1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was John Rabe who was the famous savior of Nanking. He used his diplomatic power to save thousands of Chinese civilians from the Japanese massacre. He was German businessman and high up official in the Nazi Party and is still celebrated today in China as a hero.

Remember, these online neo-nazi types are very stupid and ignorant and do no actual research into the topic other than gay bitchute videos.

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Pure projection. Stormfags are always lower tier white trash who base their entire world view off of retarded bitchute videos. None of you retards have ever read a book and are basically illiterate.

-2
Cyber1776 -2 points ago +2 / -4

This board is filled with stormfags. Get ready for them to fucking blow your mind with retarded 6 hour long bitchute videos.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ok, I asked for what specific part did you not agree with. Just saying “many” doesn’t answer this and just confirms what we both know, that you have never read this report or looked into it at all.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, but he literally says this was the day after. He’s saying that the tower already collapsed, but that the debris was in danger of falling over and they were discussing bringing the rest down.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

What specific part of the NIST report do you disagree with and why?

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

So are y’all just going to ignore the fact that in this quote he specifically mentions that this is the day after 9/11? He is not referring to the actual initial collapse of the building.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is an entire report of the physics in the NIST report that I posted. Try taking your own advice and researching this instead of just staying in an echo chamber.

-2
Cyber1776 -2 points ago +1 / -3

This is him talking about September 12, the day after 7 had collapsed in on itself. How does this disprove anything in my original post?

-2
Cyber1776 -2 points ago +1 / -3

I actually posted evidence for my claim while you are just posting trolly bullshit. I’m being much more sincere than you are.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

The collapse pattern is not at all unusual or suspicious for the building and the damage it sustained. This is a video of a simulation based off of the NIST investigation into WTC7 that shows you how it happened. https://youtu.be/VAkTbyENZ5s

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +1 / -2

A giant chunk of the towers crashed into 7, which ripped off an entire side of the building (this is conveniently never shown in truther videos despite it being easy to find). The debris also caused a fire to spread. So severe structural damage plus the fire lead to the building collapsing. This also did not happen suddenly, but over the course of hours.

There is no evidence at all to suggest any of this was a controlled demolition.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

It didn’t collapse suddenly, it slowly caved in over hours. Debris had basically destroyed an entire side of the building and the fire burned enough to structurally weaken it until it finally caved in suddenly.

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

What about building 7 made you think that?

0
Cyber1776 0 points ago +1 / -1

I asked a question, you’re the one having a mental break down because you’re such a sensitive and weak minded person that you consider so much as someone disagreeing with your retarded conspiracy theories as a personal attack.

-3
Cyber1776 -3 points ago +1 / -4

You’re an embarrassing retard and a newfag.

-3
Cyber1776 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Sure thing conspiracy tard. If you’re too stupid to argue your own retarded views just say so.

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +2 / -3

It tells you I don’t like conspiracy theories. Also, you’re a newfag with your oldest thread from a month ago, so you really have no room to start making accusations about others. You’re also the one who can only communicate with terms like “glowie” and your immediate assumption was that I’m some sort of secret agent, which is something only an insane schizo would actually think.

Reminder, you came into this thread making accusations at me.

-3
Cyber1776 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Conspiracytards are not about investigating, they ironically enough are close minded sheep themselves. They buy into preposterous stories with little to no evidence and then shrink away from open discussion as much as possible. They also establish an atmosphere of obnoxious and abrasive behavior to keep everyone in their circle in line.

This is why they are going to attack you for daring to actually post evidence they don’t like. Do what you want, but never back down to these faggots.

-1
Cyber1776 -1 points ago +2 / -3

I have had my account for a while. You’re being paranoid by insisting that I’m some sort of agent.

-4
Cyber1776 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Sorry dude, you actually researched this attack so the obnoxious conspiracytards are going to attack you.

-4
Cyber1776 -4 points ago +1 / -5

If he posted that it would at least be a theory, but he said he doesn’t care how he just blames Jews

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›