a) Within whole...a partial cannot be poor unless ignoring whole. The etymology of poor/pere - "to produce" implies whole producing partial.
Rich on the other hand comes from the root of reg - "to move within a straight line", which implies whole moving each produced partial (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
In nature there's no circular conflict in-between rich vs poor...only the production (poor) of each being within a straight line (rich).
c) A people cannot be whole...only a sum of partials within whole. It's person aka per sonos (by sound) which implicates sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" for each particular mind structured within (in-stru-ment).
We get rid of the people who take their money by deception.
Duh!!! Have everyone own nothing and be happy!!!!!
a) Within whole...a partial cannot be poor unless ignoring whole. The etymology of poor/pere - "to produce" implies whole producing partial.
Rich on the other hand comes from the root of reg - "to move within a straight line", which implies whole moving each produced partial (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
In nature there's no circular conflict in-between rich vs poor...only the production (poor) of each being within a straight line (rich).
b) Rid/reudh - "to clear; save; set free"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rid Nature gets rid (inception towards death) of being (life).
c) A people cannot be whole...only a sum of partials within whole. It's person aka per sonos (by sound) which implicates sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" for each particular mind structured within (in-stru-ment).