0
BALLSOUT 0 points ago +1 / -1

Less than 15 seconds.

-1
BALLSOUT -1 points ago +3 / -4

I have doubts. Christianity had the best shot and new membership/participation in that cult is plummeting.

It's almost like since the advent of the internet, people had access to information that the church tried to suppress for thousands of years and now people are coming to the conclusion that churches are cults for easily influenced morons and midwits.

0
BALLSOUT 0 points ago +1 / -1

Come on bro. Haven't you and OP learned since your most recent bannings that criticism of Russia or the GOP are verboten?

0
BALLSOUT 0 points ago +1 / -1

press x for doubt on that quote.

Here's a video of him saying it. Pls oh pls tell me you think it's CGI....

https://youtu.be/fmMvsAjCkog

-1
BALLSOUT -1 points ago +1 / -2

Even if that's true, that doesn't offset the fact act that they've also raped more children than any program or group that's ever existed.

Plus organized religion is bullshit.

0
BALLSOUT 0 points ago +1 / -1

OK wow..I guess Sidney Powell will actually be able to produce the kraken then. Case dismissed.

-1
BALLSOUT -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yea sorry man it isn't a "sacrifice" if the woman who is pregnant is choosing to have the abortion.

If the parents don't want to have the child, that's their business.

1
BALLSOUT 1 point ago +2 / -1

Well let's establish a few ground rules here for the sake of conversation.

Who do you put under the umbrella of "the media?"

FOX? CNN? OANN? NEWSMAX? MSNBC? New York Time? Epoch Times? Tucker Carlson? Trevor Noah?

Because those are all considered "the media," and if you're saying something is false just because it's in the media, then you must believe literally everything is false as with that handful of names, you can find opposing takes on every single issue. So I think its helpful to clarify who you mean by "the media."

-1
BALLSOUT -1 points ago +1 / -2

I think you're the one trying to manipulate here, friend.

0
BALLSOUT 0 points ago +2 / -2

5 dried grams in silent darkness.

2
BALLSOUT 2 points ago +3 / -1

Twitter is at the end of its life cycle anyway. It will become a boomer networking site once tik tok fully takes over, while the next generation social media gestates under tik toks reign.

The absolute best case scenario for twitter is under Musk's stewardship, it becomes something analogous to the wild west of internet free speech. The initial surge in users will be brief however, as swarms of pumped up pepes start calling everyone a faggot and those not accustomed to or comfortable with internet culture (boomers, libs) embark on a mass exodus.

Were looking at the twilight years of Twitter no matter what. 5-7 years before it supernovas and turns into a black hole.

by DrLeaks
0
BALLSOUT 0 points ago +1 / -1

She's a complete fucking psycho. So if you were able to get her in the sack it would be a wild ride.

by DrLeaks
-5
BALLSOUT -5 points ago +1 / -6

Whenever I see someone trying to use "woman" as a subtle pejorative, i have to assume they're either involuntarily celibate, or a divorce court dad.

Which is it?

0
BALLSOUT 0 points ago +2 / -2

Elon shills seem to be giving this post a wide birth.

-1
BALLSOUT -1 points ago +1 / -2

While your attempt to maneuver your way into a spin for this is admired, it's entirely useless as it's been obvious how full of shit she was since day one to anyone who wasn't hooked on a hopium/copium cocktail.

-1
BALLSOUT -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ehh, Lin pocketing money from Kyle Rittenhouse donors and doing some sort of bizzaro trump/QTard rally circuit to amass wealth and become some sort of pseudo celebrity tells me all I need to know about the guy. No Bueno.

-2
BALLSOUT -2 points ago +1 / -3

I'm good on Judd, save for his earlier hits, but that doc should be great. Seeing candid footage, unreleased material, interviews with his daughter.

view more: ‹ Prev