TL;DR: We discuss why you shouldn’t pay attention to Steve Bannon, and why you should be hearing all about Cambridge Analytica but aren’t.
I was going through my old notes on Steve Bannon, deciding what I should include. I don’t follow politics or alt-media in anything like the conventional sense but my notes on Bannon go all the way back to September 2017. All that time I was essentially trying to figure out, “Who is this guy, really?”
And now I realize that while it’s all interesing, none of it is important. In addition to my notes, Bannon has an excruciatingly long Wikipedia page, full of his political sayings and doings and thinkings. Virtually none of that is important either.
You see, you or I or anyone might find many or even all of those things true and correct and right, but that’s not important either. It’s all part of the Big Show that They put up on the Big Stage. You are free to react in any way you wish to any part of the Grand Spectacle, even walk out of the theater.
What you are not supposed to do is get up out of your seat, walk to the front, and peek behind the curtain to try to figure out just exactly Who in the Hell is putting on this whole Big Show. Okay, that They object to. Why? Because it won’t take too many people to yank down that curtain entirely and put an end to the whole charade that almost everyone believes is Reality.
My account of Bannon requires more context than statement. I feel it’s more of a fun trip anyway, at least as fun as these sorts of discussions may be. We’ll go from today’s headlines, back a few years, a few decades, and a few centuries. Not in order.
I would not be writing this were it not for an unlikely series of events. It’s a strange trip but you know for sure I’ll bring it all back around. As I type, it will be Halloween in just over a week. In recognition of that, I researched and wrote a post yesterday on Edgar Allan Poe. Spoiler: he’s a Salem Witch whose literary work was for social engineering.
My notes on Poe ended up right next to the note (singular) that I had on Norwegian playwright, Henrik Ibsen (1828-1906). You see, nearly a decade ago I had heard this podcast episode:
In Our Time | Henrik Ibsen (BBC Radio 4 5/31/2018)
It’s a high-brow show where the presenter (a literal nobleman) discusses a high-brow subject with two or three academics. Even in that dim and distant time, long before I knew of the Salem Witches, I thought, “Jesus H., they artificially promoted the hell out of this Ibsen weirdo and his weird work way back when. In fact, they’re still doing just that with this very show.”
I’ll be honest: I was, at the time, immersed in the work of Miles Mathis and so I went hunting to see if Henrik was secretly a Jew. How dumb of me, and any legitimate scholar will readily admit their mistakes. Anyway, Ibsen was in no way a Jew or Jew-adjacent, but he was very adjacent indeed to the Paus family:
The Paus family… is a Norwegian family that emerged as an aristocratic priestly family from Medieval Oslo in the 16th century. For centuries, it belonged to the "aristocracy of officials," especially in the clergy and legal professions in Upper Telemark. Later generations entered shipping, steel, and banking, becoming steel magnates in Oslo.
I suspect you already suspect that the Paus family seem like they might be a Scandinavian equivalent of the Salem Witches. Norwegian Witches, if you will. Put a pin in that as we rocket back to the present….
I haven’t put the Edgar Allan Poe post up yet, thinking I’ll wait til All Hallows’ Eve Eve. In the meantime, I thought I’d put up another. My last post was on the former, unlamented White House press secretary and Salem Witch, Katie Zacharia. To continue that series, I thought of Stephen Miller, the WH Deputy Chief of Staff.
See, I had recently read a very provicative article mentioning him, and—worse—I recently posted that his boss, WH CoS Susie Wiles, was herself a Salem Witch.
Miller will indeed be explored in a future post but in brief research, I didn’t know before that he had been so close to Bannon. Briefly researching Bannon, I didn’t know before that he had been so close to Cambridge Analytica (CA).
I said before I don’t pay attention, but when the mainstream media castigates and repetitively damns everything Trump-related, how had they never hammered on this? That’s an anomaly. That also brings us to literally today’s headlines:
The judge concluded that Meta’s misconduct warranted a penalty exceeding $219 billion under state law, but reduced the amount to $25 billion, making it one of the largest financial penalties ever imposed on an American corporation.
Sounds like some serious ducats but my question is: do we all get a court discount like that? Another anomaly. The subject, if you are not familiar, is the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal of the 2010s.
Was Bannon involved? As the “Cambridge Analytica” section of his Wikipedia page informs us:
According to former Analytica employee Christopher Wylie, Bannon oversaw the collection of Facebook data which was used to target American voters. Wylie who helped with creation of the company referred to the company as a "psychological warfare tool".
Let me ask you: particularly with an election around the corner, shouldn’t the mainstream media be metaphorically grabbing Steve Bannon off the street, slapping a “CA/MAGA” hat on his head, and crucifying him? Another anomaly.
I had to scroll two-thirds of the way down the page at Breitbart.com to find a picture of Zucc the size of a postage stamp and the fairly innocuous title, “New Mexico Judge Orders Meta To Pay $25 Billion in Cambridge Analytica Case” (10/22/2026). No mention of Bannon in the long article, of course.
The most glaring anomaly of the entire affair is the plot hole which no one (mainstream, alternative, conspiracy theorist) seems interested in filling in: what precisely were the relationship and mechanics of Facebook and Cambridge Analytica? This is what you and I are not supposed to ponder.
You can try to think through all the possible permutations for yourself. Did FB grant special access to CA? What did FB get in return? Did no one at FB realize they might be on the hook for a couple of hundred billion? Also, why did CA hire Bannon—a media guy—for a private intel organization? No one has tried to get to the bottom of it all and none of it makes any sense.
Unless, that is, you understand that Steve Bannon is a Salem Witch, Facebook is a Salem Witch proprietary, and Cambridge Analytica was a proprietary of British and Norwegian Witches. Then it’s obvious and old hat, the same Small Club working together.
First, I’ve never formally written up Facebook as a single subject, but I think you’ll find enough for now in this old post:
How generational Satanists took control of what goes in your ears (bonuses: a demonically-possessed novelty podcasting light and a connection to Sandy Hoax) (conspiracies.win 10/16/2024)
As to Cambridge Analytica Ltd., it was founded in 2013. After the scandal broke, they imploded it in 2018 and everyone ran off. Just as one would expect.
Three founders are listed, all British. What I would take to be the junior partners were a pair of brothers, the younger Alexander Oakes (b1968) and the elder Nigel Oakes (b1962).
Are they British Witches or just Elite Douches? IDK, but I would point this out: Nigel was at one time the "serious boyfriend” of Lady Helen Marina Lucy Taylor (née Windsor) (b1964). Taylor is a Salem Witch name and yes, those Windsors.
More intriguing is who I would believe to be senior in the CA venture: Alexander Nix. To be precise, it was only him for the US:
Cambridge Analytica (SCL USA) was incorporated in January 2013 with its registered office being in Westferry Circus, London and consisting of just one staff member, director and CEO Alexander Nix.…
Alexander is of the Nix family, which goes back centuries. The founder:
… was the father of John Nix (1791–1873), whose sons John Hennings Nix and Edward Winkelmann Nix were partners in the London private bank Fuller, Banbury, Nix & Co.
Winklemann is close to Winklevoss, is it not? Funny. Anyway, there is nothing useful to be found on the Fuller, Banbury, Nix & Co (1737-1881), but I can tell you that Fuller is a Salem Witch name.
Most intriguing is that Alexander is married to Olympia Paus (b1976). Yep, that same Paus family. Took a while but now you know why I had to write about Steve Bannon.
So is Stephen Kevin Bannon (b1953) a Salem Witch? Well, it’s nearly impossible to get any genealogy for a living person so forget about that. But there are two topics I want to tell you about.
As a basic technique in this line of research, you want to look for handlers. Often, this is a spouse. The very idea that the Salem Witches typically operate by manipulating subjects using the person they sleep next to in bed every night is appalling, but there you have it. A crucial lesson in itself.
In this case, we find that Steve divorced his first wife in 1988. His second wife was Mary Piccard (m. 1995; div. 1997). There was the close match of a “John Pickard" recorded at Salem. Score that as you will but I know how I marked it down.
If you refer to Steve’s "Media and investing" section, we don’t have precision but you can see it was in the 90’s when Bannon finally got his hands on some real money. Might Mary have had something to do with that? You decide.
In any case, and lest you think Bannon is some kind of genius so of course he made a lot of money, in 1993 he took that bundle and ran off to Arizona to become director of Biosphere 2 (1987). Why? Don’t ask me, but the project was so dopey that in 1996, the comedy Bio-Dome was released. It starred Pauly Shore, which could not be more humiliating.
Moving from the ridiculous to the subtle—and before any visible handler—what really caught my attention was Bannon’s service in the U.S. Navy (1976-1983). I noticed that he served on a destroyer, USS Paul F. Foster. Foster? Gotta be kidding me.
But now picture this: Steve is a Lieutenant (junior grade), which is the lowest rank of officer there is. He’s standing watch on the heaving deck of the Foster, rain blasting into his face, and he thinks to himself, “What am I, a chump? Never Again Volunteer Yourself. F this.”
So he makes a change. Next stop: the Pentagon, as “special assistant to the chief of naval operations”. If you didn’t know, the Chief of Naval Operations is the guy who runs the entire US Navy. Does it sound to you like a Salem Witch card was played?
The years coinciding very closely, the CNO was Admiral Thomas Bibb Hayward (1924-2022). His name doesn’t sound too promising, but take a look at his Wikitree page. Thomas’ father was Edward Payson Hayward (1891-1986). Now we’re cooking with gas.
Click on Edward’s great-grandmother Cynthia Payson (1785-1823), then on her 2g-grandfather, John Payson (1642-1719). You’ll see that he had a brother named Edward Payson (1657-1732).
Was he the very same man whose testimony is recorded under “Case files for Edward Payson? I could not say for certain but his Wikitree genealogy is loaded with Salem Witch names. Most notable is that Wikitree’s Edward was born and died in Rowley, Massachusetts. That’s about ten miles NNE of what was once Salem Village.
Bonus: You know what I found, well, not most damning but most shocking about Bannon, that which reveals him to be a huge scumbag? It was his reaction to the the death of Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012), a man he surely knew well.
Or rather, his utter lack or reaction. I cannot find anywhere on record anything he had to say about it. It’s not just that Andrew died fairly young and definitely suddenly, but that it was beyond suspicious. We aren’t here to discuss the details, but the “conspiracy theory” of it was far from fringe. See this mainstream report:
Breitbart Remembered Fondly by Most on Social Media: PEJ New Media Index February 27 – March 2, 2012 (Pew Research 3/8/2012)
On the chart, “Reaction to Breitbart’s Death on Blogs”, they record 15% as “Focus on Cause of Death”. On “Reaction to Breitbart’s Death on Twitter”, they record 10% as “Focus on Cause of Death”. That is not fringe. Also, on the same charts respectively, they record 39% and 34% as “Tributes to Breitbart”.
Yet Bannon had nothing to say about Andrew, nothing at all? F that guy.
Thanks for your attention!