1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Crypto will go to zero when someone creates a better way to make a direct person to person payment to someone on the other side of the world instantly.

There will always be many who find value in that.

So Don't hold your breath, it won't be anytime soon, if ever.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes that will work for about 1 NanoSecond

Then you will find yourself on all kinds of lists like this

Crypto Scam Tracker https://dfpi.ca.gov/crypto-scams/

News travels far and wide and quick on the Internet.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was created in the 1980s.

Name One

There were a lot of ideas created and talked about in the 1980s and 1990s but no Cryptocurrencies like we have today were in use or even created.

Ecash was conceived by David Chaum as an electronic money or electronic cash system in 1982. It was realized through his corporation Digicash and used as micropayment system at one US bank from 1995 to 1998. But it needed banks to work and failed to get enough of them on board.

Bitcoin and eCash have little in common from a design perspective. 

B-money was an early cryptocurrency concept that never officially launched. First revealed in 1998 by computer scientist Wei Da

Bit Gold was Proposed by Nick Szabo in 1998. Bit Gold was never developed beyond discussions and proposals into code

At the time none of these people were said to have Received their creations from the NSA.

You're The Fake News

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

So he created a new system then gave away the code in open source where anybody can go in and see how it works and what it does,and modify it any way they want. Which resulted in now over 10,000 competitors that he can't Control.

Definitely not the brightest bulb in the family tree.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess that works for a lot of people.

But these days, as you proably know, buying and selling cryptocurrency can be done online, laying in bed.

The Top DEX Crypto Exchanges to Buy and Sell BTC and Altcoins

https://www.bitcoin.com/exchanges/decentralized/

List of Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs)

https://www.alchemy.com/best/decentralized-exchanges-dexs

2
PLUTUS 2 points ago +2 / -0

According to Navy Intelligence whistelblower Bill Cooper, they are all made by NSA on behalf of the Rothschilds.

Bill Cooper died in 2001, long before the first cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, was invented in 2009. If you are just going to make up things at least get the details right.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

And of course this is true because Mr Rothschild, himself told you this ?

Perfectly Logical, take a financial system that you have been perfecting your control over for centuries and replace it with something brand new that will be hard to control .

3
PLUTUS 3 points ago +3 / -0

In 1983,13 Years before the National Security Agency, in 1996 published a paper entitled How to Make a Mint: The Cryptography of Anonymous Electronic Cash,  American cryptographer David Chaum conceived of a type of cryptographic electronic money called ecash

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency

0
PLUTUS 0 points ago +1 / -1

That went right over your head.

And you don't even know what "mock" means.

Which explains a lot.

I could go on with this, but I would feel guilty, It would be like taking advantage of a helpless baby.

You must be one of the "best and brightest" from the harris campaign sent here to try and dump on the Don and failing miserably.

0
PLUTUS 0 points ago +1 / -1

Exactly !

Thanks for making my point.

I said that the only thing you would find would be Don Sr,years ago, showing how little he knew about crypto and how he thought it was shady.

And you show again how you can't back up your statement of the Trump FAMILY Mocking Crypto. Nothing from Don Jr or Eric.

LOL

0
PLUTUS 0 points ago +1 / -1

I will bet that you can't cite a single source for the Trump Family mocking crypto currency.

The only thing you will find is Don Sr a few years ago saying that he prefers strengthening the US Dollar and saying that he thinks crypto is probably a little shady.

It is understandable that he did not know much about and understand crypto currency at the time. At the time he had very little understanding of computers and was handicapped by being indoctrinated in the Wharton School of Business Economics.

If he would have had a proper Education in Economics he would know that the best way to strengthen the dollar would be to send back those unbalanced budgets that congress send to him to sign, and insist that outgoing expenditures be covered always by incoming revenue.

Shilling means someone is being paid to push many times worthless and even illegal things.

Who is paying them to Shill?

Marketing a new useful product is the way things are done. That is not shilling. Shilling is when someone takes money to say things that are untrue about things they know to be useless.

They are businessmen with expertise in Real Estate and now can see the potential in Digital Real Estate. Tokenization Platforms are a very real and innovative thing that are going to bring a lot of benefits to everybody.

A CBDC is a Central Bank Scam, They have nothing to do with that.

0
PLUTUS 0 points ago +1 / -1

Blockchain is not really compatible with CBDC's

Over a period of time anyone trying to develop a CBDC is going to ditch the blockchain approach.

-1
PLUTUS -1 points ago +1 / -2

THE SKY IS FALLING !!!

Is there nothing you can't find a conspiracy behind?

How about Apple Pie and Baseball?

Swift is just a clunky, limited, private EMail System used mainly by European Banks since 1973. Maybe in 1973 it was a state of the Art, Technological Marvel but today it is a very limited, close to obsolete system rapidly losing ground to Alternatives. There are teenage social apps that have more advanced features.

It looks like some people being paid a lot of money to modernize it and have no idea of what they are doing are using the old vaporware tactic - COMING SOON.

I wish somebody would take over and take down the exchanges then crypto could go back to what it was designed for "Peer to Peer'.

Blocking Russia from SWIFT has turned out to be a little "speed bump" which they have easily got around.

I haven't seen any SWIFT fanatics monthly meetups where they get together to discuss their Anticipation of great new SWIFT features.

2
PLUTUS 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is this about fools running around like children trying to scare people by saying Ha - your supposed invention for freedom, Blockchain, is actually a scheme being used by the elites to enslave you.

First of all a Blockchain is simply a distributed data base that has been around for over 50 years. It is just a basic construct in computer science that is designed to hold data , "freedom" was never part of it.

Blockchain is a totally different technology than crypto. A lot of cryptocurrencies use it but there are alternatives to blockchain like DAG's and IOTA Tangle which some cryptocurrencies use.

Blockchain can be useful used on its own. For instance by letting you know where the banana you are holding came from or if the can in front of you contains food from a processing plant notorious for bad sanitary conditions.

But this depends on the type of information on the blockchain. Anonymous cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin do not store identifying information or transaction details on its blockchain.

Israel does not have a CBDC although they have been mucking around with the idea for the last seven years. A true centralized CBDC will never use a decentralized blockchain. A decentralized Blockchain has unnecessary layers which slows it down and does not enable total control. You need a direct centralized database for that.

CBDC's have been a huge failure in the countries that have tried to adopt them.

Adoption Rate:

Bahamas - 0.19 percent of total currency in circulation Jamaica - 0.11 percent Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU) - 0.16 percent

In Nigeria the government tried to force the people to use a CBDC by blocking access to the money in the banks and this resulted in riots.

Why Did CBDC Fail in Nigeria?

CBDC adoption in Nigeria remains abysmally low, with less than 0.5% of the population using it, while over 50% have embraced cryptocurrency.

https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/10/22/why-did-cbdc-fail-in-nigeria-valuable-lessons-for-developing-countries/

Observations from the Retail CBDCs of the Caribbean

Three retail central bank digital currencies (rCBDCs) have been issued in the Caribbean, but thus far all have struggled to achieve expected adoption from both consumers and merchants.

https://www.kansascityfed.org/research/payments-system-research-briefings/observations-from-the-retail-cbdcs-of-the-caribbean/

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System * is the original Bitcoin Whitepaper.

It solved the problem of double spending by using TimeStamped Confirmed Transactions.

zero Conf - Zero Confirmation Channels - are a step away from the Original Bitcoin Protocol.

They were not disabled in the original BTC, They were never enabled because the priority was making Bitcoin work securely not in speed.

They became available in the Lightning Development Kit’s June 2022, 107 release 

And thats the way it should be, the flexibility to choose speed in transacting with a trusted relative or friend and avoiding the possibility of having the funds completely disappear in an unconfirmed transaction with a stranger by using zero conf.

BCH Is a shadow of BTC For instance On May 12, 2024, Bitcoin Cash had about 23,000 active addresses compared to Bitcoin's more than 521,000

There is a tradeoff between Security and Speed. Bitcoin has always emphasized security. That is why it used to be slower, not because it was crippled on purpose by bankers.

But it is now the center of a whole ecosystem of projects ingeniously combining its traditional safety with increasing speed which will enable it to take on well established payment processors such as Mastercard and Visa.

Meanwhile Bitcoin Cash can't seem to get it together and has already forked many times such as BitcoinSV and BitcoinABC (now known as ECash,)

0
PLUTUS 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes thats a good title, Hijacking Bitcoin, They tried to hijack Bitcoin and failed and that is a bit sleazy then pretending it was the other side that hijacked Bitcoin.

You need to read The Blocksize War - Jonathan Bier

It gives you the bigger picture and shows you what really happened.

They had their chance, they forked Bitcoin Cash but it was a technological failure and never really caught on and is fading away.

Anybody who says that Bitcoin Cash is the original Bitcoin has never read the Bitcoin Whitepaper.

-1
PLUTUS -1 points ago +1 / -2

Bitcoin averages over 500,000 transactions a day and people are using it to order meals at McDonalds with the transaction being completed in less than a second with fees of less than a penny, far less than the percentages of mastercard and visa.

it is useless and must be used on centralized custodial scam exchanges like Sam's <

Either you have no idea how Bitcoin Works or are just flat out lying because Bitcoin is designed to work from peer to peer and does not need a Centralized Exchange.

I find the book hilarious because it was Roger Ver, who has always been sketchy, and has served prison time, It was him and his cohorts who attempted to hijack Bitcoin and make it more centralized and under their control. They failed with Bitcoin XT, which has largely been abandoned and now Bitcoin Cash is fading away the same way.

Of course people who repeat the line that "Bitcoin has been captured by Bankers" never can explain how that was done or even how that is possible.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Talk to me a few years from now when 1 BTC is over $1,000,000 USD . Sinking it, Yes I am sure that will be on the top of their agenda, the whales each with $ Billions of Dollars USD worth of Bitcoin deciding OK its time to sink it and make Bitcoin worthless.

BTC is not a stock. Its not a company where someone says I own over 50 percent of this company and have decided to shut it down.

Trust me,the bankers, as they find out more and more about bitcoin do not love it. They are scrambling to find ways to deal with it. All their old ways of trying to control it like ETF's are not going to work.

You should learn how it works instead of just repeating stupid talking points that someone gives you.

0
PLUTUS 0 points ago +1 / -1

I know you are proud of your Alma Mater but there is a reason why they call it special needs and that is because they need special help in understanding basic everyday transactions. To set them up as the standard in judging transactions which they can not even hope to understand is a little over the top.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually in none of the cases you mentioned did the government "Seize" Bitcoin. What happened was that the individuals involved were tracked down by other means and handed over the "keys" to their bitcoin as part of a plea deal.

Yes that imaginary Bitcoin off switch right next to the Internet off switch that does not exist either.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

And of course because you can not come up with any reasons why it won't work you just make up names.

Join the modern world. I vote with my phone every day on different items and products and so do many others and the banks have no problem in tracking how among millions of customers which one chose which product and adjust the accounts appropriately.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is what the USA should do

Vote using your phone.

You should be able to check your vote is recorded properly and was not hacked by using your phone at any time.

Anybody should be able to get a copy of the public database of votes and count them themselves using your phone.

But only registered voters should be able to vote and only because they have a custom 3 digit code given to them by a full time worker who's job it is to go door to door and verify a registered voter actually lives there.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats just stupid.

Some People just live inside a wacky world view.

In that world people just constantly trade in their dollars for cryptocurrency until suddenly they are left with worthless cryptocurrency and all the dollars have gone to the schemers.

In the real world people are constantly turning their new found wealth in cryptocurrency into real estate, automobiles, and many other things including dollars again. So they start out with a few dollars, turn it into cryptocurrency and then back into a lot more dollars. So the dollar flow is not one way.

The losers are those who just hold on to their dollars and dont do anything with them. The Government Con of Inflation destroys their value no matter where they are, even hidden away under a mattress.

1
PLUTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sound like a retarded Chat-GPT AI Bot.

I don't do software libraries. I am a real software Developer not a cut and paste hack, can write anything from scratch and do software that has not been developed before or things that have not been done in software.

What you call dumb fucks is actually a very active community developing new innovative software especially in the areas of Crypto and Defi. I have a lot of new original software in the pipeline that I am steadily introducing and know of many other similar projects. Like the old expression "You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet"

For instance Segwit, Schnorr Signatures, Taproot, Machankura, Merklized Alternative Script Trees, Ordinals, and The Lightning Network are all very significant software that has been added to the original Bitcoin Software. These are a lot more than simple libraries.

Then we have a lot of Software being developed around totally different approaches like Hashgraph and DAG's as opposed to a crypto hashed blockchain like Bitcoin.

You might be slow to realize it but they have been actively conditioning the public for digital payments for decades now with credit cards, bank cards, etc.

What we are actually doing is taking away their centralized power grab with our decentralization software.

Its working, you can now buy anything from groceries to real estate with Bitcoin and not worry about a centralized authority blocking your purchase and seizing your Bitcoin.

I have developed software for government agencies and semi government Organizations like the Federal Reserve and have seen a lot of their internal software and it is not pretty, more of an old archaic mess.

Thats just gaslighting, pretending TPTB are so powerful and untouchable.

Almost 10 years later a lot of this has still not changed.

The application programming languages undergirding some federal IT systems were new when "The Andy Griffith Show" premiered.

https://www.nextgov.com/digital-government/2016/05/10-oldest-it-systems-federal-government/128599/

If they powered down the grid. I would not even notice. Not that they would, They need power for their honeypot sites like this where they can try to track what the opposition is up to and also spew propaganda.

CRSH KAVU

view more: Next ›