Edison hides the forever battery
(youtu.be)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
These sorts of videos tend to make conspiracies about things that are literally just on Wikipedia. The exact story in this video is in the History section of the article. People are welcome to make these batteries if they want, but their performance as compared to Lead-Acid is not hard to find, and it is apparent why the NiFe was not adopted for automotive use.
If people think that the "official numbers" on Wikipedia are a lie as a part of a larger conspiracy, then fine I guess. I am not really interested in debating that. In that case, I would just advise you to make some forever batteries and make yourself some money.
No one in c/Conspiracies should be even looking at Wikipedia..... And yeah, who wants a battery every damn 40 years!!!! Much funner to buy every two or three. Thank you for showing my post was against consumerism!! Will try to support more in the future.
The link to Wikipedia was really just to indicate that this battery is not any sort of secret, as I assume everyone views Wikipedia as the prime example of "the official source of information." The article indicates pretty clearly that this battery design has long life as one of its strongest points. The problems with the battery should be pretty apparent from the article, especially when considering the demands needed by an application like automotive.
Also, I will look at Wikipedia whenever I desire, thank you very much. There are a lot of conspiracies that get hawked on the internet, many of them bad, and Wiki is one of the fastest ways to get the "official response" to them and test these responses for reasonableness and validity. It also turns out that Wiki is a pretty good summary of information as long as it is not too controversial. Scientific data usually falls into that category. When this assumption fails, I don't hesitate to get controversial scientific information from elsewhere.
My comment specifically said that if you dispute the numbers published on Wikipedia, I encourage you to build your own forever battery. I don't mind if someone disputes what is on Wikipedia. Even Wikipedia itself says they aren't a citable source of information lmao.
Yet you use it
Dude they have a light bulb that been on for over 120 years...
The video is not about the light bulb, it is about the battery. The Wiki I linked to says that the durability can be 50 years, which means that yes, there likely exist batteries still working after 100 years +. I am just saying that if you read about the battery and compare it to the other common electro-chemistries, you can see what the limitations are and why it is not as commonly used as the life alone would lead you to think. There is more to battery design and selection than the maximum amount of deep cycles.
In economics and industrial design, planned obsolescence (also called built-in obsolescence or premature obsolescence) is the concept of policies planning or designing a product with an artificially limited useful life or a purposely frail design, so that it becomes obsolete after a certain predetermined period of time upon which it decrementally functions or suddenly ceases to function, or might be perceived as unfashionable.[1] Once regarded as a conspiracy theory, the rationale behind this strategy is to generate long-term sales volume by reducing the time between repeat purchases (referred to as "shortening the replacement cycle").[2] It is the deliberate shortening of the lifespan of a product to force people to purchase functional replacements.[3]
Nature EVER FORwarding being cannot be hidden unless a being chooses to hide from it within the mental state of inversion.
"Though so profound a double-dealer, I was in no sense a hypocrite. Both sides of me were in dead earnest; I was no more myself when I laid aside restraint and plunged in shame, than when I labored, in the eye of day, at the furtherance of knowledge or the relief of sorrow and suffering."
~Robert Louis Stevenson, "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," 1886
Dr. Jekyll (judica ël) and Mr. Hyde (to hide) aka "hiding from Gods justice"...ones consent to any suggestion of another represents the double-deal aka entering into a dual contract; thereby hiding from the singular expansion of ones perception (effect) within all perceivable (cause). That's how few gained more energy than many can ever produce.
a) Battery; noun - "the unlawful beating of another"...consenting to any suggestion implies taking a beating from another while ignoring natural law. Only ignorance can beat ones free will of choice.
b) Battery as an electric cell fueled by the discharge of electricity implies the incarceration (cell) of choice (elect) by establishing a retreat (consent to suggested) within charge (perceivable generating perception).
If a being consents to any suggestion from another being; then a beings perception retreats from the natural charge of perceivable aka nature using motion to spiritually (momentum) animate essence (matter).
c) The protege of Edison was named WILL-I-AM MASON...
d) Thomas/toma (twin) Alva/al (to grow; nourish) Edison (son of edict)...an edict implies a "proclamation having the force of law" cause only within the force of natural law can an artificial claim be shaped.
Claiming (consent) from another (suggestion) implies a two-fold deal aka a twin engine for the nourishing growth of a chosen one and ones loss deprived choice.
I have to say, for some reason your responses are one of my favorite parts of this place, lmao.