Nobody is perfectly aligned with what you believe, except for you of course (provided your opinions don't change over time, which they invariably do).
I propose a thought experiment. Give me the perfect candidate for high office by mixing and matching historical figures and their abilities and opinions to create who you would want
Ever watch GI Joe and the creation of Serpentor? Same idea.
I'll start: Mix Pope Gregory the Great with the military acumen of Napoleon but the subdued ambition of G. Washington.
The US Coast Guard is rather small, only about 35,000 people in all, so when the recruiting crisis hit them, and they are down 3,500 personnel, it really hits them hard.
They are mothballing 10 ships and closing 29 search & rescue and law enforcement stations.
Granted, you could reject the premise that he won because there were no electronic voting machines and the fix was in the whole time, or that he's aligned to the Jews (I've seen the picture, I think it did that to make them feel safe).
Still, I think his win was a rare "black swan" event. Will he go Milton Friedman on Argentina, like the Chicago economists did in the 1970s and 1980s? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Boy)
I don't know the powers of the president in Argentina, and what legislative majorities he may or may not have, but let's say he eliminates a bunch of federal agencies that I presume is under his control, and cuts spending and limits the printing press. That will help the 143% inflation.
If you were a WEF faggot, how would you undermine it, besides propaganda that is, like they used with Bolsonaro. Sudden problems with imports and exports? Sending caravans of migrants? False flags? "Riots" from disaffected leftists street warriors?
My best guess, is that some social issue, like guns or abortion, will be used to paralyze and divide the country so that much in way of economic reforms can't take place.
EDIT to add - If you reject the premise, as the first sentence says, then this isn't thread for you. Create your own thread to call him a fake.
The mistake most made by members of this community are the use of the words: always, all, every
Secondly, a lack of qualifiers in such expansive statements, because life is messy and there are often exceptions, even if, as the saying goes, "exceptions prove the rule."
Example 1: All swans are white. Response: If I can fine but one black swan, then your assertion, really a hypothesis, has been nullified, or is wrong. Say, your average swan is white.
Example 2: All elections are rigged.
Response: This means that you are saying every election is rigged. Do you really think that the non-partisan off year election for your local community college or library board is rigged? Maybe, but that's fucking moronic. Rather, you should say "all important elections are rigged".
Example 3: All Jews are evil.
Response: All Jews today, or all Jews throughout all of time? Joseph and Mary weren't evil, therefore, your assertion is wrong. Rather, say "modern Judaism is evil as practiced."
We'll go over the ecological fallacy next, which the the second biggest logic mistake made.
This makes the a lot of sense to me:
"....the E.V. push is not about some noble goal of saving the planet and humanity. The left has no heart, we know that—saving humanity is not on their agenda. [snip] But, they persist with the lie and many states, to patronize the irrational leftist agenda, have decided to outlaw the sale of gasoline cars by 2035 with no real good plan to support the move—not to mention, to support cross-country travel, the vast number of charging stations that would be needed at every “rest stop” since, instead of filling up a tank in 10 minutes and moving along, each vehicle will sit at a charger for several hours, and the facilities that will be needed to occupy your time while your car is plugged in. Nor is anyone terribly concerned how long that trip will take even if there were functioning charging stations on the highways… which there will not be. Nobody will want to take long distance trips. I contend this is entirely by design.
But no, airplanes will not be banned because there is no reasonable alternative to jets and, unlike ground transportation where anyone can travel freely on roads and highways and between all the states of America, air travel is completely under government control through the ever-watchful eyes of the FAA, guided by the FBI’s terrorist watchlist. MAGA conservatives are already in the FBI crosshairs as “domestic terrorists,” so it will not be long before we are all banned from commercial air travel.
Therefore, I believe the ultimate goal is to prohibit our freedom to assemble, otherwise guaranteed by the First Amendment."
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/10/the_extreme_danger_of_mailin_voting.html
Israel and the US created Hamas, but the golem got out of control like it always does. Here's a link to Ron Paul, whom I am sure you heard of, talking about it.
Hamas was created by Israeli and US intelligence services to counteract Yasser Arafat, Ron Paul explains – NaturalNews.com
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-10-12-hamas-created-israel-yasser-arafat-ron-paul.html
Virtually all of the "migrants" coming into Europe are males.
However, unless they are interbreeding through rape, or the small percent of the migrants which are women are continually pregnant, or there is a massive increase in race mixing (all three of which are not happening) this is a 1-2 generation problem, demographically speaking.
(I anticipate that most people will misunderstand what I'm saying here, or will say I support it somehow or something, which is not true)
