You're shit posting. Thanks for the traffic fake Trump supporter.
Go away shill. You're not a Trump supporter; this site is not for you.
You are lying. People should not listen to you. You are just scamming people of their money using complicated language. You are delusional if you think the "alien" used here is a little green man from Mars or so. The "alien" used here is an adjective. You clearly don't know your grammar. You should go back to school and study more of English101. Use a dictionary to find out what is the meaning of "alien" in this context. Maybe your confused brain will enlighten a little and expose your lying statements.
You are lying again here. You stated, "end conclusion real science usually have doubts instead of being 100% sure." But the real conclusion of the experiment stated, "A general reflected-light view of one-half of the polished surface of the recovered specimen is shown in Fig. 1. Little if any transformation. Reflected light photomicrograph of shock recovery experiment S1230. Labels indicate direction of shock propagation and layout of discs of starting material in deformed cavity within container. The area of interest where layers mixed and reacted is near the center of the image. Dark areas are where material was plucked from the surface during polishing; there were no voids or vesicles in the sample as recovered." Where are the doubts in the conclusion of the experiment? Other people just make up whatever doubts they like regarding the experiment. You just don't admit you are full of lies.
You are making too many excuses just to type physical equations here. You can type physical equations here. Let me show you the mathematics of quasicrystals. Fibonacci tiling: a (mapsto) ab b (mapsto) a a (mapsto) ab (mapsto) aba (mapsto) abaab (mapsto) ... Example 5 to 2 cut and project set: Consider the subspace E of R raised to 5 generated by the columns of the matrix (1 : {cos(2π/5), cos(4π/5), cos(6π/5), cos(8π/5)}; 0 : {sin(2π/5), sin(4π/5), sin(6π/5), sin(8π/5)}) F (subset) π chosen appropriately, and W (subset) π the canonical window, which is the image under π raised to ∗ of the unit cube in R raised to 5. ...
You are bullshitting. You keep playing on vague words and contradicting your statements. Read your own sentences:
It is nothing alien about it probably. Just much less common phase-change process.
The question is rather - is it common/probable in space
If it were organized complex nanostructure we would have the right to suspect alien nature... But it isn't really such.
You said it is not alien. But you don't know what alien means. You keep on pushing reports of "MAY", "PROBABLE", etc. That means you are not sure and clear. That's not science. Science uses clear mathematics and measurements. You are bullshitting! Stop playing word games! Stop confusing people with your bullshit words.
You are playing stupid games. Read your bullshit posts. You are a Deep State disinformation agent.
Get out of here you sick shit! Stop your complex fuck bullshit!
Perhaps you don't know the meaning of "alien" per se. What is your definition of alien?
How long is your explanation or excuse? Can you get it soon? What's the difference between "much less common", "less common", "uncommon", and "rare"?
If you can prove it is common on Earth, show it. If you can show it is commonly found in nature, then bring it. Otherwise people should not listen to you.
Element 115 defies thermodynamics laws, radioactive decay, fission, etc. but it is still stable. It works normally and provides energy. Bob Lazar said it is not naturally found on Earth. It's possible that aliens gave it to us. Watch this: https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRj5VSmk/bob-lazar-explaining-element-115/c/
Read my comments. The footage is right here: https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRj4OiI5/
Bob Lazar said element 115 is a stable element. That explains why it is less radioactive.
A cloud chamber is used to detect if there is any radioactivity near the material or location. Particle movements can be seen on the cloud.
I think it is missing another element to make it more radioactive.
I think it is missing another element to make it more radioactive.
I saw a large spike at 1:06.
It's not clear in this video. But in another video I saw some curve line reactions in the cloud. Are these the antimatter reactions? Element 115 should emit some kind of antimatter reaction. Otherwise it's useless. https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRj4OiI5/
It's not clear in this video. But in another video I saw some curve line reactions in the cloud. Are these the antimatter reactions? https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRj4OiI5/
In another video I saw some curve line reactions in the cloud. Are these the antimatter reactions? https://conspiracies.win/p/12hRj4OiI5/
I don't see any radioactivity in there. All I see mostly is artificial smoke and it seems pointless.
I think Bob Lazar is trying to bend light with element 115. This is based on his comments.
Besides UFOs, there are also reports of USOs (Underwater Submerged Objects). USOs later become UFOs. They all came from underwater or underground. There are some things going on that the aliens don't tell us. They just deviate to other stories instead.
Read this https://patriots.win/p/12hReOrrww/
You better because you're suspicious. And Trump is not a politician.
You're shit posting. Thanks for the traffic fake Trump supporter.