2
EagleI 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was skeptical from the title alone--- was. Means he was probably forced to resign.

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some states have removed this provision :(

3
EagleI 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not a conspiracy post. It's a thinly veiled attempt to make this new community look like it's controlled and censored by TheDonald. If you're an American, Donald Trump IS our president. It's a fact.
Politics aren't a forbidden topic. You could easily make it a conspiracy post by adding more context. For instance, is there a media article saying otherwise? Is there a poll showing a large contingency don't believe it? A breakdown of all the dissent over the last four years from high places. etc

15
EagleI 15 points ago +15 / -0

This post was made by a handshake account with no posts and no comments. That means this user is NOT a member of TheDonald. They're also NOT a user of Conspiracy. That means most likely they are a bad actor, trying to make this platform look biased and/or censored. TD frens (yes, I'm a member), please help this new community survive and thrive. Help us take another community out of Reddit's hands. Only upvote conspiracies.

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are dirty multiple levels down. Maybe all the way down. What happens if you try to end the FBI? You better trust the CIA or NSA to have your back. I certainly wouldn't. Seems like a quick way to die.

3
EagleI 3 points ago +4 / -1

I hope they do ban you. I looked at your post history. You don't seem to be engaging in any positive way with the community.

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

The lucrative question was already answered on Reddit...at least twice. It was a bad choice if wording, intended to convey a free and large exchange of ideas.
This series of communities has never asked for money and turned down offers from users to give. They say free speech is most important to them. There are no ads. They don't even require an email to sign up. I imagine most of us here use a VPN. What exactly would be lucrative?

3
EagleI 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sources: Valerie Biden Owens is Joe Biden's sister: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Biden_Owens
Valerie Biden Owens married John T. Owens. https://www.nytimes.com/1975/10/12/archives/bridal-at-un-for-miss-biden.html
R. Kevin Owens is John T. Owens brother. (He was the best man in the wedding article above).
What I can't find is the source that R. Kevin Owens is related to Stephen D. Owens, although the bio photos have a striking resemblance.

4
EagleI 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup. Dominion admitted to making a donation to Clinton Foundation and did not dispute that a former staffer of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was hired as a lobbyist. https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/dominion-confirms-clinton-foundation-donation-pelosi-staffer-link_3582450.html

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can anyone point me toward more info? I'm really interested in this. I read up on Schumann Resonance and understand that concept but what does the dot have to do with that?

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

Says the person who wants the mods to take down posts they deem "misinformation"...

3
EagleI 3 points ago +3 / -0

check out the studies link, the ones where hcq is used early or as a prophylactic seem to be most effective, HCQ is used to treat a lot of different health issues (see top of post, I list some), you used to be able to pick up without a prescription in some countries (such as france who changed their law at advent of coronavirus)

15
EagleI 15 points ago +16 / -1

Enjoy war, high taxes, and the crushing weight of communism. Useful idiots.

4
EagleI 4 points ago +4 / -0

Add and enforce a rule that members have to actually like discussing conspiracies. If all their posts are "debunking" and they have more downvotes than upvotes, they can GTFO.
EDIT: They GIVE more downvotes than upvotes, not receive Aka they hate all conspiracies and continually shit on the sub

4
EagleI 4 points ago +4 / -0

I also noticed when good threads break through, they hijack top comments with popular distractions. i.e. instead of talking about new information, they will be like, "Epstein didn't kill himself!" (he didn't) or related hot topic. That way they can slide real information down the thread.

3
EagleI 3 points ago +3 / -0

No problem! I checked when making this post, and very few news outlets added retraction statements to their articles.

I've seen both prices published. Like any drug price, it varies. You can get an idea of current drug pricing here: https://www.goodrx.com/hydroxychloroquine?dosage=200mg&form=tablet&label_override=hydroxychloroquine&quantity=30&sort_type=price

I don't know enough about alternate corticosteroid regimens to comment.

by TlKr
1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're moving goal posts. You originally said Assange was ONLY in his situation because of the Trump admin. That's clearly incorrect. Assange was going to be extradited to Sweden to face sexual assault charges. He also feared those charges were a step toward extraditing him to the USA to face additional charges there. He had good reason to believe that. His source, Chelsea Manning, had been convicted to a 35-year sentence in prison. Likewise, the Obama administration had been conducting an active, long-term criminal investigation into WikiLeaks as confirmed by court documents. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/mar/05/us-government-still-hunting-wikileaks-obama-targets-whistleblowers https://thehill.com/homenews/news/314139-assange-agrees-to-be-extradited-to-us-if-obama-grants-clemency-for-chelsea

0
EagleI 0 points ago +1 / -1

Downvoted for this... "another forum designed to suck off the current president." Bullshit claim. The conspiracy sub has a mix of Trump supporters and haters, probably tipping in the favor of haters. Reddit itself bans and censors mostly conservative conspiracies-- election fraud, Bobulinski, NY Post Biden story, Seth Rich, Eric Ciarmella, QAnon, etc.

12
EagleI 12 points ago +12 / -0

Now, we're probably going to watch it happen with Ivermectin, which is looking promising.

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd love to see it.

1
EagleI 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats the point. We're NOT the media. We are a discussion community. You're asking mods to pick and choose winners AND to vet all posts. That would lead to massive censorship.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›