The vax is part of a depopulation agenda. Those who didn't take it, some 1/3 of us, are feeling fairly smug sitting here without blood clots or myocarditis or turbo cancer or our fertility ruined.
The 1/3 of us who didn't get it are the ungovernable, in one way or another, and we didn't ruin our fertility so we are going to outbreed the shitlibs and not abort our offspring.
They tried to get 100% compliance or near abouts, but Covid wasn't deadly enough, it was the flu basically.
However, the NWO satanic Freemason elite want good cattle, and that's not going to happen because we didn't fall for it.
However, what if they are working on the next bioweapon to release that targets the unvaxxed? Is that possible given our state of technology?
[edit to add, I ain't getting jabbed either, just thinking]
Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/g0I5hMxW3s7f/
TLDW - Tech company working on spores that that can survive heat and cooking that could be sprayed on food at the source (like coffee beans) that will via allow tracing of where X or Y food ends up after production, such as an expresso shop.
The damning part of the video starts about minute 8:20
Skeptical fat beta male guy on bottom right asks a decent question: "Have you seen what happens when you put these spores through the digestive systems of any animals?"
Tech startup guy on top right: "That's a great question....aaaaaannnnd....ahh, yea, ah, that's a big area of interest that we are currently working on and again I don't know if I can say more about it but there is a huge need for that."
wanna-be Steve Jobs guy on the bottom left nods and smiles like it will all work out
childless cat lady on top left looks uncomfortable
skeptical face on fat beta male guy intensifies
TLDR: Public opinion polling has the number of households with guns in America as about 35-45%, depending on the poll. The number may be closer to 60% when this is cleverly investigated.
Turns out people lie on this issue, a lot. They asked people in a poll who said they don't own guns questions that are very highly correlated with gun ownership. The non-savvy respondents in the survey who said yes on all the highly correlated questions almost certainly, statistically speaking, own guns even though they said no in the survey. When you include those people as gun owners, the rate can go as high as 60% of homes.
.....a Rutgers University study published last month in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology indicates that the number of gun owners may be substantially undercounted. According to Rutgers researcher Allison Bond, one reason is because “some individuals are falsely denying firearm ownership, resulting in research not accurately capturing the experiences of all firearm owners in the U.S.” He added, “The implications of false denials of firearms ownership are substantial.” Bond concluded, “It may be that a percentage of firearm owners are concerned that their information will be leaked and the government will take their firearms or that researchers who are from universities that are typically seen as liberal and anti-firearm access will paint firearm owners in a bad light.”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-023-02515-y
According to J.D. Tuccille (a libertarian stoner from Reason Magazine): “...the problem of dishonesty among survey respondents as pos(es) a danger to those surveyed since they don’t receive proper firearm safety information [say academics]. But [the reasearchers'] deeper concern is with the validity of research into firearms culture and policy in a country where experts don’t have anywhere near as good a handle on the prevalence of gun ownership as they had believed. …
Believe it or not, people are reluctant to tell total strangers about their potentially controversial activities....but such evasion is an inevitable consequence of decades of fiery debate and punitive gun policies.”
video: https://patriotpost.us/alexander/99460?mailing_id=7694
I get that some people want privacy. But if you won the mega billion ultra powerball multistate lottery and took the one time payout of 800 million (which happens every few years), human nature and history tells us that one of these jokers, who are ordinary people, are going to make themselves famous with odd charity donations or buying stupid things on a whim that make the news.
I don't read about this sort of thing happening. I suppose it's happening, but I don't see it anywhere. Is the lottery at the highest levels a scam, that is to say, no real human being is getting the cash? I'd like to be shown otherwise. Thoughts?
"The trick is to harvest the organs before the person’s heart slows so much that the organs begin shutting down and are unusable. If the patient dies quickly—doctors say within 20 minutes—the organs are still good and can usually be transplanted. This year, doctors in Denver managed to do just that, recovering organs from a patient who wasn’t brain dead but whose family decided to unplug a ventilator…. More than 1,300 people in Colorado are awaiting transplants—a demand critical enough that patients, surgeons, and medical ethicists are beginning to question the brain-death criterion and wonder whether something more liberal may be appropriate. But those doing the diagnoses say redefining the point at which death occurs is a slippery ethical issue—one that may have a reverse effect on organ donations because of fears that the practice is predatory."
https://www.crisismagazine.com/vault/how-science-is-redefining-death
