The FULL STORY Of The Archons - Every Gnostic MUST Know This
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
A human trying to be Holy means to try to be set apart as God, our Creator, is set apart, (and Who sets us apart) we were made that way, to be within Him Who Created us and to be His, not to become Him.
Meaning implies holding onto aka defining as affixed to build a consensus among beings...that's a synthesis. Whole (holy) dividing (divining) partial implies an analysis.
Synthesis implies comfort (want); analysis implies trial (need)...there's a choice to be made in-between.
God remains whole (motion) while setting (momentum) apart (matter)...viewing God as apart implies God lacking parts.
Only within wholeness can apartheid come into being.
How was "our" created? By partials choosing to join together. Our implies a sum of partials ignoring whole setting partials apart from one another.
Whole cannot create for whole implies the whole of what could be created. Whole can only transform (transfer form) partial. Creationism was implanted into partial to build sums aka to permit few the summoning together of many.
Creationism implies speculative masonry permitting few to shape the imagination of many by free will of choice.
God WAS whole before partials within; set apart from one another, can suggest what IS.
US (uniting states together) contradicts apartheid (setting states apart).
Way implies singular motion...we implies plural of matter. If a singular being joins a plurality; then one loses ones way.
His implies possession...Him implies procession towards division (him/her) of being.
To become aka "coming towards being" implies His work...not aka "nihilo; nihilism" implies ones denial of His work.
It's ones consent to suggested creationism (creatio ex nihilo) which establishes nihilism (not).
If one lets go of creation, then nothing seizes to exist. Why? Because without creation there can be only transformation of everything into each thing.
We (created beings) are the ones, singular, unwhole, without wholeness without His Holiness.
Nothing can't create something.
WE and BEINGS implies plurality. WE aka plural of I, first person plural pronoun, "I and another or others".
Un- "not" implies the negation of whole. Using the word "unwhole" blasphemes holiness. How could a partial negate whole other than by denial? Does a partial in denial negate whole or only self?
Whole implies out (outer cause) for partial within (inner effect). The synthetic word "without" tempts one to ignore analyzing out > with > in aka singular procession.
A sum of things can tempt one to denial being set apart within whole.