Thanks! u/Graphenium:
The worldview expressed in the Law of One/“Ra Material” and the Hidden Hand interview
https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/hidden_hand_081018
The way I see things, these two sources explain existence, the state of our world, and the meaning of life far more accurately than any other. One is a “channeled” work, and the other is a long series of Questions and Answers between a conspiracy forum (RiP ATS) and a self-proclaimed world-controller. I see them as complimentary, showing a deeper reality by showing two sides of the same coin. One side being that of Service-to-Others, and the other being Service-to-Self
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASG9Vy4Tl/round-table-suggestion-thread/c
Thread will stay open for 3-4 weeks thanks to a very helpful suggestion.
Great analysis, fren. Creatio ex Deo FTW. Any secular philosopher should come around to the same principles, and when they don't the failure of their system is obvious.
One other note, technically, we cannot know beyond what we can know, and so whenever one speaks of a hypothetical state of God as if "external" to creation that definition always includes an assumption of unknowability that makes it contradictory. What we are actually talking about is not "unknowable" if we have the power to talk about it; it's merely a shorthand way of talking about our inability to know beyond what we can know. So the whole "god" that is believed to "forget" is not ultimate being because it's something we comprehend. Rather, Being that reveals itself always as Love is defined as Love, and for simplicity's sake we think about it still being Love even in the counterfactual where we're not thinking about it.