4
InfidelCastro11 4 points ago +4 / -0

You and I have no control over gasoline supply lines. Best you can do is to become more self sufficient so you don't have to move. Until they try and force you, and then you'll have to become a criminal

5
InfidelCastro11 5 points ago +5 / -0

More like shittier feudalism. Skip 2 and 4, they're not gonna bother pushing EV on everyone. insert incentives to move into cities or nearer to your workplace. They likely won't even need to outright ban cars, they'll just make them too expensive to use.

Normies won't think "the government made my car illegal," they'll think "gas cars became unsustainable and the nice government sends a shuttle to get me to work/paid for me to relocate into the city."

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

More braindead armchair psychology because you can't handle a simple question. Cope harder. I checked your replies in case I missed it and you never answered my question. You avoid the question because your explanation of physics implies objects can move with no force being applied to them, and you'll look stupid as fuck when you say "yes." I'm not the one emotionally attached to my stance, project harder 🤡

Because I no longer apply force to the item

Things don't move because of a lack of force, bud.

by pkvi
2
InfidelCastro11 2 points ago +2 / -0

Get scared of the scary virus for the fourth time. Yawn

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you were being genuine you would've answered my question. You're just sitting there projecting 🤡

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haven't heard a better explanation, so I'll stick with gravity.

Hey, can objects accelerate with no force acting on them? 🤡

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

I got the explanation and it implies objects accelerate without a force acting on them. They don't.

You're avoiding the question because you can't answer it. Should be a simple yes or no. Thanks for playing.

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're dodging my question. Do you think objects can move when no force is applied to them?

5
InfidelCastro11 5 points ago +5 / -0

They're all pedophiles and it's not a secret, old news. Humans are the most expensive good, who else could be buying them

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you really think objects move without a force acting on them? That would be highly retarded

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cool story, why does it fall?

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you call it when you let go of something and it falls to the ground?

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +3 / -2

No, there isn't. A vacuum is just nothing. It's not a force, there's no reason it would rip away the atmosphere. You people really have no grasp of physics. If you have a particle floating in a vacuum, it will move towards a source of gravity. And stay there.

3
InfidelCastro11 3 points ago +3 / -0

What the fuck is that stupid shit supposed to mean?

9
InfidelCastro11 9 points ago +9 / -0

Let's not forget who the aggressors are. I just want them out of the nation I live in.

13
InfidelCastro11 13 points ago +13 / -0

Bolsheviks, before they starved millions of whites to death

2
InfidelCastro11 2 points ago +2 / -0

One, they get off on it. They're putting what they're doing out in the open and people largely don't even want to notice. Two, introducing an idea in any context in the media makes the public more receptive to that idea. It can even be an entirely fictional event and people will still be less skeptical of a real world counterpart

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +2 / -1

Things do not move without a force applied to them. Important to understand. When gas expands to fill a container it's because it's under pressure and/or excited. It's not something that magically happens all the time no matter what. If you put a gas into a container with plenty room to spare, it won't fill the container.

The gas won't shoot off into space by itself...because there's no force being exerted onto it.

2
InfidelCastro11 2 points ago +3 / -1

A vacuum is literally nothing. There's nothing to stop gravity. You seem to think things move for no reason. You need a force for something to move

3
InfidelCastro11 3 points ago +4 / -1

Nope. Shitty understanding of physics. A vacuum isn't a force, it's just empty space. A gas particle sitting in a vacuum has no reason not to move towards a source of gravity.

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +3 / -2

I addressed everything you said. Tell me what I ignored.

1
InfidelCastro11 1 point ago +3 / -2

You have no grasp of physics at all.

a force of 9.8m/s²

That's not a measurement of force. Try again

What happens when the bug stops flying? Wonder if that happens to things that aren't a bug too. "Things go up, so gravity not real" is a pretty braindead take. This whole thing would be more interesting if flat earthers had a coherent physics model, but you never have and never will.

hold off an infinite vacuum

You don't need to "hold off" a vacuum. It's not exerting force on anything. It helps to have some understanding of what you're trying to argue against.

Do things move if no force is being exerted on them?

5
InfidelCastro11 5 points ago +7 / -2

There is if mass and gravitation are entirely mathematical fiction with no reality outside of equation

TIL things don't actually fall when I drop them, it's just an equation. Flat earthers are quick to dismiss something as fiction while never providing a working model of physics.

If it is a strawman

They're strawmanning the conventional model of space. You know this. You're just being obtuse. They said that it's absurd to suggest that orbits don't change, no model of space suggests that orbits don't change. It's just mind numbing ignorance of the opposite position.

11
InfidelCastro11 11 points ago +17 / -6

If space is vacuum it would be impossible for our atmosphere to exists without a solid barrier ("firmament") containing it.

Gas has mass. There's no reason gravity should have no effect on it.

all these forces at work moving balls millions of miles without one iota of decay or change

Strawman. Orbits do change and decay. Why argue against something you don't understand. The actual proposed orbits are way more fucked up looking than what you saw in textbooks, all that shit is dumbed down for kids and retards.

It is an odd coincidence that the moon orbits at a rate that keeps the same side facing us at all times. Another odd coincidence is the sun being exactly far enough away from us to be the same size as the moon in the sky

NASA has been faking their space activities for 50+ years

Yep, seems that way.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›