Oh I’ve looked, and the rate if complications, particularly death, is incredibly low, in the neighborhood of a fraction of a percent. It seems you think there is different data out there, but are unable to produce it
I’ve had similar conversations with people and it always ends the same way. Seems odd that people like you want to keep this data secret
I mean, usually if I'm making a claim I'll provide a link to support it, instead of just a vague overview.
I'm a supporter of real science and data. You haven't really provided any of that unfortunately.
I have been vaxxed if you insist on knowing, but not boosted. If I were a shill, I probably would have mentioned that myself. I'm only questioning your claims. You seem to think your claims are above questioning.
I mean the vax has been advertised as "super deadly" for the past two years, but a vast majority of those who got the shot are living life with minimal, if any, side effects. I'm not sure how we can conclude it's poisonous.
But HOW is it more expensive? With so much funding going towards educating the public on a globe earth, how is the truth more costly? What more is at stake? Would it not be cheaper to just educate people on the truth?
I’m not a bot.
If this is what is preventing you from explaining further, then I think it’s valuable for us to confirm that I’m not a bot so that we can have an earnest discussion! Would you like to have a conversation on a platform that allows for voice/video call?
Not the same. This isn't an "if" statement.
You didn't "magically" get the correct answer by not believing in what ended up being incorrect. You learned the correct answer.