Ab (father) raham (multitude)...it's joining together into a multitude which tempts one to steal from the one and only father of singularity.
the theft of abrahamic identity by Israel!
Au contraire...israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies each ones resistance to form multitudes with one another. A jew aka each chosen one implies apartheid... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2vb863Dw.jpg It's the suggestion of tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which tempts gentiles into a multitude aka a melting pot aka mass migration aka multiculturalism aka the unwashed masses.
It's gentiles falling for the jewish trick of pluralism who are stealing from singularity aka who by joining together hold a consensus in possession.
There are many genealogies tracing continuous heritage that far back. Why do you infer that those genealogies are mistaken? How could such a people disappear and be wholly replaced by another if there is continuous historical attestation of their experience? Lay out your evidence.
Gene (to generate) al (all) logy (logic). All generates each one within by tracing a line of progression...logic tempts one to ignore that line by circular thinking.
Trace/tractiare - "delineate" implies a line...not a circle.
Within a line of progression...a being cannot be empty nor does anything get left behind. It's the circle shaped within a being which leaves the line behind the being, while emptying a beings mind from natural input. As in...consenting to suggested information leaves behind perceivable inspiration, while emptying the mind of the spirit of animation, hence circular thinking (logic) stagnating the thought process.
mistaken
If one takes; then one ignores all given. Taking implies missing given.
How could such a people disappear and be wholly replaced by another
Only within whole (wholly) can partial (person) shaped into a sum (people). Within a sum...each partial ignores whole, which permits another to exploit ignorance for the magic of disappearance.
If form (life) ignores flow (inception towards death) aka replacement (mind responding to place); then everything the mind ignores disappears.
In short...there never was a people (plural); only each person (singular).
historical attestation
Attestation implies nature bearing (inception towards death) the witness of being (life)...not being bearing the burden of history suggested another. Few suggest history to confine many mentally, which in return represents a witness protection program for few. While few are witnessing nature; many confine themselves to artifice.
The opposite of witness implies partaker aka a being who takes while ignoring to witness all given as a part within whole.
Lay out your evidence
Evidence aka ex (out) videre (to see)...layers prevent sight from seeing outwards. Sharing layers blankets sight manifold. Few tempt many to blind one another by sharing evidence with one another. The more evidence one holds onto; the more layers one puts upon ones sight.
Ab (father) raham (multitude)...it's joining together into a multitude which tempts one to steal from the one and only father of singularity.
Au contraire...israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies each ones resistance to form multitudes with one another. A jew aka each chosen one implies apartheid... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2vb863Dw.jpg It's the suggestion of tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which tempts gentiles into a multitude aka a melting pot aka mass migration aka multiculturalism aka the unwashed masses.
It's gentiles falling for the jewish trick of pluralism who are stealing from singularity aka who by joining together hold a consensus in possession.
the greatest psy-op ever was convincing people that the current Isreal has a connection to the biblical city wipe from Earth over 2600 years ago.
There are many genealogies tracing continuous heritage that far back. Why do you infer that those genealogies are mistaken? How could such a people disappear and be wholly replaced by another if there is continuous historical attestation of their experience? Lay out your evidence.
Whole lotta words to say nothing.
There can be only one.
Gene (to generate) al (all) logy (logic). All generates each one within by tracing a line of progression...logic tempts one to ignore that line by circular thinking.
Trace/tractiare - "delineate" implies a line...not a circle.
Within a line of progression...a being cannot be empty nor does anything get left behind. It's the circle shaped within a being which leaves the line behind the being, while emptying a beings mind from natural input. As in...consenting to suggested information leaves behind perceivable inspiration, while emptying the mind of the spirit of animation, hence circular thinking (logic) stagnating the thought process.
If one takes; then one ignores all given. Taking implies missing given.
Only within whole (wholly) can partial (person) shaped into a sum (people). Within a sum...each partial ignores whole, which permits another to exploit ignorance for the magic of disappearance.
If form (life) ignores flow (inception towards death) aka replacement (mind responding to place); then everything the mind ignores disappears.
In short...there never was a people (plural); only each person (singular).
Attestation implies nature bearing (inception towards death) the witness of being (life)...not being bearing the burden of history suggested another. Few suggest history to confine many mentally, which in return represents a witness protection program for few. While few are witnessing nature; many confine themselves to artifice.
The opposite of witness implies partaker aka a being who takes while ignoring to witness all given as a part within whole.
Evidence aka ex (out) videre (to see)...layers prevent sight from seeing outwards. Sharing layers blankets sight manifold. Few tempt many to blind one another by sharing evidence with one another. The more evidence one holds onto; the more layers one puts upon ones sight.