0
LiquidRitz 0 points ago +1 / -1

I remain skeptical due to the prevailing theories surrounding this filingat the time. None of the details seem to align with the Maxwell releases, including the previous ones and the newest release on January 3rd.

Prevailing Theories when this case went live in 2016:

  1. Trump was added to an existing case to garner media attention.
  2. Trump was the main perpetrator, with Epstein's name used to garner attention.
  3. It was all a PsyOp/AstroTurfing campaign to promote the "WithHer" movement.

We now know, definitively, that the allegations in this filing do not match the format or timing in the recently released evidence from the Maxwell case. I find the recent Maxwell releases more credible because it was actually used to convict. So it seems the entire thing was made up and we can speculate as to why.

2
LiquidRitz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone know which of the 30+ pdfs have the list?

I put the PDFs in one file, OCR'd it and still having a bit of trouble seeing a definitive list. Am I gonna have to hand type it?

1
LiquidRitz 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they are in print then you can prove it.

Your cult upbringing have no bearing on the facts here.

1
LiquidRitz 1 point ago +1 / -0

I refute that he predicted any of that and you refuse to prove otherwise.

Surely it will be easy for you to find and you have so many to choose from...

1
LiquidRitz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, prove them wrong.

You gotta source this stuff, am I supposed to just take your word for it.

You can start by showing Q's predictions.