Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
Gates & Epstein: "How Do We Get Rid of Poor People AS A WHOLE"? (eccentrik.substack.com)
posted 3 hours ago by Eccentrik 3 hours ago by Eccentrik +5 / -0
"How Do We Get Rid of Poor People AS A WHOLE"?
Evidently, Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein were seriously interested in removing the poor population - but who, exactly, did they consider "poor"?
eccentrik.substack.com
3 comments share
3 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (3)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– cyberrigger 2 points 2 hours ago +2 / -0

We get rid of the people who take their money by deception.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 2 points 2 hours ago +2 / -0

Duh!!! Have everyone own nothing and be happy!!!!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 hours ago +1 / -0

How Do We Get Rid of Poor People AS A WHOLE?

a) Within whole...a partial cannot be poor unless ignoring whole. The etymology of poor/pere - "to produce" implies whole producing partial.

Rich on the other hand comes from the root of reg - "to move within a straight line", which implies whole moving each produced partial (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).

In nature there's no circular conflict in-between rich vs poor...only the production (poor) of each being within a straight line (rich).

b) Rid/reudh - "to clear; save; set free"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rid Nature gets rid (inception towards death) of being (life).

c) A people cannot be whole...only a sum of partials within whole. It's person aka per sonos (by sound) which implicates sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" for each particular mind structured within (in-stru-ment).

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy