The pentagram as explained by Disney
(youtube.com)
Comments (3)
sorted by:
Very interesting video and wow, what a shame Disney sucks so much these days. I was not aware of all this and now am a bit interested in the properties of the pentagram and of the other regular "-grams." It would be cool to find some collection of Pythagorean mathematics. The most common item (honestly the only one I see) discussed today is* the irrationality of non integer square roots. Supposedly, according to the legend, the Pythagoreans considered this to be a very dangerous piece of math and kept it a secret.
*No, it is not the Pythagorean theorem because despite the name, no one talks about whatever Pythagoras' proof of it was.
Each being represents a property of all nature...a penta (five) gram (that which is written or marked) distracts each being from ONEs self discernment.
Plurality (penta-gram) confines the mind of singularity (being) if consented to.
Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/regular implies all of nature moving each being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death) aka delineation of essence from one another.
Gram - "that which is written or marked"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/-gram confuses ones delineation by alignment with one another, while permitting another to regulate one.
Few suggest math-a-magic to collectivize many together, which distracts each from being set apart from ONE another. Nature implies singularity adding (inception); subtracting (death); dividing (life) each being for multiplication (intercourse) with one another.
Counting another one as two makes one accountable to another one.
Item/idem - "the same"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/item Nature implies the same process differentiating each being from one another. Few distract many from that with likeness into common-sense aka a hivemind of collective consciousness.
To see implies each ones sight...which cannot be the same (perceivable); only different from one another (perception) or alike one another (suggestion).
Only a fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable) can be IN (within) TEGER (to touch) hence being able to touch one another. Few utilize suggestion to tempt each fractions consent into a consensus held together with one another.
This touching one another without letting go, while being (life) within a moving nature (inception towards death) establishes friction, which grinds each integer into a non-integer.
Ones perception in-between left/right + up/down + front/back implies the square rooted within all perceivable...consenting to any suggestion by another establishes circular thinking (logic); which turns into conflict (reason) against one another.
That's how few confine square within a circle drawn by a com (together) pass (to move forward).
Ignoring ones SIGHT in-between perceivable by holding onto either SIDE suggested permits another to triangulate.
One (life) cannot perceive sides (inception/death) while being transferred in-between...
...is within (life) the putting (inception towards death).
Hands down still the best account here lmao. I'm not sure if you are being completely serious or this is an elaborate troll, but either way I approve.