TL/DR: As if were necessary to pile on to the Salem Witch names that were documented in the last post on the Lindsay Clancy case, a bunch more have shown up. We will expand on that list here. At the same time, we will expose the work of the Internet’s leading disinfo agent, Miles Mathis. We end with more damning evidence of a fake.
After much resistance, when I finally looked into the Charlie Kirk case personally it blew up in my face with findings that no one was talking about. Same thing is happening with Lindsay Clancy. I feel obliged to document those finding for others. You may do with the information what you may, including nothing at all.
Our touchstone will be the hardest-hitting, most-deeply researched work out there from our old friend, Miles Mathis. We will once again expose the misdirection, “research” filled with dumb and useless connections meant to run you off into the deepest of weeds:
The Lindsay Clancy Case is the MOST FAKE of all Time (Miles Mathis 9/4/2026 16-page PDF)
IDK how one measures these thing, but it’s pretty damn fake alright. His paper starts off strong with reasoning about how absurd the execution of the “mistrial” plot twist is. I concur, and that’s how he hooks you. We’re focusing on names, though, so for the sake of completeness let’s start off with a quick recap from the last post.
Jennifer Tufts: Lindsay’s psychiatrist.
Jennifer Sprague: Assistant District Attorney of the Plymouth County District Attorney's office, and one of the two prosecutor’s along with Shanan Buckingham.
Kevin Reddington: Lindsay’s defense counsel. Mathis brings up some interesting info on why this guy is phony and you should read it. He mentions that Kevin rose to fame with a case back in 1989, and sees fit to mention this as the big punchline:
And how old was this Therese Rogers when she stabbed her boyfriend in the eyes? You get one guess. 33.
Mmm, tasty! Pink highlighting on the “33” and everything. Know what my punchline would be? Rogers is a Salem Witch name. See how the disinfo is starting to work?
William Sullivan: The judge. Mathis does not mention what I noted in the previous post, that William oversaw another case of maternal filicide. The murderous mommy was Latarsha Sanders.
That ends the list from the last post so from here on out we’re blazing new territory.
Michael Phippen: A former Plymouth County Assistant District Attorney who now owns the crime scene. Sound like the fix is in?
Who Owns the Clancy House Now? The Full Story of 47 Summer Street, Duxbury (2026) (Who Is The Owner Of 9/5/2026)
Howard Cooper: Patrick’s attorney. Yes, both are Salem Witch names if you feel that maybe Howard was not just a nice name for a boy and you want to up the count.
Then again, Cooper itself may seem like too common a name to count. That’s why I need to take you back four centuries to tell you about a guy named Thomas Cooper (abt. 1654 - 1712). He was involved in some kind of fornication (no shade) with a woman named Abigail Sibley (b1659). Her brother, Samuel Sibley (1657 - 1708), was at the Salem Witch Trials.
Sibley is not at all a common name, is it? Well, you’re going to have to wait another couple of posts on this case but, trust me, you’ll see it again. Put it in your back pocket for now.
John L. Sullivan: The neighbor. At the end of the last post, I suggested you pencil in the name “Sullivan”. Well, write it in ink and before we’re done with this post you’ll be reaching for your red pen and highlighter.
I didn’t bother pinning down the details, but I caught this video embedded in another. Apparently, someone dug up this three and a half year old local news interview where the Clancys’ neighbor said his son heard or saw something or other the evening of the crime which would now help pin down the timeline.
The video’s creator was asking why neither the son nor the father was called to testify to this effect during the trial, nor was even mentioned by either side. Because the whole thing is a staged psychodrama, that’s why. All I needed to see was his name but here’s a video with better isolation of the interview:
Lindsay Clancy’s neighbor, John Sullivan, originally gave info on timeline passed during pre trial (YouTube Shorts 8/21/2026)
Laura Sullivan: That’s the name of one of Patrick’s two sisters. Can you believe this shit? Seriously, no normies are actually paying real attention to this case at all, are they? I find this straight up shocking. What does Mathis have to say?
A people search on Reddington finds he is related to Schwarz, Maher, and Devine, indicating he is Jewish. Through the Duquettes he is related to the Sullivans, possibly linking him to Patrick Clancy through his sister, as well as to the judge.
That is the first time he mentions Patrick’s sister. Do you see what’s happening? The disinfo imperative is too busy running you off into the weeds filled with Jews and whoever TF the Duquettes are. Patrick’s f-ing sister is married to an f-ing Sullivan.
Caroline C. Sullivan and David R. Sullivan: From what I can tell, these are Patrick’s sister’s in-laws. Mathis dug these names up in a search on Radaris:
Patrick Clancy in New York, NY (Age 49 / 1976) (Radaris)
They are listed in the “Related to” section, although I think we would all agree he is “Related to” them only loosely and not by blood. The situation gets even mistier because the only other person listed there is:
Joanne Clancy in Quincy, MA (Age 66 / 1960) (Radaris)
Neither Mathis nor I can figure out who the hell she is to Patrick. Neither Patrick’s sisters nor his parents are listed. At the present time, I’ll chalk it all up to the Salem Witches monkeying around with records and obscuring themselves.
Lauren Astley: Mathis makes a big deal out of her name. This is the reference and the “deep dive” that Mathis hands you:
[Judge William] Sullivan is an old pro at these fake murders defended as “a brief psychotic episode”, since he was the defender in 2013 of highschool football player Nathan Fujita accused of killing his girlfriend Lauren Astley. Hmmm. Astley is another peerage name, think singer Rick Astley, who is related to Eric Clapton.
Oh shit, dawg, Clapton is one of Them too? Who knows. I haven’t looked into it and (no offense) I know you haven’t either. We’re all just supposed to be impressed with Mathis’ deep knowledge and keep swallowing.
Want to know what I found with just a few minutes’ work? We’re not going to get into any detail, but in the Lancashire Witch Trials, one of the alleged “Pendle witches” was Elizabeth Astley. One of the two presiding judges was Sir James Altham (about 1554 – 1617). The kicker? A daughter of Sir James...
Elizabeth Altham married first Sir Francis Astley (died 1638) of Hillmorton, Warwickshire….
Does it sound to you like the fix was in and the whole thing was another big fake like Salem? Does to me.
Amber Heard: Yes, you heard me, the actress Amber Heard (b1986). Tends to comfirm the thesis that the whole Johnny Depp trial was phony, doesn’t it? Anyway, let me explain how I got to Amber.
The Heard Foundation is some sort of charity operation founded by Patrick, Laura, and their sister Erin Donohue in the wake of the Lindsay Clancy killings. I presume the foundation is as phony as the rest of all this. Their tagline is, “Be Heard. Join the Herd.” That’s as ghey as it gets.
Mathis locks on to it because of an issue with—of all things but it is supposed to plant in our minds that he is an expert—photo credits suggesting the photos of the Clancy children are fake. Oh they are, as fake as all the rest of this. I took it in another direction, though.
I just thought the name was weird: “Heard”. Trust me, if you search for “heard salem witch trials” you will not find anything of interest. If the true reference was to a name, then the only famous Heard I could think of was Amber. We find that she was:
… the middle child of three daughters of internet researcher Patricia Paige (née Parsons; 1956–2020) and construction company owner David Clinton Heard (born 1950).
Listen, a Clinton I will let go, but a Parsons? You’ve gotta be f-ing kidding me. I’m not even going to claim Amber is associated with all this besides being a Salem Witch, but a Parsons? You’ve really gotta be f-ing kidding me.
Tom Clancy: Yes, that Tom Clancy (1947-2013), the very prolific and very prominent author of techno-thrillers, many of which were brought to the silver screen.
In short, Mathis thinks that Patrick is a cousin of Tom. I agree. Then Miles goes on to tell you they’re really all Jews from New York. Believe that if it pleases you to do so.
Before reading what Mathis had to say about Tom, it had occurred to me (as it has to others) that Tom was what would loosely be described as an outlet for predictive programming. I would argue for a more nuanced view but would generally agree.
In any case, being lazy I let the thesis lie. Now, because the name Clancy finally came around in what is most certainly a Salem Witch context, I finally checked him out. I won’t spoil it, but another long post is due.
Everyone is divorced from Reality in the Lindsay Clancy case
Mathis says in his title that the Lindsay Clancy case is the “most fake of all time”. He doesn’t go far enough. I actually cannot tell if he’s doing that on purpose, but I don’t think so. I will need to explain. He states:
For more evidence of fraud, let's look more closely at Lindsay herself. We are told Lindsay cut her wrists and neck, but I have looked at hundreds of photos of her online and not seen any scars.
That’s true, there are no scars. I’ve only looked at about 10 or 15 pictures of her myself. Do you know what I noticed that virtually no one else has noticed, and certainly not Miles after looking at hundreds of photos?
Lindsay Clancy (Patrick’s old wife) and Dr. Rachel Danis (Patrick’s new wife) are—without doubt—one and the same person.
If you dial up articles on the case and are shown photos of one of the two women, unless you know from context which one it is you won’t be able to tell who is in the photo. Of course you won’t, because they’re pictures of the same woman.
This has barely been mentioned online, to an extent that I find spooky. BTW, let me state that I didn’t notice it personally (because I never followed the case), but I picked it up from this video as I looked for the link to a case which I did study closely:
The Loren Piretra Show | The SHOCKING Link Between Erika Kirk & Patrick Clancy (YouTube 8/23/2026 25:14)
Start at about 5:28 for the doppleganger evidence. Yes, I get it, the woman and the video are on the whole schizo/short-attention span/disorganized thinking end of the spectrum. It’s the opposite of scholarship and documentation but you can begin those activities yourself now that you’re aware.
BTW, the “SHOCKING Link” is—as far as I can bear to draw out of the video—that the courtrooms in which Erika and Patrick appear seem to be the same. From this Loren concludes that both trials were fake. She doesn’t exhibit side-by-side video but sort of interjects this claim along the way. Told you it was schizo.
Among the evidence the video presents are various pallels and intersections between the two women. For example, Lindsay is a labor and delivery nurse while Rachel is a reproductive endocrinologist. Both women are involved in reproductive health care, see?
I’ll take that one right to the bullseye. This entire case revolves around postpartum depression (PPD). It drove Lindsay to smoke her own kids, did it not? Good gravy, what causes such a thing?
Although the exact cause of PPD is unclear, it is believed to be due to a combination of physical, emotional, genetic, and social factors such as hormone imbalances and sleep deprivation.
Do you know why they say it’s “unclear”? That’s so they can declare it is caused by what they say, when they say. You know, like white privilege or the trans genocide. But can you and I possibly get a little more clarity?
Neuroendocrine and neuroinflammatory mechanisms in postpartum depression: From hormonal withdrawal to central immune dysregulation and emerging therapeutic targets (ScienceDirect September 2026)
Summarizing the article: there is emerging evidence that PPD may be caused by more than hormone problems. Summarize the case: Patrick’s old wife killed their children because of a problem with her reproductive endocrinology, and Patrick’s new wife is a specialist in reproductive endocrinology. Pretty much on the nose, huh?
But go back and take a look at the comments on the video: The truly shocking revelation that Lindsay and Rachel are the same woman—thus exposing the whole affair as fictitious—has virtually no impact on the commenters. I had to scroll way down to find someone even attempting to engage with the evidence:
This is too bizarre my mind is blown
I’m not even certain that comment is referring to the doppleganger revelation. As to the rest, why would anyone take a moral or ethical or practical stance in reference to a work of open-air fiction? What Reality are they living in, and why does it not need to make sense to them? Mathis gives an answer that is at least correct on a certain level:
But no one ever asks these questions. The fake stories in the news and from the courts divert everyone into a myriad of sexy alleyways, and everyone just gulps it down as the best entertainment available. The Modern public is a ghoul.
The next installments will be on Dierdre Morley. Thanks for reading!