I just have to be at the wall to prove there is a wall. There's no other way. Formulate a theory, design a study and test it. No matter what you do, you can't prove there is a wall unless you observe it.

So, you're saying that can't be proven?

• The sun is a local heat source. Proof: Winter.

• Oxygen in super cold temperatures gets to solid ice. Meaning - A wall.

• How many suns do you see? 1? 1000? There is a limit to the heat from the sun, and beyond there is clearly a wall of ice. That's very simple logic.

You don't have to watch something to prove it. Have you seen your own brain? But you somehow know it's there... Right?

Because you're a human, and you've seen some humans having a brain inside their head. Therefore, you INFER that you also have a brain.

They have shot bombs (not nuke because nukes are fake) at the barrier.

Yeah, I know this, but decided to focus on the explosions, not a new potential debate. But since you know nukes don't exist, that saves me time.

Either way, they tried to use huge blasts to break the dome. They were not successful.

The barrier is probably something frozen. Silica, O2, could make an insanely powerful and efficient conductor at low temperature.

You expect silicon to raise as a gas in the upper atmosphere?

You opened yourself to me with your theory, but if we're just going to start a discussion about every element, without realizing the impossibility of that element existing in the upper atmosphere, then wouldn't that be a waste of time?

There are samples of deep blue ice that has falled from the "sky" I don't know if they are real.

Surprisingy, I know what you mean. The same unconfirmed post I have read and couldn't find more on the topic. So, in our discussion, this brings nothing concrete to the table.

You're not a stupid person. And you clearly like to speak facts. I know this much so far about you. That's why you ended your statement with "I don't know if they are real". So, let's keep it factual and based on 2 or more sources for verification.

Instead of theories, I can promise you that you can use the knowledge you already have and prove where we are definitively.

Most of them don't move, but some ("planets") do.

In ancient Egypt, these "planets" were called "wandering stars"... Because they don't follow the matrix of starts above us. They follow their own path. However, they still follow a specific path.

Do you want to be included in a little test?

The test is the following:

• I give you the tools to notice something...

• If you manage to notice this thing about the wandering stars, then you have gained knowledge.

• If you don't manage to notice something, I will show it to you, and perhaps then you will see that the truth was infront of your eyes all along...

Are you up for a challenge?

1. Use this site, which correctly points to the location of the wandering stars + sun + moon. https://www.theplanetstoday.com/geocentric_orrery.html (PLEASE KEEP IN MIND: This site offers two options - heliocentric and geocentric. I must've sent you the geocentric view, because there you will notice it. (Earth in the middle). If the sun is in the middle, then the test wouldn't show anything. So please make sure that the Earth is in the center: The options are on the left.)

2. Once the Earth is in the center, you can make the wandering stars move at the speed that you want. (This can ONLY be done properly in the Desktop version, not the Mobile version. The option is BOTTOM RIGHT below the map. Make sure you're in DESKTOP VERSION).

3. UPPER RIGHT, there is an arrow that opens a menu. Don't care about the rest of the options, just the top one. You can see a little circle and bigger circle on a scale. IF YOU MOVE THE BIGGER circle, the planets move faster. If you move the smaller circle, the planets move slower. My choice would to move the big circle between the CENTER and the END of the line. There, you can SPOT something.

4. And I will give you a hint: Notice the movement of the sun IN RELATION to the movement of the wandering stars. Another hint: What does "retrograde" mean in astrophysics?

These are the rules of the game. Can you do it?

Quick recap:

1. Earth in center.

2. Desktop version.

3. Open the menu so you can move the stars around.

4. Notice the movement in relation to the Sun.

If you have questions to better understand the challenge, you can ask everything.

But if you give a wrong answer, or give up on providing one -> Then I have to show you something that was in front of your eyes. And If I succeed - I win. If you notice it before that - you win.

Regardless, you will learn something new about these "wandering stars"... Something that nobody ever told you...

I don't know if that crazy shit about oxygen is true. I haven't been there. Neither have you.

But I sent you an actual experiment. Do you have to be there to prove it?

Sure ozone is measured and theory's are made, but its doesn't make the earth a ball. Or prove there is a dome or a wall.

There is oxygen in the atmosphere, it freezes before it even reaches the supposed temperatures of supposed space... What is there to theorize?

And in my speculation, human kind has already been culled and recycled like this, the mud floods, orphan trains, so much is so obvious that history is a lie.

Alright, I agree that history is a lie, but speculations must be based on several proofs to hold water. If speculations are based on more speculations then it doesn't hold water.

I just tried to discuss the topic with you because I had that same idea, but I was able to disprove it for a better one, than actually does hold water. Of course, it does require open-mindedness to allow a different idea instead of your own speculations, as you called them.

I do agree that we should seek more proofs and come up with a conclusion that satisfies many already established proofs.

If you continue to dig the topic, you will reach the actual answer.

Even if you put millions in advertising conspiracies.win, it would be cut off, shadow blocked or you'd be killed.

True. But to my understanding, it's a personal experience for anyone to wake up from the fake nightmare of propaganda, so probably winning 1 soul at a time is still worth it.

We cannot win, but more people can be saved.

Thank you for sharing your view on prison planet. I know how hard it can be to open up on a topic that is immediately mocked by 99% of the internet, so it grows harder and harder to speak about it. So I really appreciate your thoughts on this!

My personal experience is going from the prison planet model to flat earth. And I will share my reasoning there.

• You pointed out that flat earth is a CIA psy op. I know for a fact that the community, known as the flat earth society, is indeed a psy op. This was created to portray flat earthers as idiots, part of the mockingbird project.

• You also said, in your own words, that the Earth is flat, if I am not mistaken here:

"I'm sure we could figure it out, but as it stands, this beautiful place where you can experience massive joy and love, is flat, stationary and not a planet..."

So, I guess my question here is, why is the flat earth idea not accepted by you?

I understand why the popular flat earthers are idiots, and I understand that you don't want to be connected with them, but if you confirm that it is flat, why not be a normal flat earther, instead of the popular idiot flat earthers?

I do accept the flat earth idea, but not the flat earth model, not the popular flat earth idiotic ideas, etc.

However, I have reviewed so many documentaries to confirm this, so at this point I know it definitively. We can discuss that more in detail, if you want.

In regards to the prison planet idea, I also had that idea in mind, but found flat earth created by God to be more provable, including the fact that all these shitheads are fearing Jesus, and Christians, and definitely are satanists.

I can expand on the topic if you want some time.

But I have questions about the fence that you mentioned:

"...that herd learns they can bumb rush a fence..."

Can we really do it?

To my knowledge, and I can defend that if you want, I believe that the surrounding walls are made out of oxygen atoms.

Theoretically, how can we break the fence, while the only way to do it would be removing the oxygen? I just don't see this happening, but I could be wrong.

For example, project fishbowl (probably chosen because of the walls surrounding the Earth are like a fishbowl) has used so many nuclear heads supposedly to break the dome with no effect. They couldn't do it with nuclear explosions, so how can we achieve breaking the walls?

To mention why I believe that's a wall created by oxygen, I have several reasons:

• The ozone layer is provable due to weather balloons that can gather data from the upper atmosphere.

• Oxygen freezes at temperatures higher than what is believed space temperature to be like, so I like to easily disprove nasa theories using this easy experiment - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ik9J9NgBhoc (2:57 min video)

• And also oxygen has certain properties when supercooled (if I can use this word).

• Oxygen is a gas, so when cooled, it will gather together into ozone. Normal oxygen atoms are floating in pairs O2, while ozone is O3.

• Ozone has diamagnetic properties that can be the reason for compasses to point in one direction. (That's a theory that I have).

"Ozone's O3 structure was determined in 1865. The molecule was later proven to have a bent structure and to be weakly diamagnetic." - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone

• Now my favorite point: Ozone is violet-black solid in very low temperatures, which suggests the reason for the black sky at night, and light blue during the day.

"At temperatures below 80 K (−193.2 °C; −315.7 °F), it forms a violet-black solid.[28]" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone#Physical_properties

Unfortunately, wiki removed the part where Ozone in such low temperatures is semi-transparent, which could prove why stars are only seen at night time.

Well, these are my thoughts for now, I would be happy to further discuss the topic with you, if you want. Again, I appreciate your thoughts on the matter.

Well, they (the hidden hand) are already spinning it so they are not responsible, but "caring" and "thoughtful" about this recent assassination that they did.

You're probably right - most people in here know who the hidden hand is, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to have much information in one post, so it can be recalled in debates with normies, if any.

I know this, but these are not truly their own people.

Not all jews are satanists, that's why they can sacrifice the non-satanists easily. There are many Irish satanists, and nowadays - there are so many satanists in different nations.

Jews are the obvious easy target because they benefit the most from satanism, while hiding behind the label - jew.

Ok, I see your point. You went with the worldly rulership motive for this case, which is something I agree kinda, and also disagree kinda regarding Charlie Kirk's assassination.

You're correct about the division, and especially "left vs. right" division, which is a clear method for control of the masses.

However, this specific case, with the assassination of Charlie Kirk, was because he turned on Israel (I will make a post with all the gathered information that I have on the topic soon, you can review this later). So basically, it's not really a "left vs. right" thing, although it will be portrayed in this way, but it's more of a battle between the free-speaking people vs. those "shitheads that run this place" as you correctly put it.

I agree with your idea that a "left vs. right" is a method for control, but this is not the case - Charlie Kirk turned on Israel, and that is why he was assassinated. Which is basically what we are doing in these forums - trying to expose the crimes of those shitheads (I just like calling them like that now xd), but we don't have as large of an audience, as Charlie Kirk's, to be killed for it.

P.S.: I am also interested in your thoughts about the "prison planet", since I delved into the topic years back. If you would like to discuss it, I am very eager to assist with my research, if I can.

Here's a nice children's fable to help you cope with future instances where you have been proven wrong and you don't want to admit it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fox_and_the_Grapes

I heard it as a child, which helped to build my character. I hope it helps you too!

I also would appreciate this nonsense conversation to end, so I leave you with something to help you to build a better character.

This was a psyop to create a justification for the extermination of Gaza, which literally happened afterwards.

If you check some of those gaza soldiers, they are so bad, that I noticed how they usually turn around and point the gun to their own troops... And they are not troops, ofc, they are just kids, whose family got massacred by Israel.

In contrast, the attack on Oct. 7th was a professional hit by soldiers with cameras on their heads... WTF?

If you're a demonic being, and you want to justify somehow the death of innocent people, including children, that's how you do it.

You can download the video and share it here, I don't get the point of the image you posted...

Also, when you steal a good post from an actual researcher, you can mention that.

Thankfully, you shared the link by the actual researcher because you couldn't figure out how to get the video. And also the real researchers care about their posts.

Can you expand on the topic?

But before that, you answered to my question with "I don't care".

This action is disrespectful.

You continued with non-related argument, recalling your previous comment. And nobody asked about that.

So, that is both arrogant (to force the communication to focus on your previous comment, although nobody but you opened the topic), and ignorant (you didn't understand what kind of question was asked).

If you believe the Church and the priest are solutions for your spiritual problems, can you tell me what is this kind of Church and priest, who teach Arrogance, Ignorance, and Lack of respect?

I'm just curious here...

Sorry for my previous reply...

I would encourage you to write some more, because I study the deranged and the insane to learn what pushed them over the edge.

How was your childhood?

You started the whole thing by calling me "not intelligent", then I called you a "dumbass" - call it quid pro quo.

Liar.

I said you're probably not intelligent, which is a challenge.

You said "dumbass" and "can you think, bro"...

You're a snowflake. And, pay attention now, you're too ignorant to win an argument, and too arrogant to lose one.

That's it.

Then I said "you were a dick", which you were because insulting someone out of the blue is considered a dick behavior.

The copium of this sentence... You really are insane, you know? Twist reality for your own benefit, while falling into the abyss of madness...

So you can insult back, but I cannot. The entitlement committed suicide because your comment is just too much...

I don't know how your parents even tolerated you... You must've been a demon child...

You're clearly delusional.

You surely don't have any true friends to help you grasp reality. That's why you act in this way.

You make yourself the victim of every encounter, while you admitted that you acted like a beast because of some other comment.

Sorry, pal. You just got exposed for being an arrogant snowflake.

Deal with it.

And please don't kill anyone close to you. It's what you people do when you face the reality of your actions. Don't do that!

Make sure to give another example of how you play the victim and avoid responsibility for your actions... I wouldn't read it, but do it.

Go away, bot.

btw....Mephisto is not found in Revelations...the 666 part is...so your "literally" statement is literally wrong.

You just proved that I am correct. The 666 is ONLY found in Revelations. Cry harder, please!

The Talmud has negative statements about a person named Yeshu, scholars are unclear as to whether or not this refers to a historical Jesus as the timelines don't seem to match up.

Another lie. They actually add his mother Mary, the crucification, etc. So, only a moron, like yourself, would suggest otherwise.

Liar, liar, pants on fire! :D

You were caught in so many lies, and I just added 2 more proofs.

Let me know if you need a tissue to cry your big eyes out.

Here, to expose the shills as always! Much love! Send my regards to your father, the devil! :)

And btw, send someone better prepared than you. Wiping the floor with you is hardly a challenge. Send someone better, liar. You're a disgrace even for the devil.

Wow, one shill told the other shill something...

I'm immediately choosing the opinion of the shill I like... Oh, wait... I'm actually not braindead.

Do you actually think this will change anything?

This is just food for you. For you to have something to share. But nothing of actual value, although true...

Sad, but you keep on falling for it.

So what book talks about this "Rapture"?

Projecting much? You're crashing out, dude. I don't even have to reply - you only embarrass and contradict yourself further the more you insult me.

That quote from you is literally just insults. Not a single argument on the topic. :D

I enjoy crushing the enemies with their own words. Probably the best experience against an enemy in online communication. :D Thank you!

Smart people value their time and don't waste it reading drawn out pedantic bs. A skim-through can do. Not that you'd know that. Only midwits think writing long comments full of tautologies is a sign of intelligence. You are more concerned with sounding witty with your ad homs than saying anything meaningful.

Another contradiction. I love this!

Let's focus on this:

Only midwits think writing long comments full of tautologies is a sign of intelligence.

Actually, what is the word "midwits" (whatever that means)... I will use the simple term - idiots. So, IDIOTS try to use big words to make themselves sound smart. E.g.: "pedantic", "tautologies", "intelligence" ( I wouldn't normally add "intelligence" as a big word that idiots use, but for you - it is a big one)

You have proven in your comment, and a previous one, that you don't read fully. That's an idiotic thing to do. Arrogant, disrespectful also, but these are big words that you will need to google to realize their meaning. Basically, you're not an empathetic person. And these are not needed in society, so please - take care of that.

More projection. Do you consider yourself well brought up the way you lash out at people for no reason at all? You're a sad person really.

I struck you were it mattered, huh? You look back your parents and realize they never cared about you. That's why I am able to size people so well - my parents cared to make me someone. In contrast, you:

1. Acted like a snowflake when I just asked a question. A question in the form of a challenge, not personally to you, but to the AI statement.

And what did you do? You added some other comment you got NOT FROM ME, and tried to use that as your defence... Snowflake!

2. I tried to find a reasonable solution to the problem - miscommunication. But you didn't accept a rational explanation. No... It has to be ANIMALISTIC. You have to show your beastly qualities, even in the face of reason... Well, ok - be a BEAST. It's terrible that your parents achieved a human beast creature... But you think that's great... WTF!?! xd

3. You speak about me "lashing out", while you started this exchange. Even after your insults, I tried to seek reason, I shared personal experience. But YOU CONTINUED TO ACT LIKE A BEAST.

Am I well brought up, you ask? Compared to an animal like you, ofc.

I have a lot of skills, but explaining them to an animal like you is useless. One tho I can explain - never giving up. You have noticed by now that I sized you up correctly, I stayed on point, I speak the truth, and I won against an arrogant animal. It took me many years to not fall for the insults of beasts like you, and it gives results - I win arguments against the beasts. And that is just - beasts should win arguments, they should be demolished with their own insults. Which is something I work to perfection with a scum like you.

TL DR - Your mind is not deep to read the full comment. In the shallow places of the mind lies arrogance, egotism, and disrespect. Just 3 words that you have devoted years to attain, while I have devoted decades to remove.

Go bother someone else with your nonsense. Demolishing idiots may be entertaining somewhat, but it gets boring after some time.

You do that for Jesus, but it's incorrect when I do it to you?

Cmon... Let's be real - I exposed you to the core and you have nothing to say afterwards. That's what really happened.

You don't have to pretend - nobody is reading those long chains of comments, so it's just between us. I knew it from the start, and you pretend that my previous comment is not true. Why do you keep pretending? Doesn't that get dull after some time?

You just got entangled in your own lies. You couldn't defend them, so you mock... with an "/eyeroll" (whatever that is... do you expect an emoji would show up in that place... xd)

But with all your insults and snowflake behavior, you have proved that my words are true.

I know you don't have time to read my long comments, because I know you're stupid. Mentally handicapped, if you will. It's what you really are, and you prove it with your arrogant and ignorant behavior.

Thank you for letting your ego help me to prove my point. :D

I really blame your parents tho... They never cared about you. That's why you have no respect and you act in this way...

There you go:

"I don't hate Jesus, but I want to recomment the Talmud - a book that has the worst statements about Jesus... And my name is unsurprisingly Mephisto666, literally taken from the book of revelations, and not any other book"

Excellent! :D I don't need to expose your evil - you did that already yourself. :D

I don't believe any researcher does that.

I would share my experience tho - I search for "9/11 conspiracy", "9/11 inside job", "What really happened on 9/11"... And I have so many documentaries that mostly include this clip, that's why I said it.

Probably we didn't understand each other at the start. But I have seen this clip in so many conspiracy videos, that I doubt this video is lost on researchers. That was my point.

"It didn't help that your reply came right after the other guy saying "Omg, you're a gullible idiot" implying I agree with the AI."

Never even saw that reply. But I understand how this contributed to our miscommunication.

"Very gracious of you and nice try at gaslighting. You were the one who insulted me first though, unless you consider "I don't care" to be an insult. It seems you just had another one of those interactions you talk about, but you don't seem ashamed of it."

There you go - lovely!

You talk about "gaslighting", huh? Let's explore:

My next comment was:

What a researcher you are... Tenacious, caring, intelligent...

Or probably not.

I'm gonna go with "probably not".

So, in your own mind, "probably not a tenactious, caring, intelligent researcher" is an insult?

You could've turned that "probably" to your own benefit. Am I wrong to doubt your abilities, even tho you proved my words later?

Now, it doesn't go into miscommunication. You took my sincerity and attacked me with it. But that backfired for you, didn't it? Or are you hoping that people will read only your reply and not mine... in the hope of... gaslighting me?

I so enjoy to crush my enemies with their own words... :D That's so satisfying, I can't even put it in words...

"You had an opportunity to do so here but chose to act as if you have the moral high ground somehow. It's bizarre really."

• I shared my personal experience, and you didn't.

• I opened myself to a cruel, vicious animal like you, only to be bitten by the rabid dog you really are...

I do have a moral high ground. And I know why a rabid dog would find that bizarre... :D

"But yes, it was a misunderstanding that didn't need to devolve into insults, I give you that. I'm sorry I stooped to your level and i apologize."

HA! "Stoop to my level"?

You said: "It didn't help that your reply came right after the other guy saying "Omg, you're a gullible idiot" implying I agree with the AI." IN THE SAME COMMENT!!! aahahahahahahahahah

:D

How dumb are you?

Actually, I will side with that comment accusing you of being a "gullible idiot". I wasn't aware of it, but I will go upvote it right now! This guy helped me out a lot!

Not you, you rabid dog - SmithW1984. You're a gullible idiot. Not only that. But you use someone opening themselves to you to attack them. How evil are you?

Satan can go on vacation with how well you react to people... I still pity the ones that know you in real life... Assuming you haven't killed them all already... Vicious, rabid dog, you... Go chase a bone, you abomination.

Because the question assumed I had a specific photo in mind and that I wasn't sure if it's altered or not.

No, it doesn't.

You assumed it. Read it again.

Why ask me for an exact photo when you have all the info I have by looking at the AI reply I pasted?

I challenged the photo, not you.

It's a question that assumes the photo is faked, which it turned out to be. It's a question that triggers people to understand that these photos are faked, and challenge those, who think they are not fake. And if someone argues about a photo that is not fake, I would answer the challenge.

And this argument would still be about the photo, not personal insults.

Why would you reply something completely unconnected to begin with?

Because I don't work for you. I have my own thoughts and meaning behind my thoughts.

Congratulations on checking with AI, but that wasn't my point. Hasn't anyone conversed with you and suddenly changed the conversation to something they just thought about? If that hasn't happened to you, I can assure you, it's pretty common in conversations.

Why not reply to the thread or make another one instead?

Because it's a challenge to the validity of the statement of the AI, that you provided. Again - not to you. The photo and the AI statement only.

Your comment was out of place and I viewed it in context.

I think you just mistook it for an insult, as I am personally challenging your comment. But I was challenging the information in your comment, and you had an AI statement there.

I think it was all just a misunderstanding. I don't judge you for that, I had many of those, and I know the shame that comes afterwards when I realized that I was in the wrong AFTER spewing so many insults towards the other person, believing that I am correct...

Once I was so ashamed that I deleted all my comments to hide how incorrect I was... Then I thought about it, and I knew it wasn't fair to insult the person, who actually just gave me the correct information... I wrote personally to this person to apologize, and to my surprise, he immediately forgave me... I was expecting insults, mockery, and all the things I was doing to him... Yet, this person understood and simply forgave me... I was even more ashamed of my actions after that, but I wanted to be like this person - generous in victory, not to shame someone in their defeat... I'd probably never forget this act of kindness. It really shocked me then, I really hope to return the favor to someone one day.

So?