4
8theBritish 4 points ago +4 / -0

"No you see migrant rape gangs never existed" Sure, the people who attacked Isreal on Oct 7th and posted pictures of the women they raped and killed, would never try doing anything similar in all the countries they've immigrated to. It's not like they have a history of being sex pests around little girls.

Sounds like this Aesthetica group were just using a good media story to try and prop up their crypto. All that proves is that people are willing to use any old news story to get their scams up and running. Doesn't prove that axe girl wasn't genuine.

I could probably dig up some sketchy bank payments from around the time Trump almost got shot. Does that mean Trump's shooting was faked to pull media attention away from them?

And on the topic of white replacement, I'll just repeat myself:

Natalist feminist sisterhood propagandize White natives into believing that having children is "oppressive and mentally ill".

Natalist feminist sisterhood get worried that the work force of White nativee will fall below replacement levels.

Natalist feminist sisterhood import hordes of cheap third worlders who breed like rabits to get the birth rates up. (You yourself even admitted that this was the case)

The brown horde shits out kids with no regard for how they're raised, all while the natalist feminist sisterhood continue to propagandize the White natives into thinking having less children will save the planet somehow.

The numbers of brown retards go up, while the numbers of White natives keep going down.

But sure imp, White replacement is definitely a hoax.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +3 / -1

Cool, does that mean all the Pakistani grooming gangs got told to stand down? Have they stopped complaining about feeling unsafe thanks to all the immigrants? Can we send all the sandniggers back now?

Axe girl was part of an elaborate hoax to shill crypto? Did you confuse her for the Hawk Tuah lady?

How heinous were these German women acting? You mean to tell me war torn Germany, fillied with disillusioned army vets, was being terrorized by women? Was the Frankfurt School an elaborate cover up for all the boys women were molesting? Did more German men die to men-icide than to allied troops? Or was the more likely case that these women just whored themselves out like usual when shit hits the fan? How truly heinous of them, they took advantage of men's hearts and wallets like they always do when they take part in the oldest profession in the world.

Ah, I've got it. Women started the national socialist party, so all the violence committed by the men can safely be blamed on women. Is that it?

Islam spread like wildfire throughout the middle east because all they had to deal with were other retarded goat fucking pagans. The Byzantines and Sasanians had just finished their own war that left them too depleted to properly combat the mussie hordes in their own middle eastern territories. Or is that just more feminist historical revisionism to hide that women were really the ones to blame? Did mussie general Khalid ibn al-Walid convince the sisterhood to give him Byzantine battle plans during the battle of the Yarmuk plains?

What do you mean "Islam couldn't travel far with the technology of the time"? The Umayyad Caliphate conquered Spain and even made it all the way to France's doorstep. And all that happened in the 700s, "allowed it to happen" my ass. Or would you prefer we be speaking sandnigger now so long as those "retarded christcucks" aren't around?

So having lots of kids is only bad when White people do it in response to getting replaced by mussies? Are you one of those people who consider Arabs as White people? Is that why you think White replacement is a hoax? Or is because the loudest feminists are White, so anything replacing them is good.

3
8theBritish 3 points ago +4 / -1

And have these feminists actually done anything to make women safer? Did all those muslims get the order from their feminist handlers to stop being sex pests? "Terf island" isn't looking like such a feminist utopia these days.

Let's not look at all the freaky stuff men look up on the hub or r34 shall we? Or how you suddenly care about what happens to little girls the second the people doing it are ones you consider "natalists". Weren't you calling for the death of that one girl because she brandished an axe at a group of grown men who were following her and her little sister home from school? Women are natalists by birthright anyways, so shouldn't they start paying their debt to male kind early?

How the hell were German women seen more negatively than the allied men who Germany lost a war to? Or was all that hate directed to allied women? And why in their infinite influence, did the monkey branching natalist sisterhood (do you even use that term anymore?) try and build their women worshipping utopia in a nation that got fucked over by war and reparations? Could it be, that WW2 was Germany's revenge for their humiliating loss in WW1? Nah, it was because women needed a scapegoat and the heroic allied men (who gave their own women the vote 20 years before the war) stopped them.

Those 110% retarded christcuck ideas kept the hordes of goatfuckers out for centuries. Not to mention paved the way for the modern west. Just because modern churchians who misinterpret the scripture think being a Christian means being a soft faggot, doesn't mean Christanity is a femininist religion. Or is Eve being Adam's "helpmate" secretly mean something else?

Don't look up the birth rates for Nigeria then. The sheer natalism of it would shock you. And you said wanting to have kids at all was a mental illness.

3
8theBritish 3 points ago +4 / -1

"Grooming gangs are feminist fear mongering to get people to support more draconian feminist laws"

"Women accuse men of pedophilia to distract people from the fact that most pedophiles are women."

"The only reason women were seen in a remotely positive light is due to psyops and brainwashing."

"Patriarchal societal norms that kept human civilization afloat for centuries are a natalist psyop."

"People who want to have kids are mentally ill."

But sure, I'm the one who's being absurd.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elon let's everyone from Alex Jones to Ethan Klein post on X. If you're mad your safe space got invaded by bigoted nazi chuds, just move to bluesky like the rest of them.

But you won't. You won't even leave scored for good and head back to the nazi hating, antinatalist and tranny loving site that is reddit.

You'll keep coming back here because you can't "own the chuds" in a space where there are no chuds to own.

3
8theBritish 3 points ago +3 / -0

Censored? You'll just make another alt and come back. You left for less than a week the last time you pulled this stunt on kia2 and I doubt you'll leave this sub for good either.

Victory? At best you're a troll on a fringe internet forum that most people have probably never heard of. You're only well known here because of how nonsensical you sound and how persistent you are. Your spergouts are fun to read and respond to but that's about it.

For all your talk about the right censoring their opposition, they sure have no problem letting Hillary and Tim Walz continue to post. All the people who supposedly flocked to bluesky are still on X because they realized they couldn't grandstand over their opposition in a space where everyone agreed with them. Hasan Piker is still allowed to post there and he's as anti American as they come. Some censorship that turned out to be.

Kienan only banned you after you admitted to arguing in bad faith and your constant ban evasion. You don't see jg5 or any of the other users you labeled "bots" try to brigade your private hugbox. You permabanned me and I didn't even try making an alt to get around it.

And have you considered that maybe people aren't buying the "The walls are closing in! Trump is a pedo rapist!" argument because they've tried pulling it too many times now? Remember the sex tapes he sent to Putin? Or when he peed on a stripper and recorded it? Or all the rape accusations that only started showing up when he got elected the first time around? Cry wolf enough times without actual evidence to back it up and people are going to start ignoring you the next time you do it.

5
8theBritish 5 points ago +6 / -1

‎Lol, you're "leaving" another sub imp?

‎You said you'd be leaving kia2 until the 2026 Blue Wave, then came back not even a week later when Maduro got captured.

‎Let me guess, you'll run back to your private sub for about a day, then make another post here when you find more "proof" that the walls are closing in on the natalist secret society?

‎The same secret society, who according to you, psyoped the human reproductive instinct into existence, started all the wars, and somehow falsified every historical record showing women in a remotely positive light. And they've apparently been doing this since the dawn of civilization.

‎But sure imp, an organization of such power and influence will definitely be brought down by releasing a name list of pedo politicians and voting for the people who spent decades giving women more privilege.

‎Now I thought accusations of pedophilia was just a way for women to hide their own crimes and that grooming gangs were just feminist fear mongering, but what do I know?

‎Besides, it's not like it took 3 global powers working together to defeat those natalist feminist nazi scum the last time right? Just don't ask what the allies were doing about women's rights 20 years before the war started.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

We've already seen them turn on their own before with the split between the intersectionals and the terfs. If the natalists are fighting with the simp farmers, then that's a good thing.

Hell, we can see them infighting right now. You've got American women showing up in droves at anti ICE protests despite Trump giving them the world and more.

If they're already at each others throats, that gives us men a better chance at getting rid of their control.

Porn is just another way for women to exert power over men. Keeping us slaved to our sex drives and constantly chasing the unattainable fantasy of a woman who actually loves us. So wouldn't banning it be more of a benefit to us?

3
8theBritish 3 points ago +3 / -0

If a video game giving two cannonically married characters wedding skins is "marriage propaganda", and famously patriarchal societies having stories that portray women in a positive light is "feminist brainwashing", then how is porn not natalist propaganda too?

It's literally portraying sexual intercourse between a man and a woman as something desirable, while ignoring how it gives a woman everything she needs to ruin a man's life with accusations of rape or by baby trapping him.

4
8theBritish 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes imp, the "cult" that has psyoped the male race into finding literal demons from hell sexually attractive will be brought down by... a name list of pedophiles getting released?

That's like saying the US democratic party is going to collapse any day because Bill Clinton exposed them all as rabid sex pests.

Also, why are you against porn being banned again? It's clearly not to own the pedos, you couldn't care less about what happens to little girls. And you've certainly got no problem punishing men for being sexually attracted to women, so how is a few women worshipping simps not getting their rocks off a bad thing?

Porn is just another way for the sisterhood to sell men a false promise, that if they stay on the plantation long enough, some demonic whorespawn wearing a 10/10 skinsuit will put out for them just like the women in those porn videos they watch.

So wouldn't banning porn force more men to confront the reality that women are subhuman trash who deserve to be firebombed to death?

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

So... Hating the men who admire women so much they want to become them, is bad. Because you consider it to be "jumping in bed with terfs".

But hating the men who, according to you, only started a world war due to their love of women, is good. Despite feminists also hating said group for being racist bigoted chuds.

Why is it "jumping in bed with feminists" when it comes to hating one group of men who idolize women, but not the other?

0
8theBritish 0 points ago +1 / -1

Who gave TallestSkill access to imp's account?

And you still haven't answered my original question. Why is hating troons bad when they idolize women to the point they want to become them? Sounds like women worshipping stormfaggotry to me.

-1
8theBritish -1 points ago +1 / -2

Answer the question.

How are the men who idolize women to the point they're willing to cut off their own dicks in an attempt to become women, any less feminist or women worshipping, than the people who (according to you) only started a world war because they wanted to give women more power?

3
8theBritish 3 points ago +5 / -2

It took 3 major world powers to defeat them. With two of said powers bending the knee to feminist demands 20 years before the war started, while another apparently invented the concept of natalism itself (despite every recorded civilization placing an emphasis on protecting and raising children but that's just feminist propaganda apparently).

Anyway, remember to support the party the tried to get a female US president elected twice and has spent the last decade giving feminists more power than ever. They call everyone they hate "nazis, so it must be true. Plus, jumping in bed with feminists is only bad if they're trans exclusionary.

And you still haven't answered my question. Why should trannies be given a free pass when they're gender traitors on the same level as the "stormfags".

3
8theBritish 3 points ago +4 / -1

Bitch, you think any treatment of women that doesn't immediately involve a bullet to the brain is "feminist" and that any opinion or historical record of them being anything but subhuman demons spawned from the deepest pits of hell is propaganda.

Christians are feminists, muslims are feminists, communists are feminists, progressives are feminists, conservatives are feminists, the ancient Greeks were feminists. If your definition of feminism is as loose as "women were treated somewhat well", then Harvey Weinstein might as well have been a feminist.

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

The UK gov isn't nearly as intelligent as you make it out to be. For how much you go off on wehraboos for going "muh joooos!" when something bad happens, you can't help but claim "Da sistahood did it!" instead.

Then again, you see a religion that treats women like crap and think they must be allies of feminism somehow. So I'm not that surprised.

"How can Mr "women are all whores, focus on yourself, get a Bugatti and they'll crawl after you" suddenly promote marriage?"

Gee, it's not like men are hardwired to find women attractive or anything. It's not like finding a woman who isn't ran through is a goal for anyone who wants to have kids. Even chad gets tired of fucking easy sluts if guys like Hoemath are anything to go by.

You treat men acting on their biological instincts the way feminists treat any woman who doesn't want to be a whore. Yes, they exist, I've met them and unlike what you might expect, their husbands aren't blank eyed cuckolds either.

"No, but when someone spawns out of thin air, as the embodiment of every dumb tradcuck remark about "modern women", then disappears as fast as they show up after the election...it's a little suspicious."

Or, he could have been a sleazeball looking to cash in on an easily convinced audience. Tons of grifters do this.

And disappearing from the public eye isn't suspicious considering he and his brother both got arrested for human trafficking. The first time was in 2022 and the second time in early 2024, he was getting flak long before the US presidential elections. It's a no brainer why he wants to lay low.

Although I'm sure you'd find a way to spin it as him getting put into protective custody to keep his dealings with a secretive feminist natalist cabal hidden or something.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is about as retarded as saying Andrew Tate was a psyop from left wing atheists to throw a fuss about "violent men". When the more obvious answer is he was a PUA that correctly identified a few issues and then milked his audience of gullible disenfranchised young men for everything they'd give him.

Doss everything women do have to be some elaborate conspiracy to you? They were attention seeking whores who wanted attention. Simple as.

5
8theBritish 5 points ago +5 / -0

Germany was already broke by the time WW1 ended. Hell most of the allies were in debt after that too, it wasn't just the central powers.

I'd say something about their offensive in 1918 failing because they couldn't afford to produce any more munitions, but you'd probably claim the reason they lost was German noblewomen emptying out the treasury.

On top of being blamed for a war they didn't even start and running out of money funding said war, I'd guess having to pay exorbitant reparations would make the population of any country resentful and bitter.

Honestly, I think that just shows how much the Weimar Republic screwed up. They couldn't pay off those reparations, their efforts to pay off said reparations made their populace even more resentful, and all that did was facilitate Hitler's rise to power.

6
8theBritish 6 points ago +6 / -0

Individual parroting intersectional feminist talking points but with the "fe" removed from "female" thinks she's MGTOW.

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Anyone involved" Except troons of course.

But I thought Islam was an inherently antifeminist religion? Why would the strong and independent Sisterhood be willing to put up with the worse kinds of misogynists if their natalist utopia resembles bumfuckistan nowheri? Where the men can kill women for daring to show their ankles in broad daylight?

Giving props to a woman? How feminist of you Mrs Malta.

And look at you giving a shit about society. The tradcucked feminist run society. Why do you care if abdul has 4 wives? They're too busy trying not to get honour killed to whore around. Sounds to me like they're paying off their debt to male kind just fine.

Just convert if you're an actual man, you can make women's lives far worse that way. Preserving your nation and way of life? Thats nazi tradcuck Christian nationalist talk right there.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

"What basis do you have that anyone is a pedophile?"

Having a sexual attraction to prepubescent girls. Although considering how all women are inherently evil, I have no idea why you of all people would care so much about this. Isn't it good that those foids get what's coming to them? What are you, a tradcuck natalist simp? Is this another ploy to get us on board with more draconian laws, Sistahood agent Malta?

"Your kind are typically allergic to logic"

Cool, now how exactly does cratering the birth rates while importing hordes of fighting aged muslim men (there, I specified what kind of men, so don't get your panties in a twist Mrs Malta) do anything to advance the goals of the "natalist" (noun: promotion of or advocacy for childbearing) elites? No, South Korea doesn't count, because if those man haters are natalist then the DPRK is a democracy.

How does eradicating Christianity, the main bulwark against mussie expansion for centuries, do anything to stop the mussie hordes? And don't give me crap about cutting child benefits, those retards would be coming here even if we did get rid of them.

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +2 / -1

WW2 helped women get into the munitions factories.

I guess the sisterhood wanted to have their guns misfire but the plan failed?

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, especially the few good women in history. Mainly the allied women who worked in the dangerous and unhealthy environment of the munitions factories to support the true heroes of the war.

Or the Russian Night Witches, who flew outdated planes on dangerous missions to drop bombs on pussy whipped nazi simps.

Or all the Chinese women who got raped by IJA soldiers during the Rape of Nanking.

You and imp apparently have no problem with women working all the dangerous shit jobs or enduring horrible punishments as reparations for centuries of male enslavement, so acknowledging them should be no issue for you.

Well, unless you flip flop back to the "all wars are feminist ploys to reduce the male population" argument imp was throwing around back when the whole Russia and Ukraine thing was popping off.

But that would be at odds with how women apparently "lost" in the 40s when the "true heroes" of WW2 died by the thousands to stop The Sisterhood from gaining full control.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol, spoken like a true woman.

"He's gaslighting me!"

Maybe if you didn't make insane points people wouldn't call you out on them.

Although, you and the insufferable1 are so alike I might have miss remembered some of her points as yours.

view more: Next ›