More divide and conquer. The devil is hard at work through his minions.
(media.scored.co)
Free For All
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
He is not George Floyd for white people. He either acted in self defense or he did not. If he attacked the person / shot him unprovoked, then that is a crime. If the person attacked him, as virtually everyone honest is saying that the video shows, then he acted in self defense.
Whether Chud's material is good / intelligent / helpful or not, and even whether he is a part of a wider deep state conspiracy to "divide and conquer" is totally irrelevant. If he was attacked merely for his words and shot the man in self defense, then everyone of conscience should support him.
Incidentally, while I don't know much about Chud's personal traits and whether he is "George Floyd for white people," it is definitely looking like we have another "George Floyd" (as in, for black people), in the supposed "victim" that Chud shot. If you want to see the criminal history, particularly the violent criminal history, of the attacker, I'm sure you can find it on the tubes at this point.
He's like Floyd in that he is a scumbag being used as a tribal martyr for political reasons.
I can "merely use words" in a way that makes me a total degenerate or a decent person. Merely using words is not one all encompassing thing morally speaking. Words can start a relationship or end a marriage. Words can also be used to start a fight.
In Chud's case, he used his words and actions in order to create situations where he could harm certain people he didn't like. This is far from admirable, to put it mildly.