2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +3 / -1

I know. The point is that people like Fauci act like you are scientifically illiterate for suggesting that mRNA could be incorporated into your genome.

Dr. Doug Corrigan has written about why the vaccine could be more problematic than infection in this regard:

https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/

https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-sheds-more-light-on-whether-an-rna-vaccine-can-permanently-alter-dna/

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +3 / -1

Tony “The Rat” Fauci acts quite sure that it won’t alter DNA, but nobody knows.

‘David Baltimore, a virologist at the California Institute of Technology who won the Nobel Prize for his role in discovering RT, describes the new work as “impressive” and the findings as “unexpected” but he notes that Jaenisch and colleagues only show that fragments of SARS-CoV-2’s genome integrate. “Because it is all pieces of the coronaviral genome, it can’t lead to infectious RNA or DNA and therefore it is probably biologically a dead end,” Baltimore says. “It is also not clear if, in people, the cells that harbor the reverse transcripts stay around for a long time or they die. The work raises a lot of interesting questions.”‘

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/coronavirus-may-sometimes-slip-its-genetic-material-human-chromosomes-what-does-mean

by gamepwn
3
AnonymousFrog 3 points ago +4 / -1

Why did Trump help set this precedent?

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +3 / -1

This desperate story is even more reason not to take this vaccine.

0
AnonymousFrog 0 points ago +1 / -1

True. But I was thinking about Castro. Lol.

0
AnonymousFrog 0 points ago +1 / -1

Matthew 16:18 “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

I guess Jesus was talking about a different Church.

3
AnonymousFrog 3 points ago +4 / -1

Like father, like son.

by pkvi
0
AnonymousFrog 0 points ago +1 / -1

Too many posts without a link. You see this a lot on the chans. It’s apparently metastasized.

0
AnonymousFrog 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lately it’s been populism leads to nationalism leads to white nationalism leads to nazis. They’re afraid that more and more people are figuring them out so they are doubling down on the divide and conquer.

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes. It’s amazing that some people (including far too many cops) don’t know that having your chest compressed such that your breathing is labored isn’t sustainable even though you can say “ I can’t breathe.”

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

When are they going to tell Bill Gates to stop talking about vaccines?

1
AnonymousFrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not that it will work, but this is the answer to their vaccine propaganda.

“As discussed above, natural infection with influenza viruses can induce long-lived immune responses that potentially provide lifelong protection against specific virus strains. It has been reported that the antibody response to vaccination is much more short-lived and that vaccine effectiveness and antibody titres can wane even within a season.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-019-0143-6

1
AnonymousFrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Flat Earth reminds me of Alex Jones saying “They’re turning the frogs gay!”

They are poisning the water and NASA lies, but AJ is clownish and Flat Earth doesn’t make a lot of sense.

by pkvi
6
AnonymousFrog 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s far from the first time.

Why the WHO faked a pandemic – Forbes 2010.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201011163656if_/https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/05/world-health-organization-swine-flu-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html#1575df6b48e8

https://www.forbes.com/2010/03/10/swine-flu-world-health-organization-pandemic-opinions-contributors-henry-i-miller.html

https://davidicke.com/2020/12/10/why-the-who-faked-a-pandemic-forbes-2010/

‘Note: This article, published on 5 February 2010, originally appeared in Forbes. It was removed sometime in mid October 2020 with no explanation.’

‘Forbes article – 5th February 2010: ‘The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying “The sky is falling!” like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. “The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible,” the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this “description,” but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

‘The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO’s motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the “false pandemic” is “one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century.”

‘Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. “We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health,” he said.

They’re right. This wasn’t merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.

‘Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it’s far tamer than that.

‘Indeed, judging by what we’ve seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we’re seeing elsewhere in the world, we’ll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That’s because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.

‘Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?

‘Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide–the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO’s own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.

‘But how could the organization declare a pandemic when its own official definition required “simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” Severity–that is, the number of deaths–is crucial, because every year flu causes “a global spread of disease.”

‘Easy. In May, in what it admitted was a direct response to the outbreak of swine flu the month before, WHO promulgated a new definition matched to swine flu that simply eliminated severity as a factor. You could now have a pandemic with zero deaths.’

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doctor Sleep has the same vibe. Torture children to steal their life force.

6
AnonymousFrog 6 points ago +6 / -0

Got scarlet fever? Me neither. Thanks sanitation! Thanks immune system!

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think RFK Jr. came up with a certain world view. One that includes fighting for the underdog and defending people rights as well as protecting the environment from mega corporations. He either doesn’t realize environmentalism has been hijacked or he realizes he can only take on so many thing before he’s pigeonholed.

Interestingly, on the his last interview with Michael Moore (Thomas Payne podcast), he said something to the effect that whatever you think about 9/11, our interference in the Middle East stirred up a lot of animosity toward the U.S. a bit of a normie attitude, like Ron Paul’s blowback comments, but you know they know.

In his book American Values, he talks about the CIA quite a bit. He he calls out the lone gunman theory.

by pkvi
6
AnonymousFrog 6 points ago +6 / -0

The Fluoride Deception: an interview with Christopher Bryson

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ly_QP4rGczo (just under half an hour)

He has a book with the same title.

1
AnonymousFrog 1 point ago +2 / -1

The moon’s size matters for a total eclipse. It’s appearing almost exactly the size as the Sun creates an unusual appearance of the eclipse. If you’ve seen one, you know this.

https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/220/do-other-planets-in-our-solar-system-experience-eclipses-or-is-this-unique-to-ea

There are other moons with locked orbits.

Protip: Whenever discussing Flat Earth or other astronomy conspiracies, it’s a good idea to go to a physics forum because you’ll probably find that it’s been discussed years ago by more knowledgeable people.

1
AnonymousFrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

He was in show business for years. His show was just a way to bring in the bro dudes. And he sold out long before Spotify. Remember his selling brain pills, dick pills, and Fleshlights to his audience? Remember his moon landing sellout with Neil deGrasse Tyson?

It doesn’t pay as much to tell the truth.

by gunteh
3
AnonymousFrog 3 points ago +4 / -1

People like Bill Gates would just buy everything. The ancient Greeks talked about the problems with the mega rich become governments unto themselves.

2
AnonymousFrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve read that this is a trade-off. You can go faster, but at the cost of comprehension.

“Two experiments demonstrated that subvocalization is of value in reading for certain types of meaning. Blocking subvocalization by requiring subjects to count or say “cola-colacola …” aloud impaired their reading comprehension but generally not their listening comprehension. The effect of blocking subvocalization was found to be specific to tests that required integration of concepts within or across sentences, as contrasted with tests that required only memory of individual word concepts. Two hypotheses were offered: first, that subvocalization results in a more durable memory representation needed for integration of concepts; and second, that subvocalization enables a prosodic restructuring that makes information needed for sentence comprehension accessible.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022537180906283

This is why I wonder if the format is just limited. I want to hack the system, but maybe reading a linear alphabet is going to inherently limit learning speed. But does it do so more than other formats, like video or audio?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›