In short she suspected you of being u/Neo1, and for good reason, and she's now apologized for that.

The community has demonstrated over several months that it doesn't believe in obtaining consensus by voting. Therefore both admin and mods must judge via acting decisively and reading community feel. That is what TINAE is doing with you in this thread. She also has over 5 years' experience in this community and you don't seem to, which makes a difference.

An interesting point is that even if there were an apparent consensus it would need to be ratified by a current mod or admin anyway, so if none of them are willing to judge it as a consensus then it wouldn't matter. So far the community has been unwilling to take any consensus stand in my observation (even the discussion topics are decided by less than a quorum) and prefers to let things happen as the most active move forward with agendas. So I look forward to how your experiment concludes.

Meanwhile, your game of creating AI atheist memes and posting them where you've pretty well banned all people interested in discussing them continues. Funny, the atheists around here have a consistent habit of thinking themselves very logical but refusing to commit to shared standards of logic with others were agreement can be reached; that's pretty well the opposite of consensus-seeking.