by Renzus
1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's herd protection. Protecting the elite from the herd.

3
Cheesemaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah, yeah i knew it was "per hundred" just didn't know UK used it that way. Thx.

11
Cheesemaker 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fifteen Americans for every penny in existence?

I mean, i guess it makes cents that a Chinese writer doesn't know the difference between "per cent" and "percent"

-3
Cheesemaker -3 points ago +2 / -5

Wait until they find out that Trump killed them all. That is why the democrats have been fighting these vaccine mandates so hard all year long.

Edit: I guess people missed the sarcasm (although there is some truth that they will go this route once the truth becomes evident)

by pkvi
3
Cheesemaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good thing the UK upped their anticoagulant orders from £200M /year to £3.2B/year in July. It's a true mystery why they did that...

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/unprecedented-nhs-england-3-2-billion-tender-for-blood-clot-treatment/

by pkvi
5
Cheesemaker 5 points ago +5 / -0

They aren't that high (they're at 70.3% according to goolag)... but your point stands.

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where do I sign up for my saline booster shot?

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haven't seen this confirmed outside of random tweets. Take it with a word of caution.

Also note they just instituted it a couple days ago, I'd be surprised if they reversed course that fast. I would think they would instead delay the "deadline" multiple times before finally caving.

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

In Biden's speech today he stated that any businesses accepting federal funding would be forced to vaccinate their employees (like federal contractors). He then later in the speech announced that there would be more bailout money for small businesses.

Connect the dots. It's being done to force vaccination mandates at those businesses. Whether its just for the new money they're printing for bailouts or if it will also include the old money they printed for the bailouts is unclear.

4
Cheesemaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Variants can trigger ADE. And then they explain it as "vaccine resistant' variant rather than pointing out that ADE is a serious concern (like they should do if they were actually news).

by schris4
1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you say 39% effective, do you mean it increases of decreases bad reactions by 39%?

3
Cheesemaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

China is mentioned all the time over in GAW especially in the comments. Wtf are you talking about?

by schris4
3
Cheesemaker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh there could be variants. And the reason they're so deadly is because the vaccine is causing ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement) in people which amplifies the effect of the virus they are "trying" to stop. A slight mutation in the virus can trigger ADE.

by pkvi
6
Cheesemaker 6 points ago +6 / -0

Most people don't even know the propaganda the Nazis used to justify putting Jews in concentration camps.

The Jews were thrown into Nazi concentration camps because they were "health risks" for spreading Typhus.

Sound familiar?

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're progressing towards Mad Max. I think only a couple years away now.

by skuda
1
Cheesemaker 1 point ago +1 / -0

The study authors were intentionally being misleading. They included a bunch of third trimester participants (which far outnumbered the first trimester participants) in the spontaneous abortion calculation.

The fact is, from the study, 104 women out of 127 lost their baby in the first trimester. 104/127 = 82%

by skuda
4
Cheesemaker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't know about infertility, but it does cause miscarriages 82% of the time if received in the first trimester. There are also a lot of reports that women are getting heavy periods as well. I wouldn't be surprised if it also caused infertility.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions/

8
Cheesemaker 8 points ago +8 / -0

FDA has a track record of recalling 32% of all of their approvals (for 2001-2010):

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2625319

Conclusions and Relevance Among 222 novel therapeutics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010, 32% were affected by a postmarket safety event. Biologics, psychiatric therapeutics, and accelerated and near–regulatory deadline approval were statistically significantly associated with higher rates of events, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring of the safety of novel therapeutics throughout their life cycle.

2
Cheesemaker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember a year ago when they were against the Vax. And a 6 months before that when all the lockdowns were racist.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›