▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

So nothing I said was wrong and the most you got was a strawman. :)

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they didn't fund the Deep State and banking class. If they didn't fund Techno-slavery and AI and such. If they didn't fund endless refugees and gimmiegrants. If they didn't waste it on "muh green energy". If they didn't send money to other countries. If they didn't spend it on teaching fake history, like that "people are monkeys and the world is old".

▲ 4 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did anyone speak about evolution of one family of animal into a different one before Erasmus Darwin?

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

ALL taxation is theft. Textbook definition.

Your beef should be with taxes not with "naddalizms".

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also this image is an absolute non-sequitur and has nothing to do. May as well posit that the pic proves people are being pushed to pay for peoples' pet parakeets.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not inherently, no. There are countless ways making more kids can be pulled off, without needing others' money. People have made kids w/o (w/o means without) others' money since the dawn of time. You lack imagination.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

current day

Yes. Very good thing we have Trump and not atheist "Send money to Nepal for athiesm" Biden. Praise Jesus!

that is why

Biblical History is always relevant. Relationship with God and eternal Life is utterly important.

So was anything I said factually not correct? Yes or no?

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then his own acc. wouldn't have THREE dv's.

And he would ALWAYS be doing it, not make a measly "wave".

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your opposition to DID is based on Christianity. Atheism never has and never had any inherent provisions against DID or censorship.

P2025 is a scare hoax and bogeyman.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

But we have much more evidence the Bible is right than those. People regularly defend the Bible, nobody defends those.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

And there was a huge wave of downvoting around a week ago. EVERY POST. Even jg5's. It has calmed down by half or 75% since then, though.

I doubt it's him though. Mabye a bunch of disgruntled/angry people.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a worldview belief. Congrats, you've discovered the fact that worldviews contradict. Every worldview calls the other dumb. Now what??

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The huge mistake so SO many make is assuming the fake history atheists believe in is actually science, rather than history. Christians aren't afraid of science, it's Athiests who are afraid of HISTORY. The Bible is a HISTORY Book.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

He described non-Aryans as "chaff," writing, "All who are not of good race in this world are chaff"

Also in Chapter 11 - Race and People

The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker

Selectionism.

Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind; for if such a law did not direct the process of

evolution
▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is there any evidence the dude really said that? I can also produce text attributed to him saying "My dog stepped on my foot."

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

You forgot to reply to SmithW's latest comment (view all comments, then view this thread again).

Why? Explain please? Did you get overwhelmed in notification pings? Are you working on rebuttals What? Why?

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

"jew". As in, what is meant when people say Jesus was one.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Incredibly based takes on nat zees. Reminder: Ephesians 4:29

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›