipses are for. That and the fact that I would disagree with about 95% of their other content are why I would not vouch for them.

I will, however, give them credit for stating his full middle name, which I only found one other place. Frankly, it may not even be correct but at least they tried. That brings up the next point, a hallmark of disinfo agents: Dr. Farrell is virtually a ghost.

All that is available are various “about the author” type bios such as on Giza Death Star, Audible, and Amazon. Scrape it all together and you could put it on a laminated 3x5 note card, like for a CIA agent going out on his first mission: “This is who you’re supposed to be. Keep it in your pocket.”

You may have been asking why I didn’t go straight to Wikipedia. I did, and you can see for yourself there is no article for Joseph P. Farrell. This is where the plot thickens. You see, there was a page on Farrell, but they sent it down the Memory Hole over a decade ago.

You have to look closely at the bottom of that wiki “error” page, but there remains a link to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph P. Farrell. Their basic case is, “This guy is full of it.” Okay, I think so too, and typically you would write some fancy form of that on his page. Has wiki ever been reluctant to blackwash and badmouth someone on their own page? Of course not, that’s half the reason Wikipedia exists. But that’s not what wiki did here. They annihilated it from existence.

Almost. You can find an archived version of the page here from just a few weeks before Dr. Joseph P. Farrell was stricken with the ancient practice of damnatio memoriae. The point is, there is a 0.000% chance anyone would ever stumble across that page. Also, do you see where he was educated in physics? Me neither. But okay, Joseph, the pyramids are giant laser beams.

So why did they do it? Beats me, really. All I can do is guess. But I love to guess! It’s like looking for a small thermal exhaust port just below the main port. In this case, I think the two-meter port is two decades of his life’s work—perhaps we could say vocation—that it appears we are supposed to forget existed. I promised we’d talk about what was missing and this is it.

You can stitch together this timeline: He publishes a book in 1982, gets a doctorate from Oxford in 1987, publishes two more books in 1989 and 1990, then publishes a four-volume set in 1997. All of this work concerns some kind of arcane and tedious Christian historical something-or-other that I can’t believe very many people in the entire world are interested in. But some folks really like this kind of lore, apparently including Farrell.

At least he did. There’s a five year break after he spent those two decades on this, uh, electrifying research. Maybe he needed it. But refer back to all those bios: he makes no mention of this two decades of his life and work. He mentions the doctorate from Oxford because that’s supposed to impress us, but has nothing to say about the rest.

Indeed, how and why does one transition from patristics to Demigod of Deep Conspiracy? In precisely what way does the one integrate with the other? Alternatively, if he eventually came to see patristics as boring and pointless and even wrong, wouldn’t it be worth telling us that patristics is boring and pointless and even wrong?

What’s ironic here is that Farrell has been on The Higherside Chats numerous times as one of Greg Carlwood’s favorite guests. Carlwood had a negative experience growing up Christian and eventually left the church. He misses no opportunity whatsoever to slam Christianity, overtly or subtly, because real experiences shape real people. But not Farrell, huh?

So beginning in 2002, for no reason he ever bothers to explain, Farrell takes off at an (ahem) unbelievable pace: 27 book in 23 years, according to his Giza Death Star bibliography. Actually, it’s 28 because he left the latest one out. He’s clearly too busy writing books to make sure his website is up to date. Somehow, though, he never seems in a hurry in his interviews. He also freely invites people to email him. Who the hell has time for that?

None of the books have links to where they are available for purchase. And why would they? He casually mentioned on his most recent THC appearance that he’s rich. I suppose he doesn’t need the money from all these books. But then why does he write them? Doctor’s orders? Hates golf? Watched all of Netflix? If you can convince yourself this is all the behavior and history of a real person, there’s no more I can say.

Or is there? On to the fun stuff….

When I was stumbling about trying to find any genealogical information on the spooky Dr. Farrell, I found this arcane tidbit which would at first seem unlikely to yield anything important: Person Page - 64434: John Cockburn Thomson

That’s from a site called The Peerage, which is an unofficial but terribly elaborate effort to track all the bloodline aristocratic dickheads in Britain and Europe. I think we all realize how crucial bloodlines are to those people. Patristics may not be electrifying, but I found this one line to be so:

John Edward Joseph Farrell was the son of John Arthur Farrell and Hon. Lucretia Pauline Mary Preston. He married Harriet Nichols.

Farther down the page you can see John Arthur has another son named Arthur William Patrick Joseph Farrell, so we get the full name too. I may need to elaborate on why it caught my eye.

I hope you would agree that the Montauk Project would fit in well as an attraction at Dr. Farrell’s amusement park. We first learned about it in the book, The Montauk Project: Experiments in Time, written in 1992 by—you remember it now, don’t you?—Preston Nichols.

The Montauk Project wiki page contains a link for Preston which leads to… the book. That leads to another point. I scraped around and around for info on Preston and came up empty. Preston has no existence outside of the Montauk Project. He’s an even ghostlier ghost than Joe. Just a guess, but I think “Preston Nichols” is a fake name dreamt up for a fake project, and They got it climbing up the old family tree. Or maybe sheer coincidence, right? And here you thought the Stranger Things association to Montauk was strange.

Well, yet stranger and even more coincidental is Farrell’s connection to DB Cooper. Tell me you would have guessed at something like that before reading the title of this post. For a case that has been so thoroughly studied and discussed, you wouldn’t think this information would be hard to find, but I had terrible trouble digging up this:

Big List of FBI agents Associated with Norjak (Martin Andrade 9/22/2016)

Norjak Case Agents (All Norjak Case Agents are Seattle-based.):

2. Larry Carr, 2007-2009

5. Ron Nichols, 1977- 1990(?) Norjak case agent when money was found in 1980

6. Charlie Farrell, 1971-1977, original Norjak case agent

Three hits out of six. I’ll write it up one of these days but yes, the DB Cooper hijacking was faked. The point is, you can see Farrell and Nichols had control of the case for the first two decades.

You may be wondering why I bolded “Carr” above. Any guess? It’s another name from the list of people of the Salem Witch Trials. You’ll have to wait for the whole analysis and links but, yes indeed, there were Coopers living in Salem at the time of the SWTs, and several other names from the list show up as key players in the phony hijacking.

As a final note, one of the handful of genealogical crumbs we were handed about Farrell was that he was born in the innocuous and boring Sioux Falls, South Dakota. I feel I need to suggest it’s not so innocuous:

In 1981, to take advantage of recently relaxed state usury laws, Citibank relocated its primary credit card center from New York City to Sioux Falls.

Thanks, Sioux Falls, way to go. More intriguing to me is that its founding involved an Army officer who was also tangled up in some weird and sus military action involving Mormons, of all people. Who can bother unraveling it. Anyway, he was named James Allen. Please consult the list. SWT FTW!

Bonus: I came across this academic takedown of Farrell, in which the author devoted to him a whole chapter in a big-ass fancy book published by Cambridge University. See how much of this summary you can read without SYH:

16 - Occulture in the academy? The case of Joseph P. Farrell

I suppose my point is that I keep finding out just how different a world most of the world lives in, a place where research like that makes sense, has value, and counts as insight.

The huge controversy as I write concerns Trump pulling funding from Harvard University. If he does so for Harvard and for every other bullshit university—for any reason he cares to state—then I’m in support of it. I think perhaps that’s actually the idea behind what he’s doing.

Thanks as always for reading!

TL;DR: We’ll give the usual treatment to Kenneth Arnold, the Maury Island incident, and a couple of closely associated personalities, Raymond A. Palmer and Samuel Eaton Thompson. The bonus will be where the very strange associations of Arnold’s birthplace lead us (spoiler: to the phony Space Shuttle Challenger disaster!).

It must firstly be remarked that all we will discuss takes place in the area of Puget Sound. I have written before that “They” seem to operate out of various historical strongholds scattered around America, and Puget Sound appears to be one of them. Boeing is a ginormous defense contractor, but do you really think that cloudy and rainy Seattle is a great place to build airplanes rather than, say, the dry and clear Southwest? And when it was all popping off in Silicon Valley, why does Microsoft very controversially relocate to Redmond? Perhaps now you have your answers.

It must secondly be remarked that for some reason, the Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting has, in my lifetime, always been low-profile, like it’s on the way to being written out of history. Virtually every UFO enthusiast begins their discussion with the Roswell incident. That wiki page tells us it was not always that way:

With no phone or radio, Brazel was initially unaware of the ongoing flying disc craze. Amid the first summer of the Cold War, press nationwide covered Kenneth Arnold's account of what became known as flying saucers….

(Quick note: see how “They” hand down our culture to us, which we always believe developed naturally? The concept and term “flying saucer” originated here.)

Why is the Arnold case being dropped from the narrative? I do not know, but perhaps it is this: Roswell does not follow on naturally from Kenneth Arnold. That is, the craft he saw were semi-circular, with one of the them being bat-winged. These shapes have never been associated with Roswell, so you have to ask yourself who the hell is writing these scripts? Would it not have been more convincing to suggest one of the Washington craft crashed in New Mexico?

My answer, FWIW, is that there are too many splinters sticking up from the Arnold incident. In that way “They” have of doing it, these splinters need to be sanded down to create a nice smooth brain surface for their narrative to slide over.

Let’s begin here: You know how I just remarked that few realize the Kenneth Arnold sighting took place right before Roswell? Fewer still realize that the Maury Island incident took place only three days before the Arnold incident, and in the same place! Maury Island is in Puget Sound and Mt. Rainier is just south. Again, nothing about the Maury Island UFO matches the Kenneth Arnold UFOs. And again, who TF is writing this?

But let’s fast-forward/rewind to Kenneth Arnold. You may have known that he was a businessman who happened to be a pilot who flew himself around a lot on said business. Makes it more reasonable to believe he spent a lot of time in the air, right? Okay, sure, but he also instantly turned into a UFO investigator. What are the chances? I think you may begin to agree that the chances are 100%.

I won’t get into all the nonsense concerning either the Arnold sighting or the Maury Island incident themselves. Believe anything you wish about them. Here’s one surprise, though:

Arnold then decided to contact Lieutenant Frank Brown of Military Intelligence, Fourth Air Force, Hamilton Field, California.

Yep, that’s a name from the list of people of the Salem witch trials. Another surprise: the visit from Brown and the other Intel guy was where we were handed down the popular-to-this-day concept of “Men in black”. Yet one more surprise: read that wiki page to find that the guy that handed it to us was Gray Barker, Surprise not surprise on all this, though, right?

At this point, if you’ve been looking at the wikis for both the Arnold and Maury Island incidents, you will have seen the name Raymond A. Palmer. That dude has a helluva long wiki page, does he not? As I would consider the many things mentioned there “tainted”, there are two I would highlight: the very prominent publisher of the personal computing era Ziff Davis, and that Palmer was key to promoting “The Shaver Mystery” and Richard Sharpe Shaver. As a very young conspiracy theorist, I recall being intrigued by the Shaver material. I could not then have even begun to imagine how different my worldview would eventually become.

Can I connect Ray Palmer to the Salem Witch Trials? Well, I don’t know how hard I have to work at such things these days, but I can tell you that off Salem Harbor you will find Palmer Cove. Good luck finding out exactly who it was named after and their genealogy. If you do, please let me know. If you want a little more, I can tell you a bit about Katharine (Unknown) Palmer (abt. 1624 - aft. 1663):

On multiple occasions, Katherine Palmer was accused of witchcraft in Wethersfield [Connecticut, just over 100 miles from Salem]…. Demos states that in 1659 and 1660 members of the same family charged that Goody Palmer (Katherine) had caused the illnesses and deaths of three family members…. Henry and Katherine Palmer disappear from the Wethersfield records after 1663….

We finally come to another alien encounter investigated by Arnold, that of Samuel Eaton Thompson, which took place in 1950 while driving to his home in Centralia, Washington.

First, is Thompson from one of these Salem Witch families? Not a surprise but there’s no genealogy. I can, however, refer you to Lady Gwen Thompson. She’s prominent in Wicca, including something to do with something called the “Wiccan Rede”. Believe that crap if you wish, but I see it simply as Them on the one hand telling you witches are fake, and on the other selling you fake witchery.

The Lady’s wiki discredits the lineage idea, but this more detailed article give us some profitable knowledge:

Were there really any witches involved in the Salem witchcraft trials? (New England Folklore 7/5/2019)

They did find that Thompson had ancestors in Salem during the trials and that members of her family had later studied esoteric topics like Spiritualism. It seems likely that Thompson had inherited some occult lore from her grandmother but it was probably not older than the 19th century.

I conclude that the Thompsons are one of “those” families and were at Salem. Just like many of Their other initiatives I have yet to write up, I’ve already collected a bunch of data concerning “Spiritualism”. That one statement also seems consistent with the idea that this bullshit was invented in the 1800’s, just like I thought.

By the way, neither the wiki nor that article even notes what leaps out to me in red flashing lights: the name of her grandmother was Adriana Porter. Since our subject is fake UFOs, did I ever mention that Stanton Friedman’s first wife, to whom he was married when he “broke” Roswell, was Susie Virginia Porter?

Perhaps more damning is the peculiar name Eaton. Bloodlines being paramount to these Elites, they typically use their mother’s maiden name as their middle name. Probably no surprise at this point, but there were Eatons back at the beginning:

PASSENGER PROFILE: The Eaton Family (The Mayflower Society)

I fired a torpedo through that boat as being something other than just an ordinary boatload of buckle-shoed religious fundies seeking freedom in this post. Enough said.

Now, here’s some trivia I bet you didn’t know, let alone cared about: Samuel Eaton Thompson’s tiny hometown of Centralia is twinned with the other tiny town of Chehalis, Washington. Do you know where Kenneth Arnold took off from on his fateful journey? The Chehalis–Centralia Airport. What are the chances!? 100%, right?

Bonus: Did you think this post got weird? It gets weirder. You’ll have to decide if it means anything, but I know for sure I couldn’t possible make it up.

You see, Kenneth Arnold grew up in a town named Scobey, Montana, named after a cattleman named Major Charles Richardson Anderson Scobey, about whom I can find no information.

That name is strange, isn’t it? If it’s pronounced as I believe, then the only person with even a similar name I’m aware of is Dick Scobee. I will assume everyone is aware of one of the oddest conspiracy theories out there, that he was one of the astro-nots who was not actually on board the Space Shuttle Challenger when it exploded into a zillion pieces. No, that’s not the weird part.

Kenneth Arnold was flying to Yakima, Washington. If you were driving from there to Seattle, you would unavoidably pass through the microscopic town of Cle Elum, Washington, population about 2000. Guess who was born there? Dick Scobee.

There’s more. As a young child, Dick moved to Auburn, Washington, a suburb of Seattle. Depending on exactly where he lived in Auburn, had 8-year-old Dick gone as few as three miles northwest to the shores of Puget Sound and looked out over the waters on a certain day in June, he would have witnessed the Maury Island incident.

Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We’ll take a look at two “alien encounters” from just before 1900, exposing them as phony. Afterward, I’ll suggest what we might learn from these events in the larger context.

Advisory: I’m saving the analysis for the second part of this post because I always caution readers to beware disinfo agents pushing everyone towards certain conclusions. The necessity in this instance is this: okay, maybe these incidents were “not as advertised”, but why? How does it all fit into the Big Plan? The Big(ger) Plan is what we should always be after, so if you’re looking for ideas on that, I’ll give you mine. Otherwise, just skip it if you wish your views to stay “unpolluted”. (Also, TBH, there’s not that much evidence to go over so I thought I’d pad this out.)

My previous posts have covered Roswell, Edward J. Ruppelt, and J. Allen Hynek, starting in 1947 and going forward a bit. Here, we go back in time a good chunk. Not to “UFOs in the Bible”, because the longer story you get on those is another disinfo program. That’s actually quite a long story as to what’s going on, so I will have to ask you to set aside those “ancient UFOs” for the time being.

We go first to the much shorter but far more well-known Aurora, Texas, UFO incident of 1897. If you’re like me, you’ve probably heard a hundred shows covering this famous incident. Hey, you don’t know UFOs if you don’t know about Aurora! You likely could say many things about it: lightning storm, windmill, wreckage down a well, ayylmao in the graveyard. But (and I’m serious about this) test your knowledge right now: can you think of who owned the farm on which the UFO crashed?

Jeopardy Theme Song

I take these pains to clearly demonstrate how “They” hide the truth from us. It’s not primary or even important that secrets be classified or in secluded archives or you get booted off Twitter for mentioning them. The truth is hard to hide so They arrange to make it forgotten, first by making it unmemorable or seemingly unimportant. That’s easily enough accomplished: make all the stupid bullshit which may be true but will lead you nowhere seem exciting and titillating and what you want to tell your family and friends about that they don’t want to hear.

This is the answer to the question: Judge J.S. Proctor.

Is that what you’re going to text your bestie right now? Of course not. Hopefully, though, some of you may be like me and have already said, “Oh, okay, that’s enough for me. This whole Aurora thing is some bullshit.”

Let me amplify just a bit: You’ll find the Proctors prominent on the list of people of the Salem witch trials, our landmark hoaxed event. W.W. “Mac” Brazel found UFO wreckage on his ranch at Roswell, and guess who his closest neighbors were? The Proctors. Ever hear of Dodge cars? Capt. John Dodge was living in Salem at the time of the trials, and his wife was born Sarah Proctor. John Proctor sailed to America in 1635 with a man named Thomas Parker. Search on “luigi mangione parker” and I suspect you’ll find more than you suspected. I think you get my drift that finding a Proctor placed just outside the spotlight is damning enough.

Frankly, there’s not more to be said about Aurora, but you can believe what you heard before if you like. If you subscribe to my case, though, see how the crux of this was public yet no one knows it? Think how much interesting detail you’ve heard about Aurora, and now you know why they dreamed it up over the years.

Now, this other encounter is one you’ve probably never heard of before. I personally had not until I ran into it doing all this UFO research. It does not even have a Wiki page so far as I know. That’s strange and I’ll analyze that strangeness later, but an article describing it is:

Local retiree traces reported UFO landing in 1896 Lodi (Lodi News 3/20/2015)

Lodi, in fact, was the site of one of the first documented claims of attempted alien abductions in the 1890s. Col. H.G. Shaw, a Civil War veteran and journalist, wrote of his first-hand experience in The Evening Mail on Nov. 27, 1896. It’s been one of the most widespread accounts of aliens and UFOs.

That last sentence is typical of what is called “journalism” today, where you just make shit up. Oddly, the claim they hedge on is whether it was the first, even though the wiki page on “Alien abduction” lists It as such. As usual, I just stumbled in to all this listening to this back catalog podcast:

Episode 51: Aliens (Theories of the Third Kind 6/4/2020, ff 4 minutes if you’re super-impatient)

Now, can we connect this to The Salem Witch Bullshit of 1692? I think so. Let me refer you first to this bullshit: The Paisley Witches of 1697:

On 17 August 1696, 11-year-old Christian Shaw, the daughter of a local landowner, John Shaw of Bargarran, saw one of her family's servants, Catherine Campbell, steal a drink of milk…. The following day, 22 August, Shaw became violently ill with fits, similar to the symptoms reported a few years earlier in the American Salem witch trials of 1693.

Much nonsense ensues, but again the key is public yet unseen: the name Shaw. Not common at all, is it? Now may I refer you to this person?

Elizabeth Booth was born in 1674 and was one of the accused as well as one of the accusers in the Salem Witch Trials…. When she was eighteen, she began accusing people (ten people on record) of practicing witchcraft, including John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor, Sarah Proctor, William Proctor, Benjamin Proctor, Woody Proctor….

There are the Proctors, yes, but what’s the connection to the Shaws, you’re asking? Glad you asked! I refer you to the “Life after the trial” section:

Two years after the witchcraft trials, Booth married Israel Shaw on December 26, 1695. She was twenty two years old and the two were married in Salem, Essex co., MA.

Well, well, so there were Shaws in Salem at the time of those trials, close enough to the events to soon marry one of the main participants, and fake Shaw witches were in Jolly Old England right after. Well fucking well.

Bonus (which comes early, before all the analysis you may want to skip): I found something interesting and invite you to ask yourself if it’s merely coincidental. It concerns the fictional franchise of The Uncanny X-Men, and their fictional SHAW FAMILY TREE:

The “Shaw” name has always been synonymous with power. Unfortunately for the Shaws, power corrupts. This article will show how generations of the Shaw’s have “tainted” themselves with their thirst for power from as far back as the Salem witch trials…. In 1692, English born Reverend Hiram Shaw was appointed minister of the town of Salem.

BTW, the fictional story arc in which these Shaws first appear is “Hellfire Club”. Turns out that connects directly to all these same families we’ve been discussing. Funny, right? Okay, on to the analysis….

So how do these two small incidents fit into the Big Picture? When conspiracy theorists talk about Project Blue Beam (as loosely defined), they always say it goes as far back as President Ronald Reagan’s comments at the UN. Welp, it goes much farther back than that:

John Dewey Speech 1917 (Hour of the Time 12/15/1999 <- the original site went offline in 2025 so get these things while you can)

Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose.

Exactly what Ronnie Ray-Gun said, isn’t it? So the concept has been around a long, long time, and I don’t think it’s too much to imagine it was around at the time of these late 19th Century “alien encounters”. Let’s just assume for the sake of argument that “They” make and execute these very big, very long-term plans. Conspiracy theorists take this as an article of faith, but that’s exactly what I want to question.

Okay, so we get this Blue Beam Bullshit in 1896 and 1897, and it’s pretty lame IMHO. As far as promotion, I’d wager no one has even heard of the Lodi incident. Why did they even bother with it? Far worse, They didn’t pick up the thread of this program for fifty more years! WTF?

Further, after all that time, neither Roswell nor the Kenneth Arnold incident (also fake but which I have yet to write up) is a “continuation” of either of these incidents or even matches each other.

Also, what kind of beta test was this? They began with “Close Encounters of the Third Kind”, at the sixth and final level of the “Close encounters” scale. If you recall, the movie itself introduced the scale to the public and worked its way up for dramatic effect. J. Allen Hynek came up with that scale, which wraps us back around.

The point is this: suppose this was all a screenplay about “a coming alien invasion of Earth”, and the treatment you were handed included these four incidents as the first installment of the franchise. You would tell the screenwriter to GTFO and that he’d never eat lunch in Hollywood again. The treatment would go in the trash as utterly unsalvageable.

I say all that to point out two things, each related to the other in a way you’ll have to determine for yourself. One is that if you carry the notion that “They” are SuperGeniuses carefully and cleverly scripting events to shape the world, you should probably seriously reconsider that. The other is that the vast majority of the population actually buys into this dumb bullshit without question, and you should probably seriously take that into consideration in your Estimate of the Situation.

Thanks for reading! More UFO incident analysis on the way!

TL;DR: A false dialectic was handed to us concerning the modern UFO phenomenon. On the one hand, Martians were coming for our women (or at least our b-holes). On the other J. Allen Hynek was the scientific authority telling us there was “nothing to see here” in the skies above us, and to “move along”. We’ll look at some associations that suggest he wasn’t just some dude that happened to end up doing that.

In the last post, we looked at one half of the false dialectic. On the other side was J. Allen Hynek (1910-1986), who simply oozed scientific credibility. He was much higher profile and there is much less to say about him, which I think you will see fits the profile. In short, it looks like he was identified early, plucked out, and put in that position.

Hynek became a living meme: the bespectacled scientist with a Van Dyke and a pipe telling us it was “swamp gas”. Yes, he was quite literally the “swamp gas” guy, if you didn’t know:

Hynek recalled in his 1972 book: "Swamp gas became a household word and a standard humorous synonym for UFOs. UFOs, swamp gas, and I were lampooned in the press and were the subjects of many a delightful cartoon (of which I have quite a collection)."

He played his part well, calling bullshit on everything in the sky and on the ground:

Once back at the office, Hynek requested privacy for a phone call; "He was on the phone for quite a while, which I found very enlightening. He came out and I said, 'Well, Dr. Hynek. What do you think?' He said, 'It's swamp gas.' He tells me one minute he has no idea what it is. And then he makes one phone call to Washington and comes out and gives a statement that it's swamp gas. Very strange."

Hmmm, right? Anyway, Hynek was the scientific adviser to all three big government “UFO investigation” programs: USAF Projects Sign, Grudge, and Blue Book. The last two were officially run by Edward J. Ruppelt as discussed in the last post. They were the two opposing polarities, but Hynek was wrangled by Ruppelt, and Ruppelt in turn worked for General Earle Cabell. All the setup you need. Now the question is, was Hynek’s name just pulled out of a hat? I don’t think so. “They” don’t work like that.

First up in Hynek’s strange associations—and the reason I think They had Their eyes on him early—was that his doctoral advisor at the University of Chicago was William Wilson Morgan. It’s not that Morgan himself has any red flags on him, but it’s that—as part of Conspiracy 101—you’ve probably heard of the fundamental slam on Freemasonry known as the “Morgan Affair”: some guy was writing a book to expose the Masons so they kidnapped and murdered him. Well, (1) that guy was named William Morgan, and (2) that affair was a huge psyop that gets real shady real quick, which I exposed here:

Did you know William Morgan and Joseph Smith were Eskimo brothers? Now I think the whole “Freemasons murdered a guy!” thing was just another psyop (conspiracies.win 11/17/2024)

Point (3) is that I feel certain that the Morgan of said Affair was of the same family as “JP”, so I get real twitchy when I come across anyone named Morgan.

You can read that Hynek was also associated with Harvard, the Smithsonian, and Johns Hopkins. It’s too much detail to get in to and there’s nothing specific about his work at any of these places, but I consider all those institutions to be bastions “They” founded and run to this day. Ever wonder why it was JHU that was telling us how everyone was dropping dead from The Coof? Now you know.

One quick association I can’t resist: Do you know where we got the term “little green men”? It was in fashion for all the early decades of UFOs, and came from the Kelly–Hopkinsville encounter of 1955. I would contend that Hopkinsville and Johns Hopkins are no coincidence at all. See why I’m suspicious Hynek spent time there?

Now, I doubt there are many “science conspiracy” fans out there, but if so we’ll talk a bit about Hynek and George Gamow. He and Hynek wrote a paper about the formation of the Solar System in 1945. If you research Electric Universe theory (which is itself a disinfo program but at the expense of many revolutionary revelations), you’ll find that the conventional ideas about the origin of the Solar System are dead wrong. If you get my drift on this, I have to wonder if Hynek was specifically chosen to help with a paper full of dead wrong ideas.

Speaking of promoting dead wrong ideas, Gamow was primary in promoting the Big Bang. That idea came originally from Georges Lemaitre. Conspiracists love to tell you that Lemaitre was a Jesuit. The ones who have gone in headfirst say that “le maitre” means “the master” in French, and that this is all one big “high Masonic” joke (h/t Alan Watt). Do a little research by clicking the link to find that although Georges attended schools run the Jesuits, he specifically declined to become one. I would contend it’s enough here to know that the Big Bang is wrong, that Gamow promoted it, and that Hynek worked a bit with him. Something more than nothing, but not much.

But do you know which association I simply cannot pass off as coincidence? After Blue Book was shut down, Hynek went to work at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, a joint project between Harvard and the Smithsonian (both of them so so sus, as mentioned). The director of SAO was astronomer Fred Lawrence Whipple. Profile pic looks like a friendly old guy, right?

Maybe he was, but the name “Whipple” is not common at all, and even more not common is that it appears on the list of people involved in the (fake) Salem witch trials. Okay, maybe the Joseph Whipple in that list was just some easily alarmed and superstitious dirt farmer and the names are mere coincidence, but let’s take a look at another random Joseph Whipple from a little after and not too far from Salem, Joseph Whipple III (1725-1761):

The son of Deputy Governor Joseph Whipple Jr. who was a very wealthy merchant…. He must have had very good political connections because he became Deputy Governor aged 25….

The Governor at the time was William Greene, Sr., and Green is another name you’ll find on that witch trial list. Imagine that.

Our final topic, worthy of some discussion, is the strange shift in controlled narrative that takes place at the end of 1952. It’s a big switcheroo, and we can highlight it with what Ruppelt and Hynek said and did. I can’t tell you I have an explanation, but I would not accept something along the lines of, “They orchestrated it to make it look like They orchestrated it.” Too much even for me! Let’s start with the fact that Ruppelt had to work to keep Hynek—a serious scientist, after all--on the hook that there was something worthy of investigation:

Hynek wrote "In my contacts with [Ruppelt] I found him to be honest and seriously puzzled about the whole phenomenon".

Hynek investigated and called shenanigans on all of it. Maybe we could say it’s an application of the principle, “There’s no one better to tell a lie than someone who believes it.” But by 1952 or so, Hynek and a few others involved apparently started to believe something real was going on. Hey, They can’t have people looking into real things, can They? On the recommendation of the CIA (of course), the Robertson Panel convened in January 1953 to formally say it’s all stuff and nonsense. It worked:

[Hynek] would write that the Robertson Panel had "made the subject of UFOs scientifically unrespectable, and for nearly 20 years not enough attention was paid to the subject to acquire the kind of data needed even to decide the nature of the UFO phenomenon."

Blue Book was reduced to a staff of three and Ruppelt soon left. He later joined in the calling of bullshit:

In new chapters that were notably conservative in tone, and frequently attributed by reviewers to author disillusionment or disenchantment, Ruppelt declared UFOs a "space age myth". Content of this nature was of a noticeably different tone to famous quotes from the original "Report" that had, for example, referred critically to a 1949 change of attitude in the Project whereby "everything was being evaluated on the premise UFO's couldn't exist. No matter what you see or hear, don't believe it".

Oh, he couldn’t figure that out when he had a staff and scientists and the US military? No? Ed died within months, a tool til the end. Now, this last thing I hate to say, but perhaps Hynek was a fool til the end. In 1973, he founded the Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS). Know what the problem was there? The board included Ufologist Jerome Clark. You get that? Another name from the witch trials.

Bonus: Remember that boring Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory that Hynek worked at with Whipple?

It is likely that SAO's early history as a solar observatory was part of the inspiration behind the Smithsonian's "sunburst" logo….

They mean this logo. Have you ever compared it to the IHS emblem of the Jesuits? Maybe those Jesuit-haters aren’t 100% wrong.

Thanks for reading! See you for the next installment where we start in on some of the all-time classic UFO encounters!

TL;DR: This is a tiny incident from which we can learn a lot, including: (1) How many Ukrainians are being slaughtered in the war, (2) Donald Trump is a closet truther, (3) History is changed right under our noses, and (4) The world almost everyone lives in is far from the real one.

I’ve tried to keep track of the number of Ukrainian servicemen killed in the war since the beginning. It’s quite shocking. The last estimate I heard was from Col. Douglas Macgregor a couple of weeks ago: 1.2 million dead. That tracks with the mounting numbers I’ve followed all along.

The Ukrainian government lies their asses off about it—when they mention it at all. What may be surprising at first is that the Russian government lies about it as well. Not like the Ukrainians, of course, and for entirely different reasons. Ukraine doesn’t want everyone to know how badly they’re losing. Russia knows they have to live next door to this country into the future, a country full of fellow Slavs, and they don’t need the resentment that would come if the truth were widely known about the bloodbath they were forced into conducting.

The going rate is about 5,000 Ukrainian dead per week. Guess who said that publicly? Donald Trump. I have long thought he was a closet truther—on this and many other issues—and that he knows far more than he ever says. Before you go to verify that he said it, there is a lot more to the story and that’s what we’re here to discuss.

First, is that number accurate? As I said, you’ll have great difficulty finding a source for it. Just a couple of weeks ago, Ukrainian Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Alexander Syrsky said he needed 30k new recruits every month. God knows where it is in my notes, but right after that I read an article commenting that even that number was all Ukraine would admit to publicly because their casualty rate was 50k per month.

In conventional war, about 1 out of 3 casualties dies and the other two are only wounded. Due to a number of reasons, such as the lethality of Russia’s weaponry and extreme difficulty evacuating wounded from the battlefield, Ukraine has experienced a 1 in 2 KIA ratio. Even that figure was as of a couple of years ago and it’s only gotten worse since then. You can consider that a minimum. So 50k per month… 1 out of 2… and 5000 a week seems about right.

We need to put that in perspective, though. During the Vietnam War, the US population was about 200M. Over the course of a long war, there were about 60k KIA. Here we are half a century later and many people still remember well how terrible that war was.

Ukraine is—or was at the start of the war—about 1/5 the population that the US was in 1970, so we can magnify that KIA number by a factor of 5 to 25k a week. Thus, Ukraine has about two “Vietnam Wars” a month. I find it staggering. I wish everyone realized this.

While most people, including—alarmingly—almost all European leaders, want only war and more war, one of the few people trying to end this incredible horror is Trump. He doesn’t say it outright, which isn’t surprising if you read the first part of that last sentence again. When I saw that he was trying to get out the word about the appalling level of slaughter taking place, I took that to be consistent with the goal of alerting the public and generating popular sentiment for ending it. He said it today quite publicly in one his “Truths”.

Or did he?

I happened to notice his “Truth” when it was mentioned in a video on the Military Summary Channel on YouTube. I was quite surprised, and later went to save the link to his original post. I found that within only hours, an attempt seems to have been made to wipe it from popular media.

For example, when I searched for it, the first link that came up included this search snippet:

5 hours ago ... "Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!" he said in a post on Truth ...

Yep, that’s the text I saw. The link is to this BBC article:

Trump says he is 'not happy' with deadly Russian strikes on Kyiv (BBC 4/24/2025)

That alarming number of 5000 a week and the surrounding text is not in the article. Stranger, archived versions on the Wayback Machine are to a related but different article titled, “Zelensky cuts short South Africa visit after Russian attack on Kyiv”. Don’t ask me what the Beeb is doing, but I’m just saying that what your idea of an “article” is and what it means to “archive” probably needs some updating to match their “flexibility”.

This article preserves the original wording (for now) but it too will probably undergo some “flexibility”:

Trump says he's "not happy" with Russian strikes on Kyiv, tells Putin: "Vladimir, STOP!" (CBS News 4/24/2025)

"I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing," Mr. Trump wrote on his social media site Truth Social. "Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!"

The “Mr. Trump wrote” text is a hotlink to the original Truth. Go ahead and check it: that 5000 figure isn’t there.

A couple of things: One is that the Wayback does not have an archived version of that CBS story as of this writing. I wanted to see what it said originally, because it turns out that is the wrong hyperlink. The correct one with that wording is here. A mere clerical error on the part of CBS? Who knew they were so slipshod.

Everyone may make of this what they wish, but in this late age I find the historical record is even more plastic than I thought.

TL;DR: Ruppelt and J. Allen Hynek (to be covered later) were put in place as the spokespeople for two opposite positions: “flying saucers are real” and “you did not see what you thought you saw”. Who knows what’s going on in the sky, but if either of these two positions was correct, “They” would never have needed to set up these characters to sell us. When do “They” ever sell us the truth?

<high-pitched annoying class valedictorian voice>:

Merriam-Webster defines “dialectic” as “discussion and reasoning by dialogue as a method of intellectual investigation”.

Sounds good, bro, but the problem is that we are under constant psychological warfare, and one of the main techniques is that while everyone is busily engaging in spirited and informed dialectic with one another, we have covertly been handed a “false dialectic”. As I like to say it, you may choose freely among all the available conclusions, because all of them are wrong.

That’s what we’ve had concerning the UFO phenomenon for nearly eight decades. You are free to believe flying saucers from Mars have little green men in them, or you can believe it’s drunk hillbillies who do not recognize the Planet Venus when they see it. We have since been handed some variations and elaboration on those. So it’s not little green men, it’s time-traveling humans sent to warn us away from nuking ourselves. Does that really make a difference, fundamentally?

Well fundamentally, neither of those choices is correct, and that’s what serves to keep us away from the truth. What we’ll see is that “They” set up the false dialectic of this manufactured polarity using two spokesholes. Ruppelt, our case in point, coined the term “Unidentified Flying Object” to add some sort of scientific legitimacy to saucers. We just got through seeing the exact same thing with this “UAP” BS injected into popular culture, did we not?

So, do I know what’s going on with all this? I do not. What I do know is what anyone needs to know before they could possibly imagine they know what’s going on with all this: the entire “phenomenon” is absolutely riven with characters who are more sus than they could possibly imagine. You’ll have to take my word for it, but Ruppelt and Hynek are just the beginning of what I sometimes feel I may never get to the end of. But let’s take that first step….

I wrote briefly about Edward J. Ruppelt (1923-1960), Captain USAF, in my last post:

The (False) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age was launched out of the US Army Air Forces in 1947, fake investigated by the US Air Force until 1969, and run by “Them” all along (conspiracies.win 4/7/2025)

The preeminent point about Ruppelt is that all along he was working for the head of Air Force Intelligence, General Charles P. Cabell. You can link outward from that post to even more about Cabell and his family. They have been at it for literally centuries. I cannot understate how damning this single association is.

Going from a bloodline to a technical line, I mentioned in the post that there were “problems in his timeline”. We’ll take a look at that now to demonstrate that he was an asset who was in on this psyop from the jump. His wiki tells us:

After the war, Ruppelt was released into the Army reserves. He attended Iowa State College, where in 1951 he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in aeronautical engineering. Shortly after finishing his education, Ruppelt was called back to active military duty after the Korean War began. He was assigned to the Air Technical Intelligence Center headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

Sounds fine on its own but—as mentioned in that last post—you very often must look around what you’re told to get at the truth. Think it through for yourself: WW2 ended in 1945, Ed is discharged and goes to college, and he gets recalled to active service in 1951. Well then, how did this take place just two paragraphs before?

Ruppelt was the director of Project Grudge in 1949….

I think someone is fibbing about where he was and what he was up to. And up to what might he have been? In that last post, I complained bitterly about how the USAF suddenly somehow started collecting reports on the flying saucers they had just said were bullshit after Roswell:

During 1947 the Air Force collected 147 flying saucer reports at its Technical Intelligence Division of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio….

Did you notice where Ed was reassigned when he was recalled to service? Exact same place! Everyone is free to disagree, but it just to me seems simpler to conclude that Ed was at Wright-Patt all along, and that he was the one collecting those reports in the second half of 1947.

So it is not historically acknowledged that Ruppelt was there at the beginning, nor is it acknowledged that he was there right after the beginning, with Project Sign. However—surprise!—it was from Ruppelt that we learned about Sign:

Project Sign was first asserted in the 1956 book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by retired Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt who later directed Project Blue Book. In this he also claimed that Sign had produced an "Estimate of the Situation" which endorsed an interplanetary explanation for UFOs, but General Hoyt Vandenberg, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, shut down Project Sign for lack of proof. No copy of this document or any other corroboration of Ruppelt's claim has been produced, and Popular Mechanics called the report "probably more mythological than real".

To properly deconstruct and understand this, you have to take a step back and realize that Vandenberg, Cabell, and Ruppelt were all in on it together and, really, that’s about all the was necessary. As you can see, that group could arrange to feed you any narrative they pleased. As we’ll see in the next post, Ruppelt was Hynek’s handler so you can count that as a fourth, if you like. Did not take much to boot the whole thing up, did it?

Ruppelt goes on to direct Project Grudge and Project Blue Book, both created by Cabell. Again, see how small the group is? He leaves Blue Book fairly quickly and do you know what I think the real problem was? Too much legitimate evidence was being uncovered:

Ruppelt started the trend, largely followed by later Blue Book investigations, of not giving serious consideration to numerous reports of UFO landings and/or interaction with purported UFO occupants.

At this point, “They” wanted to shut down any investigation that might lead to… well, we’re still trying to figure out what it leads to, what lies beyond the hurricane of hoaxes and liars which I will cover in future posts. Remember, this was all designed to be a false dialectic, not a real dialectic. More on this in the Hynek writeup.

To finish, Ruppelt dropped dead from what we are told was a heart attack at the age of 37. Just seems sus, don’t it?

Bonus: Let me mention Ed’s association with prominent Ufologist Donald Keyhoe and prominent Ufological organization, the National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena (NICAP). Much more to say about both of those, but the fun factoid I’ll leave you with is that NICAP was founded by inventor T. Townsend Brown. Sure, I get that it’s relatively common, but Brown is a name from the Salem Witch Trials. What are the chances?

TL;DR: We find little-known, very curious and highly unlikely connections between the items mentioned in the title. You’re free to believe it’s all mere coincidence, but you should probably wait to decide that until the end.

Disclaimer: I always hate to begin by “giving the answer”, but once again I consider it necessary to properly interpret the significance of the references we’ll see. Probably all the material will be unfamiliar. If you’ve heard about these things before, it was certainly because you were going to be handed some disinfo right after.

James Cameron, A+++ Hollywood royalty, is no Illuminatus. Rather, he’s an asset, out on the periphery of those who really do arrange history, and who you’ve never heard of. Well, you may have heard of them, but you definitely had no idea “who they really were”.

Let me begin by raising your suspicions about James with what I would say is the highest-profile hoax he’s been involved in selling us: the purported sinking of the Titanic. It really was an iconic psyop, a “conspiracy theory” touchstone. All the conspiracy theories are wrong, of course, but we hit closest to the mark with this landmark paper:

The Titanic: the Fraud that Keeps on Giving (Miles Mathis 10/2/2018 39-page PDF)

Let me say two things right away: First, if you cannot set aside whatever objections you have and tentatively accept the thesis that the boat never sank and is not on the bottom of the ocean, turn back now. The sea of your psyche will only grow more turbulent from here.

Second, the author of the paper—as I have disclaimed many times—is a disinfo agent. He surfaces (haha) plenty of evidence that you can validate for yourself to support the basic thesis. Remember what I said about only being familiar with these topics in the context of disinformation? Well, we got an example right away.

Begin by realizing that Cameron made a whole big giant blockbuster movie about the sinking, didn’t he? You can look up the numbers, but the production budget was (for the time) an eye-popping amount. There was also an equally large marketing budget. Can you see in a new light why “They” would bankroll such things? If the project makes money, great. If it loses money, well, everybody knows the boat sank. They just saw it sink, didn’t they?

Perhaps at this point you’re cutting Jim some slack. You may be thinking that you could make a movie about landing on the Moon without anyone ever having landed on the Moon, right? (Hello, Stanley Kubrick!) But the thing is, Cameron supposedly personally landed on the site of the wreck. Multiple times, actually:

James Cameron has visited Titanic wreckage 33 times. Here’s what he said about the Titan (Deseret News 6/3/2023)

You like that? I’ll top it:

James Cameron was underwater in a Titanic submersible when 9/11 happened (DailyO 6/22/2023)

I’m going to say that if, at this point, you aren’t certain that Cameron is an asset, turn back now. From here, it’s a rocket trip to Bizarro World which will make no sense at all as evidence if you’re still thinking he’s nothing more than some dude that likes to make movies. Our rocket now sets course for the fake Charlie Manson murders, but to get there we’ll have to go through the fake Salem Witch Trials of 1692. See what I mean? Don’t worry, we’ll break all this down.

Just like in conventional Intelligence work (which I suppose is just another form of what we’re discussing), an asset like James Cameron will have a handler. I’ve seen such situations before, and I went to look at his wives, particularly his first. My first instinct was correct: it was Sharon Williams.

A lot of history has been orchestrated by a small group of families, and they are not the ones you think (which is how disinfo works). A lot of my research has centered on them, and one of their hallmark events was the fake Salem Witch Trials (10/19/2015 17-page PDF same disclaimer about Mathis). If you look at the list of people of the Salem witch trials, you’ll find the name Williams. Sure, the name is not uncommon, but you have to admit it’s already strange. We are not done with that list, either.

Try to find any information on this Sharon Williams. Good luck, she’s a ghost. You can’t know anything about her, but you should be able to know that would fit the profile. Also, history isn’t typically hidden, per se, it’s just that the “red strings” that connect events get snipped, making us lose all sense of what happened. Here’s wiki at work with two sentences that bridge a section break:

After the excitement of seeing Star Wars in 1977, Cameron quit his job as a truck driver to enter the film industry. [section break] Cameron's directing career began in 1978. After borrowing money from a consortium of dentists….

“Hey, I’m tired of being a truck driver, so why don’t you give me twenty grand so I can quit and become a rich Hollywood movie director? It’s a slam dunk!” Is that what you think happened? Me neither. We can fill in a bit of detail here:

Staying married to Cameron: A modern Henry VIII? Staying married to the “scariest man in Hollywood” is no easy feat… (Gulf News 7/22/2019)

They were married for 12 years and she supported his film-making ambitions, working two jobs, as he gained an apprenticeship at the lowbudget New World Studio. They split when he started making The Terminator, an idea that came to him in a dream, and he got together with his second wife, Terminator producer Gale Anne Hurd.

Does that fit the profile of a handler, setting someone up in their career until a handoff? You might have to widen your sense of “handler” as something more than a CIA hack in a cheap suit dropping off microfilm. And we’re just going to skip over “New World”.

Speaking of the film that launched the James Cameron we know, we find some curious information in this article:

James Cameron’s First Wife Inspired Terminator’s Sarah Connor (The Terminator Fans 6/20/2022)

Most Terminator Fans will know that The Terminator was inspired by a nightmarish fever dream James Cameron had whilst filming Piranha II: The Spawning – but the real life inspiration for his feminist icon Sarah Connor… is far more grounded in reality; as the waitress turned mother of the future was actually inspired by James Cameron’s first wife, Sharon Williams.

Now, stop and think about the plot of that movie. It’s not really about robots and guns and chases, is it? The soul of it is a very special mother, literally the mother of the savior of humanity. Although there’s no virgin birth this time, it’s still pretty unique: the father is a soldier sent back in time by his future son. Further, it’s not simply that the mother gives birth to the son, she must guard him against a (spoiler: nearly) indestructible assassin and train him to lead a rebellion to prevent the very extermination of humanity. Go, motherhood!

Except Sharon Williams was not a mother. Childless young wives and infertility were not “things” back in the 70’s when they were first married, but Sharon and James had no children. Or so we are to believe. You may think differently in a bit.

There are no photos of Sharon anywhere I can find, but in that same article there is a drawing of her that Cameron made in 1973. That was only four years after the fake Manson murders, which may seem like a pretty random thing to observe.

But look at the drawing: Sharon Williams is reclining on a couch draped with an American flag. You know who else evidently reclined on a couch draped with an American flag? Sharon Tate. You can see it in crime scene pictures included in this analysis:

The Tate Murders were a False Flag (Miles Mathis 6/29/2014 (95-page PDF)

Yes, Mathis again, but again an event that was positively faked. One of the fake victims was Abigail “Gibby” Folger, daughter of Peter Folger and heiress to the Folger Coffee fortune. Well guess what: go back to that witch trial list and make sure you can find “Bethshua/Bethsheba Folger-Pope”. Gibby is a direct descendant of a man from the 1600’s also named Peter Folger, and Bethshua was his daughter. Also, Bethshua was the maternal aunt of Ben Franklin. See how this stuff keeps going?

Of all the things in here you might have a hard time believing, one of them is that we are only now getting to what brought me here today: another bullshit article from the BBC with more bullshit about the story that will not sink:

Titanic scan reveals ground-breaking details of ship's final hours (BBC 4/8/2025)

Yes, more nonsense, but there’s something quite bizarre I need you to notice in it concerning “Parks Stephenson, a Titanic analyst”: they repeat his name three additional times, but each time they use the full “Parks Stephenson”. I have never seen anything like it before and would challenge anyone to produce a similar example. It’s baffling! Some kind of magic(k)? Who cares, there it is.

Let me get my thesis right out before you fall asleep: I submit that “Parks Stephenson” is a fake name and he’s actually the son of James and Sharon. Tall claim, but hear me out.

First up, his bio is bullshit. He supposedly went to the US Naval Academy and is both a submariner and naval flight officer. Could not decide, or just that good? They also say that in the same four years he earned a Masters in Political Science from Auburn University. You can look up other articles and interviews which mention his other incredible accomplishments. I do not find them credible. One example would be this article:

From the Titanic to Baton Rouge, Parks Stephenson looks from the past to the future (The Advocate 11/10/2022) (<-- “The Advocate” was also the name of a famous gay newspaper back in the “gays rights” days and thus almost certainly run by Operation Mockingbird—funny!)

We find out he was an aerospace engineer and was fascinated with the Titanic since childhood. Cool story, bro. There’s a picture of him and James Cameron together and the ages seem right, but also look at the one up top of “Parks” as an older man. Now look up some pics of James Cameron with a salt-and-pepper beard. You decide.

But why would I think “Parks Stephenson” is a fake name? First, what kind of name is “Parks”? A dumb one you’ve never heard before, yes, but there’s something I haven’t written up yet so I’ll be brief: There was a famous actor from the 70’s through the 90’s named Parker Stevenson. His real name was Richard Stevenson Parker Jr. Look at that Salem list again.

Stevenson was by far best known for his role in a very popular TV series called The Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew Mysteries. It turns out that the fictional setting of the show and the youth novels on which it was based is a thinly disguised Salem, Massachusetts. Whaddaya know. Nancy Drew was eventually played by an actress whose real name is Janet Louise Johnson.

If anyone could possibly think I could stitch this all together instead of it just being there for me to find, I thank you for your estimation of my skills. For everyone, though, thanks for reading!

TL;DR: Right after the end of World War 2, the psyop of the phony modern UFO phenomenon was launched, along with the USAF and the CIA who (surprise!) investigated it. We’ll organize the programs and the people to see what a tight little group it really was. The main characters were associated with the same people who organized the fake Salem Witch Trials and so many other things. The bonus connects us directly to the good old Trials.

When observing how history is hidden from us, it’s not usually the case that it is literally hidden and must be uncovered by some investigative reporter, or waterboarder, or archaeologist. Rather, it is only that the key pieces are scattered, making it very difficult to realize there’s even a puzzle. When gathered and arranged In their proper context, the characterization and conclusions become more or less obvious.

That is the case we have here. Wiki has a page closely related to what we’re discussing: Investigation of UFO reports by the United States government

Take a look at it and note what strikes you as suspicious. What red flags do you see? Actually, don’t waste your time unless you really want to. There’s nothing in it that I would notice and I’ve become much improved at noticing things. As one vital point I’ve come to notice, we’re almost always way too busy arguing about the trees to ever notice the forest.

What is virtually impossible to notice in that very long wiki page is that there was a sequence of three key programs, Projects Sign, Grudge, and Blue Book, that got underway instantaneously after Roswell. The third and final iteration was up and running less than five years later. Remember, this is after the government called bullshit on the whole thing within days of Roswell. Does this really seem like the USG we all know and love? C’mon. And it’s not just that. For example, try swallowing this factoid from the wiki:

During 1947 the Air Force collected 147 flying saucer reports at its Technical Intelligence Division of the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio, and an order was given on December 30, 1947 to begin a project to study the phenomenon.

If there had been no order, why was anyone collecting anything? Almost 150 reports in the six months left over in the year after Roswell? How did “experiencers” know who to call? More to the point, how did whoever answered the phone at the local AFB know who to report it to? This all reeks, and the first mention of the CIA reeks even more:

During the later half of 1952, the Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) Office of Scientific Investigation (OSI) conducted a study of UFOs in response to orders from the National Security Council (NSC).

Well, they just got roped into it after the USAF was fully established in its own investigations, right? Not according to the CIA:

CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs,1947-90 (Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, 1997, 19-page PDF)

While Agency concern over UFOs was substantial until the early 1950s….

That is actually the big pull quote on the first page. You sometimes get the sense that a lot of the lies we’re handed aren’t carefully designed, but more improvisational. Whatever works at the time, you know?

Similarly, there is really not much to notice—in and of itself—in any of the individual pages for Project Sign (1948), Project Grudge (1949), or Project Blue Book (1952-1969). You’ll find vital puzzle pieces there, but you already have to have a pretty good idea of what the puzzle looks like before you’ll recognize them.

At this point, we need to back up to Roswell, on which so so so so so much “UFO research and analysis” depends. Everyone is free to decide, but I feel I established firmly for myself that it was entirely fake and completely phony in this writeup:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

So this literally and figuratively legendary hoax is purportedly the reason the Air Force went off guns a-blazin’ to check out these flying discs. Okay. But of course, it wasn’t “the Air Force”, it was a handful of powerful people in the Air Force and the CIA. I’ve blown them all up before, partially in preparation for this very analysis:

Meet General Hoyt Vandenberg: the creation of the national security state, the modern UFO phenomenon, and Salem witches (conspiracies.win 1/14/2025)

(General Charles P. Cabell) A “Cabell” runs through the JFK assassination to UFOs to Thomas Jefferson to the Mueller investigation to the Mayflower and beyond (conspiracies.win 11/26/2024)

General William H. Blanchard: phony nukes, phony witches, and the (false) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age (conspiracies.win 12/4/2024)

Now, this information may have been scattered through those long write-ups, but now is the time to pull it together with our red string:

• Vandenberg was the Director of what would very quickly become the CIA until May 1, 1947, a couple of months before Roswell. He was also the Chief of Staff of the USAF—the guy that ran the joint—from 1948 to 1953.

• Cabell became the director of Air Force Intelligence in May 1948. He ordered the creation of Project Grudge in 1949. In 1952, he ordered it dissolved and Project Blue Book created in its place.

• In 1953, while still a serving Air Force officer, Cabell became the Deputy Director of the CIA. He held that position until 1962 when he was fired by JFK along with his boss, Allen Dulles.

• Blanchard, after having supposedly historically screwing the pooch, was pushed up the ladder and eventually became Vice Chair of the USAF. He was prominent for many years in the Strategic Air Command, and I would speculate his role was keeping the orchestrated Cold War on track.

Another name to add to the list is Captain Edward J. Ruppelt. He straddles the line between the men above and the coming wave of phony Ufologists, of which there is much more to talk about. Ruppelt was the Director of Project Grudge and then Blue Book until leaving the Air Force to spearhead said invention of researchers trying to find out the truth for us (if you care to believe that).

There are contradictions in Ruppelt’s timeline. Take a look for kicks, but I’ll wait to write it up along with the other Ufologists. He was the first to tell us about the existence of Project Sign in his 1956 book, also informing us that Vandenberg shut it down “for lack of proof”. Sure he did. I think we see the forest through the trees, don’t we? He also “died suddenly” at 37, from which I would personally conclude he wasn’t just some dude, if you get my drift.

BONUS: I didn’t realize it until recently, but Allen Dulles’s brother was John Foster Dulles, of airport fame. Well yes, I knew that was his brother, but I was not aware that his weird middle name “Foster” was their mother’s maiden name and reflected their bloodline. The supposed Roswell UFO supposedly crashed on the Foster Ranch. The Fosters are also prominent at the fake Salem Witch Trials. And if you didn’t see it before, I personally thought this was a gem concerning these Fosters:

Four Presidential assassinations (real, fake, attempted, and by) are tied together by the Fosters, Salem Witches, and the name “Rose” (conspiracies.win 1/21/2025)

Coincidence? I think not.

ONCE AGAIN REMOTE CONTROL, THIS TIME A FULL THROTTLE DIVE. The jet came in so fast it looks like a missile or meteor. That is why whoever got this video is questioning what it is. It is astounding a learjet held together this well at an obvious supersonic speed. All the jets will go supersonic in a dive but under normal circumstances their avionics systems prevent it. Remote control changes that....

Jim's site with the full analysis is at http://jimstonereloaded.com/. Daily updates will make it scroll off the page, so that day's specific page is at http://www.voterig.com/.ue0.html. Finally, since he's one of the most censored guys out there, a Wayback Machine snapshot is here.

The crater photo isn't good, so--astoundingly from the MSM and federal government--here is a local ABC affiliate's story that includes crystal-clear NTSB video:

New video gives closest look yet at site of plane crash in Northeast Philadelphia (6ABC 2/2/2025)

The false dialectic on this one goes like this: For the normies, it's, "just a sequence of events thing that happened nothing to see here we're experts trust me bro". For the conspiracy theorists, it's, "it was a missile and they're hiding it who was on board". All bogus and will lead nowhere.

So what is really going on? IMHO these were clearly messages to Trump, along the lines of, "We may not have stopped you taking the Presidency, but we still have moves and you better slow your roll."

The proof is that he's said almost nothing about either of these huge incidents, Nor has the media pressed him very hard even though everything else is 100% his fault. The message was to him, not to the public, and more attention does not serve Them.

For anyone reading who has doubts about this analysis, let that serve as additional proof. Imagine Trump trying to explain this Silent War to everyone, including your mom who still watches "The View" and your dad who has CNN on all day long. The truth may be true, but there are times when it's counterproductive to try to spread it.

TL;DR: In the assassination “events” of Lincoln, JFK, Reagan, and Clinton, there is someone named Foster very close to it, others with names that go back to the phony Salem Witch Trials, and a beyond odd recurrence of the name “Rose” in various contexts.

Advisory: As brief as I will try to make it, this will be another long post. I thought it best to keep this bizarre confluence together for maximum impact of the weirdness. Also, big chunks of this will be things you’ve never heard of before which I will summarize and link as best I can. Thus, we aren’t here to argue the particulars of any aspect because there is simply no room.

Make of all this what you will, but my best thesis is that the same generational Satanist families that have been here since before the Mayflower have stood just outside the spotlight as They arranged various forms of Presidential assassinations. “Rose” must be some crazy occult bullshit They throw in. It goes back at least as far as the “Wars of the Roses” and is perhaps some reference to the Rosicrucians, although all that remains for another day. It comes up way too often to be mere happenstance, as you’ll see. Although it’s all strange, it seems best to go in chronological order….

Lincoln's Assassination was also a manufactured event (Miles Mathis 2/19/2014 36-page PDF)

I’m not going to give you the usual caveat about Mathis as a disinfo agent because I’ll be giving you practical examples. That’s a pretty long and detailed paper about the event, but you’ll find no trace of what I’m presenting here. This is a prime example of high-level disinformation. At the cost of presenting you with some juicy truths, you will never be able to proceed from what you are handed to any important, deep Truth. Typically, you’re guided down a fascinating path and—at the end—metaphorically pushed off a cliff into a canyon of bullshit conclusions.

For those now thinking that this writer is doing just that by drawing from the CIA’s deep, dark pool of enticing and intriguing small-T truths to expend, I always like to explain how I got here. I was preparing a post about Project Blue Book, which was created by Charles Cabell. His wiki page mentions John Foster Dulles. I thought, “Foster? His brother was real close to the JFK assassination. I wonder if….?” And here we are.

Have you ever heard of LaFayette Sabine Foster (1806-1880)? Neither had I before today, when I went searching for anyone named Foster related to the Lincoln “assassination”. An important form of disinformation is something like an induced amnesia, where it is arranged that we are not reminded of those things from history that would lead us to the truth. Here it is admitted he was forgotten, and I’m just saying it was on purpose:

The forgotten man who almost became President after Lincoln (National Constitution Center 4/15/2024)

According to the rules of presidential succession in 1865, only Vice President Johnson, and not Seward or Grant, was in line to replace Lincoln if he died. If Johnson had died, an acting President would be appointed until a special election could be held to elect a new President (and not a Vice President). The acting President would have been the president pro tempore of the Senate, Lafayette Sabine Foster of Connecticut.

Did you catch the double-whammy about Andrew Johnson? He did in fact assume the Presidency. About Foster, though, I must also note that he was born in Franklin, Connecticut. (You won’t find the name “Franklin” in the list, but Bethshua/Bethsheba Folger-Pope, the maternal aunt of Benjamin Franklin, is very important in include. You have no idea how many Franklins I’ve found.) Foster attended Brown University, and his predecessor as President pro tempore of the United States Senate was Daniel Clark.

To close out Lincoln, you will also note that there were at least four people named Foster involved at the Salem Witch Trials, one of them being Rose Foster. Additionally, there were at least four people named Booth, which may ring a bell. Even more additionally, there were at least seven people named Wilkins. You may not want to score that a hit until you hear that one of them was named Elizabeth Wilkins-Booth. I mean, c’mon.

Even though he wasn’t involved in the assassination, I feel compelled to cram in one of Lincoln’s generals in the War of Northern Aggression: John Watson Foster (1836-1917). His wife was Mary Parke McFerson. Am I reaching by thinking that “Parke”, which is neither a feminine nor a masculine given name, is actually “Parker”? Well, let me add that as President of the Daughters of the American Revolution (an event in which these Salem Witches were up to their nipples), Mary was preceded and succeeded by Letitia Green Stevenson. Also, she was born in Salem, Indiana.

Mary was also the grandmother of the aforementioned John Foster Dulles (1888-1959). You may fondly recall Mary’s other grandson and his brother, Allen Dulles (1893-1969), for advancing classic American values with projects like the overthrow of Iran in 1953 and Guatemala in 1954, MKUltra, and the Bay of Pigs. (Let me also just sneak in here that their father was Allen Macy Dulles. No Macys were at the SWTs, but the sister coven of Salem was Nantucket, where Thomas Macy was a founder. Yes, the department store Macys.)

In deep appreciation of Allen’s efforts, and following his promise to “splinter the C.I.A. in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds”, JFK fired Allen as CIA Director in 1961. Note that at the same time, JFK also fired Allen’s deputy, Charles Cabell, with whom this particular trip beyond the looking glass all began. Almost exactly two years later, JFK died suddenly.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s mother was Rose Kennedy. Getting weird, isn’t it?

We come now to the attempt on the life of Ronald Reagan. Wait, did it just now occur to you who was involved in that? Don’t worry, I didn’t make the connection either until today:

Jodie Foster is another “star” manufactured by the Illuminati, prototype of the MK-MOUSEKETEER (conspiracies.win 2/18/2024)

Really, you can see the proof of my last statement in that post: there’s no trace of any of this larger context. I only got as far as the negative, “There’s no way she was just some rando innocent bystander”. But I live and learn and now I’m showing you more of the picture as I discover it myself.

How about the “Rose”? You’re going to love this one. In my post, I finger the culprit as George Walker Bush. His wife was Barbara Bush, and recall that she was born Barbara Pierce. Now, you won’t find a Pierce on your list, but you will find a Peter Tufts Sr. (abt. 1617 - 1700). His wife was Mary Pierce. Oh, and Barbara’s Chief of Staff as First Lady of the United States was Susan Porter Rose. Susan was succeeded in that same office by Margaret Ann Williams. Real weird, right?

Maggie was thus in service to First Lady Hillary Clinton, and so we finally come to the assassination of Bill Clinton. Excuse me! I mean by Bill Clinton. Okay, fine, all I can say is that their place of residence, the White House, was the last place anyone saw Vincent Walker Foster Jr. alive. Note that Walker was the middle name of both 41 and 43, so we have a delightful bracket of murder going.

The water gets a bit deep here, but there are deep points about disinfo to be made. I had always simply thought—and I suspect you did too—that because Vince had been Hillary’s law partner, that was why he went to Washington with them as deputy White House counsel. That’s the popular understanding, isn’t it? Well it’s true, but it’s not the whole truth. Creating an incorrect or incomplete popular understanding is its own form of disinformation. You see, they had indeed been long-time law partners, but far more important was that:

Vincent was a childhood friend of Bill Clinton, then known as Billy Blythe. Clinton, a year and a half younger than Foster, resided in an adjoining property to Foster's with his grandparents while his mother was often away studying nursing.

It seems incredibly suspicious that Bill did not seem to have any interest whatsoever in the mysterious death of his close life-long friend. Should we also coin the new term “generational handler”? Hang on to that for a sec, because the going gets really rocky if you want to get to the truth:

The Monica Lewinsky Scandal was Faked (Miles Mathis 3/5/2016 25-page PDF)

There, Mathis concludes that the man we are told was born William Jefferson Blythe III is a sort of constructed Intel legend, and is actually the son of a military intelligence officer named Col. William Jackson Blythe Sr. (<- who obviously did have a son). Then, in a later paper about Seth Rich, Mathis (or, technically, a guest writer published by MM) reveals that the “real big secret” about Clinton is that he’s a member of the British Aristocracy.

Well, that was some bullshit and exactly where he tried to run his readers into the ditch. That’s how disinfo works and you always have to stay on your toes. On a little known social media site that Mathis frequented—and that I did also until I figured out it was full of people gullible enough to hang on his every word—a reader calls him out (gently) and Mathis and his acolytes get into an argument. You can read both the accurate story of Bill and the argument at: https://cuttingthroughthefogcom.wordpress.com/2018/11/09/current-events-discussion-thread/comment-page-16/#comment-28577

To round this out and finish it off, I hope you did not forget that Vince and Hillary worked together for many years at the Rose Law Firm. Super weird, right?

Bonus: Maybe you thought the link between Lincoln and “rose” was weak, so allow me to bolster that with a discussion of “Presidential” roses. You can mentally create the Venn diagram between the lists given in these two documents:

Roses Named For Famous People

List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots

You have to subtract out the obvious BS psyops. My all-time favorite is the attempt on the life of the Jimmy Carter by Raymond Lee Harvey and Osvaldo Espinoza Ortiz. Priceless! Anyway, the overlap is surprising, and I think it provides something of a guide to interpreting history.

On my scorecard, only Coolidge and Eisenhower got roses without someone actually trying to kill them. As for Wilson and FDR, both had some fairly murky circumstances regarding the latter parts of their Presidencies, so this may be an “occult” confirmation that not all was as we were told with them, you see?

Each President got one rose, but there are four named after Lincoln. Hmm. One of those is the Souvenir du Président Lincoln:

Bred by the famous French rose breeders, Moreau-Robert, and named to honor our president upon his death in 1865....

I mean, that’s some pretty quick work, isn’t it? It seems particularly suspect when we read up on:

The Hidden Lincoln in French Opinion (American Studies Journal, Number 60, 2016):

Abraham Lincoln has never been very popular in France. No statue of Lincoln graces Paris, Lincoln Street is a small street near the Champs-Elysées, much smaller than Washington Street in the same neighborhood, both named in 1879…. Many great Americans have been hailed and celebrated in France, some for their links with France, others for their own greatness.

Fourteen years for a small street but he got that rose right away, didn’t he?

Double-bonus: This article on Presidential Plants features a photo of a species of Texas bluebonnet named after Lady Bird Johnson. To refresh your history, her husband Lyndon Baines Johnson became President after JFK lost his mind.

The fact that men named Johnson became President as a result of assassination is always included in any version of that conspiracy favorite, the Lincoln–Kennedy coincidences urban legend. You may now perhaps be of the view that not all those coincidences were coincidental. (Miles Mathis focuses on the evidence for the Johnsons being crypto-Jews, if you were wondering.)

Hope it was worth reading to the end of this very long one. In any case, thanks very much!

TL;DR: Hoyt Vandenberg was a key player in the America that came out of WW2, one that featured National Security Uber Alles and whose skies were filled with flying objects that the hyper-military somehow had to leave at “unidentified”. His background traces to fake witches, of course.

Foreword: this post doesn’t contain a lot of super-startling revelations, just a lot of regular-startling revelations. The point is more foundational. As it has turned out that we are rewriting the common and even conspiratorial understanding of history, we can’t just do that with sensational posts calling out jews and jesuits. I deeply apologize for the length, but I doubt anyone anywhere is ever going to light up Hoyt, so we have to cram it all in here….

The huge power structures built up during WW2 were going to be dismantled since Americans had been, up to that point, allergic to standing armies. Since it takes a lot of time and effort to engineer wars, They instead decided to fear-monger deadly danger lurking around every corner and underneath your bed. Also in the skies above! Were those saucers filled with little green men bent on our destruction? Reds? Chinks? Nazis? All bent on our destruction or interested in our b-holes?

The solution to that problem-reaction came in the form of the National Security Act of 1947. Among other blessings, it created the Central Intelligence Agency, of which you may have heard. The Vandenbergs were central to it. On that wiki page, you’ll find a photo of Hoyt standing behind Truman as he signs an amendment to it in 1949, and another photo of the last page of the original act signed by Arthur Vandenberg, President of the Senate and Hoyt’s father. We’ll get to him, too.

That particular year may seem familiar because of a certain purported crash, and we find the star of our show at the nexus of this aspect, too. Saucers are suddenly coming out of the woodwork and everyone is looking to the Air Force (also created by the NSA of 47) for answers. And guess who’s running it?

The National Security Act was quite controversial, as you can read in the wiki. Near the end of all the wrestling, they organized some “show hearings”, of which a couple of names caught my eye:

Major witnesses of the bill who spoke in support were… Director of Central Intelligence Hoyt S. Vandenberg, … and president of General Electric Co. Charles E. Wilson.

Out of the list of heavy-hitters in the full quote, all are high-ranking politicians or military except the guy from GE. I have yet to write it up, but GE was stolen out from under Thomas Edison very quickly by “Them”. (If you want to do the research before I get there, look for a guy named Charles Coffin and realize he’s a descendant of one of the founders of Nantucket, the sister group of the Salem crew.)

And did you catch the mistake in Hoyt’s mention in the quote? I said that the NSA of 47 created the CIA, so Hoyt was not Director of an agency that did not exist, right? It turns out no, and triple brownie points if you caught this but knew it was not a mistake.

You see, the position of Director of Central Intelligence actually predates the existence of the agency created thereafter. Hoyt was not just in on the ground floor of the CIA, he was already lurking in the basement. That’s deep in at least two metaphorical senses.

Hoyt left that office on May 1, 1947. There’s no proving it, but I suspect that from that position, he had made what arrangements he needed to for the kickoff of the modern UFO phenomenon: Roswell, Kenneth Arnold, and Maury Island. I’m not saying the CIA or the OSS or whoever ran those gags, but he was situated there for any military/intelligence angle.

The whole UFO thing goes much deeper, as we have seen, are seeing, and will continue to see. I still have to write up Kenneth Arnold and Maury Island (where it leads to DB Cooper and the Space Shuttle Challenger, of all things), but we stomped all over Roswell here:

Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)

NSA47 established the Air Force as a separate branch of the military, as mentioned, and if you read up on the controversy over that act, a lot of the opposition came from the military itself. As I see it, “They” needed to establish a separate base of power from which to operate. If you consult the conspiracy canon for polls about which branch of the military is most willing to shoot American citizens, the USAF always comes out on top. Now you know why.

On April 30, 1948, Hoyt takes over as Chief of Staff of that newly-created USAF. That was just in time for him to control the famous Air Force psyops of Project Sign, Project Grudge, and Project Blue Book. Blowing those up must wait for another post, but let me show you how they disguise his true role. From the wiki for Project Sign:

The project was established in 1948 by Air Force General Nathan Farragut Twining, head of the Air Technical Service Command, and was initially named Project SAUCER…. [two paragraphs later] Project Sign was first asserted in the 1956 book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by retired Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt who later directed Project Blue Book. In this he also claimed that Sign had produced an "Estimate of the Situation" which endorsed an interplanetary explanation for UFOs, but General Hoyt Vandenberg, Chief of Staff of the Air Force, shut down Project Sign for lack of proof.

Hoyt called bullshit on UFOs, right? Four things they make hard to notice. One: Twining was Hoyt’s deputy (maybe they just never talked). Two: Hoyt was still running the Air Force when Blue Book started, so he green-lighted a third UFO project. Three: Ruppelt was retired when he wrote the book, but not when he took over Blue Book. Four: Ruppelt therefore worked for Vandenberg running Blue Book.

For all the foregoing, four-star General Hoyt Vandenberg (1899-1954) is never talked about these days. Having served his purpose, that is just how They like it. Some may find the name Vandenberg Space Force Base familiar as the home of all West Coast space launches. Conspiracy theorists like to talk about how suspicious they are of the creation of the United States Space Force in 2019, but I’d say they missed the action by over 70 years. It goes deeper, of course.

We’ve gone way long on the nuts and bolts of Hoyt’s life, things you might bring up in polite company, so I’ll try to be brief with the genealogical and “Salem Witches” material….

Both his parents were Dutch and there are some very heavy-hitting Dutch families in America. One example with links to others is the Livingston family. Personally, I don’t think he’s connected this way, but you never know and I include it for completeness.

Another tenuous lead is that his mother’s maiden name was Kane. The NYT-published “journalist” Leslie Kean spells her last name differently but pronounces it as “Kane”. It turns out that she is lurking just under the surface of this latest wave of UFO (pardon, UAP) bullshit, from AATIP to David Grusch. John Podesta wrote the foreword to one of her books. And yes, I checked it out and will write it up later, but her ancestry traces back to the Salem Witches. Suspicious enough for you?

Hoyt was born in American-as-apple-pie Milwaukee, but he was raised in Lowell, Massachusetts, which is right next door to—you got it—Essex County and Salem. Also, Milwaukee is just a half-hour north of Kenosha, and we just saw four days ago how suspicious Kenosha is in this post:

The link between Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Paddock in Vegas, and Witches in Salem is never discussed, extraordinarily unlikely, and highly illuminating (conspiracies.win 1/10/2025)

Can we really leave it as American-as-apple-pie or do we have to start asking “what part of Milwaukee?” No matter, because we hit overdrive with Hoyt’s father, the aforementioned Arthur Hendrick Vandenberg Sr. (1884-1951).

We’re handed a bunch of lies and suspicious circumstances concerning Hoyt’s family and early years. His mother died in 1917, which would be right when Hoyt was launching into a fabulous career. Elite sacrifice? You decide.

Wiki tells us regarding Arthur that, “As a widower with three small children, Vandenberg was ineligible for active military service during World War I.” Hoyt’s brother, Arthur Jr., would have been ten, which I suppose is small. As to his other sibling, no information whatsoever is available from Hoyt’s Geni page. I mean, they don’t even include Arty Jr. What’s going on?

It gets odder with Hoyt’s “teenage years”, which we are told were in Lowell. If you read Arty Sr.’s page, there is no mention he ever lived anywhere other than Grand Rapids, Michigan, aside from time spent in Washington as a senator. That’s all the way across a Great Lake from Milwaukee. But more importantly, how does Hoyt end up in Lowell? Is it too much to speculate that as a teen he was “given over” to some other group? Sounds outlandish but the water gets deeper.

The little I can find out about Hoyt’s “teenage years” is this: while Arty Sr. skates out of military service (lucky!), he’s a war-monger and his son attends a Hitlerjugend camp on steroids. These “Plattsburg Camps” have generally been written out of the narrative. The “good guys” don’t do such things, do they? But since they love all things war, Hoyt’s involvement is acknowledged in this Department of Defense bio (4-page PDF). You can read about all this insanity here. It’s not mentioned on Hoyt’s wiki page, and you’ll be surprised the mainstream admits to it at all.

Hoyt’s camp was on Plum Island. That’s Plum Island, New York, to be specific, because there’s another Plum Island in Massachusetts. Yes, that’s the suspicious one you’re familiar with, but moreover it’s 14 miles north of Salem, separated from the mainland by the Parker River. (I bolded that so you can start checking your list of people of the Salem witch trials.) Is the name coincidence? You decide,

Virtually all of Arty Sr.’s working career (i.e. not as a US Senator) was spent “as a newspaper editor and publisher at the Grand Rapids Herald. It was owned by William Alden Smith.” Smith chaired the Senate committee on the Titanic, and you can begin to learn about all the fakery of that “hoax of the century” where:

We expose the latest news on the (fake) sinking of the Titan submersible, and find a bonus reference that leads immediately to a monstrous killer, the founding of the British Empire, and pedophilia (surprise!) (conspiracies.win 9/27/2024)

I didn’t even bother checking the genealogy, but in addition to the SWT connection, John and Priscilla Alden were two famous passengers aboard the Mayflower in 1620. Surprise again! But maybe not, because we lit up some of their shipmates in this post:

A “Cabell” runs through the JFK assassination to UFOs to Thomas Jefferson to the Mueller investigation to the Mayflower and beyond (conspiracies.win 11/26/2024)

Finally, I wonder if anyone remembers my claim that “They” had eventually set up various strongholds outside of Salem, like Denver and Kenosha? I’m adding Alden, Michigan to that list of “Spooky Places”. Want to know why?

Alden was first settled as early a 1868 by storekeeper F. J. Lewis in Helena Township…. The growing community was located along the mouth of Spencer Creek along Torch Lake, which was named after John Spencer. Spencer Creek was renamed Alden after railroad official William Alden Smith, who would later become a state politician.

Bonus: Hoyt had a son, which you might have guessed from his name alone: Major General (ret) Hoyt S. Vandenberg Jr.. There’s a whole section in his wiki titled, “Meeting Charles Lindbergh”, as if it was the most interesting thing he’d ever done. Personally, I think They included it to flog another old hoax to us once again:

Lucky Lindy? (Miles Mathis 2/23/2016 34-page PDF and yes, Mathis, disinfo caveat etc etc.)

Not-a-bonus: Wiki admits that Arty Sr. was a Mason. Do you really think the “hE’s A mAsOn!” type of research is at all important at this level?

Can’t believe you made it all the way! Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: Paddock Lake is just to the west of Kenosha, and is named after a relative of Stephen Paddock. Going back further, his ancestors intermarried with prominent families from the Salem Witch Trials. If you think this is merely wild coincidence, stop reading now.

WARNING: It will take a good bit to explain that this is no coincidence at all. This is an extra-long post, but includes three bonuses.

I have to do something I resist doing, which is to give you the answer up front. Some will bolt up from their chair at the defense table to object that this is “leading the witness!” or some such. In this case, the evidence is faint and unfamiliar. I have to show you the top of the puzzle box then explain to you where these strange little pieces of colored cardboard fit into the picture.

Further complicating the situation is the sheer weight of the bullshit narratives that have been purposely fed into the conspir-o-sphere regarding both the Kenosha and Vegas events. Whatever you now believe happened, you’re going to have to set it aside temporarily or we’ll get nowhere with this material. When you finish reading, don’t worry because you’re free to pick it back up as if none of this exists. And no, we’re not here to argue the particulars of any aspect of any of these events.

To make sense of it all, though, the big picture (for us, for now) begins four centuries ago. These Dark Occultists came over in a big wave, embedded in the Puritan Great Migration of 1620-1640. They set up shop in Nantucket and Salem, Massachusetts. Now you know why the Witch Trials were in Salem. They stayed there until about the 1800’s, when some moved out to set up additional strongholds. It turns out that Kenosha was among them, and Denver was another as we have seen in previous posts. All along, though, They have used family members to conduct their various historical shenanigans.

So what happened at these events? Vegas and the Salem Witch Trials are easy: nothing. I mean, if the odd corpse of an inconvenient person was thrown into the mix, who would know the difference? If you objected, well, there would just be the additional odd corpse of an “unfortunate victim”. Kenosha is more complex. To start us off, here’s what I wrote up over three years ago:

There was a conspiracy to murder Kyle Rittenhouse that night, and Joshua Ziminski was involved. If you don’t agree, at least tell me which Joshua Ziminski was not involved. (r/conspiracy_commons 11/21/2021)

Let’s see, 2.6K views of a long, complex post on a highly controversial topic yielding 8 upvotes. Can you say “shadowbanned”? Do They typically bother shadowbanning a load of off-target bullshit? The vital upshot from that night was this: it was a broken play.

The point of the op was to shut down the “Rooftop Korean” phenomenon, which came to prominence during the Rodney King riots. They would smoke one of these 2A types and then run the false dialectic something like this: “white supremacists freely try to murder black trans jews in the streets but thank goddess do not succeed” versus “any fuckwit who tries to defend himself will get killed and no one will get punished and you probably deserved it”. In essence, choose freely and you will be wrong in every case.

Kyle—young, pale, doughy, nerdy Kyle—was selected that night as the easy mark. Turns out he was cool under extreme pressure and good with an AR, so the plan got fucked. They tried to recover, though, and it all ended up in court. It sounds like I’m arguing the particulars of the Rittenhouse case, but this is all just context for the peek behind the curtain.

Go back and look at that Reddit post. Are you going to try to tell me his defense counsel, or any law enforcement personnel, or the judicial system, or anyone in the local press could not figure that out like I did? Forget it. What that means is that all those levers were controlled at least to such extent as to keep all the metric ton of bullshit between the lines. In short, Kyle was an arbitrary choice, but Kenosha was crucial. It is revealed as one of “Their” strongholds.

BTW, I didn’t figure it out in that order if you were thinking I was some sort of Sherlock. No, I was looking up something about the Rittenhouse incident and it dawned on me I didn’t really know where Kenosha was (see, not a Sherlock). I opened up Google Maps and—as a habit I recommend to other researchers—instead of using the search I tried to scroll and zoom and enhance my way there. When I did that, I noticed Paddock Lake, Wisconsin right next door to Kenosha. Well, here we fucking go.

I won’t even get into it, but Kenosha was the home of American Motors Corporation. I touched on it briefly in my “Flint water crisis” post, but They run both Flint and General Motors to this day. And Dodge. See the theme? AMC ended up being run by George W. Romney, the father of Mitt. The Romneys came up in my “Billy the Kid” post. Shit, it gets tiresome even linking to my own work, but I think you get the point.

Wiki tells us that the lake was named after Dr. Francis Paddock (1814-1889). I mentioned that “They” began moving out of their fastnesses in the northeast in the 1800’s and here we have an example. But maybe I’m getting overexcited and this is just some dude named Paddock, right?

He and his family settled between two lakes now known as Paddock and Hooker Lakes in the town of Salem in Kenosha County, Wisconsin (now the village of Salem Lakes, Wisconsin).

(By the by, we are also told that Salem Lakes was “formerly the town of Salem and the village of Silver Lake”. I stopped writing about the subject because it got too detailed and esoteric, but my work on the Black Dahlia eventually led to the reservoir in Los Angeles featured in the movie Under the Silver Lake. We aren’t done and this shit actually gets disturbing after a while.)

Buckle up for (or skip) this next genealogical nitty-gritty. The Geni record for Dr. Francis is: Francis Paddock. That’s a total brick wall. I include it so that you will note it’s a total brick wall, but the interesting fact is that this was “Last Updated: September 24, 2023". Isn’t that weird? This supposed rando died a century and a half ago. What more is there to say about him in 2023? I want you to notice the same brick wall in Doc’s Wikitree record: Francis Paddock (1814 - 1889). “Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]”. Well, that’s the end of that. Except it isn’t. Wiki itself tells us:

The eldest member of the group, David Paddock, Francis's grandfather, was a Revolutionary War veteran and died shortly after the trip. He was called 'Blind David' because he was blinded from powder burn injuries he sustained during the war.

A plain fact the genealogical sites somehow do not know about? My point here is that history is easily erased. But we use what we find, when and where we find it, and discover that “Blind David” was undoubtedly this man: Pvt. David Paddock (1753-1847).

Keep driving back in time through the “Son of” link, and you’ll arrive at man known as “Robert Paddock of the Plymouth Colony”. One item you might note while there is that his first wife was born Mary Ball. That is exactly the same name as the wife of George Washington. I have never followed up as to whether they were related, but we should start a pool.

Now let’s go back to the Before Times of 2017, when we all became acquainted with the bullshit narratives about Stephen Craig Paddock (1953-2017) (<-- haha, he didn’t actually die in 2017!). Again, keep driving up through the “Son of” link. (Funny, but on the way you’ll see he has an ancestor named George Washington Paddock (1819-1901). Also, Mary Ball Washington’s father’s first wife was born Elizabeth Romney, so my speculation isn’t totally off the wall, is it? Anywho….) You’ll once again end up at Robert Paddock of the Plymouth Colony. Seems bizarre that it’s this easy when it’s pointed out to you, doesn’t it?

Okay, okay, so how about those witches, huh? Well, if you wander around the Paddock (also infrequently listed as “Paddack”, so be aware) genealogy, you’ll find this prime example: Stephen Paddack (1729-1814). (See what I said about the alternate spelling? It got dropped way back when, though.)

Get out your handy list of people of the Salem witch trials. Stephen’s son Ichabod married Priscilla Clark. Priscilla was the daughter of Deborah Brown (who was born a Bunker, which I’ll tell you about in a sec). His mother’s second husband was Susannah Folger. (Bethshua Folger, a primary witness at the trials, and was the aunt of Benjamin Franklin, which I’ll tell you about in a sec.) Some female Paddock’s husband or son or whatever could have personally been at the fake trials for all I know, but I think you’re getting the picture.

Stephen just happened to be more Nantucket-based, actually. So if you get out your handy list of Nantucket settlers, you may find it interesting that Stephen’s sister was Elizabeth Swain, his niece was Elizabeth Coleman, and his wife was Eunice Coffin. Feel free to wander around these genealogies, which are like a sink drain with a hair clog of Elite bloodlines.

Bonus (speaking of witches): In Macbeth, who are Greymalkin and Paddock?

In Macbeth, Greymalkin and Paddock are the familiars of the witches, serving as their demonic assistants.

Whoa, on the nose, huh? Now, I’m not just going to leave you with, “Oh look, mention of someone named pAdDoCk!!!” Of course not, my frens. There is more.

We are told that Macbeth was written by Shakespeare, of course, but who knows who really put quill to parchment, so to speak. Yet I can definitely tell you that next to the Library of Congress, kitty-corner from the Supreme Court, and a block from the grounds of the United Stated Capitol sits the Folger Shakespeare Library. Getting the sense that a lot has been going on under our noses all these centuries?

Double-bonus: Remember in this post I mentioned the Black Dahlia and Silver Lake? That reservoir is just south of the Franklin Hills neighborhood. The murder itself is suspected to have taken place at a certain famous house on Franklin Avenue, at the end of which, as the entrance to Franklin Hills, sits the Shakespeare Bridge.

Third bonus: Did you notice the list of Nantucket settlers included the name Robert Pike? Yep, he’s a direct ancestor of Albert Pike. I’ll light up that fat jackass in a future post.

If you ain’t spooked, I don’t think you can be spooked. You are also now free to return to exactly what you previously believed concerning Rittenhouse in Kenosha, Paddock in Vegas, and Witches in Salem.

In any case, thanks for reading!

TL;DR: LAPD Chief William Parker, of the family of generational Satanists and the larger collection of families of Spook Elites, appears to have been involved in faking the deaths of Marilyn Monroe, Robert F. Kennedy, and himself.

Because there is so much material to cover, we have to be brief and to the point. That is, the focus is on Chief Parker, expanding on his involvement in these famous cases. If you have trouble believing that the deaths of Marilyn and RFK were faked, you better just hit eject now because we do not have space to discuss it and we aren’t here to argue it. Alternatively, even if this is the first you’ve heard of the claim about the fake deaths but you allow that it may be possible, then I’ll bootstrap you and you can read on to add all this Parker stuff to the cases.

There are two vital “meta-points” to this post, both involving disinformation. One concerns that highest-level disinformation agent out there, Miles Mathis (although “MM” may actually be a writing team). In none of his work—which is incredibly extensive—does he ever mention Chief Parker, and certainly not as a bloodline Satanist. So if, while reading this post, you find it of probative value in your search for the truth, you have a practical example of high-level disinfo at work.

The other meta-point concerns the standard-issue disinformation comprising a goodly fraction of “conspiracy theory”. That is, you’ll see some examples here, but there are innumerable other “conspiracies” regarding these two and their deaths, everything from JFK and RFK tag-teaming Marilyn, to aliens, to Israel, to the mob, etc, etc. The same holds for the whole of the conspir-o-sphere.

Nowhere do any “conspiracy theorists” (excluding Mathis, and we have just discussed that he is high-level) suggest the deaths were faked. Pick any or all of the juicy conspiracies you’re handed because they’re all wrong. See how that works? We’ll draw from their work because they have to give you some truths—here regarding Chief Parker—as bait for their lies. We’ll see how that works too.

To begin, the big premises of this post are the fake deaths. Parker’s they don’t even want to talk about: he dropped dead at an awards ceremony and that’s that. Miles Mathis wrote a paper documenting Marilyn’s (again, never mentioning any Parker):

Marilyn Monroe's Death was faked (8/18/2015 12-page PDF)

As to RFK, he claimed it briefly and tangentially in his paper on Charlie Manson but never documented it:

The Tate Murders were a False Flag (6/29/2014 95-page PDF)

[Abigail Folger] had worked on Robert Kennedy's campaign in 1968, and, as you will remember, he was also killed in very mysterious circumstances. His death was filmed, the wounds and gunshots never matched, the photos were faked, the “murderer” was a patsy, and we saw no body.

Since we’re talking the finer points of disinfo, it’s worth noting that Mathis made no such claim in his lengthy landmark paper over six years earlier:

The Hidden Kings: Camelot ruled from the cave of Merlin (December 2007 86-page PDF)

BTW, that paper was his big entrée into conspiracy, where he claims the JFK assassination was faked. It was not, but we aren’t here to debate that either. Do note, though, that in the Tate paper he never remarks, “Hey, I thought it was legit before, but it turns out the RFK assassination was faked.” That’s because you aren’t witnessing an increase in knowledge and the evolution of a consciousness. We were all being fed truth mixed with bullshit all along. Do you see?

Now, as far as documenting the fake assassination of RFK, the only person in the world ever to have done that appears to be… yours truly. Hard to believe but there we have it. If you’re interested in the details, you can find comments trying to expose this under my same username in these two social media posts:

Why was JFK killed and by who? Obviously wasn’t the patsy Oswald? Also, why was Bobby killed? (r/conspiracy 6/25/2022)

Deleted Reddit Thread Outlines Interesting Details on 1968 RFK Assassination (conspiracies.win 8/25/2024)

I link you to that information in its “native” context so you can also observe the gullibility and disinfo being spread around social media channels on a daily basis. It does not make for optimism.

Now, if this is your first contact with what a scumbag Chief Parker was, or as a refresher on some small part of the huge context in which he sits:

Ever feel like “To protect and serve” was a big joke? It is! We discuss that and other occultism at the LAPD, featuring Chief William H. Parker, a generational Satanist. (conspiracies.win 10/2/2024)

As to the next two links, I had thought that someone once said something like, “There is no one better to promote a lie than someone who actually believes it.” I can find no source, so who knows or cares, but here we have people who I believe have swallowed the disinfo and are trying their best to make sense of it and trying their best to pass it on:

THE MURDER OF MARILYN MONROE

When he arrived, Sergeant Clemmons was supposed to secure the crime scene, and have Marilyn's body transported to the county morgue for an autopsy. Instead, he allowed her body to be picked up by 2 morticians. Sergeant Clemmons' boss was the notoriously corrupt LAPD Chief of Police named Captain William Parker…. As chief, Parker was supposed to ensure that Marilyn's remains were removed to the county morgue for an autopsy.

The Death of Marilyn Monroe (9/20/2020)

Sergeant Clemmons’s superior officer (Chief Parker) insisted that the case be investigated as a suicide. Clemmons was told to keep quiet. When he refused he was dropped from the force.

For such a big conspiracy to work would require many officials in the corridors of power to be working together to play down the drama and hope that the public would get bored. Some of the officials often named, all friends of the Kennedys, include Police Chief William Parker, Captain James Hamilton, Coroner Theodore Curphey, Chief Daryl Gates, John Van Kamp, and Ira Reiner.

(NB: Much more to say about Gates and Hamilton at a future date.)

God bless these people, but see how it all implicitly excludes the possibility of her death being faked? I beg you to please resist the impulse to become a crusader. That will do little except obscure your view and corrupt your search for the truth, assuming that’s what you’re after.

Now allow me to frame the next set of links which—at long last—form the heart of this post. They’re desperately trying to sell you some dumb crazy bullshit about Marilyn and Bobby and JFK—anything you’ll swallow—but they give up info about the central role of Chief Parker in these “events”.

Also note the “historiography” of disinformation. The first one is not contemporaneous but almost a quarter-century after the fact. That’s because they were making it up at that time, you see? Also, it continues to this very day. That’s sure and disturbing proof that “They” are still actively polluting our timeline and distorting our reality. Here we go:

THE MAN WHO KEPT MARILYN'S SECRETS (Vanity Fair, May 1991)

"I do know that Bobby Kennedy was in town that day. He was staying at the Beverly Hilton Hotel. This was all told to me by the police chief, [William] Parker. He was very adamant that Kennedy was seen at the hotel the night of Marilyn's death."

According to L.A. Police Chief William Parker, Kennedy was seen at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on Saturday night, so he did not return to San Francisco immediately after he left Marilyn's house that afternoon.

Bombshell: Sixty Years After Her Death, New Evidence Suggests Marilyn Monroe Was Murdered and LAPD Covered Up Murder (Covert Action Magazine 8/4/2022( (<-- a high-level disnfo outlet IMHO)

Robert Kennedy was particularly close to LAPD chief William Parker, whom he considered the best police chief in the nation….

A week later, Captain James Hamilton told Clemmons to sign a report he had prepared about Marilyn’s death. Clemmons refused, but later learned that his signature was forged under the orders of Chief Parker.

Just after Marilyn’s death, Parker, who had ambitions of replacing J. Edgar Hoover as FBI chief, was the one to confiscate her phone records.

Hollywood icon [Shirley MacLaine] reveals she saw filthy bedroom encounter between Kennedys and Marilyn Monroe on JFK's birthday: Monroe had sex with Bobby Kennedy 30 minutes before she sang 'Happy Birthday' to his brother JFK (Daily Mail 11/2/2024)

Shirley MacLaine had an open marriage with producer and alleged spy Steve Parker for 28 years - who she described as the love of her life.

If I haven’t made my case by now, I never will. But let me throw in this bonus from a week after that last article….

Bonus: Marilyn Monroe has been 'haunting' a famous Hollywood hotel since she died tragically at age 36 (Daily Mail 11/9/2024)

Okay, beyond MFMs, we get ghosts. Jesus H. Christ. But did you notice the byline? Heidi Parker.

You cannot make this shit up.

TL;DR: Evidence strongly points towards Trey Parker being a member of one of a number of families of generational Satanists who have been running psyops and influencing history from just outside the spotlight for many centuries.

This is another example of how associations can be right in front of our faces, yet we never see them. I’ve known Trey Parker’s name for over 25 years, and I daresay I’ve written more than anyone in the world (at least publicly) on the Parker family of Satanists, yet it only now occurred to me that he may be one of them.

You have already concluded by this instant that he is one of them, of course, or I wouldn’t have written this and you wouldn’t be reading it. However, reflect honestly for a moment and understand that—even for readers of these posts—it never occurred to you either. The important lesson is to try to cut some slack for your normie friends and family who don’t already see what you already see.

I suppose we should start with the subconscious assumption we’ve had all along (and that normies have about everything): to the extent that we thought about it at all, Trey Parker and Matt Stone were just a couple of rando drunken college buddy creative bros that put together a low-brow, vulgar cartoon that caught the zeitgeist just right and became a runaway success. If there was anything more to the story, someone would have told us, right?

No, of course not. That’s not how the world works at all. It’s rare that you ever get more to the story, but that’s what I’m here to offer to you. It begins right at the top of his wiki page, where we find out his name is really Randolph Severn Parker III. The "Trey" comes from him being the third in a row of that fancy name. Being the third of a fancy name—especially here, where we’re on the trail of people obsessed with bloodlines—doesn’t suggest any kind of random bro, does it?

And we’re off to the races except that we come to a screeching halt. There are no genealogical records that I can locate on Trey. Sus, to be sure, but I think by the end of this you won’t feel you’ll need it for confirmation. First—and with a link containing much more context—we should recall that another Parker was previously all over our TV screens on a weekly basis:

Jameson Parker, star of the hit 80’s crime drama “Simon & Simon”, was truly the unseen Parker (plus further confirmation on Sean and Robbie and a note about psychopaths) (conspiracies.win 12/2/2024)

I guess my title stands, given that Jameson was in front of the cameras while Trey works behind the scenes. But still, as a cultural force, I think few would disagree that Simon & Simon was entirely innocuous, while South Park has upped (downed?) the level of cultural degradation a notch or two. Not objectionable to Satanists of any stripe, do you think?

While you’re at that link, you can find discussion of a telling uniformity of hair color of certain Parkers, a distinctive medium-dark reddish-brown. How about Trey? There’s a profile pic on his wiki page, but this pic might be a better one by which to judge. Actually, I’ve started to notice something about eye color too, and we’ll come back to that in the bonus. As for judging similarity, you might think about yourself as compared to your first cousins who might even share your surname. And here I’ve found a bunch of Parkers with similar hair, which doesn’t seem like it would be at all easy to find or manufacture.

On the same note of “not easy to manufacture”, Trey and the Parkers sit in a much larger context, a bit of which is discussed here:

It’s a (very) Small World 3x3: 3 Elite Families working together in 3 locations (and no one ever noticed) (conspiracies.win 3/31/2024)

Reading that, fans of South Park might already have thought, “Hey, Trey Parker is actually from Colorado!” Indeed. And not just from Colorado, but from near Denver, which that post takes as one of the three locations. Specifically, Trey was born and grew up just to the southwest of Denver, in what I am sure is lovely Conifer, Colorado. He attended school just 15 minutes north up the mountain highway and graduated from Evergreen High School (Colorado) in 1988. Hmmm, “evergreen”… that word sounds strangely familiar….

Exposing the Dark World: There’s something very strange about “Evergreen” (conspiracies.win 2/20/2024)

Speaking of high school, Trey’s partner (handler?), Matt Stone, was raised in the nearby Denver suburb of Littleton, Colorado. Ring a bell? Had the town’s most notorious event been called the “Littleton High IRL FPS in Honor of Hitler’s Birthday”, we might recognize Matt’s alma mater, but it has the far-less-market-savvy handle of the “Columbine High School massacre”. Boring name.

I note that Matt Stone “is of Irish-American heritage from his father's side and Jewish heritage from his mother's side. The South Park characters Gerald and Sheila Broflovski were named after them.” If anyone out there thinks they’re always going to find a Jew behind everything, I’ve pointed him out to you. However, I think others will recognize that if we’re always just looking for Joos, we’re going to miss quite a lot. And that’s the point.

Another key collab by Trey and Matt is the 2011 musical, The Book of Mormon. I suppose you could accept that their motivation was to take down organized religion a notch by exposing their silliness and control, or perhaps it was that Trey was once dumped by a Mormon girl and wanted some payback on her entire faith or some such thing. Sure, believe whatever you like, but be aware that there is a far deeper connection between the Parkers and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints:

Billy the Kid was the cousin of two Mormon OGs that overthrew Joseph Smith and the LDS, which should tell you one was fake and the other controlled from way back (plus the Parkers appear!) (conspiracies.win 11/12/2024)

Finally, speaking of artistic inspiration, we should talk about Trey’s directorial debut in a work that predates South Park: 1993’s Cannibal! The Musical. I mean, it’s just that Satanists are consistently rumored to practice cannibalism, so… weird.

But you know, it’s not just the subject matter and that Trey was trying to get attention as an outrageous edgelord. The musical is based on a true story. Gross. Also, you can read that the title was originally Alfred Packer: The Musical. “Packer”? Um, that’s really, really close to “Parker”, isn’t it? Maybe someone decided this musical “based on a true story about a guy almost named Parker” was a little too based on a true story and changed the name. Anyway, makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

Bonus: I know that few out there are aware but there’s this thing called pornography. It’s been around forever, but it hit ultra-overdrive in the late 1970’s with the introduction of what we used to call “videocassette recorders”, kids. Welp, that was exactly when porn actress Kay Parker was also introduced to us. Take a look at her hair and eye color. (Yes, that’s similar to her hair color as a younger woman, but don’t go looking up any pictures of that.)

Double-bonus: There was a villain in The Vampire Diaries called Kai Parker. He was not named after the pornographic actress we just talked about, if that’s what you were thinking. Turns out that “Kai” is short for Malachai.

Not to get nerdy but I have to get nerdy: the name “Malachai” is a vowelization of the Hebrew word root “m-l-k”. You will find many variations on that vowelization, from “Moloch” to “Milchcom”. The word root means something like “king”, which is a generic title.

Now, you may choose to take my take my word in place of a very long case, but I have only ever found that word historically to refer to the entity typically called Satan. I can’t even begin to describe the hurricane of misunderstanding and disinformation surrounding all this, but the point is that here we have it attached to a Parker. Mere happenstance, perhaps.

TL;DR: Whatever your opinion concerning the real or fake gunning down of CEOs, just be aware that in the case of Luigi Mangione, a stunning number of people named Parker are involved.

For the record, I thought the whole thing was both phony and unimportant from the very beginning. Frankly, I was determined not to waste any time looking into it. Just today, though, I was listening to the latest episode of the podcast, “Tin Foil Hat with Sam Tripoli”:

#844: 39 Days To Melee and The Sky Wars With Top Lobsta, Raven and Mark Steeves (12/17/2024)

I personally recommend that after you read this post, you should actually force yourself to listen to that whole podcast. The reason is that as you do, you’ll be able to study and analyze the typical kind of disinformation being peddled by persons like “Raven” and “Top Lobsta” of the “Nephilim Deathsquad”. “Mystic Mark” Steeves, who is actually the booker for the show, is along for the ride, having discovered the great value of their insights on this incident. Seriously, see how long you can put up with it.

You see, I think conspiracy theorists have the idea that disinformation is carefully crafted after long experimentation in the MKULTRA basement labs. Sometimes, maybe, but it’s generally hardly necessary. It’s all stark raving bullshit being handed out by this crew. The key, though, is the format. Sam and the gang are bro-ing down with their good bros, who are blowing their minds with this banger of bangers.

These guys are complete clowns, of course, but Sam is lapping it up. If it never crosses your mind that your “bros” might be handing you a line of bullshit, there’s basically zero chance you will ever recognize it. My God, they even discuss the “work” of Clif High, clown prince of all clowns, as if there was something real about it.

What a rant, huh? So why would I say this? Let’s dive in and we’ll try to see what we are not supposed to notice right in front of us, while Nephilim Deathsquad and every other lame sideshow act are polluting all podcasts with their deep research. Perhaps we should start slow and set the tone. Check out this latest story:

Luigi Mangione began plotting to ‘wack’ Brian Thompson as early as August, investigators say (New York Post 12/19/2024)

Well, not the story, but the pictures. Compare the two stills of Luigi walking in front of the big crowd of cops. It’s a real mess, and beyond the typical problems with shadows, contrast, and sharpness. Subjects are appearing and disappearing, and even changing heights. Just imagine that these are heads and bodies sloppily pasted one over the other. You’ll see it. More subtly, notice that in that big crowd, not one person is visibly in contact with any other person.

So that alone shows (literally) the fraud, and there’s always the meta-point: notice how little people notice of the world around them. No one else sees this? Really? That being said, who are the fraudsters? Well, did you notice in the article who’s running the show? Judge Katharine Parker.

I hope at this point I don’t have to reintroduce the family of generational Satanists that have been running psyops on us for centuries. I suppose this is the most blatant episode I’ve yet seen. Personally I can’t even figure out what the point of it was, but here it is presented to us.

We’ll come back to Judge Parker. Maybe she’s just a judge named Parker, right? She isn’t the one I first noticed, anyway. Again, as much as I tried to avoid this story, mention of this other key person came up in the TFH podcast:

Who is Nancy Parker? McDonald's employee who allegedly turned in Luigi Mangione reportedly misses out on reward money (Sportskeeda 12/12/2024)

Indeed, who is Nancy Parker? I suppose we’re discussing just what you need to know about Ms. Parker right now, aren’t we? Now, here are a few others I just happened on by-the-by, and you can decide for yourself how many Parkers is too many Parkers telling us what to think about this story.

Jessica Parker of the British Brainwashing Corporation vividly paints the scene according to “Larry” (maybe Larry Parker, eh?):

McDonald's customer recounts moment CEO shooting suspect spotted (BBC 12/10/2024)

Star Parker validates those of us who desire to hold the view that Luigi did nothing wrong. You can also read her bio to decide who, if anyone, is in the woodpile:

Star Parker: Did Luigi Mangione murder because of 'emotional disturbance'? (Daily News-Record [Harrisonburg VA] 12/19/2024)

We also get to hear from Nicole Parker, a voice from the most trustworthy of American institutions telling us that, in her expert opinion, there’s nothing to see here:

Former FBI special agent Nicole Parker: 'Not shocked' Luigi Mangione was not a client of UnitedHealthcare (Noticias Fox 12/13/2024) (<-- bizarrely this was only on the Spanish-language version of the site)

Now as we return to the judge, the waters get deep. They gave me the tiniest crumb but it was enough:

Biography of Hon. Katharine H. Parker, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, United States Magistrate Judge (Practising Law Institute)

Judge Parker clerked for the Honorable Warren W. Eginton in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut prior to joining Proskauer.

He’s actually prominent enough to have his own wiki page: Warren William Eginton. I note Warren is another of the Spook Families and is closely linked to the Parkers. For example, check out this quick historical quote:

Chelmsford and the Battles of Lexington and Concord

2 Captain Joseph Warren fired the Alarm Gun to notify the Minutemen and Militia to muster.

3 The Chelmsford Militia Companies were led by Captain Oliver Barren and Captain Moses Parker.

Right on scene but just outside the spotlight of history, you see? I suspect that, in the typical style of the Elites, “Warren” is his middle name and reflects his mother’s bloodline.

In any case, they admit he died a few years back in Redding, Connecticut. Who cares? I do. Right on that page, they tell us that the name of the town was originally “Reading”, and it was named after the town of Reading in Berkshire, England.

That, in my opinion, goes some way to explaining how this circus ended up in Pennsylvania. I had been unable to avoid hearing that factoid and it struck me as odd. Luigi had made it out of the big city full of cops, to the boonies of Altoona, and that’s where he gets dimed? Really?

Well, it turns out that there’s a Reading, Pennsylvania. Right on that page they admit that town also is named after Reading in Berkshire. Something about Reading, huh? But wait, there’s more!

The one that I was familiar with, which popped into my mind when I saw where Eginton had died, was Reading, Massachusetts. Right on the page they admit that—third time’s a charm—that town too was named after Reading in Berkshire.

Finally, the punchline: Guess who founded and named that initial American version? Thomas Parker (1609-1683).

See, I told you They had been at this a long time.

TL;DR: The claim is that the Roswell Incident (<- note that Wikipedia recently removed “UFO” from the middle of the name) was a hoax perpetrated by the same set of Spook Families (suspected generational Satanists) stretching back to the Salem Witch Trials and long before. The extremely narrow focus we’ll take here is to see if members of these Families participated who didn’t even bother changing their last names (because they know no one’s looking). Surprise! This post ends up extremely long.

I like to describe how I find my way to these things, because in the end it’s nothing special. If you think that somehow it’s all “too weird” to be true, that’s how I feel also. But when the evidence is put before us, what are we to do?

Up til now, I thought I was going to have to leave Roswell out of my big roundup of “UFO Phenomenon” <--> “Salem Witch Trials” posts. I mean, I knew it was a hoax from other analysis, but could I tie the two together? I had one tenuous link: Col. William Blanchard. That was it.

Now, a future post will discuss this guy in more detail, but I was researching Stanton Friedman. He “broke” the whole Roswell thing open in the early 70’s, reviving it from a long slumber. He seemed like a basic Jew-Canadian so I suspected he had a handler. Perhaps similarly to Budd Hopkins (another post), his wife was his handler. Lo and behold, Stanton’s first wife was named Porter, a name from the list of people of the Salem witch trials. (You can find the names we’ll talk about presently on that list.) I researched her and, yeah, she was his handler.

That was yesterday Today, I was researching a post to deboonk Roswell as the very beginning of the “(False) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age”, and I wanted to base my thesis on problems with the chronology of events. Rather than yandexing, I was using two old paperbacks on Roswell I happened to have laying around:

UFO Crash at Roswell (1991) and the imaginatively titled The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell (1994)

Both are by Kevin D. Randle (spook) with Donald R. Schmitt (probably the brains of the operation). BTW, given the title of the second, what does that make first? Joke’s on you, both are disinfo. I’ll be quoting from these books so you’ll be able to see that it’s not just that “some dude who happened to be named (blank) happened to be walking by”. These are the people who made it all go and who we got the Roswell story from. Just FYI, the 1991 book is identical to mine, I believe, but the 1994 book may be a different edition.

As I was looking for who knows what, I happened across the name of one of the airmen who loaded the “saucer wreckage” onto the bomber to fly both it and Jesse Marcel out to Eighth Air Force Headquarters: Master Sergeant Robert Porter. “OMG, is this really happening again?” asked I to myself.

Yes, and here we are. We’ll jump off from the last post, where we discussed the commanding officer of the 509th Bombardment Group, Very Heavy, and who also served as the base commander of Roswell Army Air Field at the time of the “incident”:

General William H. Blanchard: phony nukes, phony witches, and the (false) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age (conspiracies.win 12/4/2024)

Funnily enough, you see there that I can’t place any Blanchards at Salem in 1692 (yet), but they are at other “witch hunts” both before and after. The Blanchards and the Parsons, though, seem to have some “strange attraction” to the Roswell area long before flying discs started arriving. And, well, it seems like a couple of other Families did too:

Brazel picked up some of the smaller fragments and, with [William] Proctor, headed off to his nearest neighbors, Floyd and Loretta Proctor [William’s parents], who lived about ten miles from the ranch headquarters.

[Quoting the Las Vegas Review-Journal] It is said that an object described as a ‘flying disc’ was found on the nearby Foster ranch three weeks ago by W.W. Brazel and has been sent to ‘higher official’ [sic] for examination.

We are really off to the races! Now, I get that’s the next name is fairly common, but I must stress that this guy played a crucial role in my understanding of Roswell. You see, for many years I believed a saucer really did crash there and even told people that.

My opinion was based on one photo of a handful of photographs taken the day Marcel brought the wreckage to General Roger Ramey at Carswell. The evidence in it has come to be referred to as the “Ramey Memo”. Later, I flipped 180 and came to see it as evidence of the hoax. It’s all too long to explain here but you can research it on your own. Neither book mentions it. Funny. Anyway, who took that pivotal photo?

J. Bond Johnson was a staff reporter for the Fort Worth Star Telegram in July, 1947…. Johnson arrived at the base. The guard at the gate knew him, knew that he was coming, and knew where he was supposed to go…. Johnson took four pictures. Two had Ramey by himself….

A natural double! One of those two photos of Ramey yielded that “Ramey Memo” where we can “accidentally” see the text. Another photo is the famous one of Jesse Marcel, where he has a look on his face that I think you will now agree says, “Oh, I can’t say a word about how I just got historically motherfucked, can I?”

Another common name, but more crucial “first-hand testimony”:

About dusk, Sergeant Melvin E. Brown and one other soldier were stationed in the truck with orders not to look under the tarp. Brown could not resist the temptation and as soon as his superiors moved away, he pulled the tarp aside. There he saw the bodies.

Chilling! More testimony…

Frankie Rowe, whose father, Dan Dwyer, was a fire fighter with the Roswell Fire Department in July 1947, saw more than just a few fragments of debris…. Frankie Rowe later heard rumors that the being was taken directly to the base hospital. Supposedly it walked into the building without assistance.

Good heavens! Actually, I have to pause here and state that I think the name is fake and coded, and this person didn’t even exist. First, it would be very unusual at that time for a girl to have a masculine nickname. A girl named Francis would be called Francie. Worse is that it would be extremely unusual for a child to have a different surname than his or her parents. To illustrate, in the 70’s TV hit The Brady Bunch, it was never even explicitly addressed as to whether Mike had adopted his second wife’s daughters and given them his last name. It literally went without saying.

Worse than those points, we saw the name “Frankie” encoded in the Pascagoula Abduction. Worst, the name “Franklin” was all over the Black Dahlia murder. It all got so crazy I never posted 2/3 of what I had written.

Next up, a double header:

Brazel arrived at the jail sometime on the afternoon of Sunday, July 6, 1947, according to the witnesses. Deputy B.A. Clark took the initial report then turned it over to Sheriff Wilcox.

[Quoting Colonel Thomas J. DuBose, chief of staff of the Eighth Air Force] … there was talk of some elements that had been found on the ground outside Roswell, New Mexico,… that the debris or elements were to be placed in a suitable container, and Blanchard was to see that they were delivered…. They were placed in a suitable container, and Al Clark, the base commander at Carswell [Fort Worth Army Air Field], would pick them up and hand deliver them to McMullen in Washington.

That second quote is also an excellent illustration of how all this goes on right under the nose of a high-ranking officer. Mind your business, Tommy!

From here, there are a few additions that did not fit my strict criteria but I believe are worth mentioning. One is that while there is an accused witch Mary Green at Salem, for Roswell we have:

The city editor, Cullen Greene, asked him [J. Bond Johnson] if he had his camera, a Speed-Graphic, and when he said that he did, the editor told him to get out to Brigadier General Ramey's office.

Spot me an “e” after two and a half centuries? In any case, another key moving part, eh? Also, I’ve never been able to attach them one to the other, but there have been a lot of Hopkinses that have cropped up in all this, beginning with the original Witchfinder General of the early 17th Century himself, Matthew Hopkins. In fact, we saw a Hopkins right up top! And at Roswell?

The regular morning staff meeting is moved up to 7:30 A.M. Blanchard discusses the new find and its possible disposition. Attending the meeting are Marcel and Cavitt; Lieutenant Colonel James I. Hopkins, the operations office; Major Patrick Saunders, the base adjutant; Major Isidore Brown, the personnel officer; and Lieutenant Colonel Ulysses S. Nero, the supply officer.

Bonus: When you read the name of the photographer of the “Ramey Memo”, did you immediately think of James Bond? That’d be crazy if that was his name, and there he was five years before Ian Fleming published the first “007” novel, wouldn’t it?

Beyond Top Secret: Eyewitness Accounts to the Roswell Incident (Ancient Origins 4/8/2022)

James Bond Johnson, the Army photographer who took the posed photos of Ramey, DuBose, and Marcel, later surprised everyone by earning a Ph.D. degree, and becoming a psychologist, Methodist minister, and National Security Council (NSC) consultant at the White House. But he never forgot Roswell along the way, and became a highly-credible, highly-placed, direct source for the truth….

If you were wondering, yes, these Spook Families can be traced at least as far back as the time of Elizabeth I. Her private spook/sorcerer and the original “007”, John Dee, is the least interesting character running around at the time. That’s why They tell you about him over and over.

Double-bonus (part 1): This one doesn’t fit the criteria because it supposedly takes place in 1988. For anyone following my work, I think you knew this was coming:

Jim Parker’s son sees a strange pickup truck on the ranch where the debris was found in 1947. Parker and his son chase it down and discover two men sitting in a U.S. Air Force pickup with a camper on the back. Inside are maps of the local area… then ask if Parker knows about the Roswell crash, mentioning that the site is somewhere close. Parker doesn’t know what they are talking about. The men leave the ranch then.

Oh ho, gotta be real then, right!?

Double-bonus (part 2): I just found out today that one of the two main characters in 1984’s The Philadelphia Experiment is named Jim Parker. Also, you’ll also see that the character of “TV Newscaster #1” is played by Stephanie Faulkner.

Double-bonus (part 3): Guess what rancher shows up yet again in an episode of The X-Files?

Jim Parker was a rancher who lived in Browning, Montana, on the Two Medicine Ranch, with his son Lyle.

Maybe I can reach Inception and just quit. Thanks for reading!

TL;DR: We expose General Blanchard in three ways: his participation in the early fake atom bomb program, his links back to the fake Salem Witch Trials, and his crucial role in kicking off the decades-long (and going strong) UFO psyop.

Disclaimer: None of this is to say that there isn’t something going on in the skies. The point is to demonstrate that there is an elaborate, long-running psychological operation regarding flying saucers/UFOs/UAPs. I think it would be easy to guess my opinion regarding the value of the views of anyone who claims to know what’s going on, yet is ignorant of this psyop. You have to strip it all away before you can even begin to estimate the situation.

This post closes out an unintended trilogy—a Matrix if you will—composed of three people across five topics: the Trinity test, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, the Salem Witch Trials, and the UFO phenomenon. Fifteen elements in total, which is more extensive than I would have ever guessed before starting the research. We’ll have to add a bit in this post to fill out our grid, but the first two installments of what turned out to be this trilogy were:

Who needs fake witches when you have fake atom bombs? The hidden connections between General Leslie Groves and Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 11/20/2024)

Captain Deak Parsons, the triggerman for the (fake) atomic bombing of Hiroshima and involved in all the other atomic fakery, was related to Jack Parsons and all the other historical fakery (conspiracies.win 10/7/2024)

In the Parsons post, you found out that Deak was related to Jack, and that their ancestry traced back to a guy called “Cornet Joseph” Parsons, as described in this post about Jack. You also found out that Cornet Joseph was running a fake witch psyop in Northampton in 1674, almost two decades before Salem.

Before even that, though, there was another phony witch hunt in Springfield in 1642 involving persons known as “Hugh and Mary Parsons”. You’d think the genealogy would be easy, but I can’t find any appropriate Hugh Parsons, related to Cornet Joseph or not. However, Cornet Joseph died in Springfield in 1683, so you can calculate the odds on how many unrelated Parsons were running around that town at the time. FWIW, the narrative is told here:

First Witch Trial in New England – Springfield, Massachusetts 1642 (Hampden County History 10/4/2018)

Now we may move on to our main subject, General William Hugh Blanchard (1916-1966). Let’s hit his roles in the “Strategy of Tension: Nuclear Armageddon” first:

In the climaxing phase of World War II, then-colonel Blanchard was directed to prepare and supervise the detailed operations order for the delivery of the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima. He was the backup pilot for the Hiroshima A-bomb drop….

After the war, on January 20, 1946, Blanchard became Commanding Officer of the 509th, succeeding Tibbetts…. But Blanchard and the 509th were immediately ordered to commence operations for the "Operation Crossroads" atomic tests at Bikini atoll.

We skipped Trinity, but it turns out his links to Trinity, witches, and UFOs are all tied up in one. First, was there a Blanchard at Salem in 1692? Not that I know of yet, but there was one at another phony witch hunt in 1658:

More Witches Were Accused in Andover than in Salem (Andover Center for History and Culture 10/21/2015)

There is a tag for “Elizabeth Blanchard” in the sidebar, but she’s not mentioned by full name in the text. The “witch” to which they refer is Elizabeth “Goody” Garlick (Blanchard) (1620-1683). Not enough of a connection to fake witchery? Then there were three Blanchards at yet another phony witch hunt decades later!

Aftermath of the Salem Trials (Encyclopedia.com)

An episode that occurred in 1720 in Littleton, Massachusetts, was eerily similar to the event that started the Salem witch trials. It began when eleven-year-old Elizabeth Blanchard had visions, went into trances, and acted as if she were "possessed.'… Soon Elizabeth's two sisters were exhibiting the same bizarre behavior, and all three girls accused a local woman of putting a spell on them.

Haha, Littleton! I guess phony school shootings had not yet been invented so witch hexes was apparently what they were going with. And another Elizabeth, no less. But was Butch Blanchard actually descended from any of these Blanchards? You can start with the genealogy for William Hugh Blanchard and run right into a brick wall at his father. We are told, however, that Butch was born in Boston, Massachusetts, of all places. Coinkydink?

But enough about witches flying around Mass on broomsticks, what about Blanchard’s ties to the other Unidentified Aerial Phenomena now filling our skies, i.e. UFOs? As mentioned, Butch ends up in charge of the 509th and was base commander at Roswell Army Air Field at the time of the “Roswell Incident”. Will coinkydinks never end?

Now, it’s not just that Blanchard was there at Roswell at the time of the Incident, there would have been no Incident at Roswell were it not for him. Well, none that we would have ever heard of anyway. He was the one that ordered base press officer and his personal friend, Lt. Walter Haut, to write that historic press release about the “saucer crash”.

Had he not done that—and I cannot stress this point enough—we all would have had zero way of finding out. I mean, can you name something amazing or interesting or not at all interesting that happened at the military base nearest you today? Of course not. They see no benefit in keeping the civvies apprised of any of their doings, lest you become intrigued or ask further questions or object. So, huge mistake on Blanchard’s part, just set off an A-bomb on his own career, right?

Of course not, silly goose! That’s not how the military works. Proven to be someone who likes to blab to the public, a year later Blanchard got promoted to America’s most sensitive military unit as Director of Operations for the now nuclear-armed Strategic Air Command. Later…

On February 19, 1965, Blanchard became Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, with promotion to four-star rank.

Number two guy running the whole USAF. Not bad! I really don’t get why everyone in the military doesn’t talk about all the things that happen that the public may find interesting. Clearly the recipe for success! Seriously, though, I think we can all see this was the reward for loyal service. (Loyal to whom is a separate question.)

As an aside, you can use this knowledge of Blanchard’s role and context—which I found quite startling when I first uncovered it—as a litmus test for all the disinfo agents pimping their narratives about Roswell. Just listen very closely when the topic of Blanchard comes up. They jerk the wheel like you’re going to go in the ditch (which, in reality, is where they are steering you). Most simply never talk about him. They have way more to tell you about all those real live dead ayylmaos.

Aside to the aside: There are so many jokers out there telling you about how flying saucers are hovering over strategic military bases disabling the nukes with their special rays because the, uh, Greys are trying to, uh, save humanity so that, uh… you know. Take time to reflect on how very far afield we are from that kind of talk. Okay, back to wrapping up our business….

We still did not determine whether Blanchard had a link to Trinity, did we? Well, if you start at the Trinity Site Historical Marker and go due north, in less than 10 miles you’ll come to the old Blanchard Mine, Bingham, Hansonburg District, Socorro Co., New Mexico, USA.

That mine is all that’s left of what was once a vast series of rich lead mines known as the “Blanchard Claims”. If you thought White Sands Missile Range was big, just know that the Blanchard Claims included all that and a similarly-sized piece north of Highway 380. Not bad, huh? Do I think Butch was a member of this family, and that it included those fake witches centuries ago? Even with no further evidence, I certainly do. Thus, I think the fact that the fake first A-bomb blew up there, and the fact that a flying saucer decided to crash there, and the fact that Butch was in charge and made sure we heard about it, and the fact that Deak Parsons’ family moved there, etc, are, in fact, not coinkydinks at all.

Bonus: You want to know how I first heard about this last part, having to do with Butch and the Blanchard Claims? A number of years ago I was stumbling around Google Maps, trying to find out precisely where this purported saucer purportedly came down, when I saw a marker for the Blanchard Rock Shop.

It’s a little roadside shop, a tiny remnant of those claims. Okay, I understand that 380 doesn’t get a lot of traffic, but how many people have passed by over the decades that could have noticed what I noticed? A jillion or so? Yet in those several years, I have never once heard anyone mention this connection. Trust me, I’ve been listening closely. Just more talk of ayylmaos.

Anyway, it’s… well, it’s something to reflect on how little others really see of the world around them. It literally just goes flying by on the highway.

Preview: This post launches us off into the “UFO Phenomenon”. The fakeness and Salem Witchiness of UFOs just makes you SMH more as we enter the (false ) Dawn of the Flying Saucer Age!

Hope you enjoyed, and thank you for reading this long one.

TL;DR: Actor Jameson Parker looks like (including literally) a member of the Parker family of generational Satanists stretching back over four centuries. Coincident Information reinforces the case that Sean (of Napster, Facebook, and Spotify fame) and Robbie (of laughing about his kindergartner purportedly getting gunned down fame) are both of the same family.

As a refresher from what seems so long ago now, and particularly important for anyone coming into this cold, the claim here is that Jameson is yet another member—among many we have discussed previously—of this same Parker family:

How generational Satanists took control of what goes in your ears (bonuses: a demonically-possessed novelty podcasting light and a connection to Sandy Hoax) (conspiracies.win 10/16/2024)

First, a note for those who did not live through the 80’s about how famous Jameson Parker was. It’s not very specific, but “everybody knew who he was”. Think of any famous Chris: Evans, Hemsworth, Pratt, Pine. Now add them all together. In its heyday, four out of every ten households watching TV had it tuned to Simon & Simon when it was on. Don’t forget the show was on weekly.

There is nothing comparable to that in our current times. Game of Thrones does not even come close numerically, if that’s what you were wondering. Culture was quite different then, and you can see how everybody knew who Jameson Parker was. The point is, there was one of “Them” in the glaring spotlight in front of tens of millions of viewers and no one had “They Live” glasses on to see.

So what did I find out about Jameson that convinced me he was one of those Parkers? Well, let me start with the item that I discussed in the “Second bonus” of that linked post, the one I mentioned as personally the most convincing that Sean and Robbie were related: hair color.

If you have any familiarity with bleach blond beach boy A.J. Simon, driving around San Diego In his white convertible VW Rabbit, you know for a fact that Jameson had sandy hair. Well, apparently, he had undergone the Clairol transformation. Check out all his pics on IMDB, particularly “Rita Moreno and Jameson Parker in Anatomy of a Seduction (1979)”. Whaddaya know, his natural color appears to be a pretty distinctive medium-dark reddish-brown.

Maybe just an extraordinarily unlikely coincidence? Sure, so let’s see what else we can find. Now, Wikipedia plays this angle down, but Jameson began a writing career and I came across this autobiographical profile:

His father was a high-ranking Foreign Service officer who subsequently retired to become director of a small museum in Virginia…. As a result of his father’s career, Jameson was educated at a variety of preparatory schools in America, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland....

Not to jump to conclusions, but his father really seems to be a spook. Remember who else was a top-level spook running around the Swamp in those days?

If you thought the Phoenix Program in Vietnam was demonic, that’s because it was run by Evan Parker from a family of generational Satanists (conspiracies.win 8/23/2024)

Wiki tells us that our Jameson is actually a Junior, and his father was the original Jameson Parker. The genealogy of Jameson Parker is so scrubbed we can’t even tell if we have father or son. One tiny quantum left unscrubbed is the Wikitree record for Jameson J. Parker. which is definitely for the actor. I’m not on the “Trusted List” and cannot see more, but somehow I feel that there is nothing much further They will allow us to see.

Foiled, as far as having their genealogical information aired like all the rest of us, but Wiki disclosed (probably accidentally and against their will) that Jameson’s father “had been general legal counsel for the Parker family steel mill….” A clue!

There is indeed a Parker Steel Company, specialists in metric sizing, but it’s located in Toledo, Ohio. Not somewhere spooky or suspicious, right? But then in their “History of Parker Steel”, we read this puzzling factoid:

Though Parker Steel was established in 1955 by Leo Goldner, his son Paul Goldner renamed the company to Parker Steel International in 1991….

Why would either Goldner call his company “Parker Steel”? We were just told it’s not located anywhere called Parker. Welp, They are just lying to our faces once again. Of course it was founded by these Parkers. Interestingly, there is another Parker Steel in the UK, and I’m 99% sure it belongs to Them too. The UK branch probably told the American branch to stop acting like provincials and move to metric.

More compelling is that Jameson attended a fancy prep school in DC, St. Albans School. Well, I know this may be surprising, but guess who attended Chantilly High, less than 20 miles away? That would be Sean. Did you go to high school that close to where your parents went? I suspect that the answer for most is, “Not at all.”

Google up images of Jameson Parker and since he’s an actor you’ll find plenty of good head shots from his prime. Now take a look at the wiki profile pic of Sean. Hair color aside, the similarity is quite striking, isn’t it. Think of all the fathers and sons you know. Do they look that much alike? Infrequently, right? It’s virtually always a resemblance at most, an echo of the father mixed with the mother. At this point, I might have speculated that Jameson was secretly the father of Sean.

But are we at the end of the road? Nope. Being the persistent type, I thought I might be able to “backdoor” Jameson’s genealogy somehow through Sean’s line. I punched the name of Sean’s father, “Bruce Parker” (which to me sounds like it would be pretty common), into Wikitree hoping to get lucky. And did! I found the record of Bruce G. Parker aka Mott. Paydirt!

I can’t really say I know exactly what that “aka Mott” part means. Just another glitch in a manipulated and scrubbed record, I suppose. The gem, though, is that they admit his wife’s name was “Yvonne Mott”. That record is scrubbed but we already have the key association: the marriage of a Parker to a Mott. And where did we last see that?

Colonel Tom Parker, the handler of Elvis Presley, was a Parker (yes, one of the generational Satanist Parkers, but we’ll have to get through several layers of disinformation to get there) (conspiracies.win 10/26/2024)

As stated, the catalyst for that post was noticing that Col. Tom had married Marie Francis Mott. Also note Wikitree’s non-specific factoid that Bruce is “Father of [private son (1970s - unknown)]”. Sean was born in 1979.

The primary conclusion here is that we have the right Parkers. The secondary conclusion is that there really is a person called Bruce and that he, not Jameson, really is Sean’s father. Frankly, that makes the resemblance between Sean and Jameson even more striking.

Jameson was born in 1947 and Wikitree states that Bruce was born in 1945. Way back in that Geni record, we were allowed to know that Jameson was the “Brother of Private; Private; Private and Private”. Nearly certainly (given all the scrambled and deleted evidence) Jameson is Bruce’s kid brother and therefore Sean’s uncle.

Bonus: I also think Jameson is a psychopath. And no, I don’t think he’s a violent murderer or gets up to “Eyes Wide Shut” occult insanity or anything like that. Psychopathy is universally misunderstood, and the nature of it is more subtle than is portrayed in popular fiction. “They” take advantage of this misunderstanding and, of course, do not want to clear it up.

In Jameson’s case, I noticed something long, long ago in Simon & Simon. Jameson plays the calm, reserved, conservative counterpart to his brother’s emotionality and impetuousness. You’d really have to watch an episode--or even several—to see this, but A.J. Simon was too… flat. He lacked affect, in a very subtle way.

Without watching the show for yourself, the closest I can come to generating the same impression is this: you know how when you watch an actor playing a role, you get a feeling for the personality of the character, or the actor, or a fusion of both. You often hear people say something like, “I hope (blank) is a nice person in real life. I like their character so much that I really want to believe that’s how they actually are.”

I used “(blank)” on purpose, because that’s how Jameson is: (blank). In fact, if you still have those images of him up, you may be able to see what I mean from just that. There’s something lacking in his expression, isn’t there?

But okay, who cares if he’s a psycho? Well, it seems that these generational Satanists cultivate psychopathy. It would probably be a short book to go over all the evidence, but if you ever wondered how in the world They get people to go along with their outrageous plans, those plans aren’t outrageous to a psychopath.

It’s been a while since I saw Sean Parker interviewed, but IIRC he had that same flatness. I believe these bloodline Satanist families may be primary (i.e. genetic) psychopaths and, reflexively, that’s part of why bloodlines are so crucial to them. They can’t afford to get any normie blood—let alone whatever causes elevated levels of consciousness—mixed in there.