TL;DR: In this first part, we analyze the hard evidence: what was really going on with Theranos, who were the Salem Witches involved, and the new meta-documentary. In the second part, I will tell you about the strange set of coincidental names associated with all this, one interpretation of which is that we are dealing with a Very Small Club indeed.

A couple of days ago, before I began this research, I could have told you almost nothing about Elizabeth Holmes and the whole Theranos debacle. “Did you know her dumb deep voice was phony? That’s how fake a person she was and how gullible the whole world is getting.” All I had.

Really, I thought that would have been surprising “conspiracy theory” info. I bet if you said that right now to a normie, chances are they wouldn’t believe it. I was surprised to find out that the fake voice is now admitted but still no one talks about it.

Now, with this new meta-documentary, I see it’s all getting worse. It looks to me like the Salem Witches are exploring this issue:

How far can we push the ‘reality’ that we hand to people? How much unreality can we implant before a person declines to accept it as genuine and authentic and ‘real’? How little verifiable fact can we base it on, how malleable can we make it, how absurd and surreal, before people wake up from from their dreams?

Keep that in mind as we explore, but we’re ahead of ourselves. We need to back up and sort out what was really going on with Theranos (2003-2018) in the first place.

Let me preface with this: in the Theranos era up to the implosion, the one and only Salem Witch I can locate is Elizabeth herself. There may have been others required to pull it off, but if so they are cloaked and we’ll never locate them.

After that time, it all blows up with Salem Witch names, starting with meeting her future husband in 2017 (or so we are told). Point is, there wasn’t some grand crew of Salem Witches pulling off a Grand Conspiracy. I said it was an exploration of how little “They” needed, and in this case it was only Elizabeth.

For example, if you can find something Witchy about the “Svengali” figure, president and COO Sunny Balwani (1965), at the center of it all with Holmes, then that would be news to me. After all, he was left holding the bag. He’s still in the joint while Liz is already at a halfway house. See how it works?

About the best you’re going to get from the conspir-o-sphere is this:

A Theory about Theranos being a Deep State project and Holmes - a patsy (r/conspiracy 9/27/2026)

The OP pulls together some good information and you may want to read that, but the analysis is… not good at all. Not thorough, in that a lot of the analysis should end with, “… so that can’t be what it was about”. Science itself is ruling things out.

I suspect the problem—extremely common—is that he or she had the conclusion in mind before the analysis began. “Hey, I bet Holmes was the fall girl!” Then all roads lead to Elizabeth and not “my idea was dumb”.

Oddly, if I claim that Holmes was the only person in on it, then the post could be considered a disinfo effort. But no. Why would They ever bother when everyone is light-years from cracking the case?

The basic conspiracy ideas would center around: (1) grift, (2) surveillance, and (3) occult “blood ritual”. All of them fail for one reason, and this is what all the whistleblower types and others that got a look at the idea were saying from early on: the tech was impossible not just in practice but in principle.

Thus, it was knowable that Theranos would fail and it did fail, and this would have been particularly clearly to the people that put it together. No surveillance or blood rituals were done. How was that ever supposed to work?

As far as grifting, if you think the Salem Witches are interested in clipping some fools for a few hundred million, you need to read up on them some more. The fortunes they have accumulated along the way are vast, and we will see that even in this post. And in any case, with a grift you’re supposed to run away forever and leave the mark thinking, well, anything other than that they’d been ripped off. You don’t make a documentary about it years later.

Now to the main question: were the Salem Witches involved? I had noticed somewhere along the way that Elizabeth Holmes (b1984) shared a surname with a couple of notables. I discuss both (fake) serial killer H. H. Holmes and (fake) mass shooter James Holmes in this post:

NBC’s “Timeless”, the Chicago World’s Fair, America’s first (fake) serial killer, oligarchs, the Salem Witches, Harry Houdini, and MIT’s first female architect (conspiracies.win 2/9/2026)

Was Elizabeth related to either of them? Not that I could show directly. As I recall from research on that post, the Holmes genealogy is quite cloudy and fragmentary. Also, the genealogy of living persons is not available. That is, unless they hand you something.

One of her paternal great-great-great-grandfathers was Charles Louis Fleischmann, a Jewish-Hungarian immigrant to the United States who founded Fleischmann's Yeast. The Holmes family "was very proud of its yeast empire" history, according to family friend Joseph Fuisz: “I think the parents very much yearned for the days of yore when the family was one of the richest in America. And I think Elizabeth channeled that, and at a young age.”

That would be the familiar Fleischmann's Yeast. How much moolah are we talking, that they might have had a one time?

Burns Philp sold its yeast business to Associated British Foods in 2004 for US$1.4 billion.

Respectable, but there’s more. Let me give you some idea of the circles in which this Holmes family moved. Of course, none of this is mentioned while they tell you about Fleischmanns.

Elizabeth’s great-grandfather was Christian Rassmussen Holmes II (1898-1944). His brother was Jay Fleischmann Holmes, and Jay’s wife was Frances Sarah (Peters) Cushing. Jay was her second husband, Frances’ first being Henry Cooke Cushing III. Henry had himself been married before, his first wife being Mary Cathleen Neilson (Vanderbilt) Arostegui (1904-1944). Yes, those Vanderbilts.

So to summarize in a gossipy way: Henry left a Vanderbilt to marry Frances, and Frances left Henry to marry a Holmes. Maybe some indication it wasn’t all about yeast, don’t you think?

Further, there’s some question as to the “ethnicity” of a couple of the names. I think you can see it best on the “Ancestors” tab for Elizabeth’s grandfather, Christian R. Holmes (1923-1996). Her great-gandmother, Henrietta Robertson, was born in 1844 in Prussia. Does Robertson sound like a Prussian name to you? I also note that Roberts is a Salem Witch name.

More to the point, Elizabeth’s 2g-grandfather, Christian Rasmus Holmes (1855-1920), was born in Denmark. Well, “Rasmus” or, in the next generation, “Rasmussen” is definitely a Danish name, but where did “Holmes” come from? That’s an English name. Point is, I don’t think these people were like every other Prussian and Dane.

That brings us to Elizabeth’s husband, featured prominently in the new documentary: Billy Evans (b1991 or 1992). Yes, a Salem Witch name. Imagine that. Hazy birth year but whichever it is, he’s significantly younger than Elizabeth.

Let me mention this too: I would bet that she was never pregnant and the children in the documentary are not hers. I have no specific evidence. Is her marriage fake as well? Sheesh, why wouldn’t it be?

There is a trove of relevant info in this mainstream article:

A San Diego Hotel Company's Close Ties To "The Dropout" Elizabeth Holmes (SanDiegoVille 3/5/2022)

During the first days of jury selection at Holmes's federal fraud trial, a man describing himself as "concerned citizen interested in the trial" and calling himself "Hanson" reportedly piqued the curiosity of reporters by frequently chatting with media members. The man allegedly claimed to be a "car enthusiast" who was attending the trial as "a media watchdog".

Turns out it was his father, William L. Evans. WTF, right? The family owns three hotel properties and assorted other goodies around San Diego. You can take a look on a map where it’s all located. I don’t even want to know how much the real estate might be worth, and...

It is reported that Evans Hotels estimated annual revenue is currently $180.6 million per year.

Remember, it is all privately-owned. That’s a lot of scratch, right?

“He [Evans] is a trust fund baby and has a lot of money, and he's probably helping out with the legal bills because Elizabeth's family doesn't have money either,” surmised host Nick Bilton on his Vanity Fair podcast Inside The Hive in June 2019.

Well, Nick, with due respect you should stop surmising. Another article sums up this interchange which you can look up if you care to watch it:

A new trailer for the documentary sees Fielder ask Holmes, “You really feel you did nothing wrong?,” and her replying, “I did not.” He asks Evans, “Weren’t you worried she was scamming you?” He replies, “100 percent, but what did she have to gain from me?” Fielder notes, “Well, isn’t your family rich?” Evans says, “Yeah, I think that there’s, like, a lot of different levels of wealth.”

The documentary shows them living in a rental in Del Mar, California. Seems like an average suburban ranch style. It looks dim and dingy, and part of that is how they shot it.

Now listen, Del Mar is a very nice place so let’s not underestimate that. A condo under a thousaand square feet will set you back about $1.75M. That being said, the SanDiegoVille article from 2022 mentioned this:

It has been reported that Holmes and Evans have been living on a home at the 74-acre, century-old Green Gables estate currently listed for sale for $135 million, located in Woodside, CA, in the Silicon Valley area.

That is what I’ve been driving at: the Holmes family is at a different level of wealth. Is she really “Elizabeth the college dropout”, or is she a Holmes?

Moving on, I really thought I was going to write a lot about what we’re supposed to think is the “best movie of the year”. I have not and will never watch it, and thus have little to say about it. Want my review of the trailer?

Elizabeth Holmes is horribly miscast and shockingly awful in the role of Elizabeth Holmes. Nathan Fielder is completely unconvincing as “documentarian” and takes you out of it every time he’s onscreen, which is a lot Everyone is unsympathetic, everything is unbelievable, all is constantly depressing. Zero out of five stars.

Obviously that’s just me, because look what the culture creators handed down to us as our Truth:

On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an approval rating of 98% based on 172 reviews, with an average rating of 9.3/10…. Metacritic, which uses a weighted average, assigned the film a score of 97 out of 100, based on 40 critics, indicating "universal acclaim". PostTrak audiences gave the film a 98% positive score, with 91% rating it a "definite recommend".

You Can See Everything (2026) is obviously another Star Wars. Gonna be a big Oscar night.

There were two filmmakers. The one who appears onscreen and participates in whatever it is they’re trying to do is Nathan Fielder (b1983). He is supposed to be a comedian and (personal opinion only) seems like a psychopath. I found it disturbing to even look at him, like “no one is home”.

The one you don’t see is Lance Oppenheim (b1996). He married a woman named Abigail Rowe in 2025. There were two people named Roe at the Salem Witch Trials, so check out the timing of all this and score it as you will.

A few notes on the studio, A24 Films LLC (2012). Turns out they were behind the other “must see” of the year, Backrooms. Whaddaya know. It was based on the web series of director Kane Parsons (b2005). One of the producers was Osgood Robert Perkins II (b1974). If you ever wondered why it was so hard to break into Hollywood, maybe it’s because all the spots were spoken for.

Let me finish on the doc by commenting on the title itself, You Can See Everything. I think that’s the Big Joke in it all. It should have been called, You Can’t See Anything. Nothing real, that is. It’s all manufactured, artificial, surreal, constructed, staged.

Nothing is as it appears to be, and that is my theme with all the Salem Witches and all Their works. Love it or hate it, you simply cannot take any of it at face value and begin reasoning or reacting from there. You will always and forever be deceived, ignorant, asleep. Wake up. Maybe You Can See Something.

Very weird bonus: Did any of this discussion put you in mind of the 2010 film, Inception? I thought about it a lot and the imagery was deliberate. “They” are handing us a dream world and seeing if anyone kicks.

Now, web ads are all dynamic these days so I could not prove this, but when I was reading one of the articles for this research there was a big banner advertising Foreverspin tops. Look up a still photo of the top I know you’re now recalling. They’re virtually identical.

Was that mere coincidence? Who knows. However, I do know that “They” want our tops to spin forever. You understand what that means.

Theranos was about blood, so kinda on the Halloween theme, right? We’ll hit Halloween and Salem on the head in Part 2. Thanks for reading!