Tartaria Star Wars Connection.
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Star Wars is (((propaganda))) to brainwash young white people into believing the most evil thing in history was an "undemocratic authoritarian empire" that was under the control of their own people. I wonder what real world example we are supposed to then refer this to. The empire literally has an endless army of unthinking, unfeeling, all white soldiers called "storm troopers," lmao. Lucas did not even try to hide it.
The only thing Star Wars has in common with Tartaria is that both of those things are fake jew hoaxes to confuse white people.
Star Wars, sure, jews own & control Hollywood. But, I don't get this about Tartaria. It appears on many old maps of the world. For instance the Bertius map of Tartaria circa 1600.
And why would the jews invent Tartaria? as an Empire you mean? I'm not saying you're wrong, jews make up all kinds of things, but perhaps you could clarify.
Tartaria is definitely a real territory and people throughout history. When people on the internet talk about Tartaria though, they are talking about this "lost empire" that was "erased from history" at some nonspecific point near the end of the 1800s or turn of the 1900s. It is generally mixed in with the prior civilization having great technology that could do things like provide free energy based on ether physics. It is also usually based on a flat earth cosmography, often with significant territory and other civilizations "beyond the ice wall" that we are now all cut off from.
I obviously don't believe this due to the lack of evidence of most of those claims (it is of course true that older civilizations built much nicer buildings than we do). But in my opinion, in addition to just a fun conspiracy people tell, this is a psyop. It has people focused on recovering this supposed lost civilization and looking for the extra land beyond the ice wall and the free energy of the ether. In reality, your civilization, land, and everything else are being taken from you in the here and now.
IMO, a lot of things have been "erased from history", not only the Old World. How do you explain the amazing architecture, all the magnificent buildings, which couldn't have been built by a civilization that all they had was horse & buggies and no power tools. Tartaria may be the part of the Russian Empire, that was part of this Old World, which survived the "sudden fires" all over the world, about the same time.
Same magnificent buildings you find in other parts of the World, even in America, Australia, Britain, France, etc. There is a channel on BitChute called "My Lunch Break" where you will find a lot of interesting videos about this Old World.
A civilization with nothing but horses, hammers, and chisels, with no electricity and no machines built this?
I don't agree with you here. Watch this, it's OK if you disagree. Worth mentioning Nikola Tesla would also disagree with your statement.
Maybe you came across some fox who talk about civilizations "beyond the ice wall", idk. I haven't. and never associated the shape of the Earth to the Old World, architecture, buildings, and advanced technologies. IMO, we used to have such technologies that's how were able to build not only buildings but other structures like the Pyramids. We don't have the technology, and/or lost the know-how, that's why we can't build like in the past. Just look at we build today, structures that last only a few decades, not thousands of years.
I still don't see from your comments how this is a jews psyop. Like I said, why would the jews invent such a conspiracy? is there any money in it for them? are more whites dead because of it? is Moshiach going to be revealed earlier because of this? if your answer to any of these three questions is Yes, I would like to know your reasoning.
As I said, I agree about the architecture. I just think that "it was a completely different culture where people valued creating beauty" is a valid explanation. It isn't like we can't build things nowadays. Could the ancients build a 10 TB hard drive or an SSD? Could they build supersonic jets, hypersonic missiles, or rockets to bring satellites into orbit? We are very technically advanced compared to them, but we only use it in places where it creates utility. There is no reason why we are unable to pay our people to build Old World style cathedrals, we just don't value it as a culture.
There really was a concept of the ether in science that lasted until the first quarter or so of the 20th century. This concept was based on the fairly reasonable idea that electromagnetism should propagate in some medium, just like sound (pressure) does in fluids like air or water. While the hypothesis was fine and is understandable given their knowledge, every model proposed failed experiment. Eventually, the issue was resolved with Special Relativity.
Since then, and particularly in the modern internet era, there are conspiracies about the ether being some suppressed science that created free energy and whatever. Especially nowadays, since we are now more than a century away from all this. I would suspect that the scientists searching for the ether in the 1800s would absolutely marvel at our contemporary command of electromagnetism and energy in general.
No one ever explains how all these old technologies supposedly worked, and it is doubtful that this could be suppressed. Information travels too widely and freely. Regarding all the supposed 20th century inventions, I cannot prove that these things don't exist. If "the oil companies" buy them up or kill the inventor, I am not sure how I would refute this.
What I do know is that they all sound like they make no sense. The hydrogen car that runs on water makes absolutely no sense. You can definitely use hydrogen to build an engine (via combustion) or motor (via a fuel cell) for a car. But getting the hydrogen from water that the car is itself splitting is a textbook perpetual motion machine. The video you link just hand waves this away by saying it used "resonant frequency" or whatever but resonance has never been shown to violate either the first of second law of thermodynamics.
I don't know what to make of Tesla. His early work on AC, the induction motor, the transformer and all that are great. His "earthquake machine" is real. Even his "Tesla coil" is real, although it does not do what people often say it does. I do not know how Tesla thought he was going to deliver power around the globe without wires. This sounds like a real stretch to me and I doubt the problem was JP Morgan was unable to charge for it. If Tesla coils were an efficient way to transfer power, people would be using them. With the internet, it would be impossible to keep this a secret. Tesla coils work, but if you want to deliver power all over a space the size of the United States, nothing is known that tops wires.
All that said, energy is effectively "free" in the sense that sunshine and geothermals are more than we use as a species. Harvesting it is not free though, otherwise everyone would be getting solar panels.
There are some Tartaria people who do not buy into all the flat earth insanity, and if you are one of them then fine. In my experience, the "generic old world" crowd like the Lunch Break guy is a bit more reasonable. The stories from the flat earth corners that think the projection dome is going to come down and we are going to ascend to our true 5 dimensional selves or whatever is all just so crazy.
Like I said, the whole thing reeks of a lost Utopia to me. A former civilization with free energy ether technology that lived in harmony with the planet and in beauty. And I know that this is not you, but essentially limitless land and resources "beyond the ice wall." This is all a distraction. We should be focusing on expelling all the Somalis, Haitians, and everyone else from this "realm," that is, the United States.
Tesla viewed the Earth and its upper atmosphere (ionosphere) as a giant capacitor and intended to harvest (extract) this electrical potential. Then Tesla was planning to use the Earth's electric force to transmit them wirelessly to global consumers. His primary method involved using massive transmission towers to charge the Earth’s ionosphere and utilize the planet itself as a conductor for resonant energy distribution.
He described the future cell (mobile) phone in a interview to a magazine in 1926: "When wireless is perfectly applied the whole earth will be converted into a huge brain, which in fact it is, all things being particles of a real and rhythmic whole. We shall be able to communicate with one another instantly, irrespective of distance. Not only this, but through television and telephony we shall see and hear one another as perfectly as though we were face to face, despite intervening distances of thousands of miles; and the instruments through which we shall be able to do his will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone. A man will be able to carry one in his vest pocket." - Nikola Tesla, 1926
The Jesuit Military Order of Rome, through their Masonic bankers and business leaders, orchestrated the deaths of numerous wealthy individuals, including John Jacob Astor, a key funder of Nikola Tesla’s research. John Jacob Astor died during the sinking of the Titanic (Olympic) which to me raises a whole new set of questions. And it wasn't just JP Morgan who didn't like Tesla's idea of "Free energy for all". There were other bankers. The bankers used their media power to destroy Tesla. And he's not alone, same was done with cold fusion. Martin Fleishmann, Stanley Pons, Eugene Mallove, Emilio Del Giudice, Giuliano Preparata, to name but a few researchers and scientists who were hounded ridiculed silenced and ostracized for their discoveries.
That is interesting. While I have doubts whether it would work, I do not consider this to be fringe science like ether or zero point energy harvesting. The earth's static electric field due to the ionosphere is definitely real. Harvesting energy from it would be akin to harvesting energy from lightning, and in fact lightning basically creates the ionosphere.
The problem with doing this is almost the reverse of harvesting lightning. Lightning is extremely powerful and concentrated. The discharge of the ionosphere on the other hand is extremely tiny and diffuse. But in principle there is no reason it cannot be done. It is not contrary to physical law.
Tesla coils also exist. No physicist denies this and they (nearly) all deny the existence of the ether. So it is a separate question whether the ionosphere has energy and whether power can be transmitted wirelessly with whether there is a luminiferous ether.
I have a hard time believing that this technology is being suppressed in a world with the internet and now AI. It is not different in principle than solar panels, geothermal systems, or even wind or water turbines. There is "free energy" everywhere and you can buy devices to harvest it. All these systems have practical problems and limitations. I can't speak to Tesla's idea because I have never seen a working model or even a theoretical model, but generally the atmospheric currents from the ionosphere are tiny.
I think the interest in this in conspiracy circles is due to the fact that we don't have one. It creates mystique. There are no such conspiracies about solar panels or wind turbines. In fact, the conspiracy about these is that "Big Green" lobbies for the government subsidies.
Don't bother arguing with the shilling nasa fan boy...
'Member, be respectful, attack the argument not the person.
Its OK. I'm a big kid and don't worry much about internet comments. I also don't think it is possible for me to ever feel insulted by a flat earther.
Fair enough...I stopped arguing with it months ago after they were defending nasa and its legitimacy.
2026 and still believing in nasa is infantile. 😆
We can all disagree without personal attacks.
They largely can't though because any normal debate quickly burns through all their points. They then either have to concede or start name calling.
I didn't even bring up NASA, I just commented that the insanity we have been seeing about Tartaria lately from certain corners of the internet (largely not here) is pretty obviously propaganda, just like Star Wars was. And IMO the propaganda, by just a coincidence of course, is coming from the same people who gave us Star Wars.
Motion > momentum (inception towards death) > matter (life)...motion implies the emperor; momentum implies the emperors dominant rule; matter implies the subjected realm within the emperors dominant rule.
Motion forces momentum to divide matter into physical & mental strength (potential of living) while weakening it (process of dying)...being implies in-between (matter) a dividing (momentum) force (motion). It's the force which awakens each being within.
Flow (motion) dividing (momentum) into form (matter) implies the internal spreading of shaped form.
Motion using momentum to divide matter implies the animation (upper + lower air) of each burning essence (living being) in-between.
There can be only one empire (motion) for each dominated (momentum) subject (matter) within...and it doesn't need protection. It's each subject within which is tempted to protect and harm each other, while being subjected to the dominance of the one and only empire.
Only the empire uses, which allows each subject within to re-use. Those who ignore that ETHER implies ones position in-between a dividing force; are being tricked with EITHER to choose one side within a conflict against the other.
There can be only one ether (singularity)...not either one or the other (plurality).
Civil implies public life (plural); being implies private life (singular)...civilizations represent a plural domestication system within a singular force. The singular force destroys any plurality shaped within again and again and again...as motion moves forwards.
Only within a line can a circle be shaped...it's the looking around mentally (logic) and physically (reason) which prevents one from seeing straight aka utilizing the force dividing ether within oneself.
a) Nothing implies ones denial (nial/nihilo - "nothing") of everything. Only within everything can each thing come into being.
b) Con (together) centrate (center). There cannot be togetherness at the center (matter) of a dividing (momentum) force (motion)...only apartheid. Trying to hold onto one another mentally (ideals) and physically (idols) destroys singular apartheid with plural togetherness.
That's why each jew concentrates gentiles together aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
Concentration holds plasma together, while ignoring the dividing power of ether giving ones essence the free will of choice to choose in-between.
Skywalker (those from above) was originally "Starkiller", Fallen Angels are know as "Stars". Darth Vader means "Dark Father". Emperor Palpatine from either "papal" referring to Pope, or "palatine," which relates to Palatine Hill in Rome or signifies someone possessing imperial or royal privileges and high office. So the the Pope/Roman Empire with the Fallen Angels and the Dark Father destory the Saints by executing Order 66.