In the new multi-polar world we are transitioning too, it will be China, the US, Russia, India, and sorta maybe the EU. But Trump wants to give Japan a seat at the table as an equal, and the rest want them excluded.
I have never seen Japanese/American relationships so close as now.
From a purely rational perspective, voting makes little sense. Your vote has, mathematically, about the same chance as lightening striking in the same spot twice, as swinging an election one way or another. The race to win the Virginia governor's seat was decided by 533,000 votes or so (if they were even all real votes).
It makes even less sense, rationally, when voting in presidential elections where (particularly in America) state's electoral college votes go to one candidate to another, and you're a "red" guy in a "blue" state. There are a lot of other things, from a sort of Utilitarian perspective, to maximize one's life's experience, that are better than voting. Spending 30 minutes working out, or with your kids, or playing video games, has from an Epicurean point of view more pleasure than researching the candidates and taking the time to stand in line and cast a ballot.
However, do you think that Mr. Global rigs all elections? Is the CIA algorithm and/or the mail in ballot scam run by NGOs funded by Soros and his ilk affecting the race for the local mayoral election in your town, or the local school board? Either of these races have way more say on what your property taxes are and a direct effect on your life, than distant major races like for the president or senator.
Unless you, and many others simultaneously, are on a collective tax strike, you're not resisting the system by not voting. They don't care if you vote or not. In fact, they would prefer if you didn't as it makes it easier for them to cheat. Less ballots to dump at 3am.
So is voting worth it? Not really, but think of it like being in a crowd at a stadium. You're just one of a large group of cheering fans. Yet, fans do sometimes make a difference in a game, and the collective participation in the event does have meaning.
I realize this is from an American perspective, and I welcome the perspective of foreigners on this topic.
I have this idea that I've been thinking about lately. When right wing parties finally get in charge of western Europe, and start expelling the Mohammedian invaders, it's going to be akin to the religious turmoil of the "reformation" that lasted for about 200 years, thereabouts, and involved numerous wars and massacres and particular in Elizabethan England, a level of social control (oaths, fines, etc.) that made the Global War on Terror seem like a school yard play.
There has been a failure to replace the populations...the elite who planned the replacement will shift 180 and go all in on the social control necessary to track down and expel the invaders.
This is a win/lose scenario.
And no, Europe won't go the way of South Africa or Rhodesia. White people there were 5% of the populace in Rhodesia and 8% in South Africa. Such minority status doesn't exist in mainland Europe.
...because they aren't doing it themselves.
The primary reason the Epstein material (limited as it is) was allowed to be released is because it is a form of intimidation. The satanic Freemason elite want you to think that they are infesting every nook and cranny of power: corporate, finance, government, media, NGOs, etc.
But we know that not everyone at the top of these structures is a member of that club, based on their warning years ago (Kat Williams warning about Diddy for example), and some that "made peace" with the pedos but never joined (Rosanne for example) who now complain after they were exiled for one reason or another.
Give me a fraction, based on your best guess, of how many elites at the top are really demonically influenced freemason pedophiles. I'm saying 1/5 maybe, and 2/5 are posers who go along to get along. My source? Hunch.
(Thread prompted by the one about seeing someone with lizard eyes, who is possessed by a demon)
I have once. Waken from a dead cold sleep, my girlfriend and future wife said to me "we're not alone". I looked at the foot of the bed and their was a very angry young boy. I was shocked and became afraid myself as I sensed a power there, and then, like a balloon popping, he vanished.
She asked me what I saw, I said a very angry young boy, who looked to be age 9-10. She confirmed that was what she saw too.
I suppose it could have been an angry guardian angel, or even a passing demon, but let's go with ghost.
I have never doubted things spiritual since that day. I was about age 19.
...so I'm going to call you blue pilled and act like I've won the debate.
My friends, anybody on this cul de sac of niche shit-posting is not blue pilled. They might agree with you on 9/11 or the moon landing, but disagree with you about who killed JFK or the utility of the Federal Reserve.
Be open minded and debate the issue in your post, rather than bringing in outside BS purity spiral material.
Thanks!
He said this in the context of pushing France towards allowing assisted suicide.
"A study aimed to estimate the excess mortality in Germany for the years 2020–2022, showed that in 2020, there were approximately 4,000 excess deaths, while in 2021 and 2022, there were approximately 34,000 and 66,000 excess deaths, respectively [24]. A long-term population-wide cohort study in Pescara province (Italy), analysed nearly 300,000 residents over 30 months (June 2021 to December 2023) and investigated the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and cancer hospitalizations [25]. The study found that vaccination was associated with a 23% increased risk of cancer hospitalization after receiving one or more doses, and a 9% increased risk after receiving three or more doses. Statistically significant increases in risk were observed for breast cancer (+54%), bladder cancer (+62%), and colorectal cancer (+35%) after at least one dose. Notably, while vaccinated individuals exhibited lower all-cause mortality, this could be attributed to “healthy vaccinee effect” [26] or to the “case-counting window bias” [27], rather than a direct protective effect. A large population-based retrospective cohort study from South Korea, involving over 8.4 million adults from 2021 to 2023, assessed the cancer risks within one year after COVID-19 vaccination [28]. The study found that vaccinated individuals had a 27% higher overall risk of developing cancer compared to those unvaccinated."
Source:
Exploring the potential link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations and cancer: A case report with a review of haematopoietic malignancies with insights into pathogenic mechanisms