The comment about a better Christian seemed like it could be understood as an attack and I knew OP would find it an attack. I think the whole world could do with being better little Christ's.
Better Christian? I'm sorry, but do you think you're a better Christian than Jesus? Do you think I am better one than Jesus? Or third-eye-vision? It's a proper assessment, not an insult, in my opinion. How you know how he would take it is a level of mind-reading I am totally unfamiliar with.
Let me explain - Christianity is a belief that stems from a book called the Bible. In this book there are rules that should be followed, if you don't follow them - you're less of a Christian, and if you do follow them - you're more of a Christian. That's an accurate assessment of how one is a better Christian than another.
How did you manage to assess what is an attack without the Bible? How did you manage to read his mind? And let me say this - how he takes it doesn't reflect on what I've said. I can call someone "friend" and they may take it as an insult, in this case, who is correct and who is wrong?
I'm sorry but I don't agree with your moderation so far. Actually, I would like to hear it from third-eye-vision on his genuine thoughts, without the fear of his statement being deleted. Honestly, I believe that any rule that I quote from the Bible, he will agree on, so that's the backbone of our argument. Which then strengthens our communication about better Christian, when in turn leads to a useful conclusion for both of us.
I'm sorry, but if you don't believe in the Bible, your moderation is out of place. You said it already that this place is a community, while you can't let people express their opinions, if they differ... That's really strange. Would Jesus do the same?
Removed for rule 1 violation. Be respectful, attack the argument not the person.
Just informative, could you please let me know of the "attacks on person" that you detected in my comment?
I'm not trying to go against the rules, but trying to improve based on the rules. If that's not too much trouble. If it is, I understand.
The comment about a better Christian seemed like it could be understood as an attack and I knew OP would find it an attack. I think the whole world could do with being better little Christ's.
Better Christian? I'm sorry, but do you think you're a better Christian than Jesus? Do you think I am better one than Jesus? Or third-eye-vision? It's a proper assessment, not an insult, in my opinion. How you know how he would take it is a level of mind-reading I am totally unfamiliar with.
Let me explain - Christianity is a belief that stems from a book called the Bible. In this book there are rules that should be followed, if you don't follow them - you're less of a Christian, and if you do follow them - you're more of a Christian. That's an accurate assessment of how one is a better Christian than another.
How did you manage to assess what is an attack without the Bible? How did you manage to read his mind? And let me say this - how he takes it doesn't reflect on what I've said. I can call someone "friend" and they may take it as an insult, in this case, who is correct and who is wrong?
I'm sorry but I don't agree with your moderation so far. Actually, I would like to hear it from third-eye-vision on his genuine thoughts, without the fear of his statement being deleted. Honestly, I believe that any rule that I quote from the Bible, he will agree on, so that's the backbone of our argument. Which then strengthens our communication about better Christian, when in turn leads to a useful conclusion for both of us.
I'm sorry, but if you don't believe in the Bible, your moderation is out of place. You said it already that this place is a community, while you can't let people express their opinions, if they differ... That's really strange. Would Jesus do the same?
Removed for rule 1 violations