“Alien Crystal” Found In Meteorite?
(youtu.be)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
You are playing stupid games. Read your bullshit posts. You are a Deep State disinformation agent.
Why ?
You are bullshitting. You keep playing on vague words and contradicting your statements. Read your own sentences:
You said it is not alien. But you don't know what alien means. You keep on pushing reports of "MAY", "PROBABLE", etc. That means you are not sure and clear. That's not science. Science uses clear mathematics and measurements. You are bullshitting! Stop playing word games! Stop confusing people with your bullshit words.
If I would know what "alien" means it would mean I know anything about aliens being real and it would be then more,much more interesting that some quasicrystals in meteorites... Unfortunately I don't know nothing sure about aliens or even if they exist so...
True,but at the end conclusion real science usually have doubts instead of being 100% sure. Moreover this webpage not supports physical equations needed to show even known conditions needed to creation of quasicrystal in scientifical way - both from solid state physics and thermodynamics side, not mentioning that rock crushing rock with such speeds there are in space would mean also pressure - not only temperature,so probably you shall not ask me but materials science professors to give you it mathematical.
Ok,I think linking research will work - if it will not work for you I wouldn't response anyway: https://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/naturalquasicrystals.html Especially:
https://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/ncomms5040.pdf
https://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/PNAS-2016-Asimow-1600321113.pdf
You are lying. People should not listen to you. You are just scamming people of their money using complicated language. You are delusional if you think the "alien" used here is a little green man from Mars or so. The "alien" used here is an adjective. You clearly don't know your grammar. You should go back to school and study more of English101. Use a dictionary to find out what is the meaning of "alien" in this context. Maybe your confused brain will enlighten a little and expose your lying statements.
You are lying again here. You stated, "end conclusion real science usually have doubts instead of being 100% sure." But the real conclusion of the experiment stated, "A general reflected-light view of one-half of the polished surface of the recovered specimen is shown in Fig. 1. Little if any transformation. Reflected light photomicrograph of shock recovery experiment S1230. Labels indicate direction of shock propagation and layout of discs of starting material in deformed cavity within container. The area of interest where layers mixed and reacted is near the center of the image. Dark areas are where material was plucked from the surface during polishing; there were no voids or vesicles in the sample as recovered." Where are the doubts in the conclusion of the experiment? Other people just make up whatever doubts they like regarding the experiment. You just don't admit you are full of lies.
You are making too many excuses just to type physical equations here. You can type physical equations here. Let me show you the mathematics of quasicrystals. Fibonacci tiling: a (mapsto) ab b (mapsto) a a (mapsto) ab (mapsto) aba (mapsto) abaab (mapsto) ... Example 5 to 2 cut and project set: Consider the subspace E of R raised to 5 generated by the columns of the matrix (1 : {cos(2π/5), cos(4π/5), cos(6π/5), cos(8π/5)}; 0 : {sin(2π/5), sin(4π/5), sin(6π/5), sin(8π/5)}) F (subset) π chosen appropriately, and W (subset) π the canonical window, which is the image under π raised to ∗ of the unit cube in R raised to 5. ...